☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
2

How is German expansion different from zionism?

submitted by TheGreatWar to HitlerWasRight 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 19:11:17 ago (+3/-1)     (HitlerWasRight)

I'm about 200 pages into Mein Kampf and I find myself at a loss to grasp the difference between Zionism and the Pan-German sentiments espoused by Hitler. This is especially true since he makes the point that a nation is not a piece of land, but one race with one worldview. The Jew is also one race with one worldview. At the time they had no national land and were therefore easily regarded as parasites. But they now have a homeland to provide security and defense for their race. If the Jew is an eternal parasite then what use does it have for a homeland? If the Jew has a homeland then how can it be a parasite, and thus how can it be morally inferior to the German? Being a parasite is the main and perhaps only argument Hitler makes against the Jew. Is the Jew, now having realized some of its zionist dreams, on equal footing with the German?


17 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Paradoxical003 0 points 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 20:11:20 ago (+0/-0)

German expansion is done by Germans for German people, but other white ethnicities also benefit.

[ - ] Thought_Criminal 0 points 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 20:25:44 ago (+0/-0)

I'ma poke my head out the teepee and ask Chief Running Dear for you.

[ - ] dalai_llama 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 20:38:30 ago (+1/-0)

lol, as if teepee niggers could stop scalping each other long enough to realize there is more to life than peace pipes and human sacrifice.

[ - ] bosunmoon 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 20:25:54 ago (+1/-0)

Because Hitler wanted every people to dwell in their own land and remain separate in order to retain racial diversity and keep peace. The modern definition of diversity is the polar opposite of the true meaning of the word.

[ - ] TheGreatWar [op] 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 23, 2022 00:13:25 ago (+1/-0)

Hitler believed in territorial expansion backed by population growth where the superior races choke out the inferior. He absolutely didn't believe in keeping peace. He believed in eternal struggle. Please read what he wrote.

[ - ] xmasskull 0 points 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 21:17:52 ago (+0/-0)

On that,the joos want everyone one else to diversify except for THEM.

[ - ] BitterVeteran 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 23, 2022 07:29:26 ago (+1/-0)

Their 'homeland' is stolen land made 'legal' by a highly illegal contract.

Kill all jews.

[ - ] Lordbananafist 4 points 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 20:48:13 ago (+4/-0)

Germans aren’t evil

[ - ] dalai_llama 6 points 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 19:29:35 ago (+6/-0)

I just think it's hilarious that Israel is to the jews exactly what Hitler tried to make Germany to the Germans.

Yet somehow one group is "God's chosen people and our greatest ally" but the other is "the greatest threat to Europe."

[ - ] DukeofRaul 4 points 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 19:51:33 ago (+4/-0)

Its also funny the Jews homeland is Canaan.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 2 points 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 20:24:25 ago (+2/-0)

Spiritually maybe, ethnically it's almost completely khazaria these days with few exceptions due to misegination.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 3 points 3.1 yearsMar 22, 2022 20:13:26 ago (+3/-0)*

We aren't jews.
What's good for them isn't good for us, what's good for us is good for us.
Having a secure homeland and an expansive empire coming out of it is good for the people who have that.
So we want ourselves to have that, and we don't want the jews to have it, because they are our enemy, and what exclusively benefits our enemy harms us.
The reverse is also true, which is why the jews don't want us to have this for ourselves, either.
The thing that makes somrthing good or bad is who it hurts, and who it helps.

[ - ] TheGreatWar [op] 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 23, 2022 01:15:41 ago (+1/-0)

That's the conclusion I arrive at. This places the Jew on an equal moral footing with the German. Hitler's arguments for natural competition remain sound but his assertion that Jews are parasitic lacks support, at least within Mein Kampf.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 23, 2022 02:41:01 ago (+1/-0)

Jews are parasitic, but that has nothing to do with having a homeland for your nation, and an empire.

[ - ] Egg_whitey 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 23, 2022 03:09:56 ago (+1/-0)

They have their own homeland but still are parasitic in nature due to the stranglehold on banking, medicine, government, victim complex etc.

[ - ] TheGreatWar [op] 0 points 3.1 yearsMar 23, 2022 10:16:33 ago (+0/-0)

Sounds good. So then Zionism would be the nobelist of their aspirations since it is equivalent to Pan-Germanism, would it not?

[ - ] Paradoxical003 1 point 3.1 yearsMar 23, 2022 10:29:40 ago (+1/-0)

It's not the means, but the ends that matters.
Not the actions, but the people who stand to benefit or suffer from them.
Get this through your head, good and evil are characteristics of genes, not actions, of it benefits the evolutionary interests of your genes, or harms those of their competitors, then the action is good.
If the reverse, then evil.
Everything we can condemn the jews for is made worthy of condemnation because our people are harmed by their actions, but jews are the ones who stand to gain from them.

I can't make this any simpler, theres your team, and there's the team which opposes your own.

Whatever gets points for your team is good, whatever loses points for your team is evil.

Their team opposes your own, therefore whatever points they get is as good grom your perspective as a point that your team has lost.