Sign into an existing account

Serf didn't own land. They were tied to the lords land a needed his approval to move or leave or travel, and worked 2 days a week for the lord. They weren't allowed to do anything without authorization including marriage. They couldn't work on Sunday, owed 2 days a week labor for the lord, so had 4 days to produce whatever they could for themselves.

It's not as bad as Hollywood makes it out but don't for a second think it wasn't a form of slavery. Your children were owned by the lord who owned the land you were bound to.

When there was an invasion, the local lord would most likely mount on a horse and fight.

When I worked in an office my effort was commiserurate with what I was getting paid. If they promoted someone less experienced, stupider or lazy over me I would do very little. I haven't worked in an office since this whole push for diversity was just beginning but I imagine it would be a nightmare to work there now. I got fired from about as many jobs as I walked out on.

By definition serfs did not own land. They had hereditory duties to work a certain piece of land (or a particular profession) and faced serious penalties for failing in that duty or trying to escape it.

Most people were taught that this social structure was something that happened after the roman empire collapsed and the barbarians took over, in fact it was a structure created by the empire. The empire began paying it's expenses by inflating the money supply. They minted mountains of trash coins which regular people were required to accept at face value ie. pretending a shitty piece of theoretically silver but actually mostly lead was worth a 20th of it's weight in gold. but taxes couldn't be paid back using the same coins at face value, they had to be paid in actual gold.

No one outside the imperial system had gold so eventually an arrangement was worked out where they had to pay their taxes "in kind" ie. through goods and services. Shoemakers paid in shoes, peasants paid in grain and bakers paid in bread. Above them was a politically connected citizen with the political connections necessary to make his tax burdens go away by supplying these goods to the army. Citizens who weren't connected enough, or couldn't extract enough resources, had to sell themselves into slavery and become servii.

One result of this was that servii who were deemed to work a taxable trade would try to leave for a less burdened one, so eventually they decided that trades were for life and hereditory. You and your sons were bound to whatever you did in perpetuity.

When the barbarians invaded they weren't considered a disaster, the locals welcomed them because they were usually less horrible than having an imperial master. They stepped right into the boots of the former Roman planters and took over the system. And that's how western europe ended up with a german aristocracy ruling over an underclass of servii (serfs).

Almost nobody lived until 60 back then

Who the fuck pays for their parents medical bills after they die?

Is this accurate? Or fantasy? Also, thinks he is in control (has no clue in reality).

deleted

Wrong. There is no dispute the women is the head of the household