Sign into an existing account

That was alimony and or child support/welfare.

Pay women to be disloyal

Lmao, over 50% of homosexuals were abused sexually or traumatized as children. Therefore kids are raped by gay men and become gay men or lesbians themselves. Gays have no moral restrictions and are known for having by far the most sexual partners. I’m talking hundreds if not more of sexual partners.
Jews rape kids the most though it is from this seed that the degeneracy has fomented. You liberals can’t even label your opposition correctly. No one here is a self proclaimed “conservative” as the media portrays it. We are national socialists, white nationalists. White nationalists have almost zero cases of child rape or homosexuality in their countries. Jews are the masters of projection, the masters of deception and subversion. It’s why they invented and run hollywood, which is named after a witches wand of holly wood.

46% of male homosexuals report being molested, as compared to only 7% of heterosexual men. Source:

https://archive.ph/e1kvC

Your argument would carry more weight if you actually listed some conservatives. Moreover, there must be something wrong with your NPC programming. Trump and Kavanaugn rape the pussy, not the anus. It's important that you remember the official talking points.

The problem is really not government but bureaucracies. We got rid of religious bureacracies and the bureacracies controlled by the parasitic nobility. But we exchanged that for secular government bureacracy and the private sector financial bureacracies. We stupidly thought that by strengthening private sector bureacracies we would be limiting the power of government bureacracy (communism) but they just joined forces.

People who produce tangible physical wealth have a work product that can be quantified with some level of objectivity. Food production generally has value. A car or a house has some value, usually.

The work product of bureacracies is information and the usefulness of that information is highly subjective. Complex societies need bureacracies to transmit information to different sectors of society, so that we can coordinate economically. So we can’t dispense with them. But manipulative and status seeking individuals will always be attracted to them because they are the weak spot of highly productive societies which can be exploited. Its easy to disseminate disinformation through bureacracies to increase the power and wealth of the bureacrat.

Bureaucracies are so complex as information systems that it is usually too difficult to calculate how inefficient or corrupt they really are. But evolution predicts that a population which is in the position to exploit such a niche will evolve to get better and better at exploiting it over time. And so now the bureaucrat class (public and private are now indestinguishable) insists that workers (actual wealth producers) exist to benefit inefficient bureacrats (when obviously the truth is the opposite since bureacracy is pure overhead which makes nothing). Hence white men are enslaved to bureacrats who control all cultural institutions and disseminate false economic and moral information.

Everyone knows the problem with niggers. They don’t make or do anything useful and they steal from and harm others in society. Obviously jews and a few others including some whites are doing the same thing, but they have a strategy consistent of their high IQs. Like niggers, they don’t choose to be this way— it is genetic. Opportunistic behaviors seem to vary somewhat independently of IQ— I.e. we got some real high IQ niggers fucking our world up, and some of them are white.

But we can use eugenics to eliminate the more opportunistic people from our population just as easily as we can eliminate the low IQ folks. Alot of the genetic “garbage” is at the very top.

If we minimize bureaucracy, keep bureacracies small and disconnected, eliminate hereditary bureacracy and limit or eliminate compensation to bureacrats we can solve much of the problem.

We also must reduce wealth disparity. This eliminates the incentive to be corrupt. The amish are a really good example of this. Their bureaucrats (ministers) only control small ordnungs and they all have real jobs on the side. No one has a billion dollars. The guys that have 100 times more money than the average amish person still have to wear those stupid clothes and they can’t drive a porche or divorce their wife for some trophy slut like Trump did. There’s no huge payoff for being rich in “plain” societies. So corrupt asshole types can’t thrive. My belief is that very wealthy people do not deserve their wealth because they do not create good market outcomes such as improved efficiency— they are all cheaters.

Sorry if I seemed to go on a tangent. You can’t live without rules like the libertarians think but you can minimize corruption by distributing power and limiting how much wealth and power anyone person can have. And all the policy changes in the world won’t fix shit unless you are breeding to eliminate traits like manipulativeness and greed. Its not enough to get rid of jews.

Man love Thursdays happens in Iraq too. Lot's of male Arab Muslims fuck each other. They also fuck livestock and farm animals. The reason is because there is a huge lack of available women for marriage in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

China has the same exact problem, it's the reason why faggotry is becoming rampant in the PRC. Last year the PLA had to reject 400,000 conscripts from Military service because of homosexuality.

IS bacha bazi also an Iran thing? thought it was only Afghanistan and Pakistan.

I'm not familiar with it