Im also not sure why you think you have room to talk on the subject. I would allow every nigger dog in the world to visit my house before i ever let your slimy kike ass in.
Dalmatians and shitbulls are low IQ impulsive shit-breeds. Agree on the others though. Rotties and GS are great dogs but can become neurotic and learn bad habits with the wrong owner. Have seen it many times and it takes years to break habits and abuses suffered and learned as a pup with these breeds but it can be done.
Shitbulls, Dalmatian, American Labrador, huskies, and other low tier shit breeds cannot be fixed. They have just as much hope of being safe around children as aborigines do of becoming rocket scientists
Fight the power! amiright? Let someone else build it and you can use it as you want because that's how communism works! All the bennies, none of the effort! And you can tell the janitor to go fuck himself as you shit on the floor! Hellsyeahfeelsgood! Do you get tired of the basement always being the coldest room in the house?
Are you a sockpuppet of FagKikeQueero or just another kike infiltrator? You both exhibit the same low-functioning autism behaviors. How someone who lacks the ability to communicate like a normal person became a mod around here I'll never know, but you're a shining example of why all mods are faggots.
Stop trying to control people’s right to have a pitbull. People with common sense should not have to be jewed with this shit. What the fuck is the matter with you people? You aren’t regulated enough?
help we need more lawyers to save us from ourselves.
Ok, so we acknowledge pitbulls can't be trusted around children (or the elderly, or other dogs, or other pets, or adults, or...). So if you have a right to have a pitbull what does that mean? Do you have to keep it chained up on your property at all times? Are you not allowed to come withing 6ft of another living thing while going out for walks?
Like maybe if you live in the middle of alaska with no contact with anyone that might work, but for most people it means they can't have a pitbull.
Until they smash their owner's face into the ground and kill that cat (the website said it made a "miracle escape" but I doubt it.)they looked like perfectly happy, normal dogs.
I don’t really agree pitbulls can’t be trusted around children. I think a small percentage cant be trusted around children and its difficult to tell which ones they are. Having said that, they are on the order of 1000 or maybe 10,000 x more likely to kill a toddler than a retriever. They have a never-give-up intensity which really bad when they have your jugular in their jaws. That also makes them very intimidating as a security dog. They absolutely intimidate niggers which is why niggers get them. There is a need for them in some quarters. You really might want that intensity in some situations. Unfortunately theres no guarantee that intensity will be directed in the direction you want, with any intense breed.
Ive handled more than my fair share of dogs including pits. Ive found them to be very loveable although sometimes a bit unhinged. I also had a large aggressive dog for many years. He was from a “family friendly” breed. Capable of tearing holes in people. Tore a couple in me. Memories. I actually really miss him. But once I knew what I had I just developed protocols, no kids, no petting, etc. A good fence is necessary. I don’t live in the country.
I never assume a dog won’t bite. Its like saying “that person wil never hit”. People who adopt pitbulls should assume they are prone to aggression until they know the dog very well. I would never assume any pit should be around my toddler until I had alot of first hand experience with that particular dog. Thaat is something you can’t trust to a babysitter.
Yeah the babysitter should have known these dogs couldn’t handle a toddler. But the dad is a jackass, he must have known this person had pitbulls. I frankly wouldn’t trust any dog larger than my toddler to be with that toddler unless knew the dog really well.
Dog aggression is a probability, low or high, and breed is a moderately good predictor, but this is a slippery slope. Why wouldn’t they also ban boxers and rottweilers and mastiffs and german shepherds? If you let jews regulate this shit they will absolutely go after every breed thats ever bitten a kid. You can’t get a dog with a guarantee to not be aggressive to your family. Any dog breed that’s going to effective at home security will come with this sort of risk. They are not as reliable as a gun. They are more autonomy which can be good or bad.
There is no easy solution for this imo. Fags here think “get rid of nigger dogs- problem solved” but they won’t stop at pit bulls, and I tend to think that, to a large extent, their threat to little kids/innocent neighbors is proportional to their effectiveness to serve as a deterent. You just have to be a safety fag with these power breeds.
I just had a family member get a really powerful security breed. The husband wanted it. But neither know what the fuck they are doing — dog virgins with little kids. I managed to talk them out of a male. That right there reduces the risk by about 90%. If you look at these attacks, they are overwhelmingly males, and I bet alot of them are intact.
Recall in the middle ages the irish employed dangerous dogs to guard their territory alot. Even though they occassionally attacked kids— Im sure we can think of an example.
TLDR I guess Im saying their usefulness correlates to their risk which is true for several other security breeds. .
There is a need for them in some quarters. You really might want that intensity in some situations. Unfortunately theres no guarantee that intensity will be directed in the direction you want, with any intense breed.
I'd rather have a dog I can train to be intense. Defending your home with an uncontrollable dog is like buying a claymore instead of a shotgun to deal with home intruders.
Dog aggression is a probability, low or high, and breed is a moderately good predictor, but this is a slippery slope. Why wouldn’t they also ban boxers and rottweilers and mastiffs and german shepherds?
Do german shepherds have anything near this reputation? I don't think they do. They make excellent guard dogs, but the key difference is that their aggression can be trained.
I get the problem with purity spirals, but that goes both ways. If it's ok to keep a pitbull in a suburb is it ok to keep a slightly more dangerous animal? If you keep going that way then some idiots will be taking their pet bear or tiger for a walk in the park.
Recall in the middle ages the irish employed dangerous dogs to guard their territory alot. Even though they occassionally attacked kids— Im sure we can think of an example.
Ok, sure, if you live in a warzone with constant clan raiding it might make a lot of sense to keep an extremely dangerous animal to patrol your ringfort at night. But those animals were not kept in the same areas as children and their owners checked to make sure no one was around before they were released to patrol at night.
That practice is not compatible with open plan suburbs.
Plus, even if we do say "ok, you can keep a pitbull as a limited use security dog," we still need people to be aware that they are not suitable as family pets and aren't cute lapdogs.
The problem is you can’t teach it. German shepherds are more trainable and more reliable but less intense. Sometimes you want a claymore. I mean they are certainly more trainable than a claymore, they are not totally random in their attacks but they are harder to control, yes.
Do german shepherds have anything near this reputation? I don't think they do. They make excellent guard dogs, but the key difference is that their aggression can be trained.
Sometimes. Sometimes they bite. Its hard to say how much more dangerous pitbulls are vs shepherds in terms of fatal attacks. I tend to think pits are alot more populous in the US because niggers tend to have them in the south and they dont fix them. They are a very large proportion of shelter dogs, maybe close to half. There are probably 5 to 10 times the number of pitbull fatalities as shepherd fatalities. But shepherds are definitely in the top 5 killer breeds.
Does that mean that all pitbulls are high risk dogs? I must emphasisize no. I was bit on the leg by a GS when I was about 8 btw, running away from him. Anecdotal of course. But not unheard of. Of course he didn’t rip my throat out which maybe he gets some points for.
if you live in a warzone with constant clan raiding
We’re getting there.
ok, you can keep a pitbull as a limited use security dog," we still need people to be aware that they are not suitable as family pets and aren't cute lapdogs.
But this isn’t true. Most make great pets. Many have very low aggression. There are millions of these dogs in the US. They are safer than niggers by many orders of magnitude. Niggers kill like 10,000 people a year here. Pits kill like 100. Its really not like leaving your baby with a tiger. I still wouldn’t do it. But I wouldnt leave my baby with a GS either.
The problem is you can’t teach it. German shepherds are more trainable and more reliable but less intense. Sometimes you want a claymore. I mean they are certainly more trainable than a claymore, they are not totally random in their attacks but they are harder to control, yes.
How many police forces or professional security companies use pits as security animals? Now do alsatians. There's a reason for that.
Pits were bred to kill dogs and other animals in fighting pits. They were never intended to be lapdogs or guard dogs.
They are safer than niggers by many orders of magnitude. Niggers kill like 10,000 people a year here. Pits kill like 100.
Like I said "more dangerous things exist" does not stop them being a problem.
I don't think their is a "right" to a breed of dog. You don't have a right to a tiger or lion. They are called "pit bulls" because it was literally bred for being put in a pit to fight another dog with all the ferocity of a bull.
Goldfish never kill toddlers. Ban all dogs and everyone can have goldfish for companions.
Nah thats’ nuts. Lets just ban breeds that have killed toddlers: pitbulls, rottweilers, boxers, bulldogs, huskies, malamutes mastiffs, akitas, chows, labs, german shepherds, danes, dobermans, basically any dog over 60 lbs.
Once you let jews decide which dogs you can own they will never stop. Shepherds occassionally kill too. If they were as common as pitbulls you woul see a lot more German Shepherd attacks. Where you draw the line at acceptable fatalities of innocents is always going to be arbitrary. Why is 100 deaths a year unacceptable but 10 is okay? Jews will not let you have any security breeds if you start down this road. I dont think its your right to tell me what breed I can have.
Iirc, pits kill more than all those other breeds combined. They're the niggers of dogs. That said, I agree that the gob'ment doesn't have any right to prohibit owners from keeping any breed of dog whatsoever.
No, look at the stats and the dates of deaths due to mauling. Records have been kept for the 100 years or so. St. Bernards are first, followed by pit bulls. Nothing else is even close. They are not conducive to society, just like niggers.
Honestly, all dogs can attack it’s just pits are made to do it and have a higher likely hood.
If you split the litter up at the end of the 8th week, and they get proper training that doesn’t include treats, doesn’t rely on purely positive methods and the dog gets properly crate trained. Then you will have a great pit for your entire life.
Problem is most white dog owners are dumb, so if you have a nigger or a spic raising it you’re in a world of trouble. Add to it that this breed of dog is being bred in the hood by an overwhelming number you d people (people who don’t know what they are doing but think it’s a good way to make money) well now you’re in for a disaster.
Fuck you kike. You probably think guns kill people too. Its not the nigger dogs fault people are soy cucked fucking morons who cant be a pack leader. Its not the nigger dogs fault that it wasnt put up properly around toddlers. They are the perfect home defense weapon.
When tools arent used properly, thinks tend to go wrong. Dogs dont come with instruction manuals, and people are inherently retarded.
Shitbulls are a trash nigger breed who should all be put to death. I got attacked by pit bulls as a kid and this is not an uncommon experience. Your probably think niggers can behave if trained as well lmao
I never said anything about training. I said they ere the perfect home defense weapon and should be put away properlywhen not in use. Niggers who cant follow these simple rules should be charged with attempted murder.
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 7 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 08:38:09 ago (+11/-4)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:01:50 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 11:05:19 ago (+1/-0)
Think a charity of "Shotguns for Shitbulls" would gain some traction...especially if the owners received a charitable contribution with their dog.
[ + ] Qwertytoal
[ - ] Qwertytoal 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:12:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 09:08:13 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 09:54:13 ago (+1/-1)
Shitbulls, Dalmatian, American Labrador, huskies, and other low tier shit breeds cannot be fixed. They have just as much hope of being safe around children as aborigines do of becoming rocket scientists
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:06:34 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 11:52:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 12:20:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 12:19:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 17:46:06 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Blackpowerwhitepowder
[ - ] Blackpowerwhitepowder -3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:02:25 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 12:19:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:07:16 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 11:08:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 17:50:37 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] breh
[ - ] breh 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 14:14:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Cinj
[ - ] Cinj 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 16:08:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 17:44:24 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Cinj
[ - ] Cinj 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2022 15:04:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 14, 2022 17:20:50 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Cinj
[ - ] Cinj 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2022 03:08:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2022 06:37:57 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Cinj
[ - ] Cinj 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2022 13:11:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 15, 2022 20:12:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] jigganiggaboo
[ - ] jigganiggaboo 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 20:27:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] armday2day
[ - ] armday2day 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 12:13:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 09:57:23 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 09:39:06 ago (+1/-2)
Stop trying to control people’s right to have a pitbull. People with common sense should not have to be jewed with this shit. What the fuck is the matter with you people? You aren’t regulated enough?
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 5 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 09:51:14 ago (+5/-0)
Ok, so we acknowledge pitbulls can't be trusted around children (or the elderly, or other dogs, or other pets, or adults, or...). So if you have a right to have a pitbull what does that mean? Do you have to keep it chained up on your property at all times? Are you not allowed to come withing 6ft of another living thing while going out for walks?
Like maybe if you live in the middle of alaska with no contact with anyone that might work, but for most people it means they can't have a pitbull.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:05:20 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:11:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:35:33 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:37:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] QuasiVoat
[ - ] QuasiVoat 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 11:37:22 ago (+0/-0)
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/vicious-pit-bulls-pull-helpless-10755320
Until they smash their owner's face into the ground and kill that cat (the website said it made a "miracle escape" but I doubt it.)they looked like perfectly happy, normal dogs.
[ + ] Teefinyomouf
[ - ] Teefinyomouf 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 14:52:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 11:21:54 ago (+1/-2)
Ive handled more than my fair share of dogs including pits. Ive found them to be very loveable although sometimes a bit unhinged. I also had a large aggressive dog for many years. He was from a “family friendly” breed. Capable of tearing holes in people. Tore a couple in me. Memories. I actually really miss him. But once I knew what I had I just developed protocols, no kids, no petting, etc. A good fence is necessary. I don’t live in the country.
I never assume a dog won’t bite. Its like saying “that person wil never hit”. People who adopt pitbulls should assume they are prone to aggression until they know the dog very well. I would never assume any pit should be around my toddler until I had alot of first hand experience with that particular dog. Thaat is something you can’t trust to a babysitter.
Yeah the babysitter should have known these dogs couldn’t handle a toddler. But the dad is a jackass, he must have known this person had pitbulls. I frankly wouldn’t trust any dog larger than my toddler to be with that toddler unless knew the dog really well.
Dog aggression is a probability, low or high, and breed is a moderately good predictor, but this is a slippery slope. Why wouldn’t they also ban boxers and rottweilers and mastiffs and german shepherds? If you let jews regulate this shit they will absolutely go after every breed thats ever bitten a kid. You can’t get a dog with a guarantee to not be aggressive to your family. Any dog breed that’s going to effective at home security will come with this sort of risk. They are not as reliable as a gun. They are more autonomy which can be good or bad.
There is no easy solution for this imo. Fags here think “get rid of nigger dogs- problem solved” but they won’t stop at pit bulls, and I tend to think that, to a large extent, their threat to little kids/innocent neighbors is proportional to their effectiveness to serve as a deterent. You just have to be a safety fag with these power breeds.
I just had a family member get a really powerful security breed. The husband wanted it. But neither know what the fuck they are doing — dog virgins with little kids. I managed to talk them out of a male. That right there reduces the risk by about 90%. If you look at these attacks, they are overwhelmingly males, and I bet alot of them are intact.
Recall in the middle ages the irish employed dangerous dogs to guard their territory alot. Even though they occassionally attacked kids— Im sure we can think of an example.
TLDR I guess Im saying their usefulness correlates to their risk which is true for several other security breeds. .
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 11:39:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 11:47:11 ago (+0/-0)
I'd rather have a dog I can train to be intense. Defending your home with an uncontrollable dog is like buying a claymore instead of a shotgun to deal with home intruders.
Do german shepherds have anything near this reputation? I don't think they do. They make excellent guard dogs, but the key difference is that their aggression can be trained.
I get the problem with purity spirals, but that goes both ways. If it's ok to keep a pitbull in a suburb is it ok to keep a slightly more dangerous animal? If you keep going that way then some idiots will be taking their pet bear or tiger for a walk in the park.
Ok, sure, if you live in a warzone with constant clan raiding it might make a lot of sense to keep an extremely dangerous animal to patrol your ringfort at night. But those animals were not kept in the same areas as children and their owners checked to make sure no one was around before they were released to patrol at night.
That practice is not compatible with open plan suburbs.
Plus, even if we do say "ok, you can keep a pitbull as a limited use security dog," we still need people to be aware that they are not suitable as family pets and aren't cute lapdogs.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 13:19:59 ago (+0/-0)
The problem is you can’t teach it. German shepherds are more trainable and more reliable but less intense. Sometimes you want a claymore. I mean they are certainly more trainable than a claymore, they are not totally random in their attacks but they are harder to control, yes.
Sometimes. Sometimes they bite. Its hard to say how much more dangerous pitbulls are vs shepherds in terms of fatal attacks. I tend to think pits are alot more populous in the US because niggers tend to have them in the south and they dont fix them. They are a very large proportion of shelter dogs, maybe close to half. There are probably 5 to 10 times the number of pitbull fatalities as shepherd fatalities. But shepherds are definitely in the top 5 killer breeds.
Does that mean that all pitbulls are high risk dogs? I must emphasisize no. I was bit on the leg by a GS when I was about 8 btw, running away from him. Anecdotal of course. But not unheard of. Of course he didn’t rip my throat out which maybe he gets some points for.
We’re getting there.
But this isn’t true. Most make great pets. Many have very low aggression. There are millions of these dogs in the US. They are safer than niggers by many orders of magnitude. Niggers kill like 10,000 people a year here. Pits kill like 100. Its really not like leaving your baby with a tiger. I still wouldn’t do it. But I wouldnt leave my baby with a GS either.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 14:39:42 ago (+0/-0)
How many police forces or professional security companies use pits as security animals? Now do alsatians. There's a reason for that.
Pits were bred to kill dogs and other animals in fighting pits. They were never intended to be lapdogs or guard dogs.
Like I said "more dangerous things exist" does not stop them being a problem.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:04:00 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 12:08:36 ago (+2/-0)
Nah thats’ nuts. Lets just ban breeds that have killed toddlers: pitbulls, rottweilers, boxers, bulldogs, huskies, malamutes mastiffs, akitas, chows, labs, german shepherds, danes, dobermans, basically any dog over 60 lbs.
Once you let jews decide which dogs you can own they will never stop. Shepherds occassionally kill too. If they were as common as pitbulls you woul see a lot more German Shepherd attacks. Where you draw the line at acceptable fatalities of innocents is always going to be arbitrary. Why is 100 deaths a year unacceptable but 10 is okay? Jews will not let you have any security breeds if you start down this road. I dont think its your right to tell me what breed I can have.
[ + ] QuasiVoat
[ - ] QuasiVoat 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 17:01:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 17:48:45 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 11:13:11 ago (+1/-0)
Then again, I am also a big fan of the death penalty. Up against the wall with your beast.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 17:49:37 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Blackpowerwhitepowder
[ - ] Blackpowerwhitepowder -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:01:45 ago (+0/-2)
If you split the litter up at the end of the 8th week, and they get proper training that doesn’t include treats, doesn’t rely on purely positive methods and the dog gets properly crate trained. Then you will have a great pit for your entire life.
Problem is most white dog owners are dumb, so if you have a nigger or a spic raising it you’re in a world of trouble. Add to it that this breed of dog is being bred in the hood by an overwhelming number you d people (people who don’t know what they are doing but think it’s a good way to make money) well now you’re in for a disaster.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:08:52 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 08:28:56 ago (+4/-6)
When tools arent used properly, thinks tend to go wrong. Dogs dont come with instruction manuals, and people are inherently retarded.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 5 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 08:48:49 ago (+9/-4)
Do agree that I'd let them in before a kike
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 08:54:11 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 09:43:59 ago (+2/-1)
That's training talk
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:09:31 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy -2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 10:49:45 ago (+0/-2)
How do you like that you fucking big nose kike?
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle -1 points 2.2 yearsFeb 13, 2022 17:51:40 ago (+0/-1)