Pooled press attempts to ask President Biden a question as he walks to G7 leaders photo op with Japanese PM. White House official swats press away, saying "no no no no no"
You were surprisingly silent on the 20 odd posts on tlol about Albright dying...
What is your beef???
Notice: No tlol post.....
If I were you, instead of making a comment like this - post your own ORIGINAL content here from all those sites. tlol could use it.
Edit: LMAO at downvoaters - you know it's true.
This is a personal vendetta against the core concept of the web - disseminating information on sites... Yet tlol has no problem with multiple posts on the same information - as long it is from (((approved))) sources??? such kike mentality. retards.
As for news aggregators - doesn't breitbart, zerohedge, etc collect news from all over and concentrate it at a single site? Apparently this means you have an (((approved))) list of sites that you allow...
Pretty much every post you reply to with this list is original on tlol. That is a valid use of the post feature to me.
Whether it is a retarded article or not, that is the what the downvoats are for. Users have to be given a certain level of expected intelligence, just for being on the site.
This really breaks down to a small clique on here that seemingly hate particular users. Abusive users are bad and should be dealt with on a system level, and that is what mods and owners are for.
As with all things, I gravitate toward total freedom if there ever is an issue.
Making money from the web should not be considered bad - doesn't poal do it? tlol even? coalfax is probably even trying to make money.
What is the standard for when making money on the web is not allowed? I lose money every year on my websites, but I don't care - because I feel those are providing a service or at least give me what I need from them.
I couldn't imagine trying to run a site that costs thousands of dollars per month without pushing for some type of return that at a minimum pays the majority of the bills.
Instead of trying to cancel someone, I would think pushing for better original content is the more useful direction.
And as for all the other sites - I'm sure they have their own rules, but if each post is singular and original, that shouldn't impact on tlol at all.
It's probably more annoying to visit all those sites and see the same stuff over and over. I don't do that. I am here for information and discussion. Drama is not beneficial to anyone, unless there is abuse that needs to be dealt with.
I see the multiple posts when major things happen, but shrug those off, because people are excitable and retarded, which makes all social media sites just dumb sometimes. I would rather not have repeated posts than original posts from a random.
There are some real randoms on here too - how are those not self-promotion? Posting videos and tweets that they make. That is the 100% definition of self-promotion, right? Yet that is good content and should be fully allowed. We all have the right to opine about anything we feel like on the free interwebs.
I don't like drama, vastly dislike hypocrisy, and would rather spend my time learning new information from whoever feels like it. If there is a topic or idea that I dislike, I just pass it over.
I would rather spend my time helping someone to better themselves than to just consistently try to get them banned. That's just me though. I have very little tolerance for cancel culture from anyone.
If you have the ability to discern intention in another person, then more power to you.
99% of people have zero ability to do this in real life - including zogbots and the jewdicial system.
Being able to do it over the interwebs elevates you to god status. (((disney))) should make a movie about you.
On a serious note - does that intention change how the users on here operate? Does reading the title of a post influence a person? Are we so gullible as to lose our sense of critical thought because of words in a headline or discussions in a comment?
At this point in the maturity of the internet, everyone deserves what they get.
That's why retardit is an echo chamber, as well as all the news sites. They each decided to cater to a very specific audience, and each one now fully revolves around that echo chamber.
Disrupting the echo chamber circle jerk is probably something that should be applauded.
Fake internet points, and all honeypots aside, there are things to be learned from everyone, and as long as the abuse isn't disrupting the site, I have no problems with any of it.
As I write this, I look at the new posts and see several in a row that are not my cup of tea, but don't care either way that they are a) shameless self-promotion, or b) pretty much content free, but I have no objection to any of it.
[ + ] ruck_feddit
[ - ] ruck_feddit 5 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 12:22:22 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 3 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 12:32:46 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 12:55:03 ago (+3/-1)*
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal -2 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 13:04:14 ago (+1/-3)*
What is your beef???
Notice: No tlol post.....
If I were you, instead of making a comment like this - post your own ORIGINAL content here from all those sites. tlol could use it.
Edit: LMAO at downvoaters - you know it's true.
This is a personal vendetta against the core concept of the web - disseminating information on sites... Yet tlol has no problem with multiple posts on the same information - as long it is from (((approved))) sources??? such kike mentality. retards.
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 2 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 13:56:33 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 14:17:15 ago (+1/-1)
Retards. No defense of their action, just kike complaining. LOL.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 14:42:15 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 17:01:16 ago (+0/-0)
Do you honestly think (((cnn))) is different???? The web developed as a way to self-promote.
You know those little "follow us on facebook" tags???? They are a remnant of the whole "visit us on cnn.com" that started it.
Here is an example from 10 years ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSUFzC6_fp8
starts at 3:15.
As for news aggregators - doesn't breitbart, zerohedge, etc collect news from all over and concentrate it at a single site? Apparently this means you have an (((approved))) list of sites that you allow...
Pretty much every post you reply to with this list is original on tlol. That is a valid use of the post feature to me.
Whether it is a retarded article or not, that is the what the downvoats are for. Users have to be given a certain level of expected intelligence, just for being on the site.
This really breaks down to a small clique on here that seemingly hate particular users. Abusive users are bad and should be dealt with on a system level, and that is what mods and owners are for.
As with all things, I gravitate toward total freedom if there ever is an issue.
Making money from the web should not be considered bad - doesn't poal do it? tlol even? coalfax is probably even trying to make money.
What is the standard for when making money on the web is not allowed? I lose money every year on my websites, but I don't care - because I feel those are providing a service or at least give me what I need from them.
I couldn't imagine trying to run a site that costs thousands of dollars per month without pushing for some type of return that at a minimum pays the majority of the bills.
Instead of trying to cancel someone, I would think pushing for better original content is the more useful direction.
And as for all the other sites - I'm sure they have their own rules, but if each post is singular and original, that shouldn't impact on tlol at all.
It's probably more annoying to visit all those sites and see the same stuff over and over. I don't do that. I am here for information and discussion. Drama is not beneficial to anyone, unless there is abuse that needs to be dealt with.
I see the multiple posts when major things happen, but shrug those off, because people are excitable and retarded, which makes all social media sites just dumb sometimes. I would rather not have repeated posts than original posts from a random.
There are some real randoms on here too - how are those not self-promotion? Posting videos and tweets that they make. That is the 100% definition of self-promotion, right? Yet that is good content and should be fully allowed. We all have the right to opine about anything we feel like on the free interwebs.
I don't like drama, vastly dislike hypocrisy, and would rather spend my time learning new information from whoever feels like it. If there is a topic or idea that I dislike, I just pass it over.
I would rather spend my time helping someone to better themselves than to just consistently try to get them banned. That's just me though. I have very little tolerance for cancel culture from anyone.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 18:05:06 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 24, 2022 19:02:24 ago (+0/-0)
99% of people have zero ability to do this in real life - including zogbots and the jewdicial system.
Being able to do it over the interwebs elevates you to god status. (((disney))) should make a movie about you.
On a serious note - does that intention change how the users on here operate? Does reading the title of a post influence a person? Are we so gullible as to lose our sense of critical thought because of words in a headline or discussions in a comment?
At this point in the maturity of the internet, everyone deserves what they get.
That's why retardit is an echo chamber, as well as all the news sites. They each decided to cater to a very specific audience, and each one now fully revolves around that echo chamber.
Disrupting the echo chamber circle jerk is probably something that should be applauded.
Fake internet points, and all honeypots aside, there are things to be learned from everyone, and as long as the abuse isn't disrupting the site, I have no problems with any of it.
As I write this, I look at the new posts and see several in a row that are not my cup of tea, but don't care either way that they are a) shameless self-promotion, or b) pretty much content free, but I have no objection to any of it.