×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
15

It makes them admit to being wrong

submitted by account deleted by user to HolocoughHoax 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 09:11:25 ago (+17/-2)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/7tp72k.jpg

account deleted by user


17 comments block


[ - ] Garrett 8 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 09:47:10 ago (+8/-0)

no critical thinking whatsoever. they are completely in line with the media. no 'what if?'

its like they cant allow their minds to wander from one specific track

[ - ] Slumbermachine 6 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 10:23:39 ago (+6/-0)

Like sheep to the slaughter.

[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 09:12:16 ago (+5/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] voatisajewishheaven 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 11:57:54 ago (+4/-0)

What's your take on this one?

What's on the mind of the people who agree with this?

[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 12:13:34 ago (+3/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 7, 2022 06:40:37 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 14:35:39 ago (+0/-0)*

'Fully' is the operative term. I recall people getting very alarmed about this in the beginning, as if it were a postponement of all data release for 75 years. Instead, it would be putting a limit on the amount that they must release per month or per quarter (I cannot recall the frequency of releases). The releases are supposed to start almost immediately. That data has to be reported in a standard form, meaning work must be done to prepare every page of these releases. The idea is that there is so much data that you couldn't reasonably expect a pharmaceutical company to (all at once) outlay the necessary resources for processing the sheer amount of raw data they've collected. So it is supposed to make the process more cost effective and manageable, by permitting them to release X number of pages per month, or something.

I'm not sure this jibes with me or not, but it's difficult to verify one way or the other. Sometimes you have to step back, and think about things from the rhetorical standpoint. Regardless of whether this is corrupt or not, how does the reasoning I provided (above) sound to the average person? The answer is: pretty good. It's probably not a useful hill to try and take.

It could very well be that they want to slow-drip the information for the sake of avoiding letting the totality of shit become intelligible all at once. Imagine you have the choice of sending your kid to some school, and you find out that some sexual misconduct happened there with the faculty. Suppose you find out it was once per year for 50 years. That, versus 50 times in one year. It's all shit, right? But the latter is much more shocking.

It's not that the absolute information is going to change with a slow release, rather, it's that the time interval during which all adverse events occurred (1-2 years) will drift backward into history with each passing month and year. All of the events of that short span will be dilated out across decades. The perception of the severity of things 75 years from now will match how seriously most young people take Pearl Harbor today. Those of us alive in 75 years who lived through this will be the grandmas and grandpas 'spouting crazy shit' at the dinner table on holidays.

[ - ] uvulectomy 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 15:33:11 ago (+2/-0)

The idea is that there is so much data that you couldn't reasonably expect a pharmaceutical company to (all at once) outlay the necessary resources for processing the sheer amount of raw data they've collected. So it is supposed to make the process more cost effective and manageable, by permitting them to release X number of pages per month, or something.

Except their excuse is bullshit. They're slow-walking it by releasing the bare-minimum per month required by law, which is 500. If they're releasing 500 pages per month, that works out to one single person going through about 16-17 pages per day.

I'm sure they have plenty of drones they could task with upping the pace. Give 75 people 32 pages per day, and they could have it done inside of 6 months. But they won't, because they're intentionally dragging their heels. They can generate 438,000 pages of shit in that time, but they can't format it and redact it for public release given another 6 months? BULLSHIT.

[ - ] dassar 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 17:31:35 ago (+0/-0)

Yep . That is all it is. They are intentionally slow walking.
They are a multi-million dollar Company's that have secured ongoing supply agreements to the tune of several trillion dollars per year, yet out of all their 10 000/ 20 000 plus employees they are not able to hire an extra 30 -50 archivists to collate/ redact (if necessary), itemise and organise the data already in the company archives ??.
Fck them and fck anyone that thinks it's even a plausible excuse.

For reference, Large Corporates and private Company's and private Citizens are regularly ordered to provide large amounts of their data/ information/ tax sheets etc to Courts/ IRD within set time limits or failure to comply results in judgements and rulings against them. Tens, thousands, even hundreds of thousands of documents (paid for out of their own pockets).
The Vaccine Companies are simply joo-balling ....

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 13:14:51 ago (+0/-0)

Link?

[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 14:23:16 ago (+2/-0)

Even lighter things like (incorrectly) thinking it was developed weeks instead of the 10+, years

Did nobody else catch this?

[ - ] dassar 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 17:55:44 ago (+1/-0)

Yea, while it is true that m-RNA may have already been studied for a number of years - not sure if actual m-RNA corona virus vaccine using the spike protein for humans was - but the thing is, even if it were, why is it there is no 'traditional vaccine' and why are they completely neglecting to manufacture one ??.
Is it bc using all the long established safety guild lines and clinical trial protocols for human vaccines means it usually takes 6-8 years and cannot be done quicker bc of the existing safety protocols in place - Is that why m-RNA vaccines had to be given 'warp speed' and EUA - to circumvent long standing procedures and laws for traditional vaccines to follow and pass in order to be brought to mass market .
This entirely new method of delivery was able to be fast tracked simply bc they are so new and 'outside' the existing legislation for established pharmaceuticals/ medications.
Why couldn't they 'warp speed' a traditional vaccine using live/ attenuated holo-cough virus ??. Because existing laws seem to forbid that.
The m-RNA is a computer AI generated simulation of a spike protein (it's all created from computer software/ simulations and AI generation- -none of it is natural or organic) and we are hoping that our bodies will correctly should create antibodies to it -with nothing going wrong , short term, medium term , long term - except for them pesky rare/ extremely rare events, but hey, symptoms usually resolve in a few days, lol.
Bait and switch.

[ - ] Garrett 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 22:25:26 ago (+2/-0)

this technology of mrna vaccines has never been rolled out on a large scale like this. same with nanoparticles. it truly is a new ball game as we have no idea what the long term effects will be on people


also with traditional vaccines wasnt there a lack of testing of long term effects as well

[ - ] dalai_llama 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 12:59:57 ago (+1/-0)

I feel like the real goal is to inspire as much lock down time as possible to keep people feeding on their preferred social media bubble.

You might be able to resist this because you're an adult that has already lived a life, but think of what this is doing to kids under 18. They're spending their entire youth entrapped in a world of false propaganda. Their entire lives are ruined because of this.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 21:36:40 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] beece 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 09:34:27 ago (+0/-0)

Your link is temporarily cucked @Leafa.

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 6, 2022 13:15:52 ago (+1/-0)

It's working now. Probably just the image host being retarded