Sign into an existing account

That the Laws, Rights, Freedoms, etc. These should only apply to the descendants of those from whose minds these concepts originated; the White Caucasian Europoid Indo-Aryan Hyperborean/Atlantean/Lemurian Gentile Folk - and only those of sufficiently pure racial ancestry should be eligible for being trusted to possess these powers.
For we've seen how they may be wielded well by their rightful inheritors, but also how they are abused by those to whom these things should not have been given.
We know now that bestowing the gifts of liberty, accountability, and protection to just anyone is a path the leads to the strong being yoked by the weak with the chains of guilt and shame used to place their hearts and minds into bondage.
That this creates a dystopic world where the unproductive wealthy extract the value of the labors of the productive class to bribe the unproductive poor into an infernal conspiracy of parasites.
An open conspiracy to feed of those who can produce until they are drained dry and could be consumed utterly, or until they recognize the vile plot for the wickedness which it truly is, and starts an immune response against their infection.
Or until, in rare cases, the adult finally listens to the fresh perspe time of the youth, who point out the (embarrassingly obvious) truths about their state of affairs.
The United States was the best society the world had yet seen, but in its decline, we can see the flaws in its design, flaws present from its origin, which should be amended in the next great empire our people build.
The first design flaw, which we all recognize, was erroneously designating the jews to be of their race, and this worthy of the treatment which should be reserved only for their own kind, this despite having ample evidence against such a claim. The membership of the founders in masonic societies and their association with the illuminated orders that were originated by jews in Bavaria, is likely to blame for this mistake, and potentially others as well.
Mistakes like incorporating any measure of democracy, despite the clear evidence of where giving the deciding power to the people would ultimately lead, into an idiocratic rule of fools, who would unsurprisingly elect the psychopathic con-men of demagoguery, which are best at swaying the love of crowds, this problem with democracy cannot be addressed in any way, not even by having strict criteria for the electorate (they will inevitably give the vote to everyone), nor by adjusting the value of votes by state populations (the infamous electoral college).
The ultimate issue is creating a good design for your country, then allowing those who stand at the highest positions in your society to make changes to this design. No good could possibly come from such a policy, the national leadership should at the very most act only as overseers, comnanders of watchmen, not lawmakers. The limit of their power should be that they can only enforce the laws that your society is founded with, but never make changes to those laws, no additions, no subtractions, no surprise situations, and no "interpretations". They must also be prohibited from being arbitrary or inconsistent in their role as enforcers, especially if the cause is suspected to be corruption, and not mere ineptitude.