×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
17

The Death of Beauty is the End of Meaning

submitted by fightknightHERO to BlackPilled 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 08:42:47 ago (+18/-1)     (dailystormer.su)

https://dailystormer.su/the-death-of-beauty-is-the-end-of-meaning/

the furniture hit me real hard

god forgive us for abandoning proper carpentry for made and china consoomer-grade garbage


9 comments block


[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 19:11:06 ago (+0/-0)

I saw a red poofy-tailed fox today. Beauty is not dead.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 13:09:40 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 12:44:25 ago (+0/-0)

If our enemies (evil) are SO powerful, why do they WASTE so much time and effort on LOOKS and APPEARANCES and convincing US? Do they think we are STUPID?

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 10:12:24 ago (+0/-0)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brutalist_architecture

Also, I happened to get into a conversation with a gas station attendant a few weeks ago. I made a passing comment about how ugly my new debit card and the new bank logo were. The attendant went off about how everyone is 'flattening' and simplifying their logos like it was some central mandate to do it. He agreed that in almost all cases they are far uglier than previous ones.

Apparently being super abstract and primitively symbolic is where things are going. Hey our logo used to be a fox. Now it's three squiggly lines like those symbols on the stones from Fifth Element. Awesome huh!?

I want to make an observation about this: if a company can afford to do that, by which I mean lose actual brand designation from their logo, it's probably because there's so little competition that they no longer need you to be connected to their logos. It's usually not a sign of functioning markets when huge swaths of industries all go in the same direction like a school of fish.

[ - ] fightknightHERO [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 10:21:56 ago (+1/-1)

oh yes, the INTENTIONAL niggerfication of art in literally everything

you know, lately i've seen more (((new))) hipster faggot products in the grocery with literal ZOG art that could've made by a fucking toddler

it's not coincidental that some companies choose this line of art, i'm 100% sure they get paid/compensated for this
the absolute pettiness of the jews to murder even the smallest amount of art/skill/beauty in this world is staggering to me

everything must be dumbed down, everything pretty must be bastardized and negrofied

everything that is wholesome must be demonized and forgotten
the stuff that i see every year get progressively worse, but the one thing jews can't kill is nature
nature in it's natural form is beauty incarnate
no amount jew niggerfaggotry can take that away from me

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 10:38:51 ago (+0/-0)

The loss of these things is commensurate with the loss of the individual himself.

I just noticed your comment about the furniture. I'm not excellent and have a long way to go, but I have gotten into furniture building in the past three or four years. Number one, I've learned a lot. Number two, I have an appreciation for how difficult making heirloom quality things is, along with how much heart and dedication someone doing it with care must invest. Lastly, I've learned how fucking much we've compromised on the quality and standards of almost every kind of furniture and weight-bearing fixture in our homes.

I was moving my brother into a house not long ago. He received a computer desk for Christmas 2020. It was delivered direct. Some Chinese or Taiwanese piece of shit with the 'modern' gray veneer and plastic painted to look metallic. I'm thinking: "This thing was probably bought on Wayfair or something and was 600% more than what it should be."

Sure enough, it fell apart on the first move. I'm not a dumbass mover. I'm kind of obsessive about things like that (I need psychological help!). I'm talking about the kind of motion that is just unavoidable in any move. This thing came apart at three different joints. Of course they all used those godforsaken cam doohickeys, the ones with the pins where you turn the 'locking' nut to secure it. Absolute fucking trash. Particle board covered in one fiftieth of an inch of veneer.

Contrast this with an antique desk that my grandmother owns. It has survived three or four moves, not even counting any before she became owner of the piece. This thing is a beast, a terrible pain to move really. But it's heavy and quality. She hasn't really kept up maintaining the wood as much as she should, but besides some UV affects, this thing is solid as an oak.

I understand that you can get custom fine furniture built today, but with the trends being what they are, it becomes insanely expensive. Even in the mid-range of the kind of shit everyone's buying, you can poke these things with your finger - fully assembled - and just feel the amount of play in the structure.

But it all fits with the consumerist model. It's not economic for a company to build something that could last a century or more. Instead, make things that dissolve into dust during the first move. And then they'll have to buy another! And they will! Why? Because most people don't even grasp the economics of paying three times as much for a quality piece that lasts a half-century, as opposed to buying a new affordable one every three years for the same amount of time.

I have noticed, however, that many of the women in my life don't seem to mind or care too much about quality. If something 'looks right from the road', matches their overall decorating theme and gives them the druglike satisfaction of making a purchase, it's fine. It's almost as if a lot of people would prefer the accelerated buying cycle because buying shit is the height of their experience.

Sorry for ranting.

[ - ] fightknightHERO [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 10:42:09 ago (+1/-0)

But it all fits with the consumerist model. It's not economic for a company to build something that could last a century or more. Instead, make things that dissolve into dust during the first move. And then they'll have to buy another! And they will! Why? Because most people don't even grasp the economics of paying three times as much for a quality piece that lasts a half-century, as opposed to buying a new affordable one every three years for the same amount of time.

it pains me how normalized is this globohomo shopping behavior is

people rather pay cheap for something that lasts them a few year then actually invest in something they could pass onto their grandchildren

[ - ] FellowWhite 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 17:41:01 ago (+1/-0)

But it all fits with the consumerist model. It's not economic for a company to build something that could last a century or more. Instead, make things that dissolve into dust during the first move. And then they'll have to buy another! And they will! Why? Because most people don't even grasp the economics of paying three times as much for a quality piece that lasts a half-century, as opposed to buying a new affordable one every three years for the same amount of time.

Since most things are bought online these days you have no indication of quality until you've actually bought it, so its hard to justify paying so much more for something that could be of equal or even worse build quality. A desk made of particle board and veneer looks the same in the images as one made of oak. There are also things where poor build quality is acceptable as they aren't expected to have to endure any strong forces. I still prefer antiques when it comes to furniture but when it comes to things I have to buy new I always opt for the cheapest chinesium option I can find since I assume the more expensive options will have cut the same corners.

[ - ] taoV 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 13:55:08 ago (+0/-0)

My gut says it's tied to the same idea as ESG. Somehow they are incentivized to have this shitty imagery and it's not just that handful of big designers went to the same school.