Sign into an existing account

Its overworked underpaid and new diversity hire pilots and pilots passing out from cardiac problems.

Lolz, OK Sure smooth brain - here's your opportunity to explain ..... or just Tell us you didn't read/ understand this meta study of 5G scientific data without telling us .

I could doxx myself, but I would rather not. I have extensive experience related to such things. And, I did mention the MIT technology review. I'm not your mom, I'm not going to do everything for you. Search it if you're curious. The danger of 5g manifests especially in that it uses higher frequencies that do not propagate as effectively over a long distance, so antennas must be added essentially to most street poles. While the radiation is non ionizing, that still presents a myriad of potential risk factors to have those antennas much closer to our bodies at all times. I believe even things like wifi would take decades and proper scientific studies to actually prove that we are harming ourselves in a subtle but very real way. Not to mention the surreptitious capabilities of these systems, especially utilizing the vectors that DARPA doesn't want you to know are possible. (Think things like using beamforming antennas and wifi signals as a sort of "radar" to detect movement or create somewhat of an interior map of locations, etc). Not all is what it seems. The problem with 5g is there expressly aren't really any good sources, because like the vaccine, you are the guinea pig to see if and how biological life is affected. Of significant note also is that current cellular data networks are plenty fast even for streaming HD video in real time. Why do we need faster speeds, and why the extreme push by these corporations and the government to roll out 5g while people are distracted with a contrived pandemic? Or, are those claims a mere smokescreen for more lofty and nefarious goals?