Sign into an existing account

I am, but not a globalist or corporatist one.
I have some economic policies that I strongly beleive in.
I beleive that borders should be secured and that only whites should be permitted to cross.
I believe that toll taxes must be paid as fees for crossing the border.
I believe that there should be no "temporary" nonwhite foreign workers living in our lands.
I believe that tarriff taxes should exist on transactions that occur across national borders.
I believe that a nation should be capable of standing completely on its own, rather than becoming reliant on foreign powers.
I believe that there should be a complete separation of market and state, that large corporations could only emerge from government interference in business.
I believe that the ownership of intellectual property should not be legally recognized, as it interferes with the rights of citizens regarding the ownership of their physical property, and that IP is another poisonous policy which gives rise to the corporation.
I believe in monetary reform, that the government should run a national central and retail bank as a part of their essential services, that these banks should only deal in currencies that are representitive of -and exchangeable for- actual physical commodities, that these banks should only lend this money on a full reserve basis, that these banks should never charge any form or amount of interest on a loan, and that they should never make credit loans to individuals for the purpose of funding their private purchases.
Such that doing state banking, and doing away with the jewish venoms of fiat currency, fractional reserve lending, usury (and indeed, interest in general), and using the curse of credit to entrap citizens in debt, would all allow the people to reclaim power over their money, and the value of their labor.
I'd also do a reversal of two corporate policies which have worked in tandem towards the creation of the corporate monster, the first being that that would abolish the legal concept of corporate personhood, thus returning the members of a company to legal accountability for the actions they've engaged in from their positions, and the second policy is that I would end the rule that companies are legally required to act in the best financial interest of their shareholders, which has been a law that had obligated the company leadership to behave as a psychopath would when serving on behalf of their company.
My view of economic problems and their solutions is far more complex than that of a typical lolbertarian.
Granted, the society that the average lolbert would create would be a white supremacist society by default, simply because removing all the institutional factors that keeps the white man down while elevating every other race would result in racially conscious whites rising to the top in all areas of power and influence, then we'd see the result of a country where all the most important players are distinctly /ourguys/.
I also am more thoughtful about economic policy and its effects than a typical natsoc, who just wants to do what Hitler did, which is take a bunch of loans, then attack those who you owe the debts to. The natsoc also fails to see past the initial stage short term issues that would result from cutting all the safety nets to shreds, that order would emerge from the chaos, that the inferior stock of the population would die off and be replaced by the superior ones, that degeneracy would die out simply due to the consequences that naturally follow from such behaviors when the government no longer shields them from the effects of degen activities, and that tradition would reassert itself as the root of tradition is that trad ways are the most optimal.

Take your meds, jew.