Is that so, because I have seen your posts and you do not use the king james to make your smears. You use jew funded bibles. Do your smear with the King James Original version and I will show fool you are. Even though that is easy to do.
Only defense of pedophilia if you believe that the Bible is thr exclusive authority on moral matters, which I obviously do not.
You used a corrupted and jew funded version that changed the meaning of the passages and censors other passages at convenience of the synagogue. You relativize the meaning of Good and Evil out of convenience as well.
The whole point of my post was that moral judgements can originate from extra-biblical sources.
When Good and Evil are relativized at convenience of the one making the statement. That is basically saying "Stealing may be bad for you. But out of hunger you may steal, does that make you bad?" While you put that behavior in a context that "forces" one to steal, you look to relativize the bad behavior because of "reasons".
Stealing is bad. Period.
Let's use another extreme scenario:
Killing is bad, but if it is between your life and anothers', then is that good or evil?
This is where the smearing continues by saying that turning the other cheek means that we let our detractors to strike us. Which is not true. It means to evade the attack and let them know that we stand firmly as equals. Killing in the context it was given meant murder.
You shall not murder. If someone is killed out of self defense that is not bad. If it was just killing that is bad, then the Word would not say that murderers have to be put to death, or that sodomites and degenerates deserve death. And so on and so forth.
Your smearing was done with corrupted versions of the Bible. Nothing more. And the fact that you say that moral judgements can originate from extra-biblical sources is deceptive as well because it purposely leaves behind convenience of those that emit such false judgements.
Relative morality is based, it's your morality that's jewed.
Some deontonological rule like do not steal or do not murder is bad because it disregards the circumstances, but it's far worse flaw is that it makes no distinction between one person and another.
It's monstrous in this way, which puts it exactly on par with utilitarianism.
Human identities and their relationships to one another go completely ignored, human are reduced to being faceless, indistinguishable, interchangeable, and expendable.
It's inhuman and repulsive so.
Not all people are the same, and not all people should be valued the same.
People should be valued differently in accordance with the relationship they have to the actor.
So yes, relative morality is about making judgments that are convenient to the actor, because that's how it should be.
You wouldn't be the kind of parent who would consider your own child as being of equal moral importance to you compared to any other child, such as the child of a complete stranger, would you?
Relative morality is based, it's your morality that's jewed.
Your convenience makes you a slave of the jews. Not me. While I and my brethren will be hunted by the jews and their slaves we will make our stand because we are free of the synagogue's dogma. Our spirit is free. While yours is simply dead.
The rest of your stance is of no interest to me. Once again you have dodged the challenge for you to use the King James Original version to make your smearing.
I will not debate your convenience as I already know it is the cause of your actions and statements. Is the behavior of a coward.
Your morality is slave morality, it makes no distinction between kin and those who are not.
Whether the system is consequentialist (like marxism) or deontonological (like the Bible), normative ethics are designed to fail precisely because they are normative.
Just applying some rule or ends across the whole of humanity, without making distinctions or establishing priorities, is what had led both to take turns fucking the world up and being the other for their failures.
You create the cycle of rise and fall, a good morality must be partial, it must be exclusive, it must be hierarchical.
These kinds of ideas of utilitarian and deontologocal ethics are the things that are promoted to us by those in power precisely because they are what keeps these jews in power.
The jews are happy to discriminate, they will easily say who is more important to them than others.
They will have a whole hierarchy of moral obligations, and will know each person's place on it.
Kin selection is important, any moral ideology that fails to integrate kin selection is doomed to failure.
Kin selection is where morality comes from in the first place, denying it it's place means creating a moral system without regard for the purpose morality was always intended to serve, the purpose that has shaped out moral instincts and psychology, that which compels us to be moral and not behave immorally.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:27:37 ago (+1/-0)
Believing in imaginary friends is 100% proof of insanity
[ + ] sguevar
[ - ] sguevar [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:29:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:30:53 ago (+1/-0)
Youre welcome
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 01:17:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] sguevar
[ - ] sguevar [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:00:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 21:50:24 ago (+0/-0)
Its Kings James Version, not Kings James Original Version. Its KJV not KJOV.
Retard.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 00:06:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] sguevar
[ - ] sguevar [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 00:30:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 07:53:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] sguevar
[ - ] sguevar [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 08:57:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:02:15 ago (+0/-0)*
The whole point of my post was that moral judgements can and do originate from extra-biblical sources, even for Christians.
[ + ] sguevar
[ - ] sguevar [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:10:29 ago (+0/-0)
You used a corrupted and jew funded version that changed the meaning of the passages and censors other passages at convenience of the synagogue. You relativize the meaning of Good and Evil out of convenience as well.
When Good and Evil are relativized at convenience of the one making the statement. That is basically saying "Stealing may be bad for you. But out of hunger you may steal, does that make you bad?" While you put that behavior in a context that "forces" one to steal, you look to relativize the bad behavior because of "reasons".
Stealing is bad. Period.
Let's use another extreme scenario:
Killing is bad, but if it is between your life and anothers', then is that good or evil?
This is where the smearing continues by saying that turning the other cheek means that we let our detractors to strike us. Which is not true. It means to evade the attack and let them know that we stand firmly as equals. Killing in the context it was given meant murder.
You shall not murder. If someone is killed out of self defense that is not bad. If it was just killing that is bad, then the Word would not say that murderers have to be put to death, or that sodomites and degenerates deserve death. And so on and so forth.
Your smearing was done with corrupted versions of the Bible. Nothing more. And the fact that you say that moral judgements can originate from extra-biblical sources is deceptive as well because it purposely leaves behind convenience of those that emit such false judgements.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:24:09 ago (+0/-0)*
Some deontonological rule like do not steal or do not murder is bad because it disregards the circumstances, but it's far worse flaw is that it makes no distinction between one person and another.
It's monstrous in this way, which puts it exactly on par with utilitarianism.
Human identities and their relationships to one another go completely ignored, human are reduced to being faceless, indistinguishable, interchangeable, and expendable.
It's inhuman and repulsive so.
Not all people are the same, and not all people should be valued the same.
People should be valued differently in accordance with the relationship they have to the actor.
So yes, relative morality is about making judgments that are convenient to the actor, because that's how it should be.
You wouldn't be the kind of parent who would consider your own child as being of equal moral importance to you compared to any other child, such as the child of a complete stranger, would you?
[ + ] sguevar
[ - ] sguevar [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:29:03 ago (+0/-0)
Your convenience makes you a slave of the jews. Not me. While I and my brethren will be hunted by the jews and their slaves we will make our stand because we are free of the synagogue's dogma. Our spirit is free. While yours is simply dead.
The rest of your stance is of no interest to me. Once again you have dodged the challenge for you to use the King James Original version to make your smearing.
I will not debate your convenience as I already know it is the cause of your actions and statements. Is the behavior of a coward.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 09:42:31 ago (+0/-0)
Whether the system is consequentialist (like marxism) or deontonological (like the Bible), normative ethics are designed to fail precisely because they are normative.
Just applying some rule or ends across the whole of humanity, without making distinctions or establishing priorities, is what had led both to take turns fucking the world up and being the other for their failures.
You create the cycle of rise and fall, a good morality must be partial, it must be exclusive, it must be hierarchical.
These kinds of ideas of utilitarian and deontologocal ethics are the things that are promoted to us by those in power precisely because they are what keeps these jews in power.
The jews are happy to discriminate, they will easily say who is more important to them than others.
They will have a whole hierarchy of moral obligations, and will know each person's place on it.
Kin selection is important, any moral ideology that fails to integrate kin selection is doomed to failure.
Kin selection is where morality comes from in the first place, denying it it's place means creating a moral system without regard for the purpose morality was always intended to serve, the purpose that has shaped out moral instincts and psychology, that which compels us to be moral and not behave immorally.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 11, 2022 23:29:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] sguevar
[ - ] sguevar [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 12, 2022 00:31:16 ago (+0/-0)