×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
3

Why you should only use the King James Bible. (If you want to read the Bible in English).

submitted by WileyWallaby to Christianity 2.8 yearsJan 20, 2022 13:09:09 ago (+7/-4)     (Christianity)

This started out as a reply to a comment but it's such an important issue that it deserves it's own post.

"Yea hath God said" being, quite literally, the oldest trick in the book the enemy loves to cast doubt on what God really said. (The serpent making Eve question if God really said what He said about not eating the forbidden fruit, and if He did, did He mean it, and if He did was he lying.)

Consider the New Testament, for about a millennium and a half there was essentially no real debate on what the text of the books that comprise the New Testament was.

Those accepted texts were collectively called "the received text" meaning essentially "the same texts we've always had" scholars refer to them as the "Textus Receptus".

About 500 years ago, a guy named Desiderius Erasmus (aka Erasmus of Rotterdam) who has been widely regarded as the smartest man who ever lived, compiled them all together. There was of course the occasional manuscript found that differed from the vast majority and it was rightly discarded.

This assembled Greek Textus Receptus forms the basis for all faithful translations of the (New Testament) Bible, the most recent one in English being the King James Bible.

Since those times scholarly methods of textual criticism have become popular with really "smart" ideas like "well if 120 ancient texts agree and 1 or 2 say something different, the 1 or 2 must be right because they wouldn't go against the grain unless it were true".

Using these sorts of methods God-haters have been able twist the words to say whatever they want to undermine key doctrines of the Bible like the virgin birth, Jesus' death on the cross, the divinity of Christ, etc. And with corrupt minority texts like the codices vaticanus and sinaiticus they release so-called bibles that just change whatever they feel like.

We could do the same sort of breakdown for the old testament and the masoretic text vs the septuagint and get into all that if I felt up to it but hopefully you get the idea.

TL:DR if you speak English you should be reading the King James Bible and not some modern adulteration like the NIV.


6 comments block


[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 2.8 yearsJan 20, 2022 20:08:17 ago (+2/-1)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] mattsixteen24 0 points 2.8 yearsJan 21, 2022 23:00:10 ago (+0/-0)

Only the original Douay Rheims. The revisions are counterfeits as with all English translated bibles except for the original DR bible below. Please read https://www.realdouayrheims.com/

https://archive.org/details/holiebiblefaithf00mart_0
https://archive.org/details/nevvtestamentofi00mart

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 2.8 yearsJan 22, 2022 13:35:14 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] mattsixteen24 0 points 2.8 yearsJan 22, 2022 22:31:55 ago (+0/-0)

The RSV2CE lines up with what? The original Greek?

[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 2.8 yearsJan 20, 2022 14:29:04 ago (+1/-0)

Which version is best if I want to read it in pig latin?

[ - ] WileyWallaby [op] 3 points 2.8 yearsJan 20, 2022 14:31:18 ago (+3/-0)

the ingkay amesjay :)