And this isn't the first time in their history that this has happened. I usually say, "history doesn't repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme." However, in this case, it looks like history does indeed repeat itself.
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 14:15:57 ago (+2/-1)
I wouldn't be too giddy about this yet.
73% of the brits are jabbed, which includes probably 95-99% of those over 65.
The coof has been proven to be more deadly to those elderly and with health problems.
This data is just the coof having its way with the elderly, and then the "i told you so" crowd spreading it as some sort of proof.
Wait for the data to be released by age group and by per capita in jabbed vs unjabbed.
That will tell a little bit more accurate story.
When each age group tells the same story about the coof (not very likely, the younger crowd will survive coof with or without the jab) then you can say "i told you"
The better data will be the excess deaths or just overall deaths in each age group. The jab will show up in that data, not from the coof data.
This was always the actual case. Most (presumably) healthy individuals will only need to isolate at home with zero hospital intervention - those who are elderly, frail, prone to sickness or have comorbidities - diabetes, obesity etc are at most risk of 'severe outcomes' and will require hospitalisation before the experimental vaxx jab.. Add the gene therapy into it and now even the presumably healthy are at increased risk of a severe outcome ...
The fact that these leeches on society can keep spouting their obvious lies and still: a) keep living and b) keep their job, means they are supported by TPTB.
Of course the (((media))) is going to limit how much information the normies get, along with sanitizing all efforts for curious individuals to be able to find data.
Didn't the CDC just say that it won't publish data, for fear of misinformation?
How can that be a thing?
Government transparency just means that the data "identifies" as being public information. LOL
The better data will be the excess deaths or just overall deaths in each age group. The jab will show up in that data, not from the coof data.
Do you think they are going to release it if it shows the vaccinated dying more than the unvaccinated? My boomer mother ended up with a mini-stroke within 10 days of her second jab. This year she tested positive for breast cancer. Do you think the CDC will list her in those groups as part of the vaccinated?
The US military has a database for health incidents. There was a leak showing a huge spike in conditions associated with vaccine injury. What was the response to this? It was "fact checked" and "debunked" by officials claiming the database was in error for recent years before Covid, and has since been "corrected". Funny that:
The governments can cover the compilation data, but when reports start to amass about the average person dying around everyone, the anecdotal evidence will hopefully start to drive curiosity.
Many little things will compound - first it will be sportsball players that are making the news, then young people, then middle aged neighbors, etc.
When the life insurance company won't pay out because of the jab, or the rates for every kind of insurance skyrocket due to the complications, people will start to make connections.
The more the governments hide the data the more the people should start to distrust everyone.
Maybe a 10% increase in deaths won't trigger the normies to look for data, but maybe it will.
They ARE full of THEMSELVES aren't they? THe DEMAND forgiveness up FRONT, just in CASE. I say they IMAGINED that. Let's NOT give it to them. It's TIME someone was RUINED (That is NOT a nobody) takes REPONSIBILITY LOSES what the RISKED. NOT admiration of thier elite spirit. Right? Lets MAKE SURE, there IS NO cocktail party (YOU are NOT invited to) CELEBRATING their TRIMPHANT LOSSES (and COMPENSATION) (at OUR expense, but WE don't COUNT). Friends like that, WE don't NEED.
[ + ] SilentByAssociation
[ - ] SilentByAssociation 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 15:40:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 14:15:57 ago (+2/-1)
73% of the brits are jabbed, which includes probably 95-99% of those over 65.
The coof has been proven to be more deadly to those elderly and with health problems.
This data is just the coof having its way with the elderly, and then the "i told you so" crowd spreading it as some sort of proof.
Wait for the data to be released by age group and by per capita in jabbed vs unjabbed.
That will tell a little bit more accurate story.
When each age group tells the same story about the coof (not very likely, the younger crowd will survive coof with or without the jab) then you can say "i told you"
The better data will be the excess deaths or just overall deaths in each age group. The jab will show up in that data, not from the coof data.
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 15:21:23 ago (+3/-0)
Most (presumably) healthy individuals will only need to isolate at home with zero hospital intervention - those who are elderly, frail, prone to sickness or have comorbidities - diabetes, obesity etc are at most risk of 'severe outcomes' and will require hospitalisation before the experimental vaxx jab..
Add the gene therapy into it and now even the presumably healthy are at increased risk of a severe outcome ...
[ + ] obvious
[ - ] obvious [op] 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 17:05:45 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 17:11:51 ago (+2/-0)
The fact that these leeches on society can keep spouting their obvious lies and still: a) keep living and b) keep their job, means they are supported by TPTB.
Of course the (((media))) is going to limit how much information the normies get, along with sanitizing all efforts for curious individuals to be able to find data.
Didn't the CDC just say that it won't publish data, for fear of misinformation?
How can that be a thing?
Government transparency just means that the data "identifies" as being public information. LOL
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 20:48:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 21:02:35 ago (+0/-0)
Do you think they are going to release it if it shows the vaccinated dying more than the unvaccinated? My boomer mother ended up with a mini-stroke within 10 days of her second jab. This year she tested positive for breast cancer. Do you think the CDC will list her in those groups as part of the vaccinated?
The US military has a database for health incidents. There was a leak showing a huge spike in conditions associated with vaccine injury. What was the response to this? It was "fact checked" and "debunked" by officials claiming the database was in error for recent years before Covid, and has since been "corrected". Funny that:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jan/31/instagram-posts/numbers-were-based-faulty-data-military-spokespers/
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 22:07:53 ago (+0/-0)
Many little things will compound - first it will be sportsball players that are making the news, then young people, then middle aged neighbors, etc.
When the life insurance company won't pay out because of the jab, or the rates for every kind of insurance skyrocket due to the complications, people will start to make connections.
The more the governments hide the data the more the people should start to distrust everyone.
Maybe a 10% increase in deaths won't trigger the normies to look for data, but maybe it will.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 13:30:03 ago (+1/-0)
Which is why the bankers are playing a dangerous game here.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 3, 2022 09:58:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 3, 2022 01:11:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 20:46:57 ago (+0/-0)
It's verking!
[ + ] thebearfromstartrack4
[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 17:49:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] albatrosv15
[ - ] albatrosv15 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2022 15:58:12 ago (+0/-0)