Sign into an existing account

So you take the truths, and correct the lie.
Ideas don't come only in complete sets, you dolt, dogmas do.
And the modularity even of those are up for debate.

I think we can glean tidbits to give insight into the kike agenda enjoy completely condemning her writing or putting her on a pedestal. Rand worshippers are pathetic though.

She made a lot of good points.

deleted

deleted

Yes.
She told viral truths, parts of her philosophy are Indespensibly good.
Where they fall short, you merely make the necessary corrections.
It's not much work, the fact that you are acting like its some impossible or unknown feat in philosophy to make your philosophy with parts of the ideas of others, either by taking one philosophy and making improvements, or taking the ideas of different philosophers and meshing them together, or doing both, taking all of the ideas from different philosophers, then combining them, altering them, or adding in parts of the ideas you've provided.
Philosophy is about the pursuit of truths, not about the pursuit of agreement.
One can be heavily inspired by one philosopher, but that doesn't make one a disciple who is always in perfect agreement.
One can be heavily inspired by multiple philosophers who disagree on things, saying that each is right about some specific subject, even if it is your opinion that, generally speaking, they are wrong.
Or one could say that their ideas are correct only after they were modified thusly, or given to some new application.
This is philosophy, not religion, it's incredibly modular, the strongest possible links between ideas could only be a chain of logic which connects them together by establishing a necessary causal or conclusive relationship.