Sign into an existing account

AntiSemitism began for me upon learning the 911 attacks were the work of Jews, the loathing became more intense after being appraised of Adolf Hitler's Jewish roots, and discovering the Holocaust and the Holodomor in the Ukraine and in Russia were similarly the work of Jews.

It extends to Palestinian & Lebanese Semites who similarly turn from exposing Jew culpability, amplified upon finding Jews have infiltrated the political and social order world wide, whence all decisions at government level, all political appointments and all news reporting is at their behest.

Just as the null response to evidence there were No Japanese Planes at Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941, shames the entire Japanese nation tribe and race.

So does the null response to evidence of Jew culpability for the 911 attacks, and the subsequent illegal and unjust wars under the aegis of the War on Terror, itself in alleged response to Moslem guilt, shame the entire US social and political order.

Thus "good" Jews will side with me and demand the politicos and police in Australia, answer charges stemming from the null response to the December 2006 killing of Katherine Schweitzer in Sydney, she said Jews sent her family to Auschwitz whence only she survived out of fourteen.

And the July 2000 Brisbane disappearance of Steven Goldsmith, who was in the company of a local policeman one night early in the same week he was reported missing, whose fate appears to be ground work for future charges Jews were "disappeared," while nobody gave a good G-d damn because they were Jews.

Never defend yourself, always be on the attack.

Respond with "From context I always thought anti-semitism meant opposition to corruption and white collar crime. The people were forced to apologize because they were going after the people in power who invariably crushed them. I never knew it had anything to do with jews."

Now play dumb. Refuse to admit you always knew it was about jews. Watch them squirm.

I don't. I just say 'Yeah.'

I'm also anti-cancer, anti-obesity, anti-meteor-strike-mass-extinction-event.

I don't like bad shit.

If you paid attention during the 'meme wars', the tendency for labels to stick happens when you protest them, i.e. when you react negatively to them. I noticed that liberals tended to blow a gasket about such things, and all it did was act like glue. Playground principles here, folks. Be rubber, not glue. Either blow past it without acknowledging the accusation, or, if that is unavoidable, causally (almost aloof) nod yes that you hate Jews. Of course, if you are going to do the latter, be prepared with some effective rhetoric that is equally casual to deploy. The worst thing you can do is to let your emotional level become elevated in the way you respond. Even as you defend your reasonable and highly justified avarice toward the Jew, continue to speak about it as if it were as obvious in your world as the sky being blue. This is all subtle psychology. People gain most of their information about any position not from the contents of people's language, but from the way things are said (including tone, posture, agitation, etc.). You are naturally more skeptical to someone defending any claim who is also agitated.

Things that are obvious are obvious. I don't ever have to become upset when defending the claim 'the sky is blue'. If someone objected to this, would you become angry? You'd probably look around, breaking a hypothetical '4th wall', like some character from The Office. Now, imagine that the world was divided on this issue, and both sides were equally virulent arguing for their belief about the sky's color. Suddenly people would grow uncomfortable with doubt.

Part of the way that the powers that be gaslight everyone is by making people agitated about things that used to be obvious. If you want to remodel people's opinions about anything, get one group to fight another about it. It changes everyone.

You have no idea how important the way we carry ourselves is. At some point, there is just casual acknowledgement of the truth, and then action (say, if we need to put a foot down on a face). We tend to lose ground when we get bogged down in the in-between, where the agitated debate takes place. Be cool, until you can't be cool, and then do something swift and authoritative.

I don't really care about being called a racist, antisemitic, etc. I openly admit to being a racist.

Anti judaic.

just fuck with the robotic word repeaters. "I'm anti judaic, not anti semitic"

I tell people that I'm not antisemitic, I'm pro-palestine. They don't know what the fuck to answer to that.

I would not encourage anyone to engage in the merits of the label as a topic . It's intended to offend you and to shut you up. As soon as you start trying to engage on it, you've already lost. You've demonstrated that you found it significant enough to want to address it. The best thing, I think, is to act as if it never happened.

say you're jewish on your moms side and a filthy goym has no business telling a jew what he can and can't say, only goym are not allowed to have these discussions and should be locked up for questioning a jewish narrative but it is ok for you to say what you think

It really depends on what kind of person you're talking to. If it's someone you know and is also someone who is actually open minded, you can probably start feeding them small red pills on the JQ. If you try forcibly administering a melon-sized red pill it's almost never going to go over well, so pace yourself and this individual will slowly come to terms. Plant some seeds that'll get their noggin jogging. For instance, you can tell them that whenever they read an article that is anti-American, or see a trailer for something that seems to be anti-Christian, that they should do a little background research on the authors, creators, producers, etc. Something to get the ball rolling.

Now if you're arguing with people who you know won't change their minds (such as conservacucks and libtards IRL, or just generally anyone calling you an anti-semite on the internet), you'd be wasting your time in trying to have an honest discussion. Instead you're better off trolling them. I'd say do that deconstruction shit that commie fags and kikes do all the time. "What does 'anti-semitic' mean? How did you come to the conclusion that what you said defines 'anti-semitism?' What part of my comment meets this definition? How? Why? Under what authority are you to claim what I said is 'anti-semitic?'" Put them on the back foot and keep making them respond to questions. If they say anything contradictory make them falter and eat their own words.

If you want to troll but are not interested in wasting your time just respond with "yes" like a Chad instead, and if they respond, just keep replying with one word responses such as "cope," "seethe," etc (use a couple more words if it's someone IRL otherwise you might end up looking like an autist lol). If they're responding with walls of text figure out how to efficiently respond so that they keep wasting their time writing more walls of text. Remember, brevity is the soul of wit.

Could always say, "I'm not anti-Semitic, I like Arabs" Since semetic are people that speak Arabic languages.

i just wear it with pride.

deleted

account deleted by user

Im PRO whatever TEAM I belong to. It's NATURAL. Guess that means on some level I'm AGAINST whatever "teams" I DON'T belong to. SEEMS NATURAL.