×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
12

You can vote your way into socialism but you have to shoot your way out.

submitted by OriginalGoat to whatever 2.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 09:27:34 ago (+13/-1)     (whatever)

I respect most people on this site but I have a confession to make - I'm not really a soldier like most of you. In the growing scope of getting people to wake up I would consider myself an alarm clock, albeit most people require a metric fuckton of breadcrumbs before they start waking up I've found some things. First of all, ranting is only effective in the later stages of waking somebody up, otherwise, the effect is actually negative. Secondly, the magical dirt theory, if presented at the right time is the most effective tool in getting people to think but alas, I'm not writing this post to explain my strategies to help people arrive at a critical thinking destination - I'm writing this to voice my concerns about a singular topic.

I've found that the easiest thing to get people to align with is the concept that lazy people are the worst parts of society and those that do nothing cost the most. Next up is actually niggers, people are generally pretty open to the fact that niggers ruin good things - magical dirt theory really proves this without a lot of room for contention. The final step (albeit slow and tedious to getting here) is convincing people that the kikes manipulate the niggers to create discourse while the kikes subvert society and backdoor degeneracy into everyday life through controlling the media, public education, debt and politics. That's tough but most people that get to niggers eventually make it to kikes.

Again, not my struggle. I've studied economics at a college level and I always thought that basic economics were generally indisputable and therefore a great place to get people to start asking questions. The most basic form of treason against economics is rent control. I shouldn't have to explain this to everyone here but the only way to keep rent reasonable is to have a free marketplace on rentals, rent control is the governments way of purchasing votes from naïve voters who want something good right now. The most important thing with rent control is that when it's implemented it's hot potatoes. Rent as many places as you can get your filthy little hands on when rent control is implemented because in 10 years you'll be a fucking sultan. You see, rent control absolutely abolishes the balance between supply and demand and suddenly taking in tenants is extremely dangerous because if you get shitty tenants you're stuck with them for maybe years. If you charge too low of rent today then you're renting at a loss tomorrow because tenant rights makes eviction extremely tedious and expensive. So, housing crisis emerges on the coattails of rent-control and everyone believes that more government is the answer. I see it everyday, people say "the government needs to step in and get these greedy landlords under control" but they're missing the actual picture because it's not painted in black and white.

The concept of rent-control destroying the housing market and creating a housing disaster is not one that comes with an A causes B explanation. It's A coupled with B, C and D over time will cause absolute poverty for anyone who's not rich. So, it's a hard concept for people to grasp that with rent-control comes less granny suites because tenants aren't worth the hassle, locked-in low rates stops people from moving out of units that are too big for them because smaller units cost more due to the "new market" being too small for the demand because people hang onto their old units and then the final and worst aspect of rent-control... The rich know what rent-control means, so they'll take advantage by doing what I said earlier and renting themselves up a large amount of units at the start of rent-control and just have them cause in 10 years they'll cost nothing. Landlords will stop renovating units because the rent can't change anyway, they'll choose to allow a building to fall into disrepair so they can evict everyone and then renovate the entire building and re-rent it with much higher rents. All of this combined leads to an insane housing crisis that's all caused by rent-control.

It's this exact reason why you can vote your way into socialism but you have to shoot your way out. I don't want to admit to too much cause I'm sure that you all already believe I'm a faggot but I wasn't actually that extreme before I took economics. It was learning how absolutely uninformed society is that lead me to where I am today but I'm facing difficulties. To wake people up to the lazy, means that people have to not be lazy and if they're not lazy there's a good chance they're already there. Wake people up to niggers? Simple if they're already there. Same with kikes but much more eventual and gradual.

To start the process generally requires some education and I've found myself running into brickwall after brickwall trying to educate people on the dangers of socialism. I learned about the magical dirt theory from voat and it's paid dividends but only for people that are starting to wake up. I truly believe that economics is the best way to get people started but need a better approach.

Thanks for your time faggots.


6 comments block


[ - ] HeyJames 5 points 2.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 10:00:31 ago (+5/-0)

Socialism is fine if everyone is white and women don't have rights.

Hitler was right

[ - ] OriginalGoat [op] -1 points 2.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 10:41:35 ago (+1/-2)

Socialism is the antithesis to innovation.

[ - ] HeyJames 4 points 2.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 10:47:40 ago (+4/-0)

Don't agree with this. The third Reich invented more than any other government during its short existence

[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 2 points 2.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 17:22:29 ago (+2/-0)

True, but go read a bit on NotSoc, especially Hitler's quotes, there should be plenty of posts on this site.

If I had to briefly describe it. It didn't follow the socialist path that we know. It was flexible. If some areas needed to be capitalistic, they would be capitalistic. If some areas needed to be socialistic, then they would be socialistic.
The people came first, the economic ideology came second.

[ - ] GlowNiggerDick 1 point 2.3 yearsFeb 15, 2022 13:49:33 ago (+1/-0)

What Natsoc at the time was simply an Authoritarian system. You can call it whatever you want but at the end of the day the only difference between the German system, and the Russian system was the guy running the show. Stalin was a paranoid sociopath who stole power, Hitler was a guy that people gave power and wanted to be Charlemagne 2.0 for his people who he loved. The way Germans ran things, human rights took a back seat, just like they did in Russia. The sad reality is there isnt a "humane" way to deal with egomaniacal ethno-religious zealots that hide behind liberal laws, corrupt politicians, and use their vast international nepotistic networks to psychologically, culturally and financially dominate countries and their people. The solution requires and end to basic freedoms, and opens the doors for a guy like Stalin to take over after the good guy dies or retires. Sadly there is no "good" form of government. Its all bad.

[ - ] natehiggers 4 points 2.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 11:05:07 ago (+4/-0)

Nothing wrong with National Socialism