Or... just have secession an integral part of the system. If I don't like my local supermarket manager I change supermarket, there's no need to kill him. Worst cast scenario I can make my own. Same should apply to courts and governments.
The problem there is your supermarket manager doesn't control anything outside the supermarket. If he's the only supermarket, then yes people do want to kill him as they talk about in remote communities when one guy is charging 10 dollars for an apple, and nobody can afford food.
When election cheating makes it impossible to remove the king, you have to set an example for all future kings. That's why justice has to be seen to be done or there's no justice.
The problem there is your supermarket manager doesn't control anything outside the supermarket. If he's the only supermarket, then yes people do want to kill him as they talk about in remote communities when one guy is charging 10 dollars for an apple, and nobody can afford food.
Whenever I hear of scenarios like that I'm always more inclined to ask questions like "why is he the only supermarket?" or "is he the one driving up apple prices or are they high for some other reason?" or "why can't people buy directly from the orchard?".
It's rarely the case that physically threatening the final vendor in the supply chain helps.
When election cheating makes it impossible to remove the king, you have to set an example for all future kings. That's why justice has to be seen to be done or there's no justice.
Depends. If you can just as easily secede from the kingdom the king's ability to negatively impact you is minimal, so the need for beheadings isn't very strong.
If, on the other hand, he attempts to stymie that process then I agree: No mercy. There should be zero tolerance for infringing natural rights.
The problem has been the slow takeover. Democracy worked when women's job was to shame the fucktards, and the oligarchs couldn't so easily buy the civil service and the parasite politicians.
The problem isn't any system; it's the absolute idiots running it. Absolute fucking idiots will run natsoc.
The school board meetings and lections have been empty for twenty years. Everyone wants someone to run it for them.
Anon is not wrong. Harold Covington repeatedly said the purpose of democracy was to prevent change and he was not wrong. NOTHING has been changing except the kikes and their "loyal supporters" are getting richer and degeneracy is getting worse (look at the faggot freak show who manages nuclear waste).
A country operating under a democracy is no different that a person living with cancer long term. Would you want that on your border? Go ask Putin. With luck he will succeed with ease. China has managed to keep Democracy off is borders as well.
Some other lies adjacent to democracy itself are that other systems must be barbaric (they say "undemocratic" to mean that), and that people are not represented unless they all have a direct vote.
With the intention of exposing how people are trained/brainwashed into wanting democracy above anything else, I think it would be interesting to make vocal supporters explain specifically and convincingly why it is better than, for example, the Roman patronage system.
Now that I think about it, when only men voted, that was a microcosm of patronage with the man as the patronus and his family the cliens.
I knew something seemed FAKE about it. FUNNY thing IS, an "elite" thinks THIS is intellegent and SMART. hahaheeHeeHaHaHEEHEEHEEHEEHAHAHAHAHEEHEEHAHaheeheehahahmmhahaheeHeeHaHaHEEHEEHEEHEEHAHAHAHAHEEHEEHAHaheeheehahahmmhahaheeHeeHaHaHEEHEEHEEHEEHAHAHAHAHEEHEEHAHaheeheehahahmmhahaheeHeeHaHaHEEHEEHEEHEEHAHAHAHAHEEHEEHAHaheeheehahahmmhahaheeHeeHaHaHEEHEEHEEHEEHAHAHAHAHEEHEEHAHaheeheehahahmm
It will always be about what problems people want to tackle. You have just one ruling class now and they just choose to tackle problems that will net the globalist the most money and power.
Democracy is all about taking as many things that people can make private decisions about, and making them into public services that people then have to fight over decisions about. Very, very little justifies being put into public decision.
Spoken by someone who clearly doesn't understand the difference and thus sees none. These are incredibly different systems and why the country doesn't get destroyed by a single idiot. It takes an overwhelming majority to accomplish something. Not a simple majority. You're proving my point with your blatant ignorance.
You fail to differentiate between simple and overwhelming majorities. Democracies also have zero measures to balance cities and rural life, which we do through mechanisms such as the bicameral legislature and the electoral college.
As far as governmental systems go, it works well. Corrupting that system is what has caused it to not work well. If the US were an ethnostate, then we wouldn't be having these these problems.
You fail to differentiate between simple and overwhelming majorities. Democracies also have zero measures to balance cities and rural life, which we do through mechanisms such as the bicameral legislature and the electoral college.
Measures to balance cities and country areas are just changing who the political majority are. They don't alter the power of the majority.
As far as governmental systems go, it works well. Corrupting that system is what has caused it to not work well. If the US were an ethnostate, then we wouldn't be having these these problems.
The US was an ethnostate. All of those checks and balances failed to prevent the corruption.
It does not work well, no centralised system on the scale of the US can work well. Democracy (and that's still what it is) is broken.
That's not what the bicameral legislature and electoral college do. You seem not to grasp the nature of function of these bodies.
The US was a majority white, but was never set up as an ethnostate. Germany was an ethnostate because it consisted of Germans. White doesn't count as an ethnicity and it only seems that way here because black people have no fucking clue where they are from. Ask a black person what their heritage is in the US, and they'll say "black" or some nigger version of it. As a black person that almost anywhere else and you won't get that answer. Go to Europe and ask white people what their heritage is and I guarantee you they won't just say "white". Calling "white people" white deprives white people of all the culture they have created between Scottish, Irish, British, Italian, French etc. So, no. The USA was never, by definition, an ethnostate.
The one thing we do seem to agree on is the fact that the USA is too large and too diverse of opinion to continue in its current form. That, I will agree to.
That's not what the bicameral legislature and electoral college do. You seem not to grasp the nature of function of these bodies.
The electoral college effectively acts as a scalar field upon people's votes altering the majority. It's supposed to be another layer of representative decisionmaking but it never worked like that in practice.
The bicameral legislature prevents a few states from dominating all the others through weight of population. That also alters where the majority lies, but doesn't prevent it existing.
The US was a majority white, but was never set up as an ethnostate. Germany was an ethnostate because it consisted of Germans. White doesn't count as an ethnicity and it only seems that way here because black people have no fucking clue where they are from. Ask a black person what their heritage is in the US, and they'll say "black" or some nigger version of it. As a black person that almost anywhere else and you won't get that answer. Go to Europe and ask white people what their heritage is and I guarantee you they won't just say "white". Calling "white people" white deprives white people of all the culture they have created between Scottish, Irish, British, Italian, French etc. So, no. The USA was never, by definition, an ethnostate.
White americans were effectively an ethnicity of their own at that point. And yes, the US was set up as an ethnostate.
The one thing we do seem to agree on is the fact that the USA is too large and too diverse of opinion to continue in its current form. That, I will agree to.
Yes. Not only that but no country that size can be called a nation.
This is revisionist bullshit written by ignoramus and upvoted by similar.
Democracy was assaulted and subverted.
The enemy was silent and sitting still.
They promoted. Women's votes. They knew the outcome. Universal votes plus low iq immigration. They took over education and removed understanding of the impact of social policies.
They took over the media. Good ppl were slandered and vile uppers had their dirt hidden
They funded dirty politicians. They funded academia to promote destructive policies.
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 9 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 22:15:13 ago (+11/-2)
[ + ] NationalSocialism
[ - ] NationalSocialism [op] 8 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 22:16:33 ago (+9/-1)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 6 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 22:22:41 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] NationalSocialism
[ - ] NationalSocialism [op] 4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 22:26:09 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 02:15:20 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 09:46:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 21:00:43 ago (+0/-0)
When election cheating makes it impossible to remove the king, you have to set an example for all future kings. That's why justice has to be seen to be done or there's no justice.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 21:10:48 ago (+0/-0)
Whenever I hear of scenarios like that I'm always more inclined to ask questions like "why is he the only supermarket?" or "is he the one driving up apple prices or are they high for some other reason?" or "why can't people buy directly from the orchard?".
It's rarely the case that physically threatening the final vendor in the supply chain helps.
Depends. If you can just as easily secede from the kingdom the king's ability to negatively impact you is minimal, so the need for beheadings isn't very strong.
If, on the other hand, he attempts to stymie that process then I agree: No mercy. There should be zero tolerance for infringing natural rights.
[ + ] calx
[ - ] calx 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 22:34:01 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 22:55:09 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:18:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Belrick
[ - ] Belrick -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:20:29 ago (+2/-3)
Go get boosters.
Sozi is for losers sociopaths and cunts. Actual men embrace ancap
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 5 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:26:08 ago (+6/-1)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 00:21:13 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 00:40:49 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] calx
[ - ] calx 6 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 22:19:18 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 02:12:41 ago (+4/-0)
The problem isn't any system; it's the absolute idiots running it. Absolute fucking idiots will run natsoc.
The school board meetings and lections have been empty for twenty years. Everyone wants someone to run it for them.
[ + ] RecycledElectrons
[ - ] RecycledElectrons 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 05:35:18 ago (+3/-0)
All people are created to be equal under the law.
That's the difference.
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 00:29:08 ago (+3/-0)
No need to convince the public of a things value at all.
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:57:01 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 09:56:45 ago (+1/-0)
A country operating under a democracy is no different that a person living with cancer long term. Would you want that on your border? Go ask Putin. With luck he will succeed with ease. China has managed to keep Democracy off is borders as well.
[ + ] SithEmpire
[ - ] SithEmpire 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 03:47:22 ago (+1/-0)
With the intention of exposing how people are trained/brainwashed into wanting democracy above anything else, I think it would be interesting to make vocal supporters explain specifically and convincingly why it is better than, for example, the Roman patronage system.
Now that I think about it, when only men voted, that was a microcosm of patronage with the man as the patronus and his family the cliens.
[ + ] thebearfromstartrack4
[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 12:55:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Bigdeal
[ - ] Bigdeal 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 12:16:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 07:55:15 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 09:47:10 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 03:28:32 ago (+0/-0)
This video explains what anon was thinking pretty well
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 03:26:31 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] enormousatom
[ - ] enormousatom -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 07:35:20 ago (+2/-3)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 09:47:56 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] enormousatom
[ - ] enormousatom 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 19:27:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 20:29:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] enormousatom
[ - ] enormousatom 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 21, 2022 06:43:05 ago (+0/-0)
As far as governmental systems go, it works well. Corrupting that system is what has caused it to not work well. If the US were an ethnostate, then we wouldn't be having these these problems.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 21, 2022 08:09:49 ago (+0/-0)
Measures to balance cities and country areas are just changing who the political majority are. They don't alter the power of the majority.
The US was an ethnostate. All of those checks and balances failed to prevent the corruption.
It does not work well, no centralised system on the scale of the US can work well. Democracy (and that's still what it is) is broken.
[ + ] enormousatom
[ - ] enormousatom 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 21, 2022 16:52:41 ago (+0/-0)
The US was a majority white, but was never set up as an ethnostate. Germany was an ethnostate because it consisted of Germans. White doesn't count as an ethnicity and it only seems that way here because black people have no fucking clue where they are from. Ask a black person what their heritage is in the US, and they'll say "black" or some nigger version of it. As a black person that almost anywhere else and you won't get that answer. Go to Europe and ask white people what their heritage is and I guarantee you they won't just say "white". Calling "white people" white deprives white people of all the culture they have created between Scottish, Irish, British, Italian, French etc. So, no. The USA was never, by definition, an ethnostate.
The one thing we do seem to agree on is the fact that the USA is too large and too diverse of opinion to continue in its current form. That, I will agree to.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 22, 2022 15:50:33 ago (+0/-0)
The electoral college effectively acts as a scalar field upon people's votes altering the majority. It's supposed to be another layer of representative decisionmaking but it never worked like that in practice.
The bicameral legislature prevents a few states from dominating all the others through weight of population. That also alters where the majority lies, but doesn't prevent it existing.
White americans were effectively an ethnicity of their own at that point. And yes, the US was set up as an ethnostate.
Yes. Not only that but no country that size can be called a nation.
[ + ] Belrick
[ - ] Belrick -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:25:01 ago (+3/-4)
Democracy was assaulted and subverted.
The enemy was silent and sitting still.
They promoted.
Women's votes. They knew the outcome.
Universal votes plus low iq immigration.
They took over education and removed understanding of the impact of social policies.
They took over the media. Good ppl were slandered and vile uppers had their dirt hidden
They funded dirty politicians. They funded academia to promote destructive policies.
Damg ppl get educated.
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 4 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:57:47 ago (+5/-1)
[ + ] Splooge
[ - ] Splooge 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 03:56:21 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:34:43 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 09:49:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 4hourAccount
[ - ] 4hourAccount -5 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 02:13:50 ago (+0/-5)
you stupid niggers need to go
my eyes bleed looking at you all
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 03:36:01 ago (+2/-0)