Sign into an existing account

Seems like a bit of a reach. Was the kike who wrote this drivel struggling to find a blog topic? It's such a seemingly random choice, but like an inkblot test, the reactions of this author shed a bit of light into the darkened recesses of the jewish psyche.

Her entire article, even the basic thesis that this mass-marketed Hollywood crap is any different from Hollywood's other mass-marketed crap stems from her assumption that if she were to visit the town portrayed in the film, her big kike nose and stupid NYC accent would make her stand out.


Look at all the baggage she attaches to a simple question that one might ask an unfamiliar visitor in a small town. Even in her wine-based fantasy she readily acknowledges that she is clearly not from around there. So, they aren't supposed to ask where she came from? This is the kike mindset on full display. She's pissed she wouldn't be able to infiltrate there.

deleted

deleted

This is kind of condescending review, despite the writer praising it. She makes some really stupid comments, like suggesting there is something significant to the name Mason, as in Mason-Dixon. Charles Mason was an English astronomer who with Jeremiah Dixon surveyed the boundary between the North and South from what is now West Virginia to Delaware.

She also uses some less than respectful vocabulary, such as white-bread America and WASP-iness, and makes sure she mentions that she's a jew in the last sentence. I also disliked this sentence: "There is an almost Tolstoyan grasp of human imperfection and the way families provide a space not only for grotesqueries but also for tolerance." What the hell does that even mean?

I might watch the movie, but that would be despite her crap review.