Sign into an existing account

15 years ago I developed a solution to the illegal immigration problem. No one recognized it as the answer.

Give illegals 30 days to return to their homes of origin with any and all property.

After 30 days, illegals will be actively sought out and when found their personal property and any property they have in their possession will be confiscated. Bank accounts, cash, lowriders, boom boxes, mariachi hats, etc. This also includes rental properties and vehicles. If you rent a home, apartment or car to an illegal, it will be confiscated.

All illegals found will have their home addresses searched for other illegals. Wash rinse repeat.

The now detained illegal will be issued 1) orange jumpsuit and 1) bus, train, freighter ticket to their country of origin. This will be paid for by a trust funded by the confiscation of illegals.

The illegal will be finger printed, photographed and a detailed file made of his/her identity so that if they return and are caught(they will be), they will be executed the following the day. Man, woman, child.

I guarantee this will work.

Send'em to the French Guiana,work camps;just like back in the day.

1 million shitskins is a drop in the bucket. I guess it's a start

There’ll be a war before that.

Feels like France over all European countries besides maybe Britain will experience a race war between the natives and the foreigners first

I support just killing anyone who isn't white, jews especially included among that number.

Kill everyone of a different race from the national founders, and then all racial issues are solved.

Why look for countless ways to live with the problems caused by the presence of other races when you can just get rid of the source of those problems?

Why should you be like a smoker trying to manage the myriad issues caused by their smoking when you can just get rid of the cigarettes?

It's an arbitrary thing, that people put getting rid of the cause of the problem in a separate category from the other solutions which never work, and in many cases are seem to just aggravate things further.

Be the exact kind of monster the jews turn people against of away from, if that's the thing which they most turn the people against or away from, then that's what you should be.

Ask why you, a white man, would want to give uo their privileges instead of increasing and expanding them, ask why it is in your interest to care about the oppression those who are unlike yourself go through, and why it wouldn't be in your interest to see them be oppressed even more.

You aren't like them, so you have nothing to gain by thinking of them the way you'd think of someone who is like yourself, in fact, you have much to lose by doing so, it would be best to make things better for yourself and those like you, and worse for anyone who is different.

The practical sense of the world is that your discrimination agaibst those who aren't like yourself benefits you far better than a lack of such discrimination, it's not in your interests to treat them equally.

It would also be completely against your interests to do the reverse, and discriminate against your own kind, in favor of those who are more different. You actually lose out more by doing so, and for what? Their gains aren't yours, but their losses could be your gains.

Thus, from a purely strategic perspective, it's best to be as racist as you could be.

Is it morally wrong? No, because the thing about good deeds is that they tend to benefit the ones who practice them, that's what made them good in the first place. Is it psychopathic? No, a psychopath cares about about one but themselves, a racist is merely selective about who they care for, and who they do not.

Letting these people leave will be a mistake, npt only will they take things with them, knowledge included, but they could use the things they acquired against you once they've left. There's no guarantee that they will leave, as well, and the cost of relocating them is far worse in the long run than just killing them, it's better to kill them all, especially the children.

That's the purely logical and strategic view, devoid of moral considerations beyond just what is best for you and those you love. If you don't care for them, then there's nothing nothing be gained from acting as if you did.

It's not cruel, cruelty would be making them suffer or humiliating them, or anything unnecessarylike that, no, we are just talking about killing them, which can be done in the quickest and most efficient manner possible.

Just go around shooting them in the head, or slitting their throats, or running them through. Or just getting them to kill themselves, I'm sure you could find a way.

There's also the most efficient method, just withholding from them what they require to continue living, stop feeding them, and prevent them from feeding themselves, they will starve, and you won't have to deal with them for much longer.

If they try to leave, you kill them with the other methods listed above. That's the best thing you could do for yourselves.

Think like a Vulcan, no morals, no emotions, just pure logic and reason.

And in the US we have recently gotten rid of policies that would ensure that dangerous criminals and people related to terrorist activity would not be allowed to enter the country freely.

The 2/3 stat against increased immigration has been shown in surveys from 1965 all the way up to now. It's probably the most consistent statistic you'll ever see, and also the starkest proof that we do not live in a democracy.

Allright. That means they're going as soon as we get rid of every living politician.

FUCK THE PARTIES.

they should go back and do something about the shithole they came from

The other 1/3rd are sand niggers.

I don't blame them, France should belong to the French and not nigger and camel nigger immigrants.