×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
4

On the woman question.

submitted by Jewfed9000 to Women 3 yearsApr 15, 2022 19:47:50 ago (+7/-3)     (Women)

It's genetical. Throughout history, the gene that made women take up a sword to defend her home against the "Rapist"/"Pillager" from the other tribe was "killed", so to speak, because these women obviously did not survive when taking up arms in defense. So the only gene that survived was the subverting one, the sneaky one, the liar and emotional manipulator. This is not to insult all women, but to say - they had to do it, to survive. We kinda have to talk about this in society to be honest.


11 comments block


[ - ] Lordbananafist 3 points 3 yearsApr 15, 2022 20:14:20 ago (+3/-0)

Talk about it after jew death

[ - ] Ozark 0 points 3 yearsApr 15, 2022 20:22:53 ago (+0/-0)

Figured you would say something about Sport Sullivan and baseball.

[ - ] Lordbananafist 1 point 3 yearsApr 15, 2022 20:29:20 ago (+1/-0)

Because the relevance of the subject matter is limited by the combat capability of the female

Yes. It would totally have fit.

[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 3 yearsApr 15, 2022 21:27:17 ago (+2/-0)

Feather Indians have had their blood watered down by the women making half White babies all the time. The satanic accuser media doesn't ever tell anyone about the feather men pissed off about that.

Chinese have so many people they don't care anymore about the women chasing White men, and they're thoroughly racist. You don't see very many Chinese men marrying White women.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3 yearsApr 16, 2022 00:52:12 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Jewfed9000 [op] 0 points 3 yearsApr 16, 2022 05:54:15 ago (+0/-0)

Blackpilled again... :(

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3 yearsApr 15, 2022 23:09:20 ago (+0/-0)

Men and women may or may not have genes for fighting but those genes are turned on by testoterone.

Alot of the genes that would be involved in defending your country from rapist and pillager are also the genes involved in being a rapist/pillager. The genes for raping and pillaging are activated by testosterone.

I think an argument can be made for the genes that cause women to be loyal and “feisty” being eliminated by male rapists/pillagers. Polygynist societies in particular probably select women for traits like transferable loyalties because the trade women like chattel.

We should talk about it and we should talk about the reality that males are fueling wars because of their reproductive instincts to eliminate male competition. At the national level we are still behaving like niggers. White men from the US are waging a war today against Russia. Americans are running the Ukrainian military right now. There may not be too much raping but there absolutely will be pillaging. A bunch of jewish neo-cons may be giving the orders, but white guys are carrying out this war.

To understand why women don’t fight more, you should probably look at why men fight. This is not only a matter of self defense. Men try to steal resources and territory from each other so they can have more and better women. This is always thee reason for war.

[ - ] Jewfed9000 [op] 0 points 3 yearsApr 16, 2022 06:00:55 ago (+0/-0)

Thank you for the reply, sweet cheeks! ;)

[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 3.0 yearsMay 11, 2022 21:01:14 ago (+0/-1)

Utterly laughable if you actually know anything about genetics.

Alot of the genes that would be involved in defending your country from rapist and pillager are also the genes involved in being a rapist/pillager. The genes for raping and pillaging are activated by testosterone.

Lmao this is classic wikipedia-smart, and barely even that. Tell me all about the emotions genes have, and how they gallantly activate themselves when the pillagers show up. Because that's how genes work. LOL.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 11, 2022 23:05:45 ago (+0/-0)

Males want to hold or gain territory and resources to maintain or increase their access to females. That is why all wars are fought. Thats why men fight wars, not women. Maleness and the reproductive model in whch males fight to the death to hoard resources from each other is far older than human beings. Its legacy behaviors and they come from legacy genes that are indeed activated by androgens. Genes do control emotions. The genes Im talking about are more heavily transcribed in males and they are the reason males react more violently when their towns are being pillaged. And alot of these genes are the same in bulls and rams and roosters and bears. Its a behavioral model that appears useful in males of many different species.

You seem to be implying that genes are not in control of your reactions when your town is being pillaged. Am I right in assuming this?