Sign into an existing account

Just some reading material if youre interested.
https://archive.ph/AwvZr
https://medium.economist.com/big-love-and-big-war-exploring-the-link-between-polygamy-and-violence-67306fb3c41b
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rstb.2011.0290

The inbreeding is actually caused by polygamy imo. Increased competition from polygyny (lower trust in society) results in increased balkanization in to feuding tribes — only trust in the most closely related families makes sense. It makes sense that parents would try to marry their children within these close tribal groups because you want the obligation of a dowry to stay in the tribe. It makes little sense to give so much money to a potentially hostile neighboring tribe. Banning cousin marriage might reduce hostilities within some of these shitholes.

Wrong. The genetic legacy of high levels of polygamy lasts for centuries or longer.

This is a principle thats observed in other mammals, birds, reptiles etc. Higher levels of male promiscuity correlate to higher male violence and males stealing resources from each other. Lower male promiscuity— monogamy— correlates to higher levels of paternal investement in offspring.

Polygamy can be particularly advantageous to males under certain conditions because of the potential for very high reproductive success with low resource investment (e.g. 3 minutes) , but this creates increased competition among males who try to kill each other and hoard females.

Niggers are the extreme example of this. SS africans and other primitive groups in the tropics never relied heavily on males for food since there’s a year round availability of plant food. Males focus on fucking and fighting, famillies are matrilocal. Males do not raise their own biological children.

In muslim regions, paternity is assured by controlling female sexuality. Therefore males care for their own offspring. Women are purchased with money, goats, etc. But polygyny still leads to increased male competition both through violence and through theft/corruption. The wealthiest men can be 4x as sucessful reproductively as the average male. That can never happen in monogamy. That is what incentivizes extreme greed among males. Whether they’re aware of it or not, greed for wealth among men is fueled by the desire to acquire the best females and the most females. Particularly the latter.

Within islam, the way to acquire 4 wives is not to work 4x harder, it is to cheat your neighbor in business or to conquer someone elses country and enslave them or steal their riches or steal their women. Or you could just rape women. These behaviors led to the high reproductive success of corrupt and violent males for many generations in Islamic socities.

Everyone in the middle east is a decendent of horny polygamist warlords with 50 kids. It would take a lot longer than a hundred years of monogamy to cleanse the middle east of these behavioral traits, assuming they stopped this behavior. It has abated but not stopped. All the countries of the ME and NA have around 5 or 10% polygamy, especially in Arabia and Egypt. I just looked it up a few days ago. That effectively doubles the incel rate of monogamists. Chronic shortage of women. Chronic wars over women and wealth.

Europeans were very monogamous until recently. This is the most efficient pattern for resource allocation to children. I.e., it incentivizes males to work, not fight and steal. It will take a few more generations for this white shift to polygamy to cause whites to become more corrupt. But that is happening now. We are becoming more like muslims and niggers. We must not let that happen.

I had the same argument with her. Not sure what she is reading but she seems to always circle back to polygamy as if this explains all the world's problems.

Government is corrupt from the school boards and city councils on up. Not to mention code enforcement, property tax collectors and mayors.

Yes. “B-but not us!”