this is a serious attack on many fronts. i understand this is just a small town and will go through challenges in courts and whatnot, but the idea here is make it too expensive for gun ownership, but also to get some back door legal liability for gun owners so they can be sued and attacked via the courts. expensive on the front end, but WAY too expensive (or worse) if you dare to use your gun - even in self defense. Dems HATE self defense, cause you need to be dependent on the government for your "protection".
But the criminals will NOT purchase liability insurance. Only the LAW ABIDING (don't NEED it, but SUBSIDIZE? those criminals?) get it. You should KILL the criminals INCLUDING the ones who REQUIRE insurance from the LAW ABIDING (don't NEED it).
You are completely fucking retarded. You can't be required to purchase a product. You aren't required nor have a right to purchase a car; therefore, you can be forced to purchased insurance to use it. You have a right to your body and a gun; therefore, cannot be compelled to buy insurance for them.
That is what I said via multiple comments. That you couldn't put that together demonstrates you are too stupid to be posting or commenting with adults.
You’re such a fag you don’t see how you’re saying one thing and then saying the exact opposite. You don’t have the right to buy one thing but have the right to buy something else. You’re the fucking retarded niggerfaggot. Fuck off.
I have the right to buy whatever the fuck I want. You’re stupid as fuck.
Okay faggot. you can buy your car but you don't have the right to drive it. You don't have the right to drive on streets. It's a privilege. It can be taken away. You low IQ simpleton. Only one thought process can enter your mind. You can't branch to related and relevant ideas. That's the mentality of a retard or nigger. I bet you work a cash register.
It’s a privilege in your mind because you are a bitch to the government. You’ve let them make you think they are allowing you to do things in life. You’re the problem. Do not make children.
You don't have a right to a driver's license. It is considered a privilege because you are on roads paved by public funds. So, you can buy a car (effectively, that is a right) and you don't have to buy insurance, if you're not a driver, but add in the license and you can be required to buy insurance. On the other hand, requiring insurance on a gun could cause an infringement on your rights, because fsiling to buy the unsurance would allow the government to take action upon your owning a gun.
Gettng to point B from point A could be accomplished through various means and you have a right to get from point A to point B. You don't have the right to make that travel in whatever manner you choose, because it could very easily trample the rights of others. Owning a gun does not trample on another's rights. Shooting the gun wherever you want is not a right. Because a gun is to be used to protect one's life or liberty, having one and the ability to use it in need, cannot be restrained by limitations or requirements that some may not be able to meet, such as, the purchase of insurance.
A homeless man on the streets has the right to live without a home. He has the right to a gun. He cannot be required to give up either of those rights because of a requirement to pay the government which could only be done via money that he has a right to avoid.
Does one have a right to any commodity?
You have the right to keep and bear arms, but nobody is required to give you one. You have the right to travel, but nobody is required to give you a car or roads or gas. If you have a gun, you have a right to keep it and should have the right to keep it on you. If you have a car, though you should have the right to keep it, you don't have a right to a place to keep it or to use it on public lands.
If you own a howitzer, nobody would be required to give you a place to store it. Okay, I'm rambling at this point, but things are not always black and white. The justification for one item doesn't automatically transfer to another.
Unfortunately, they can pass whatever law they get enough votes for. It is up to the citizenry to bring a lawsuit to stop it. And it has to go through the liberal CA courts.
San Jose is not a small town. It is the third most populous city in the most populous state. There are over 1,000,000 REGISTERED residents in San Jose.
legal fees in the event you shoot someone trying to rob your home and the cops decide to arrest you
I'd like to see you try and collect that money. I'd be willing to bet $100 you would never see a dime from your claim. This is also pretty state-specific, as many blue states have laws requiring you to flee if possible, and make it very difficult to prove that you didn't have the opportunity to flee.
they are trying to get you, one way or another. the linked article is just another way to try and make you a criminal for not following their commie ideology.
The annual fee will amount to between $25-$35 and will be paid to a nonprofit, which will distribute the money among groups offering services like suicide prevention counseling and firearm safety training.
Found the jew connection/ actual goal. Tens/hundreds of thousands of people paying $30 a year to a single "nonprofit". I am sure everyone on here already knows about how various jews are all over any kind of work with "organizations" like this, and any other "charities" that don't go so far as to perform physical labor.
Edit: San Jose is not 'small town' OP.
San Jose, officially San José is the largest city in Northern California by both population and area. With a 2020 population of 1,013,240, it is the third-most populous city in California (after Los Angeles and San Diego) and the tenth-most populous in the United States.
Edit 2: Damn, the welfare niggers and other broke-asses don't even have to pay. The people who would be actually committing "gun violence" because "dey hongry" get a free fucking pass. 🤡🌎
The pioneering ordinance provides exceptions to active and retired police officers, people with a license for concealed carry, and poor people facing financial hardships, who wouldn’t be able to afford the additional costs.
If someone could afford shit, they wouldn't be out committing armed robbery, this bill is just a way to track and transfer money from Whites to kikes. Only exception for CC holders because their name and prints are already on a government list.
i think the bigger deal here is the precedence of legal liability. if you are found liable for shooting someone (even if you did so in self defense), then their family can bring civil suits against you. whether you win or not in court is irrelevant, you will still be bankrupted by all the lawyer fees, court fees, etc. this is exactly the tactic that gay/trans activists follow.
[ + ] thebearfromstartrack4
[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 13:14:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 14:16:31 ago (+0/-0)
Do newspapers have to pay a fee for a printing press?
"Paying" for a right is not Constitutional.
Only one member actually had a brain when saying that gun violence comes from those that have guns illegally.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 14:26:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 14:30:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 16:13:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MasklessTheGreat
[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 16:30:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 16:56:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MasklessTheGreat
[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 17:35:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 17:41:32 ago (+0/-0)
You can't be required to purchase a product. You aren't required nor have a right to purchase a car; therefore, you can be forced to purchased insurance to use it. You have a right to your body and a gun; therefore, cannot be compelled to buy insurance for them.
That is what I said via multiple comments. That you couldn't put that together demonstrates you are too stupid to be posting or commenting with adults.
[ + ] MasklessTheGreat
[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 19:48:59 ago (+0/-0)*
I have the right to buy whatever the fuck I want. You’re stupid as fuck.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 20:06:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MasklessTheGreat
[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 20:52:02 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 20:56:55 ago (+0/-0)
Okay, I can tell now you're just a jew wasting my time. Goodbye. KYS.
[ + ] MasklessTheGreat
[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 21:44:37 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 27, 2022 00:37:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 27, 2022 08:25:17 ago (+0/-0)
Gettng to point B from point A could be accomplished through various means and you have a right to get from point A to point B. You don't have the right to make that travel in whatever manner you choose, because it could very easily trample the rights of others. Owning a gun does not trample on another's rights. Shooting the gun wherever you want is not a right. Because a gun is to be used to protect one's life or liberty, having one and the ability to use it in need, cannot be restrained by limitations or requirements that some may not be able to meet, such as, the purchase of insurance.
A homeless man on the streets has the right to live without a home. He has the right to a gun. He cannot be required to give up either of those rights because of a requirement to pay the government which could only be done via money that he has a right to avoid.
Does one have a right to any commodity?
You have the right to keep and bear arms, but nobody is required to give you one. You have the right to travel, but nobody is required to give you a car or roads or gas. If you have a gun, you have a right to keep it and should have the right to keep it on you. If you have a car, though you should have the right to keep it, you don't have a right to a place to keep it or to use it on public lands.
If you own a howitzer, nobody would be required to give you a place to store it. Okay, I'm rambling at this point, but things are not always black and white. The justification for one item doesn't automatically transfer to another.
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 [op] 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 17:42:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 17:43:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 16:53:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 27, 2022 00:34:44 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 11:13:13 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 [op] 1 point 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 12:37:53 ago (+1/-0)
I'd like to see you try and collect that money. I'd be willing to bet $100 you would never see a dime from your claim.
This is also pretty state-specific, as many blue states have laws requiring you to flee if possible, and make it very difficult to prove that you didn't have the opportunity to flee.
they are trying to get you, one way or another. the linked article is just another way to try and make you a criminal for not following their commie ideology.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 14:25:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 16:10:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SirNiggsalot
[ - ] SirNiggsalot 2 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 09:46:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 2 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 10:16:30 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] breh
[ - ] breh 2 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 11:52:14 ago (+2/-0)*
Edit: San Jose is not 'small town' OP.
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 [op] 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 12:40:52 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 27, 2022 00:35:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 3 points 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 10:58:09 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] SilentByAssociation
[ - ] SilentByAssociation 1 point 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 14:30:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 1 point 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 14:38:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 1 point 3.4 yearsJan 26, 2022 16:11:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 27, 2022 00:41:47 ago (+0/-0)