[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 1 point 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 21:24:03 ago (+1/-0)
Science hasn't confirmed interbreeding between niggers (common homo erectus africanus) and lower apes, though it is known that interspecies relations do occur fairly regularly in certain regions and there is a lot of 'unknown hominid' DNA floating around in Africa. Floresiensis was likely assimilated (raped to extinction) by bantus, who have spread across the continent in recent centuries. I doubt there are any pure floresiensis around at this point but they may have existed until relatively recently.
Do you mean science HAS confirmed interbreeding? Ive read all the studies you are talking about. You are conflating populations.
West Africans have admixture from an unknown extinct population of homos that probably diverged from a common ancestor around a million years ago, maybe later. Probably comparable to Neanderthal in genetic distance. No fossil of this population has ever been found: their existence was inferred from african genetic samples and the admixture event (humpy humpy) is estimated at 30kya. Average 7% admixture from these archaics in Yorubans.
I don’t think a genetic link has been estabished between Floriensis and any modern population, but floriensis lived in Indonesia not africa. So there would be no way Bantus could rape Floriensis.
Austroloids such as Papuans, Melanesians, Abos have admixture from Denisovans. Denisovans were similar to Neanderthal but lived in Asia. I think Papuans have like 10% Denisovan DNA. Which is pretty high. Polynesians and SE Asians have lesser amounts. We have Denisova fossils. Scientists assumed they were Neanderthal for a long time.
Genetic studies of Andaman Islanders suggest they may have also partly descended from another population that is not Neanderthal or Denisovan or Floriensis or African ghost population. There may be other admixture events yet undiscovered.
This has all been discovered in the last 10 years or so. There seems to be an impetus to change the definition of homo sapien to include neanderthal and denisovan and african ghost population which would put the new date for the beginning of the human race quite a bit farther back than the 300 kya date that they use currently. And it would increasingly call in to question the Out of Africa theory. Really, human evolution has been multiregional or distributed.
[ + ] Steelerfish
[ - ] Steelerfish 2 points 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 19:23:15 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 19:11:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 1 point 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 21:24:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 22:03:36 ago (+1/-0)
Ive read all the studies you are talking about. You are conflating populations.
West Africans have admixture from an unknown extinct population of homos that probably diverged from a common ancestor around a million years ago, maybe later. Probably comparable to Neanderthal in genetic distance. No fossil of this population has ever been found: their existence was inferred from african genetic samples and the admixture event (humpy humpy) is estimated at 30kya. Average 7% admixture from these archaics in Yorubans.
I don’t think a genetic link has been estabished between Floriensis and any modern population, but floriensis lived in Indonesia not africa. So there would be no way Bantus could rape Floriensis.
Austroloids such as Papuans, Melanesians, Abos have admixture from Denisovans. Denisovans were similar to Neanderthal but lived in Asia. I think Papuans have like 10% Denisovan DNA. Which is pretty high. Polynesians and SE Asians have lesser amounts. We have Denisova fossils. Scientists assumed they were Neanderthal for a long time.
Genetic studies of Andaman Islanders suggest they may have also partly descended from another population that is not Neanderthal or Denisovan or Floriensis or African ghost population. There may be other admixture events yet undiscovered.
This has all been discovered in the last 10 years or so. There seems to be an impetus to change the definition of homo sapien to include neanderthal and denisovan and african ghost population which would put the new date for the beginning of the human race quite a bit farther back than the 300 kya date that they use currently. And it would increasingly call in to question the Out of Africa theory. Really, human evolution has been multiregional or distributed.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 1 point 2 yearsApr 19, 2022 04:37:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 2 points 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 18:37:26 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 2 points 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 18:42:06 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 1 point 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 18:44:37 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] IfuckedYerMum
[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 2 points 2 yearsApr 18, 2022 18:45:44 ago (+2/-0)