×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
38

Once we win, Eugenics must return.

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 10:54:22 ago (+41/-3)     (whatever)

We must restore the numbers of rarified recessive phenotypes.

Blonde and red hair, blue and green eyes, pale and fair skin, freckles and dimples, these must not vanish from the earth.

More broadly, we must restore the white race, not just to increase the numbers of the global white population (comparative to the world's other races), but also to improve the genetics of our people, we must strive to improve the genetic potential behind their natural capabilities.

Weve been shown the horrors that come from a nation that is full of genetic inferiority, they inevitably pull everything down around them.

Like (((Alisa Rosenbaum))) had said, it's not the superman who threatens the subhuman, but the subhuman that is the danger to the superman, like crabs in a bucket, the subhuman would prefer everyone die than that on would live any better than another.

The subhumans among our own race must be dealt with before we can be strong enough to deal with those outside our people.


54 comments block


[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 8 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 11:18:38 ago (+8/-0)

No argument. Blond and red hair, blue and green eyes, fair skin. Imagine a world, a paradise only inhabited by fair skinned peoples. Imagine if we hadn't spent the past century plus propping up inferior, parasitic races to the detriment of our own? If we could only get rid of the tendency of the White race to be empathetic. But then we'd be White niggers. No, better we get rid of the interior races and focus that empathy on ourselves.

[ - ] Reawakened 2 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 14:00:10 ago (+2/-0)

Imagine if we hadn't spent the past century plus propping up inferior, parasitic races to the detriment of our own?

This says it all in a nutshell. That needs to stop and it needs to be drilled into every generation from this day to the end of time.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 26, 2022 15:08:22 ago (+0/-0)

There was a college professor who forced her pro socialist students to share a grade, the average of all their grades.

They failed the first class, their scores for the rest just kept getting worse. The students spent all their study and class time attackung one another, or seething at one another.

I say we do something similar to open borders proponents, we take sone stranger and force the globalist to live with the stranger, whatever happens, they cannot kick out of the house or even do much as request that they leave, the stranger must have all their needs met, food, shelter, etc. All at the expense of the homeowner. See how long they last.

[ - ] aleleopathic 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 14:24:30 ago (+1/-0)

Imagine if we hadn't spent the past century plus propping up inferior, parasitic races

But we didn't. Jews did, with our money, stolen at gunpoint.

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 3 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 11:58:26 ago (+3/-0)

and who is going to implement that? The government? That's the problem.

Sir Francis Bacon came to the conclusion that the only way to save the world would be a religion based around the idea of Eugenics.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:50:31 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 14:00:47 ago (+1/-0)

No! Thats the worst thing. Royalty/nobility form and endogamous caste and begin to evolve parasitic traits over time. All organisms evolve to exploit their niche more efficiently. Aristocrats do this by becoming better parasites. No genetic elites ffs!

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 16:45:19 ago (+1/-0)

i don't know the correct answer, but there is a reason that jews try to get rid of monarchies.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 17:12:52 ago (+1/-0)

-That they don't control.

Fixed.

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 17:46:33 ago (+0/-0)

That is true, but it is much harder to corrupt a monarch because they want their kingdom to be healthy and successful.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 18:09:17 ago (+0/-0)

Well yes, because in a monarchy, it is YOUR kingdom.

As in, the whole country is a piece of property handed down throughout the family line.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 27, 2022 02:58:08 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 28, 2022 19:19:13 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:58:03 ago (+1/-0)

We govern ourselves. Who gives a fuck if others recognize our authority? Call it a religion. Thats what the jews do. There really is no difference between religion and government anyway.

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 14:04:23 ago (+0/-0)

Of course there is. Governments are permanently changing their opinions on things. Religions are much slower in that regard.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 15:36:20 ago (+1/-0)

No. I mean government and religious hierarchy are just cultural authorities that manage our ideologies, maintain enforcement of taboos. We are genetically programmed to follow/obey religion/government which is why its hard to tell where one leaves off and the other begins. They occupy the same part of your brain. Kings are always gods or representatives of gods (dieu et mon droit). It was only enlightenment fags that thought these were separate things and even then they never imagined that the government would become explicitly anti-christian.

Theres no difference between religious morals and secular laws. They come from the same place. They are rules that are in place to promote the well being of a group of economically cooperative humans who are related genetically. Our justice system is so corrupted by jews that it doesn’t even resemble a sane moral regime. But that is the purpose of any functional justice system. The unvarnished truth is: morals are just good economic policies.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:11:37 ago (+0/-0)

A Whites-only government.

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:20:16 ago (+1/-0)

Governments are too incompetent and corrupt for that. Even if white only. It kind of worked in Germany because there were extensive "background checks" for the officials, but nowadays people are just too degenerate.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 14:55:14 ago (+0/-0)

That religion is the one taught in the bible. When one reads it, they'll understand that race is an important component.

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 14:56:20 ago (+0/-0)

Christianity is all about feeding the poor. Eugenics is about getting rid of them instead.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 15:50:31 ago (+1/-0)

Christianity also had some sensible policies, like not letting priests reproduce, not allowing polygamy, not allowing out-of wedlock sex, and placing sanctions on bastards, all which acted as eugenics policies with big impacts on the populace.

I wouldnt say eugenics is about getting rid of the poor but preventing them from being born. I think preventing the rich from being born is equally important. Enforced monogamy of the christian era did that to a great extent.

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 26, 2022 09:08:35 ago (+0/-0)

Not letting priests reproduce is dysgenic because priests always had above average intelligence. Not allowing polygamy is also dysgenic, because you are limiting the reproduction of the alpha males. Banning abortions is also highly dysgenic...

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 26, 2022 14:21:43 ago (+0/-0)

I couldn’t disagree more. You are only thinking about IQ. If IQ was the only trait that mattered jews would be fabulous people.

Yes ability to do calculus and build stuff and read and write and speak well is important. Equally important are the traits for honesty, hard work, cooperativity, egalitarianism. Whites do this better than other groups on average. But there are always wolves in the fold. You think hi IQ makes us good productive white people? It doesn’t.

There are many whites who, like jews and niggers, are opportunists. They are not interested in creating a meritocracy in which people are rewarded for the productivity, and we all cooperate and behave responsibly. They only care about maximizing their power over other people. Lots of these people have high IQs

This is all niggers care about but they are so stupid and obvious, they resort to outright violence and theft. Jews use complex legal, economic, and ideological institutions to exploit and manipulate people. Many white gentile elite are playing the same game.

Our elites— the Bushes, the Clintons, the Bidens, the Trudeaus— have behavioral traits that set them apart from most whites. Power attracts them. They’ve always been like this. When they weren’t exploiting the serfs in their own countries, they were exploiting irishmen or selling opium to the chinks or importing niggers in to the new world or making deals with jews.

The problem IS the alphas. I feel like I have explained this aspect of human evolution alot in my comment on polygamy and somehow, you’re the one guy on this site that hasn’t seen them.

The reason why whites and some asian groups evolved to be less violent and more cooperative and hard working was they began to practice monogamy which worked economically better in colder climates for early eurasian hunter gatherers. Thats why everybody else is less impulsive than niggers and abos. All other eurasians have some ancestors who were cold climate monogamists.

Whereever polygamy can succeed males become hypercompetitive. This is NOT GOOD. Males begin hoarding females and they will kill each other to do so (niggers) and they will also steal from each other if there is any heritable wealth in the society (muslims) . This is why you must prevent the alphas from reproducing with more than one female.

You would think that the guys here who constantly bitch about hypergamy and a lack of available females would have some awareness about the behaviors that cause them. But I guess not.

This is the profile of an alpha: more greedy for women, more greedy for shekels so he can have more women, more violent so he can kill off his competitors so he can have more women, more willing to exploit and enslave his fellow males so he can cock block them and have more women. They are not meritocratic— they hoard resources to hoard women. These are the traits that make a successful polygamist.

This is why muslim societies are so corrupt and violent. Its not because they read the koran. Polygamy is a genetic condition. Societies become very corrupt when they let it flourish.

It disincentivizes cooperation between males and productivity of males. It destroys trust. The most efficient allocation of male productivity is monogamy, in which each male has a wife and children and each male has an incentive to work.

Contrast with polygamy where the top 10% have 2 or more females and the bottom 10 or 20 percent have no females. The top ten percent will have more children than they can support well with an honest job (the kind of job no jew would have), ie, lower levels of paternal investment per child. The bottom 10 to 30% of males (young, poor) have no females and therefore no reason to work. Men with no females spend all day murdering and stealing from their male competition to acquire a scarce number of available females. Why should these rogue males maintain fair play in a society where they are cock blocked by rich guys?

The most aggressive, libidinous, machiavellian males acquire the most females and the reproductive payoff is huge for these assholes. The society is flooded with the progeny of alphas, who will all want to be alpha and all have alpha behavioral traits. They don’t play well. They aren’t honest, they are cutthroat. They are also all perverts and rapists. These are the traits you select for when you allow alphas to reproduce 3x to 10x as much as the average dude, a population of violent corrupt horny assholes.

Monogamists are selected for entirely different traits. Being a good supporter of the family. Not fucking other dudes’ women. Acting in a chivalrous manner. White guy stuff. As much as you guys hate to admit it, you are heavily selected for traits that females favor because white males compete for the highest value female.

Polygynists compete for the highest number of females, a strategy that intensifies intrasexual competition between males and incentivizes all kinds of dirty tricks between males.

Which polygamist societies are productive and not full of corruption? None.

Priests are bureaucrats. Their job is informational (moral) . Historically they have been political and legal authorities. Bureaucrats create no wealth. They are informational overhead of an economy. We need bureacrats but they are inherently dangerous because if they become entrenched they can manipulate cultural information to increase their power and exploit the workers. So you never want them to breed or at least you don’t want them to make any real money and you don’t want to let any of their children inherit their positions. Otherwise bureaucrats will evolve parasitic traits . They will be selected for parasitic genes, you see?

The founding population of jews were a caste of priests in some early bronze age city-state. The founding jew population got terrifically successful manipulating the laity with religion. There is no other theory of origin that makes sense to me. If you let a bunch of corrupt priests breed and get powerful and exploitive, they would look just like jews imo— good at the law, good at story telling, good at conning people out of shekels, smart— I could go on. Jews are the result of letting priests marry. They got efficient at manipulating people through religion and then they expanded in to other bureacracies.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 15:02:35 ago (+0/-0)

Christianity is all about feeding the poor.
no, it isn't.

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 15:04:24 ago (+0/-0)

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 15:09:30 ago (+0/-0)

nice try. keep reading

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 17:07:28 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 16:46:07 ago (+0/-0)

"nation" isn't just a location

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 23:19:30 ago (+0/-0)

No shit.

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 27, 2022 09:05:10 ago (+0/-0)

obviously you understand that, otherwise you wouldn't have said what you said.

I was pointing out the (((christian nation))) narrative that says we should give people in africa shiny things so that they say they are christian, and then we need to support them forever because they are just like us.

[ - ] UndercoverGoyim 3 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 11:50:15 ago (+3/-0)

The altruism of Whites is by far their biggest weakness. Too many Whites think that nurturing shitskins and mongrels is a virtue. This is why redpilling a few boomers on eugenics is sort of pointless; kikes and shills are indoctrinating Whites faster than we can redpill them, not to mention the mass importation of shitskins that are always going to be hostile to our people.

Taking control of the narrative is the one thing that will save the White race.

[ - ] localsal 4 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 12:25:08 ago (+4/-0)

The other half of that is "selective prosecution", where Whites are targeted with more severe penalties for protecting themselves. This makes Whites afraid to do anything to save their own causes.

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 16:53:43 ago (+1/-0)

I think we are getting the narrative slowly. many more people know a little now, and it is just a matter of time. It has become way too obvious that you can't relax, and the reason some things/places are nice is because of the people there.

We need to get back to high trust, and this can be done in smaller locations and then spread out.

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 2 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:12:44 ago (+2/-0)

I'm less concerned with saving rare hair and eye colors than I am with increasing intelligence and wisdom. If more people understood science, rather than just blindly cheerleading it, the plandemic would have failed before the vax came out.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 26, 2022 01:34:11 ago (+0/-0)

We need to do better at eliminating traits for deceit and corruption. Weve rooted out a lot of impulsive nigger-like behavior from our population but at the top of the social hierarchy are a different set of bad actors. They use exploitation and manipulation of data to steal and murder. They’re just a more sophisticated kind of nigger. Our white leaders go along with jews and stab their own people in the back for shekels. And the same group was basically doing the same a few centuries ago.

The only way to eliminate corruption and tyranny is to engineer a more egalitarian population. We can never allow anyone to have a million times more money than the average person’s annual income! In a meritocracy, no one is ever that meritorious. No one is a million times more productive. You are simply rewarding the most psychopathic greedy people in that scenario. Only unusually greedy people will have power and that shit is genetic.

[ - ] ForgottenMemes 2 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 11:19:28 ago (+2/-0)

The argument I use for eugenics it that (nearly) all public policy is either eugenic or dysgenic. Welfare, abortion, taxation, 3rd world immigration, feminism, pedohomo tolerance, etc. These are all dysgenic policies. Having a dysgenic policy is totally immoral and can not be tolerated in a healthy society.

A big part of liberalism is pretending the are not opportunity costs for things (like affirmative action) by insisting these are a dichotomy you destroy the arguments for them. Most normal fags will not argue if you simply say you want to hire more blacks. Affirmative action is taking jobs from more qualified whites and giving them to less qualified blacks. This is almost impossible to sell to anyone who is not a rabid libshit. This tactic works amazingly well for eugenics.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 18:22:35 ago (+1/-0)

I love it when you talk like that. Can there be gallows? and guillotines? and firing squads? and electrocutions? and ovens? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE?

[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 2 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 22:56:39 ago (+2/-0)

Colloseums

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 16:41:27 ago (+1/-0)

i think we need hyper eugenics though. if 2 reds marry and start having kids there needs to be huge pressures for them to make as many children as possible. Maybe things like in-home childcare to help the mother, preferred placement at jobs for the father (similar to what low iq people currently get), no property tax, free houses, etc.

things similar for blond hair, blue eyes, green eyes, etc. but to a lesser degree.

I am not a redhead by the way.

people who have mixed-euro would be neutral treatment, and if you decide to burn coal or something then society won't really care about you.

[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 15:29:08 ago (+1/-0)

"Eugenics is evil!"
"Fight the evil Nazis!"
"They're breeding a Master Race of blue-eyed, blonde supermen!"
...thus began World War Two.
Shortly after rousing the entire western world to unite against Germany's evil plan to breed intelligence, artistry, beauty and strength for the benefit of humanity, the "anti-eugenics" jews, who condemned the practice (after a millennium of stealing European genes), destroyed the German people.
Once gaining full control over western nations, they then introduced welfare, affirmative action, "equal rights" and open borders to facilitate their own eugenics program for the west. Instead of intelligence, artistry, beauty and strength, the "anti-eugenics" jews have devastated every White nation by breeding stupid niggers, talentless queers, ugly muslims and weak spics in all our nations.

Hitler's eugenics program strengthened the human race. It was real progress.
The jew's eugenics program is designed to destroy the human race.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 17:15:53 ago (+1/-0)

The jews never ran any eugenics programs.

Unless you count the ones they took over and turned into temples of moloch, like planned parenthood.

[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 27, 2022 03:36:30 ago (+0/-0)

In my opinion, the Catholic Church was a jew-run eugenics program.
After the Romans razed their temple in 70AD, the jews invaded Europe as refugees and called themselves Kazarian (People of Caesar). All education and higher learning was controlled by the church. Only intelligent people were allowed to become scholars and enter the priesthood. Priests were forced to take a vow of celibacy. Rabbis were encouraged to have as many children as possible. After 2,000 years of this policy, the ashkenazi jews raised their average IQ a standard deviation above their European hosts. As primitive as it was, that was a eugenics program.

[ - ] Hoobeejoo 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:26:33 ago (+1/-0)

Either through eugenics or dygenics, nature will cull thr heard. I prefer eugenics as it plays to strength while dysgenics plays to the lower common denominator.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:14:20 ago (+1/-0)

I'm more for ensuring retards(85IQ and less) and vicious/insane criminals cannot procreate, and to offer incentives for those of 115+ IQ to procreate. The other stuff is nice, but is as an aside to our great people's intellectual prowess.

This of course being after removal of the jews and shitskins from our countries.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 2 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:23:44 ago (+2/-0)

You underestimate the importance of recessive physical traits.

The appearance of your people matters immensely.

In fact, the argument "race is just skin color" would fail even if race were just skin color.

For having different familial groups which could be distinguished from each other by sight would inevitably lead to conflict between them, where the one with less success blames the more successful for their failures, accusing them of coming upon their greater share of prosperity by underhanded means.

Just the same, the prominence of the unique aesthetic traits of our people us vital to the survival of our people as a whole, to see a population of whites who are possessed of the hair or eye colors of the lower races not only raises doubts about their heritage, but harms the morale of our people in that the most beautiful of our traits has successfully been snuffed out by those envious other races who hate them for their unique beauty.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 26, 2022 00:02:43 ago (+0/-0)

I agree that our unique aesthetics are nice, but I think that IQ and overall intelligence should be the main attribute that we work towards.

That isn't to say we ignore the other stuff, no 1-armed hunch-backed geniuses here. We can absolutely be big, smart, good-looking folks despite what jew media would say about only having one thing at a time.

There should also be a population of natural Whites left to their own devices, just in case we fuck things up somehow. A voluntary force of scientific controls. Just so long as they are genetically tested from time to time to ensure no jews or shitskins made their way in somehow.

[ - ] _Obrez 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 23:40:55 ago (+0/-0)

once we win that means no jews, no jews means genetic engineering isn't going to be a tool to destroy us as a people so we will use this rechnologt to solve in a couple of generations what hard eugenics would have taken a half dozen to achieve, further if we offer it to other countries we could easily see many turn white, india and the latin world favor fair skin and european features, japan and other east and south asian countries love anime and european aesthetics so much they would engineer the next generations to be happa anime characters.

We just need to set racial purity laws for genetic engineering in europe to protect the original ethnotypes.

We solve the africa problem by paying our niggers to go to africa in exchange for their citizenship. Call it reparations then letting them starve.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 16:28:47 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 17:17:12 ago (+0/-0)

I totally do want to live in a mobile home.

But one that is actually mobile.

[ - ] zr855 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 14:02:58 ago (+0/-0)

Reads like a kikes fantasy about "nazisim". Kike confirmed. Who is up-voting this kike?

[ - ] Sherb 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:57:46 ago (+0/-0)

We are already living in an eugenics society. You guys see it as grooming what you want in the next generation, but for the big boys already in place, they see it as reducing global population/getting rid of whites.

Both side are bad. If you select only what you want, you and your "side" will get weaker. You can literally breed yourself out of existence after a few generations.. and then you become the j.

[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 13:36:02 ago (+0/-0)

I'm SO sick of stupid people (lbierals) and blacks (sub stupid apes). It THIS isn't prima facia evidence of WHY we DO NOT "tolerate" their presence, I don't know what is. MAYBE thats the whole point of this "Exercise". In WHICH case I ALSO pick the "elites" who are NOT who thought UP this object lesson.

[ - ] zr855 -1 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 14:03:44 ago (+0/-1)

Everyone upvoting this is a glownigger.

[ - ] Monica -1 points 3.3 yearsFeb 25, 2022 11:28:50 ago (+0/-1)

hu get tym foe rehd dat shyt muh broh myns be tryppn