[ - ] YamaMaya 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 09:26:54 ago (+1/-0)
Im particularly passionate about the medicalization of birth, as I was personally a victim of that hellish torture. I can tell you I know why they do it, they want women terrified to ever give birth.
Much of the medical model of birth is designed to undermine a woman's natural process of birth. She needs quiet, calm, and privacy to birth. She needs to be left alone after to bond with her baby. She needs to breastfeed to protect her from hemorrhage. All of these things have been undermined for so long, its no wonder humans are so miserable. If you are birthed in a traumatic way your mother suffers and struggles to bond with you which creates more human suffering, which of course the kikes love...
they're all predominant in the west where overpopulation is no issue. if it was simply about overpopulation it would be targeted in overpopulated areas, not on whites.
Brainwashing people against White Christian heritage No fault divorce Tender years doctrine Women's liberation Money borrowed into existence The myth that children should move out at 18 psychoanalysis advertising ... too many to count
I sympathize with the inclination to see this list as evidence of genocide, depopulation, and even of agendas having a religious tone.
But I'd also encourage people to think of things through an economic lens (and this doesn't necessarily eliminate the religious tones).
All of the things in that list are promoters of instability at the level of the individual. Our economy relies on increasing levels of consumption. Since the early 20th century, the powers that be have been working with academia and intelligence agencies to discover scientific means for controlling consumption cycles.
Ways of increasing consumption include effecting changes at the product and service level. (a) Do not give people the whole of what they need, keep them returning; think of the transition of most softwares to SaaS. (b) Design your products to fail or be exhausted at certain intervals.
The other way is to effect change in the consumer, which is just to make his desires predictable. A person can cause certain desires in another, associated with instinctive passions, to become predictable. He does this by promoting instability. Our government has been using 'Chicken Little' ("the sky is falling") techniques in mass media to do this for a century now. When a person is fearful or stressed, he will cope by realizing easily accessible rewards, each of which is signified by a certain set of behaviors. Sex is a major one. Entertainment is another. To any extent you can combine these things into new admixtures, you've got new products.
But sex-seeking can be an unpredictable set of behaviors. How do you control it? Stop him from going out to get it. Offer it on the internet as pornography. Start a business where the women 'come to him' (OnlyFans). Now his consumption can be analyzed with equations and such businesses can anticipate revenues, while planning on how to introduce instability at regular intervals to increase your commitment even further.
The use of war, political distrust, social distrust, dissolution of religion, breakdown of the family unit and of marriage (etc.) all have the basic purpose of removing a person from stability and predictability in their lives - which is what all of our actions have as their ultimate ends. So, you keep a person acting. They don't know it, but all of their actions are no longer serving the desired end. They are on a hamster wheel, and their efforts don't produce sovereign independence.
Eventually they will come to see the ends of all of their actions as access to consumption itself. They will work to acquire what everyone is running out of, the dopamine drip that allows them to cope with the absence of stability in their lives.
This will be a system of perfect economic units, as long as you can stop anybody from noticing and prevent revolutionary tendencies. For that you must control media and communications infrastructure. Other than that, you want a population that doesn't sleep soundly at night. You even want them to have a certain distrust of you (two-party system, Satanic cannibal theories). So you purposefully leak signals of corruption. You have eccentric parties and permit certain suspicious personalities lurking near you become public knowledge - controlled opposition leaks the damning suggestion, which is never conclusive. Now a subtle whispering paranoia bubbles beneath the surface of society, but it is never allowed to become too audible: our leaders are Satanic cannibals using blood magic to control the world. Better yet, the more you can get people arguing about whether it's lizards or Clintons from the dark side of the moon, the more instability you create.
The science - the kinds of theorizing you won't hear about - would pertain to determining precisely the line their efforts must 'walk' in order to avoid creating too much instability. The science would pertain to finding empirical signals which can be observed/verified and which reliably predict where that line is. Once you have a range for those variables, you can begin consciously to play with it. If there is a slump, you turn up the heat a bit.
All of it sends impulses down the wire into the top of your head that causes you to go spend money.
It's simple. Pleasures are fleeting. Comfort can't last. You sit in a comfortable chair. Your comfort will not last. Eventually you must readjust your position in the chair. What was once comfortable is no longer - in fact, what begins as comfortable becomes uncomfortable. In this analogy, each time you adjust: you're giving someone money. You're being a good little atom in the chemistry of commerce.
Wealth is discipline, and what this ideal economic world order opposes is any of us building independent wealth. Independent wealth is their primary enemy. To be wealthy means to be independent, not only to do more of the things you want to do (power), but also to resist doing things they want you to do.
If you think about history and the social order, you'll note (and this is much more obvious at local levels) that before mid-20th century or so, families had the majority of power in given localities. They would amass wealth, and they would transfer that wealth to their offspring for generations. If you visit most historical towns in this country, you'll see those lineages of mainstay families recorded in the names of streets and buildings, and possibly find those names still occupying seats in local government. You'll notice two or three major families with the lion's share of property ownership followed by a longer list of surnames representing lasting entities in that town. Blood was the rule.
The new world order is about destroying all of that, in order to destroy independent wealth. Again, the independence comes from the wealth. Discipline becomes wealth, and wealth becomes the power not to comply, and furthermore, to offer alternatives to other people who wish to associate with your wealth (say, by living in your town). They want us atomized, like lonesome hamsters, producing our required quota of economic energy. Our frantic feet and spinning wheels makes the machine go, and the more uncritical we are about the transition of our natural ends (stability and independence) to consumption itself, the deeper we go into this determinism: we become less human.
Stability is parents. Stability is spouses. Stability is God. Stability is savings and stockpiles. Stability is community-lvl agreements, cooperation and insurance.
Therefore, those powers which are interested in a fundamentally new world order must destroy these things.
I'd just add a couple more thoughts to all of this:
1. Control of money. If you are the power that wishes to discourage independent wealth, you can marginalize the threat by controlling the money supply. It's basically highly responsive arbitrage. Manipulation of currencies can counter independent wealth, beneath the level where individuals have the ability to invest in foreign currencies. But this is one of the strategies of globalism and free markets, which allow the wealthiest to play games using multiple international economies as players, and to undermine the majority of persons in the domestic economy who are subjects of that economy.
The move toward digital currency will be a step toward tightening that grip even more. Even fiat money has value determined somewhat independently of central powers. Two Joe's can trade in it because they form independent agreements. This will all change if the government can prevent free association and transaction, and further, shut off your money for non-fiscal reasons (you aren't toeing the moral line; social credit, etc.)
2. The move to sexualize children is often treated by conservatives as a primarily religious (or 'evil') motivation. That is how the social aspect of the issue is clothed, but the underlying motivation is economic. It creates separation between parent and child, and also introduces younger people to the instability of sexual maturity. Sexuality comes with insecurity and with some of the greatest pains/fears humans experience. Introducing young children to the political identity games associated with sexuality makes them consumers at younger and younger ages. They will become more independent in demanding what they want, whereas prior to sexualization, children are subjects of the parent.
3. The primary reason for intentionally thinking in these economic terms is to free yourself of the social narrative being foisted on you. The economic motivations beneath most of these pushes are veiled in social hot-topics, so that people are distracted and will believe that the relevant conversation is occurring at the social level. Instead, the relevant level is the economic level. The social parts are a distraction to keep the two factions of plebs at each other's throats over phantasms.
Take the 'don't say gay' bill controversy. People are generating a social phenomenon over this bill because they are convinced it pertains to identity politics, or to conservative values. That's the hamster wheel. It's about taking away parental authority regarding how their children are sexualized, and at what age. It's about breaking down family structure to turn young kids into self-conscious consumers.
But they'll get the public arguing about gays and religious sin. The powers that be are usually always operating at a different level of abstraction, and it should be our goal to get people to see what it is really about. Consider what it would mean if we could just convince people:
"This isn't about homosexuality. It's primarily about conserving a parent's rights to guide the introduction of sexual concepts into their child's mind at age levels they find appropriate. Since they have the primary interest in the wellbeing of their own children, they are the most appropriate level for those decisions, until a child reaches a certain age, at which point his/her own sexual changes become unavoidable for the school system itself to deal with. This bill determines that age is 8, at minimum. Before 8-yrs, parents have the right to protect their children from all sexual education by outside parties. We feel this not only honors the interests of childhood, but also of the parent, and gives to them natural powers commensurate with their much higher level of personal investment."
It's not about gays. The powers that be want it to be about gays and oppression, yada yada. But I would wager that most people would find it hard to argue with the logic that it should be up to parents how to sexually educate their children younger than 8-yrs. At least, that's a much stronger line of argument for the sane among us. I say that it is stronger because it is intuitively stronger, whereas arguing against homosexuality (i.e. all homosexuals are pedophiles) plays right into the identity politics, getting us caught in the quicksand.
It's not about educating children on homosexuality, it's about protecting children from any sexual education program before a certain age. You see how this pivots the conversation?
but I've never been able to express it as well as you have.
Try writing your own thoughts down for yourself. It really helps to solidify your thinking. Then you can put it online and see it get torn apart or praised, likely both. This helps you to hone your thinking as you see the different perspectives on your thoughts.
In a way, nihilism is like hitting rock bottom, everything else is up from there. Part of what drives nihilism is seeing just how shit the world is. And there's no doubt that we are in a decline.
The path out, I suppose, is to realize that you cannot do anything about it. You are not some all-seeing god able to make instant changes to affect the world.
But you can make changes in your world. The one you live in right now. It starts with you, your family (if you have one), and your household. In a way it's a bit like being stoic in that what isn't going to effect those things is something you don't need to worry about.
As you make changes to you/yours for the better, you effect the things that you can change, thereby making at least a small part of the world a little bit better. This gives you hope and a better outlook on life in general.
Count your blessings, seriously. Get a pad and pencil, write 'em out. Bet ya it's longer than you originally thought. Count stuff like clean, warm water and daily calories, friends and family, loved pets, and so on.
Start there and see if there's anything you can make better, however small. Anything/one you've been taking for granted lately, maybe eat a bit better today than yesterday, whatever. Take a break from the internet, go outside, enjoy something/one outdoors, and forget about the crazyness for awhile. Seriously, get off the internet for a few days, not even to shitpost or get entertainment.
Thank you for taking the time to write this! It is very well presented.
It's important to underscore that the most common equivalent of wealth is money, but like you said, our enemy understands that wealth empowers us, so they take steps to remove our access to wealth in a variety of ways. Wealth includes stability like you mentioned: access to a stable household with stable family (broken families not only destroy in the present, they destroy in the future), meaningful spirituality that enriches you and your environment/community, access to abundant resources, time.
Time is very important. The people who machinate white genocide have a copious amount of time in which they can engage their passion. They're not stuck in a 9-5 job, driving an hour back and forth to work 5 days a week. They don't have to go shopping for groceries and run around town to do chores. They don't even spend the time to raise their own children. Unfortunately, most people with access to true wealth have understood time for a very long period of human history and use a large portion of their time to steal yours away from you. We do not struggle, we do not organize, and most importantly, we do not rebel against the (((forces))) that oppress us when we're too busy just trying to survive a broken system. We'd rather chase the peddler's poison than the creator's panacea.
Therefore, those powers which are interested in a fundamentally new world order must destroy these things.
Conveniently, I believe we also require destruction of the current order. It is thoroughly corrupt, permanently irreparable. Either way, things are going to get bad, but if we're clever, the vacuum give us an opportunity to magnify and disseminate our beliefs back into the mainstream. We need a white homeland to realize our racial destiny.
Thanks for the response. You touched on something here that I'm also passionate about: this issue of time.
It isn't an accident that, using the clothing of (the philosophy and politics of) education, the system is extending the acceptable period during which we are educating the young, namely by (a) diluting and slowing the rate at which we progress education in the established K-12 pathway, and (b) making it difficult to avoid (at the very least) an additional four years of education added after high school, which for the most part does nothing useful by way of preparing any individual for productive participation in actual work.
I could go on about the university scam for hours.
I recently had a conversation with a person who was pursuing a career in counseling. What we're talking about, at bottom, is a job where someone is paid to listen and to talk to someone about their personal problems. Now, the current education culture - obsessed as it is with everyone's safety, and insisting on thinking for people by removing their own sovereignty - will say, "You're playing with someone's mind here. You must certainly require many years of education to do this job!"
So a person who might naturally be capable of accomplishing the ends of a counselor must do not only four more years of undergrad, but also an additional two years to get his/her Master's. We've got a situation where this person will go into debt to what amounts to a banking system (colleges) and gives up six years of his/her productive life just to get the green light to legally accept money from people who want to talk through their problems. There is a serious imbalance here, because not only does the state stipulate all of this, that person can't even be licensed (and therefore earn the salaries they were told about when considering that field) for an additional 2-3 years after receiving the required degree - they have to work under supervision. Now, in total, this person is looking at 8-9 years after graduating high school before they are able to take the licensing exams just to talk to people about life's problems.
And now go look at what that licensed counselor is even able to earn at the 'entry level', which now means being in his/her late twenties and just entering the first position relevant to his/her career. I've seen people earning less than $50,000 working in agency settings, and for the government (with Master's degrees).
Forget what you think about the rigor of that job field, or the supply of counselors. Any argument that says, "Well, it doesn't pay a lot because so many people can do it", will eat its own tail. Because that logic runs contrary to the logic which says these people require 8 years before being ready to do the job! Am I being clear? If the reasons given for low salaries are true, then it is insane that our system is requiring those people to spend 6-8 years of their lives preparing for that job after high school! It's utterly insane.
Consider what giving up this amount of time amounts to in the long run, in the financial sense. Consider an investment that starts at 30 (if that person can even afford to invest substantially at 30), versus investments that begin at 20. Suppose a person at 30 wants a child and has to buy a home, and have a wedding, yada yada, will they even be able to begin investing at 30? Perhaps not until 40 now? That's considering student loan debt, house debt, family expenses, etc.
The way we are delaying the ability of people to begin earning wealth by artificially extending the 'preparatory period' that says they are able to do productive work is reaching debilitative levels. We have whole generations who are not going to amass any meaningful wealth, collectively on the scales that matter to counter government overreaching. It's a timebomb that I consider carefully engineered.
And it has been engineered using this terrible philosophy of safety. That the government has to micromanage the safety of every person, and continue to establish more and more bureaucratic red tape to ensure employees in this country's various industries are 'vetted' by a well-rounded education. It's a fucking scam. Is a counselor on the backside of his/her 20's, after achieving that Master's, really guaranteed to do a safer job of counseling than someone who started at 20-yrs?
No sensible person thinks so. I know people in my own life who have gotten PhD's in psychology and to have a conversation with them reveals nothing that a person couldn't have gotten from education that began in high school and was supplemented by on-the-job training.
And don't even get me started on the emergence of unpaid internships and the human capital of 'experience'. We have kids going into $50k in debt and being told that after this they need to build unpaid experience to have human capital in their job field. The Boomer generation, drooling at the promises of the television, has sold generations of young people into one of the greatest scams in history.
[ + ] YamaMaya
[ - ] YamaMaya 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 09:26:54 ago (+1/-0)
Much of the medical model of birth is designed to undermine a woman's natural process of birth. She needs quiet, calm, and privacy to birth. She needs to be left alone after to bond with her baby. She needs to breastfeed to protect her from hemorrhage. All of these things have been undermined for so long, its no wonder humans are so miserable. If you are birthed in a traumatic way your mother suffers and struggles to bond with you which creates more human suffering, which of course the kikes love...
[ + ] AOUsYamaka
[ - ] AOUsYamaka 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 09:54:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 11:32:28 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 12:35:45 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 3 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 07:14:07 ago (+3/-0)
No fault divorce
Tender years doctrine
Women's liberation
Money borrowed into existence
The myth that children should move out at 18
psychoanalysis
advertising
... too many to count
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 5 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 09:24:36 ago (+5/-0)*
But I'd also encourage people to think of things through an economic lens (and this doesn't necessarily eliminate the religious tones).
All of the things in that list are promoters of instability at the level of the individual. Our economy relies on increasing levels of consumption. Since the early 20th century, the powers that be have been working with academia and intelligence agencies to discover scientific means for controlling consumption cycles.
Ways of increasing consumption include effecting changes at the product and service level. (a) Do not give people the whole of what they need, keep them returning; think of the transition of most softwares to SaaS. (b) Design your products to fail or be exhausted at certain intervals.
The other way is to effect change in the consumer, which is just to make his desires predictable. A person can cause certain desires in another, associated with instinctive passions, to become predictable. He does this by promoting instability. Our government has been using 'Chicken Little' ("the sky is falling") techniques in mass media to do this for a century now. When a person is fearful or stressed, he will cope by realizing easily accessible rewards, each of which is signified by a certain set of behaviors. Sex is a major one. Entertainment is another. To any extent you can combine these things into new admixtures, you've got new products.
But sex-seeking can be an unpredictable set of behaviors. How do you control it? Stop him from going out to get it. Offer it on the internet as pornography. Start a business where the women 'come to him' (OnlyFans). Now his consumption can be analyzed with equations and such businesses can anticipate revenues, while planning on how to introduce instability at regular intervals to increase your commitment even further.
The use of war, political distrust, social distrust, dissolution of religion, breakdown of the family unit and of marriage (etc.) all have the basic purpose of removing a person from stability and predictability in their lives - which is what all of our actions have as their ultimate ends. So, you keep a person acting. They don't know it, but all of their actions are no longer serving the desired end. They are on a hamster wheel, and their efforts don't produce sovereign independence.
Eventually they will come to see the ends of all of their actions as access to consumption itself. They will work to acquire what everyone is running out of, the dopamine drip that allows them to cope with the absence of stability in their lives.
This will be a system of perfect economic units, as long as you can stop anybody from noticing and prevent revolutionary tendencies. For that you must control media and communications infrastructure. Other than that, you want a population that doesn't sleep soundly at night. You even want them to have a certain distrust of you (two-party system, Satanic cannibal theories). So you purposefully leak signals of corruption. You have eccentric parties and permit certain suspicious personalities lurking near you become public knowledge - controlled opposition leaks the damning suggestion, which is never conclusive. Now a subtle whispering paranoia bubbles beneath the surface of society, but it is never allowed to become too audible: our leaders are Satanic cannibals using blood magic to control the world. Better yet, the more you can get people arguing about whether it's lizards or Clintons from the dark side of the moon, the more instability you create.
The science - the kinds of theorizing you won't hear about - would pertain to determining precisely the line their efforts must 'walk' in order to avoid creating too much instability. The science would pertain to finding empirical signals which can be observed/verified and which reliably predict where that line is. Once you have a range for those variables, you can begin consciously to play with it. If there is a slump, you turn up the heat a bit.
All of it sends impulses down the wire into the top of your head that causes you to go spend money.
It's simple. Pleasures are fleeting. Comfort can't last. You sit in a comfortable chair. Your comfort will not last. Eventually you must readjust your position in the chair. What was once comfortable is no longer - in fact, what begins as comfortable becomes uncomfortable. In this analogy, each time you adjust: you're giving someone money. You're being a good little atom in the chemistry of commerce.
Wealth is discipline, and what this ideal economic world order opposes is any of us building independent wealth. Independent wealth is their primary enemy. To be wealthy means to be independent, not only to do more of the things you want to do (power), but also to resist doing things they want you to do.
If you think about history and the social order, you'll note (and this is much more obvious at local levels) that before mid-20th century or so, families had the majority of power in given localities. They would amass wealth, and they would transfer that wealth to their offspring for generations. If you visit most historical towns in this country, you'll see those lineages of mainstay families recorded in the names of streets and buildings, and possibly find those names still occupying seats in local government. You'll notice two or three major families with the lion's share of property ownership followed by a longer list of surnames representing lasting entities in that town. Blood was the rule.
The new world order is about destroying all of that, in order to destroy independent wealth. Again, the independence comes from the wealth. Discipline becomes wealth, and wealth becomes the power not to comply, and furthermore, to offer alternatives to other people who wish to associate with your wealth (say, by living in your town). They want us atomized, like lonesome hamsters, producing our required quota of economic energy. Our frantic feet and spinning wheels makes the machine go, and the more uncritical we are about the transition of our natural ends (stability and independence) to consumption itself, the deeper we go into this determinism: we become less human.
Stability is parents. Stability is spouses. Stability is God. Stability is savings and stockpiles. Stability is community-lvl agreements, cooperation and insurance.
Therefore, those powers which are interested in a fundamentally new world order must destroy these things.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 10:37:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 11:02:33 ago (+0/-0)*
1. Control of money. If you are the power that wishes to discourage independent wealth, you can marginalize the threat by controlling the money supply. It's basically highly responsive arbitrage. Manipulation of currencies can counter independent wealth, beneath the level where individuals have the ability to invest in foreign currencies. But this is one of the strategies of globalism and free markets, which allow the wealthiest to play games using multiple international economies as players, and to undermine the majority of persons in the domestic economy who are subjects of that economy.
The move toward digital currency will be a step toward tightening that grip even more. Even fiat money has value determined somewhat independently of central powers. Two Joe's can trade in it because they form independent agreements. This will all change if the government can prevent free association and transaction, and further, shut off your money for non-fiscal reasons (you aren't toeing the moral line; social credit, etc.)
2. The move to sexualize children is often treated by conservatives as a primarily religious (or 'evil') motivation. That is how the social aspect of the issue is clothed, but the underlying motivation is economic. It creates separation between parent and child, and also introduces younger people to the instability of sexual maturity. Sexuality comes with insecurity and with some of the greatest pains/fears humans experience. Introducing young children to the political identity games associated with sexuality makes them consumers at younger and younger ages. They will become more independent in demanding what they want, whereas prior to sexualization, children are subjects of the parent.
3. The primary reason for intentionally thinking in these economic terms is to free yourself of the social narrative being foisted on you. The economic motivations beneath most of these pushes are veiled in social hot-topics, so that people are distracted and will believe that the relevant conversation is occurring at the social level. Instead, the relevant level is the economic level. The social parts are a distraction to keep the two factions of plebs at each other's throats over phantasms.
Take the 'don't say gay' bill controversy. People are generating a social phenomenon over this bill because they are convinced it pertains to identity politics, or to conservative values. That's the hamster wheel. It's about taking away parental authority regarding how their children are sexualized, and at what age. It's about breaking down family structure to turn young kids into self-conscious consumers.
But they'll get the public arguing about gays and religious sin. The powers that be are usually always operating at a different level of abstraction, and it should be our goal to get people to see what it is really about. Consider what it would mean if we could just convince people:
"This isn't about homosexuality. It's primarily about conserving a parent's rights to guide the introduction of sexual concepts into their child's mind at age levels they find appropriate. Since they have the primary interest in the wellbeing of their own children, they are the most appropriate level for those decisions, until a child reaches a certain age, at which point his/her own sexual changes become unavoidable for the school system itself to deal with. This bill determines that age is 8, at minimum. Before 8-yrs, parents have the right to protect their children from all sexual education by outside parties. We feel this not only honors the interests of childhood, but also of the parent, and gives to them natural powers commensurate with their much higher level of personal investment."
It's not about gays. The powers that be want it to be about gays and oppression, yada yada. But I would wager that most people would find it hard to argue with the logic that it should be up to parents how to sexually educate their children younger than 8-yrs. At least, that's a much stronger line of argument for the sane among us. I say that it is stronger because it is intuitively stronger, whereas arguing against homosexuality (i.e. all homosexuals are pedophiles) plays right into the identity politics, getting us caught in the quicksand.
It's not about educating children on homosexuality, it's about protecting children from any sexual education program before a certain age. You see how this pivots the conversation?
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 11:12:03 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 11:40:10 ago (+1/-0)
Try writing your own thoughts down for yourself. It really helps to solidify your thinking. Then you can put it online and see it get torn apart or praised, likely both. This helps you to hone your thinking as you see the different perspectives on your thoughts.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 11:47:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 12:36:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 14:18:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 15:08:57 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 19:27:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 20:08:08 ago (+0/-0)
The path out, I suppose, is to realize that you cannot do anything about it. You are not some all-seeing god able to make instant changes to affect the world.
But you can make changes in your world. The one you live in right now. It starts with you, your family (if you have one), and your household. In a way it's a bit like being stoic in that what isn't going to effect those things is something you don't need to worry about.
As you make changes to you/yours for the better, you effect the things that you can change, thereby making at least a small part of the world a little bit better. This gives you hope and a better outlook on life in general.
Count your blessings, seriously. Get a pad and pencil, write 'em out. Bet ya it's longer than you originally thought. Count stuff like clean, warm water and daily calories, friends and family, loved pets, and so on.
Start there and see if there's anything you can make better, however small. Anything/one you've been taking for granted lately, maybe eat a bit better today than yesterday, whatever. Take a break from the internet, go outside, enjoy something/one outdoors, and forget about the crazyness for awhile. Seriously, get off the internet for a few days, not even to shitpost or get entertainment.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 21:53:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 11:41:53 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 12:04:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] heebiejeebies
[ - ] heebiejeebies 1 point 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 11:33:03 ago (+1/-0)
It's important to underscore that the most common equivalent of wealth is money, but like you said, our enemy understands that wealth empowers us, so they take steps to remove our access to wealth in a variety of ways. Wealth includes stability like you mentioned: access to a stable household with stable family (broken families not only destroy in the present, they destroy in the future), meaningful spirituality that enriches you and your environment/community, access to abundant resources, time.
Time is very important. The people who machinate white genocide have a copious amount of time in which they can engage their passion. They're not stuck in a 9-5 job, driving an hour back and forth to work 5 days a week. They don't have to go shopping for groceries and run around town to do chores. They don't even spend the time to raise their own children. Unfortunately, most people with access to true wealth have understood time for a very long period of human history and use a large portion of their time to steal yours away from you. We do not struggle, we do not organize, and most importantly, we do not rebel against the (((forces))) that oppress us when we're too busy just trying to survive a broken system. We'd rather chase the peddler's poison than the creator's panacea.
Conveniently, I believe we also require destruction of the current order. It is thoroughly corrupt, permanently irreparable. Either way, things are going to get bad, but if we're clever, the vacuum give us an opportunity to magnify and disseminate our beliefs back into the mainstream. We need a white homeland to realize our racial destiny.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 3 yearsApr 1, 2022 11:58:24 ago (+0/-0)*
It isn't an accident that, using the clothing of (the philosophy and politics of) education, the system is extending the acceptable period during which we are educating the young, namely by (a) diluting and slowing the rate at which we progress education in the established K-12 pathway, and (b) making it difficult to avoid (at the very least) an additional four years of education added after high school, which for the most part does nothing useful by way of preparing any individual for productive participation in actual work.
I could go on about the university scam for hours.
I recently had a conversation with a person who was pursuing a career in counseling. What we're talking about, at bottom, is a job where someone is paid to listen and to talk to someone about their personal problems. Now, the current education culture - obsessed as it is with everyone's safety, and insisting on thinking for people by removing their own sovereignty - will say, "You're playing with someone's mind here. You must certainly require many years of education to do this job!"
So a person who might naturally be capable of accomplishing the ends of a counselor must do not only four more years of undergrad, but also an additional two years to get his/her Master's. We've got a situation where this person will go into debt to what amounts to a banking system (colleges) and gives up six years of his/her productive life just to get the green light to legally accept money from people who want to talk through their problems. There is a serious imbalance here, because not only does the state stipulate all of this, that person can't even be licensed (and therefore earn the salaries they were told about when considering that field) for an additional 2-3 years after receiving the required degree - they have to work under supervision. Now, in total, this person is looking at 8-9 years after graduating high school before they are able to take the licensing exams just to talk to people about life's problems.
And now go look at what that licensed counselor is even able to earn at the 'entry level', which now means being in his/her late twenties and just entering the first position relevant to his/her career. I've seen people earning less than $50,000 working in agency settings, and for the government (with Master's degrees).
Forget what you think about the rigor of that job field, or the supply of counselors. Any argument that says, "Well, it doesn't pay a lot because so many people can do it", will eat its own tail. Because that logic runs contrary to the logic which says these people require 8 years before being ready to do the job! Am I being clear? If the reasons given for low salaries are true, then it is insane that our system is requiring those people to spend 6-8 years of their lives preparing for that job after high school! It's utterly insane.
Consider what giving up this amount of time amounts to in the long run, in the financial sense. Consider an investment that starts at 30 (if that person can even afford to invest substantially at 30), versus investments that begin at 20. Suppose a person at 30 wants a child and has to buy a home, and have a wedding, yada yada, will they even be able to begin investing at 30? Perhaps not until 40 now? That's considering student loan debt, house debt, family expenses, etc.
The way we are delaying the ability of people to begin earning wealth by artificially extending the 'preparatory period' that says they are able to do productive work is reaching debilitative levels. We have whole generations who are not going to amass any meaningful wealth, collectively on the scales that matter to counter government overreaching. It's a timebomb that I consider carefully engineered.
And it has been engineered using this terrible philosophy of safety. That the government has to micromanage the safety of every person, and continue to establish more and more bureaucratic red tape to ensure employees in this country's various industries are 'vetted' by a well-rounded education. It's a fucking scam. Is a counselor on the backside of his/her 20's, after achieving that Master's, really guaranteed to do a safer job of counseling than someone who started at 20-yrs?
No sensible person thinks so. I know people in my own life who have gotten PhD's in psychology and to have a conversation with them reveals nothing that a person couldn't have gotten from education that began in high school and was supplemented by on-the-job training.
And don't even get me started on the emergence of unpaid internships and the human capital of 'experience'. We have kids going into $50k in debt and being told that after this they need to build unpaid experience to have human capital in their job field. The Boomer generation, drooling at the promises of the television, has sold generations of young people into one of the greatest scams in history.