×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
21

"It's NOT just a phase, mom!" It is now lol

submitted by big_fat_dangus to ThotPatrol 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 12:02:08 ago (+21/-0)     (a.pomf.cat)

https://a.pomf.cat/bxoyvk.jpg

Pedo commenters kill yourselves immediately, thanks.


16 comments block


[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2022 23:38:18 ago (+0/-0)

Which one is Mom?

[ - ] CHIRO 6 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 14:59:05 ago (+6/-0)*

I'm tempted to go find the comments section to see what the general consensus is. But I'm not going to because I know what I'll find is hundreds of people talking about that 14-yr old's independence, controlling 'backward' parents, and the 'support' of 1.7 million weird pieces of shit who have no business 'following' a fucking 14-yr old.

Listen, the girl is pretty. We all know that. Congrats mom and dad, your daughter won a genetic lottery.

But there is no good reason why any adult needs to follow someone this age because they are pretty, or because they're interested in the life of someone this young. And if you want to argue that the majority of that 1.7 million is probably 14-17 yr old boys, you're not really getting over the hill. A person this age doesn't need to be made into something like this online; she doesn't need to know what it is like to be a source of adulation for 1.7 million people. She is 14 for fuck's sake.

But something tells me that this is all related to other 'mom behavior' I've seen on social media - I don't mean this mom specifically. Vicariously living through and elevating themselves because of their kids; shit maybe this is just the evolution of Honor Roll bumper stickers, and maybe I'm just a grumpy aging twat. So throw them to the wolves. They're your property right?

Now someone accuses me of hypocrisy because I'm stipulating that parents should treat their kids like property and keep them off the net.

So let's do this. I'm skeptical of any parent that is putting their child out there for consumption rather than being concerned with protecting them. But hey, if clout is today's currency, maybe moms think this is the best way to get their little beauties acting gigs. She already has a million followers! Like pre-marketing the cows for slaughter.

EDIT: It occurred to me that a starlet from my youth, Britney Spears, got famous at, what, age 15 or 16 or something. So fuck it. I guess this is nothing new. Same game, different arena. The same shit I said above could have been levied at parents auditioning their children at acting agencies in the 70s. What was the point if not mass consumption?

[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 5 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 15:10:54 ago (+6/-1)

I'd say 95% of those "followers" are just straight up pedos. There are already a few here in this very comment section.

[ - ] CHIRO 4 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 15:12:39 ago (+4/-0)

Yeah, I noticed that too. Some fuckin people, man. Judgment day can arrive anytime now afaic.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 15:57:06 ago (+2/-2)

deleted

[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 4 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 15:59:30 ago (+5/-1)

Doesn't matter. She is 14, dumbass.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 23:18:23 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 9, 2022 13:28:20 ago (+0/-0)

You have no idea how cloning works, do you.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 18:56:45 ago (+2/-0)

We have normalized child stars as a society. We banned children from working in factories and farms but when it came to working for jewish hollywood, as always, an exception was made. Its never good for kids to be “stars” or to make money. Parents swap their kids innocence for some sort of social currency as a celebrity and justify it with “shekels for college, security” — terrible thinking. Children should not be famous for any reason. They will only be exploited by adults.

All these child stars grow up to be bonkers, and I don’t just think its because pedowood screwed them up. I think its because their parents are bonkers, which is a prerequisite for selling your children. Its hereditary.

[ - ] RedBarchetta 4 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 15:53:52 ago (+4/-0)

Don't worry. When she is older she will get all that back if she just sits in front of the camera. Fucking Tit Tok live is comical. Whores don't do shit other than just sit in front of the camera. They need to be shamed. Holes are not a talent.

The Chinks are fucking LAUGHING. Hard.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 2 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 15:41:47 ago (+2/-0)

Lucky local townies in their 20s. Now she'll just be a regular slutty lolita for attention.

[ - ] Teefinyomouf 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 9, 2022 12:38:24 ago (+0/-0)

Mirror mirror on the wall...

[ - ] Redhairin 0 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 13:28:19 ago (+0/-0)

Better late than never I suppose. Still, 1.7 million followers shows some bitch was asleep at the wheel for a while.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 3 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 13:31:39 ago (+3/-0)

Seems more likely the kid acted up and got her shit deleted as a punishment, as opposed to the mother having an issue with the kid being a social media hoe.

[ - ] youregay 2 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 16:21:22 ago (+2/-0)

Try again...

"Namely, her 14-year-old daughter Valentina got her 1.7 million followers TikTok and Instagram accounts deleted because the mom believes they’re unhealthy, and she didn’t want her daughter to judge herself based on the online feedback she receives."

[ - ] SirNiggsalot -6 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 13:39:32 ago (+1/-7)

I would give her a good spanking for being naughty

[ - ] deleted -7 points 2.4 yearsJan 8, 2022 12:34:49 ago (+0/-7)

deleted