Sign into an existing account

They have been lowering the standards since 97. I went through basic in 97 when “they” decided to let women in the infantry. Everyone was pissed from us recruits to the NCOs and COs. During our last 25 mile road march I had to carry this weak broads ruck sack on my front, my ruck sack on back along with my M16 for the last 5 miles. She graduated just same. Women should not be in combat roles all soldiers know this.

WOMEN AND MEN ARE THE SAME BIGOT!!!!

Women are meant to be acted on, not actors

Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Event #5 - Leg Tuck:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXSHlJVjpIM

Maybe this is how you answer the question, "What is a woman?"

The current fitness level of most soldiers is disgusting. I've seen more overweight sailors and those sheeboons that can't meet muster, get to fly a desk. Which means they can complain and whine and get off base housing. There's zero loyalty to the Navy, its a job they don't want but pays them. And BECAUSE they are active service they can take loans out on all sorts of shit they can't afford. Then their CO has to teach them how to balance a fucking checkbook.


OK rant over.

Even a weakling male should be able to so one. Says a lot about the strength of women

What about the duck walk, they still do that? That "exercise" is so bad for your knees; just because you can doesn't mean you should. That one needs the axe just because it can permanently fuck your cartilage.

Wtf. That's it? I didn't know what it was until I read the article... and that's fucking it?? Women are PATHETIC.

At least they'll have their pronouns squared away.

my god that ginger's chin. And is that blond a tranny? and a niggress.

REMEMBER, EVERYTHING in EVERY competence or certification TEST is put there by a dirt bag who may or maynot be insane, or sadistic, etc. DOES it REALLY prove or indicate COMPETENCE? Or is it just a kid with a magnefying glass?

People really don’t understand why we go to war as a species. Men go to war to kill off male competition so they can have more females and to steal resources from other dudes, so they can have more females. From an evolutionary point, men go to war to acquire more females. This isn’t conscious motivation, but the behaviors have their roots in our neurology from before we were even humans. The impulse of guys to kill each other comes from these ancient reproductive strategies. We can attribute all kinds of political justifications to war, but in the end, the only reason to be at war is to steal somebody elses women or to reduce the number of lower class males in your own society so that you can have more women or to steal wealth so that you can have more women or MAYBE to prevent your women and wealth from being stolen from somebody else. These are the reasons why men evolved to be good at warrior stuff and women never did.

Once people understand that this is the whole reason behind war like behavior, the idea of women in the military seems absurd. Women stand to gain far less from war than men. Women in the military is just a way to turn the military in to another social services bureacracy through which (((they))) can pander to women . They are turning the military in to some world wide social work organization.