Pseudopagans are those fake religions that came after the creation of the Abrahamic religion, they include the likes of Wicca, Thelema, Voodoo, and Santeria.
Pseudopagan religions like Wicca and Thelma tend to originate in the degenerate sex cults started by Jews who wanted to shtup underaged shiksa girls.
Voodoo and Santeria started as deliberate backlashes against "White" religions from agitated members of those peoples who the White man had conquered, Jews often played roles in their foundation.
Then we have Satanism and Luciferianism, both of which are not religions pf their own, but reactionary heresies that occured within Christianity, often started by Jews. Very popular among the elites of Hollywood due to how well these cults work towards establishing, keeping, and expanding the control of its leadership over its individual members, by such means as those of blackmail.
Neopagans and new age are both not real religious orientations, they are fake inventions of a Jewish dominated culture that serve only to strip the world of true faith by offering a consumer friendly junk food alternative.
Here's what I got: if there's a point to life, we're not ready to understand it yet. The best we can do is produce kids and make the world as accommodating for them as we can. If we do well, perhaps some of our genes will remain present in some distant descendant who truly understands the meaning of it all.
If you're over ~7 years old, you've already died at least once. That is to say, almost every cell that was in your body at birth has been replaced with some other younger, healthier cell. There are things you've experienced but completely forgotten.
If you've produced surviving offspring, then half of you lives on in their bodies, even if your own body dies. We probably shouldn't see reproductive continuity of life as meaningfully different from cellular continuity of life-- especially if you can transfer what useful knowledge you've gathered to your kids.
Sounds like Evolutionism. Pretty fucking based. If there is a god or are gods or something else, they probably created (or were created by, who tf knows) evolution.
We can agree with the atheists on the non-existence of God's, afterlives, or souls, but not on their more nihilistic conclusions, life isn't meaningless, morality is a real thing, and both are of vital importance to all of humanity.
The purpose of life is to achieve evolutionary success, the standard of morality is derived from this purpose, actions which are more conducive to improving the evolutionary fitness of one's own genetics are more moral than those which are less effective in these respects.
The most essential philosophical foundation being that the morality of one's actions is derived from the evolutionary advantage or disadvantage conferred by their undertaking.
The moral purpose of one's life is a personal mission to maximize the number of living organisms who inherited genetics identical to one's own, and to maximize the presence of common genetics in those organisms.
With the preservation of different kinds of common genetics having a different moral value attached to them.
The most important of common genetics are those which get expressed as traits and are more recessive by comparison.
The second most important are the comparatively recessive common genetics which are not expressed as traits.
The third most important being common genetics which are expressed as traits and are more dominant.
The common genetics that are comparatively dominant and not expressed as traits are of the fourth most important value.
And of least moral value are the genetics which are not held in common.
Rather than seeing people and other living beings are ghosts wearing puppet suits of meat and bone, you see them as a bundle of genetic traits expressing themselves together in response to their environment as an extant organism.
Everything that lives is synonymous with it's body, the mind is the result of the functioning of physical components, the brain is the hardware, and the mind is the software running off of it, when the brain shuts down, the mind ceases to exist, minds aren't "things", they are activities - processes. The soul was the attempt to mischaracterize a function as an object.
A psychopath doesn't have a bad heart or a wicked soul, they have a malfunctioning amygdala, all evil is defective genetic traits or competing evolutionary strategies, even the moral failings in yourself probably results from these things, even when you are generally upstanding or successful.
For example, you value monogamy but committed adultery anyway, then you regret that you had been disloyal to your partner afterwards. Thus is because you have inherited traits that predispose you to both more K-type behaviors such as monogamy, and also inherited traits which carry a disposition towards R-type ones. These two conflicting survival strategies are essentially at war within you, and thus they expressed themselves as moral inconsistency or even hypocrisy (your actions going against your own beliefs).
So this religion even has a philosophical view of the origins of sin, although what exactly is perceived as being sinful might differ from one individual to another, there'd likely be enough of a general consensus to form a satisfying common agreement between most members of society, and those who do not agree could form their own separate society as long as they would be able to agree that they should not impose their moral values upon the societies of others.
For the reasons listed above, moral ideologues that do not permit their adherents to live and let live with societies that hold different standards from themselves are to be wiped out from existence.
Ideologies like Islam and Marxism are but two prominent examples of ideologues which hold world conquest as an unshakable foundational belief, and should therefore be hunted down and destroyed (through the extermination of their followers).
actions which are more conducive to improving the evolutionary fitness of one's own genetics are more moral than those which are less effective in these respects.
Sorry for this wall of text... The system isn't preserving my formatting: Agreed--although with some rather large caveats. We don't always know, within our lifetime, whether something counter-intuitive might actually be the best strategy. Also, relatively simple heuristics, that require less energy to think through, can often be the more effective strategy--even though they're less precise / partially inaccurate. E.g., while 'kill or be killed' is a more straightforward approch, those who participate in cooperative strategies like Christianity do well in some environments. They can and have succeeded, in evolutionary terms, even without knowing or caring about e.g., genetics and game theory, etc. Speaking of which, I'd recommend playing with this a little bit: https://ncase.me/trust/
Your neurons will live for, it is believed, up to 300 years. That's why these trans-humanists want to integrate their brains with a machine, so they can experience a VR utopia for the maximum duration.
[ - ] odinist 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 19:50:10 ago (+1/-0)
"Valderman" is from the fucking White Wolf RPGs, you dumb faggot.
And even the concept of it is retarded (spell casting men). Yes, Odin is who gave us the runes, but otherwise seiðr (divination) is for women. Men should face the threads the Norns have woven for them like men, not try to get sneak previews like a cheating faggot.
Pretty much everything else you said was right, though, at least.
You have a very narrow understanding of pagan religions. You only mention specifically the Norse pagans. Pagan religion goes back thousand and thousands of years. Considering your restrictive definition of what is pagan and what is not, you disregard pre-Egyptian dynasty religion, the Greek Eleusinian mysteries, Babylonian, Persian, and Assyrian pagans, and ancient paganism as practiced by tribes on that continent tens of thousands of years ago, whose religious beliefs can be inferred by what they buried their dead with.
You have your opinion, and you're welcome to it, but you don't really much authority to speak about paganism.
I mean, for a post about Paganism, it definitely was more about what it isn't than what it is. But I don't think he's denying that many other parts of the Aryan diaspora from Sumeria/Caucasus produced their own unique religions. I wonder how he'd distinguish Paganism from Hinduism, Daoism, Shinto, and other eastern religions, or if some would be included. Confucianism probably shouldn't be.
No, you just seemed to be reading something into it that wasn't said and wasn't necessarily intended. But considering your name I guess it's fitting that you'd assume you know more than is said.
Atenism is the one started by Akhenaten the tranny right? Pretty sure his dad was the pharaoh of dreamcoat Joseph. Akhenaten was likely their first attempt to rule directly but it backfired, Tut's curse may be the result of a jewish plague, and the new line of Pharaohs that started after Tut was started by the people who threw the jews out of Egypt. Atenism would therefore be proto-Abrahamic, not Pagan.
Others are free to disagree in their estimates of which Pharaohs were the Pharaohs of Joseph and Moses, but take some time to think about their stories. Joseph arrives in Egypt, claiming he fled persecution in the land of his birth at the hands of men he once called his brothers from another mother. He then worms his way up through Egyptian society, tells the Pharaoh a story of a boom and bust cycle that will lead to hard times economically and ecologically, and uses that as an excuse to take power over the stores of economic value, namely the granaries. Side note, the granaries of Egypt and Mesopotamia (Babylon, etc.) were the first places where currency originated.
Joseph does such a great job that the Pharaoh invites his incestuous trickster family to live there. Within a generation, the Egyptian people are so happy with the jews that they start murdering their firstborn sons. One jew baby escapes and goes on to inflict plagues and natural disasters on the land before fleeing with so much of the Egyptian people's wealth that they're able to build a giant golden idol out in the desert and it takes them decades to haul all their stolen loot home.
This is the story of Genesis and Exodus. Read your fucking Bibles people. Holy shit, the kikes have done this at least 100 fucking times (probably more like 1000) since at least 3300 BC.
The faith of Adam, the first human, was "Abrahamic" monotheism, even though his descendent Abraham was yet born. Adam spoke with God directly, as Moses was also given the blessing.
Unrepentant deniers of the one true God will burn in hell for eternity, whatever label they carry.
"paganism", or any belief that associates intrinsic ability or power with a false associate of God (an idol), is clearcut misguidance.
Here is some proof:
And you see the mountains, thinking them motionless [solid and rigid], while they will pass as the passing of clouds. [It is] the work of Allāh, who perfected all things. Indeed, He is Aware of that which you do.
That's just the thing. He only married women. Most of his wives were previously married. 1400 years ago people didn't accept the jewish concept of "teenager".
Im glad you've realized that it's subjective unless God instructs.
I agree that we waste the potential of our kids, the education system is only that in name, In function it's a system of indoctrination.
But I disagree that just because children are smarter and more mature than we think, that they are to any extent intelligent and mature enough to consent to sexual activity, especially with an adult partner.
Yes, they are capable of understanding a lot more than our society thinks they are, but they aren't adults the bodies of children, they still have a child's brain and mind, which is incapable of providing informed consent to sex.
Its my opinion that pedophiles are criminals who deserve to suffer, and that their deaths would make our world a better place.
If I could trust government enough to rule on cases such as these, I'd advocate a death penalty for anyone who sexually molests or corrupts a child, and anyone who involves a child in any sexual activity or exposes them to any material of a sexual nature (including the faggots practicing bdsm sex in public at the pride parades).
He started raping a girl as soon as he first met and married her when she was four or five, a toddler.
He was first able to get his ponos in her vagoo after she turned nine, still considered to be only a child by our standards.
He was with still fucking her till the end of his life, and that meant her tweenaged and teenaged years, as well as her young adulthood were filled with her getting filled by him.
Also the girl was his own neice, so their sexual relationship was incestuous as well, not to fail to mention that he was physically and psychologically abusive to her, so their relationship was also chock full of domestic abuse.
By most modern standards, your perfect man was a piece of shit who wouldn't last long in the prisons of a western country, because even the other prisoners would see him as absolute evil and kill him at the earliest opportunity.
Your god's blessing is passed on through trickery and deceit. It was passed from Jacob the trickster to Joseph the swindler to Moses the genocidal maniac. Do you know why Christians eat flesh and drink blood in their ritual of communion? The jews have been doing sin transference magic for thousands of years, since long before they created Christianity and Islam. You're the chicken. You're the children Moloch and Saturn are eating. You're the christian sacrificed for the sins of others. And they love their little word games as much as Hillary in her email about sacrificing chickens to Moloch.
Our ancestors had done it for years, and it's been a much better use for a corpse than to just bury it or burn it. If you think about it, the medical world is rife with both practices, what else could be said about the donations of fluids and tissues than that they are a societal acceptable form of cannibalism?
As well, human milk is better for us than that of cows or goats, and young mothers could often use the money from selling their milk to be processed and sold in supermarkets. So why not allow the commercial sale of human milk, and it's use for the production of our dairy products such as cheeses?
Legitimate questions here.
Properly processed, Human meat could be safe for cooking and consumption, so why not allow the commercial sale of human meat products? As this is a general statement, the same also applies to any other part of a human cadaver that could be harvested and used as a food product, like their blood and bones as well.
It's just like any other animal, if certain humans are unappealing for this use, we could just do what the harvesters of organs and blood do, and set up a list of requirements for the humans being harvested for food or drink.
Like obviously we won't take the milk of a woman with aids or some other disease that could be transmitted through her fluids.
A lot of the problems come with very simple solutions.
If people get sick from cannibalism, they can just die on their own. It won't affect us, because we will have gotten rid of the welfare state by the time we institute this policy. In fact the deaths of the stupid and weak will only make us stronger, and their sickness will only improve the health of our economy.
[ + ] Hermes
[ - ] Hermes 4 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 15:23:39 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Temp20210918c
[ - ] Temp20210918c 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 17:24:44 ago (+1/-0)
If you're over ~7 years old, you've already died at least once. That is to say, almost every cell that was in your body at birth has been replaced with some other younger, healthier cell. There are things you've experienced but completely forgotten.
If you've produced surviving offspring, then half of you lives on in their bodies, even if your own body dies. We probably shouldn't see reproductive continuity of life as meaningfully different from cellular continuity of life-- especially if you can transfer what useful knowledge you've gathered to your kids.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 18:09:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2 yearsApr 10, 2022 15:12:45 ago (+0/-0)
We can agree with the atheists on the non-existence of God's, afterlives, or souls, but not on their more nihilistic conclusions, life isn't meaningless, morality is a real thing, and both are of vital importance to all of humanity.
The purpose of life is to achieve evolutionary success, the standard of morality is derived from this purpose, actions which are more conducive to improving the evolutionary fitness of one's own genetics are more moral than those which are less effective in these respects.
The most essential philosophical foundation being that the morality of one's actions is derived from the evolutionary advantage or disadvantage conferred by their undertaking.
The moral purpose of one's life is a personal mission to maximize the number of living organisms who inherited genetics identical to one's own, and to maximize the presence of common genetics in those organisms.
With the preservation of different kinds of common genetics having a different moral value attached to them.
The most important of common genetics are those which get expressed as traits and are more recessive by comparison.
The second most important are the comparatively recessive common genetics which are not expressed as traits.
The third most important being common genetics which are expressed as traits and are more dominant.
The common genetics that are comparatively dominant and not expressed as traits are of the fourth most important value.
And of least moral value are the genetics which are not held in common.
Rather than seeing people and other living beings are ghosts wearing puppet suits of meat and bone, you see them as a bundle of genetic traits expressing themselves together in response to their environment as an extant organism.
Everything that lives is synonymous with it's body, the mind is the result of the functioning of physical components, the brain is the hardware, and the mind is the software running off of it, when the brain shuts down, the mind ceases to exist, minds aren't "things", they are activities - processes. The soul was the attempt to mischaracterize a function as an object.
A psychopath doesn't have a bad heart or a wicked soul, they have a malfunctioning amygdala, all evil is defective genetic traits or competing evolutionary strategies, even the moral failings in yourself probably results from these things, even when you are generally upstanding or successful.
For example, you value monogamy but committed adultery anyway, then you regret that you had been disloyal to your partner afterwards. Thus is because you have inherited traits that predispose you to both more K-type behaviors such as monogamy, and also inherited traits which carry a disposition towards R-type ones. These two conflicting survival strategies are essentially at war within you, and thus they expressed themselves as moral inconsistency or even hypocrisy (your actions going against your own beliefs).
So this religion even has a philosophical view of the origins of sin, although what exactly is perceived as being sinful might differ from one individual to another, there'd likely be enough of a general consensus to form a satisfying common agreement between most members of society, and those who do not agree could form their own separate society as long as they would be able to agree that they should not impose their moral values upon the societies of others.
For the reasons listed above, moral ideologues that do not permit their adherents to live and let live with societies that hold different standards from themselves are to be wiped out from existence.
Ideologies like Islam and Marxism are but two prominent examples of ideologues which hold world conquest as an unshakable foundational belief, and should therefore be hunted down and destroyed (through the extermination of their followers).
[ + ] Temp20210918c
[ - ] Temp20210918c 0 points 2 yearsApr 16, 2022 10:55:06 ago (+0/-0)*
Sorry for this wall of text... The system isn't preserving my formatting: Agreed--although with some rather large caveats. We don't always know, within our lifetime, whether something counter-intuitive might actually be the best strategy. Also, relatively simple heuristics, that require less energy to think through, can often be the more effective strategy--even though they're less precise / partially inaccurate. E.g., while 'kill or be killed' is a more straightforward approch, those who participate in cooperative strategies like Christianity do well in some environments. They can and have succeeded, in evolutionary terms, even without knowing or caring about e.g., genetics and game theory, etc. Speaking of which, I'd recommend playing with this a little bit: https://ncase.me/trust/
[ + ] allahead
[ - ] allahead 0 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 17:45:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 2 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 15:01:44 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] odinist
[ - ] odinist 2 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 19:45:49 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] odinist
[ - ] odinist 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 19:50:10 ago (+1/-0)
And even the concept of it is retarded (spell casting men). Yes, Odin is who gave us the runes, but otherwise seiðr (divination) is for women. Men should face the threads the Norns have woven for them like men, not try to get sneak previews like a cheating faggot.
Pretty much everything else you said was right, though, at least.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 17:39:38 ago (+1/-0)
You have your opinion, and you're welcome to it, but you don't really much authority to speak about paganism.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 18:12:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 23:16:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 23:39:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 17:37:24 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 18:02:14 ago (+1/-1)
Others are free to disagree in their estimates of which Pharaohs were the Pharaohs of Joseph and Moses, but take some time to think about their stories. Joseph arrives in Egypt, claiming he fled persecution in the land of his birth at the hands of men he once called his brothers from another mother. He then worms his way up through Egyptian society, tells the Pharaoh a story of a boom and bust cycle that will lead to hard times economically and ecologically, and uses that as an excuse to take power over the stores of economic value, namely the granaries. Side note, the granaries of Egypt and Mesopotamia (Babylon, etc.) were the first places where currency originated.
Joseph does such a great job that the Pharaoh invites his incestuous trickster family to live there. Within a generation, the Egyptian people are so happy with the jews that they start murdering their firstborn sons. One jew baby escapes and goes on to inflict plagues and natural disasters on the land before fleeing with so much of the Egyptian people's wealth that they're able to build a giant golden idol out in the desert and it takes them decades to haul all their stolen loot home.
This is the story of Genesis and Exodus. Read your fucking Bibles people. Holy shit, the kikes have done this at least 100 fucking times (probably more like 1000) since at least 3300 BC.
[ + ] Nagasaki
[ - ] Nagasaki -2 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 15:52:06 ago (+2/-4)*
Unrepentant deniers of the one true God will burn in hell for eternity, whatever label they carry.
"paganism", or any belief that associates intrinsic ability or power with a false associate of God (an idol), is clearcut misguidance.
Here is some proof:
https://quran.com/27/88
Provide me a plausible explanation of how this was on the tongue of an illiterate Arab orphan, or just give in and accept.
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 16:17:14 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Nagasaki
[ - ] Nagasaki -2 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 17:54:29 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 1 point 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 18:00:09 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] Nagasaki
[ - ] Nagasaki -2 points 2 yearsApr 9, 2022 01:38:00 ago (+0/-2)
Im glad you've realized that it's subjective unless God instructs.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -2 points 2 yearsApr 10, 2022 09:06:54 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2 yearsApr 10, 2022 15:46:13 ago (+0/-0)
But I disagree that just because children are smarter and more mature than we think, that they are to any extent intelligent and mature enough to consent to sexual activity, especially with an adult partner.
Yes, they are capable of understanding a lot more than our society thinks they are, but they aren't adults the bodies of children, they still have a child's brain and mind, which is incapable of providing informed consent to sex.
Its my opinion that pedophiles are criminals who deserve to suffer, and that their deaths would make our world a better place.
If I could trust government enough to rule on cases such as these, I'd advocate a death penalty for anyone who sexually molests or corrupts a child, and anyone who involves a child in any sexual activity or exposes them to any material of a sexual nature (including the faggots practicing bdsm sex in public at the pride parades).
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 2 yearsApr 10, 2022 20:25:36 ago (+0/-1)*
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2 yearsApr 10, 2022 15:33:40 ago (+0/-0)
He was first able to get his ponos in her vagoo after she turned nine, still considered to be only a child by our standards.
He was with still fucking her till the end of his life, and that meant her tweenaged and teenaged years, as well as her young adulthood were filled with her getting filled by him.
Also the girl was his own neice, so their sexual relationship was incestuous as well, not to fail to mention that he was physically and psychologically abusive to her, so their relationship was also chock full of domestic abuse.
By most modern standards, your perfect man was a piece of shit who wouldn't last long in the prisons of a western country, because even the other prisoners would see him as absolute evil and kill him at the earliest opportunity.
[ + ] Nagasaki
[ - ] Nagasaki -1 points 2 yearsApr 10, 2022 15:34:27 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2 yearsApr 10, 2022 15:47:12 ago (+0/-0)
Recognize the difference.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2 yearsApr 8, 2022 18:21:55 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] -1 points 2 yearsApr 10, 2022 15:27:31 ago (+0/-1)
Our ancestors had done it for years, and it's been a much better use for a corpse than to just bury it or burn it. If you think about it, the medical world is rife with both practices, what else could be said about the donations of fluids and tissues than that they are a societal acceptable form of cannibalism?
As well, human milk is better for us than that of cows or goats, and young mothers could often use the money from selling their milk to be processed and sold in supermarkets. So why not allow the commercial sale of human milk, and it's use for the production of our dairy products such as cheeses?
Legitimate questions here.
Properly processed, Human meat could be safe for cooking and consumption, so why not allow the commercial sale of human meat products? As this is a general statement, the same also applies to any other part of a human cadaver that could be harvested and used as a food product, like their blood and bones as well.
It's just like any other animal, if certain humans are unappealing for this use, we could just do what the harvesters of organs and blood do, and set up a list of requirements for the humans being harvested for food or drink.
Like obviously we won't take the milk of a woman with aids or some other disease that could be transmitted through her fluids.
A lot of the problems come with very simple solutions.
If people get sick from cannibalism, they can just die on their own. It won't affect us, because we will have gotten rid of the welfare state by the time we institute this policy. In fact the deaths of the stupid and weak will only make us stronger, and their sickness will only improve the health of our economy.