It is good to be cautious but I'll need more than a 140 characters to agree he's "evil as Fauci". That podcast was over 3 hours of the guy laying out point after point with context.
But, you think a big name doctor who literally invented the thing we're dealing with calling for "active surveillance, tracing, testing" is just a little oppsie doopsie he made? It's fucking obvious who and what Mallone is...
Fauci is responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Robert Malone isn't. I'm sorry to disappoint you, but we are not going to have brilliant guys from the best universities, who invent things, have been working with the government for decades, are based and publicly name the Jew. That's too much to expect. Malone is our ally on certain things and I'm sure he will get more and more redpilled as they attack him. He's openly naming Blackrock and Vanguard as the culprits of the plandemic. Sooner or later he'll realize where the true problem lies.
My problem with this is that EVERYONE who disagrees with the narrative is labeled a glowie or fed. The right has zero sense of unity, anytime someone tries to break the mold they are labeled in this way. It's why the left keeps on winning. And honestly, the whole "everyone who doesn't agree with me GLOWZ" sounds like something a leftist would say. Many conservatives try to act like they're open minded free thinkers, but posts like OPs just go to show how badly liberalism has infected the minds of Americans.
Mass formation psychosis. That is what we should be focusing on fixing the most right now.
No. The left does not win because they're better at PR or more popular. They win because jews operate in lockstep to take over our institutions and establish jewish supremacy.
It doesn't matter how open minded or free thinking we are, this war is not going to be won with debates.
It doesn't matter how open minded or free thinking we are, this war is not going to be won with debates.
Agreed, but I fail to see what it will be won with, at this point. "Guns" some would say, but my issue with that is: I don't exactly see soldiers marching with bayonets attached forcing this shit to happen. People are literally just going along with it, and trying to "win" that only feels like beating my head against the wall.
"The courts!" others will say. Well, I've started a telegram group that's successfully helped one guy in a 2,000 employee hospital stop the vax mandate, so it's not like I'm a doomer about this, yet...I know our groups success story is a rarity and there's a reason you'll never hear about it on the "news" anyways.
"Start a homestead!" still others will say. Oh I am. I'm about to go live in a tent with a family to help them do that and learn those very skills. But is that literally all I can do in all of this? Is this just an inevitable cycle that humanity has gone through multiple times before? Are we living first hand through why the pyramids exist but we have no idea how they were built or who built them?
Hey, at least I have this place to write comments as a form of mental therapy. So I've got that going for me I guess.
Soldiers marching down the street is step number 10. Step 1, 2, 3, etc. has to happen first.
The way I view the situation is like this: the anti-whites are confident because their actions and anti-whiteism has no consequences for them. Whites, on the other had are demoralized because being anti-white has no consequence for the anti whites. Step one is to hand out consequences for anti whites and this starts on a local level.
Step one is to discipline your local anti white, film it and make propaganda out of it and spread it in channels where young white people spend their time. This is step one. When more than one white person is disciplining antiwhites because he has seen other white people dishing out discipline we have reached step two. And so on..
This is what Feds fear the most and why they either preach "do nothing" or "go blow up a building".
I think that second part you mentioned ("and spread it in channels where young white people spend their time") is the key bit though. That's how anti-white sentiment became normal in the first place, jews control popular culture and use it to spread ideas of jewish supremacy and white villainy. If we're going to do anything it has to be to take back that control.
Agreed, but I fail to see what it will be won with, at this point.
I don't think it is winnable, but if it is it'll be won by retaking control of media and storytelling. It sounds silly but that's the lynchpin of our enemys' system of control. If the general public were successfully deprogrammed then every other form of institutional control they have would be worthless.
Which is why I objected to the idea that we need to be more fair debating partners. They didn't get to where they are by debating fairly, they did it by propagandising and charicaturing their debate opponents. If we can do that better than they do then we'll win, if not then we'll lose.
Is this just an inevitable cycle that humanity has gone through multiple times before? Are we living first hand through why the pyramids exist but we have no idea how they were built or who built them?
Probably, yes. Every indo-european society warns about the ragnarok, or kali yuga or whatever. Either way they describe how society periodically collapses, the gods all kill each other and everything starts from scratch. It has happened several times in known history, every time there was a massive metropolitan empire (or multiple empires) that reached peak size and collapsed. The classes most networked and dependent on the imperial system mostly died off. The ones who were independent and self sufficient tended to survive.
My problem with this is that EVERYONE who disagrees with the narrative is labeled a glowie or fed.
Wrong. Absolutely wrong. Malone isn't just "everyone"...quite the opposite. He's in the narrative because he's supposed to be, otherwise he wouldn't be there. He aint you and me bud...
The right has zero sense of unity, anytime someone tries to break the mold they are labeled in this way.
How is calling for "active surveillance, tracing, testing" "breaking the mold"...it's literally the opposite of that. How do you not see that?
And honestly, the whole "everyone who doesn't agree with me GLOWZ" sounds like something a leftist would say.
everyone who doesn't agree with me GLOWZ
Not what I'm doing at all...
Many conservatives try to act like they're open minded free thinkers, but posts like OPs just go to show how badly liberalism has infected the minds of Americans.
I'm not a "conservative"...
Do you actually NOT have a problem with an establishment doctor who's obviously being presented to us as "our guy" openly calling for "active surveillance, tracing, testing"
It's weird to me that nowhere in your comment did you address the obvious point of my post.
He’s a vaccinologist. He formulated vaccines for a living. He took the vax when it was released. He’s 65. His kids are adults. When adverse effects became known he began to change his position on this vaccine. He never supported vaccines for kids.
Even so that still seems pretty stupid to me. 65 is only barely on the threshold of where covaids begins to become a threat (on paper). Taking experimental treatment is normally considered a last ditch effort for the terminally ill or for a very limited group of test subjects with years of longtitudinal study.
It's crazy to throw caution to the wind and jump straight to mass distribution. Doubly so for a vaccinologist.
Im sure that having been the inventor of the platform itself, he was a bit psychologically invested in this jab working. I was skeptical of this vax when it launched, but I hoped it would work and be safe. There’s nothing fundamentally bad about the mRNA technology. And 65 is a dangerous age to get covid. Ive known people younger than that who died of it.
We can play purity games all day like “I was an antivaxxer before you”. There’s plenty of that going around here. Ive personally been anti-vax since I did a deep dive on MMR about 10 years ago but I understand that vaccines can work in select circumstances. I can understand how people have blinders on because of their jobs or personal circumstance, even if they’re knowlegeable, because I was one of them.
Ive watched maybe 4 or 5 long interviews with this guy. My impression of him is that he’s a literal genius in medical technology who’s spent his life pursuing research that he believed would save lives from within the establishment, which means his a bit prone to normie thought patterns, but he clearly had a big wake up call and has been speaking out against this vaccine and its risks in a way that few others can authoritatively. He understands the disease, the medications proposed for treatments, the vaccine, and the industry. This guy could have said nothing when he got pushback. Instead he’s continued to sound the alarm because he knows his bona fides on this subject are difficult to impugn.
Everytime I hear this guy talk I learn something. Whether he’s discussing the corruption of the regulatory agencies or the science side, he is incredibly informative. There’s no way you can dismiss the importance of having someone this smart on the subject on “our side”. I wish he loved hitler too, but we can’t have everything we want.
He seems like a fairly conservative family guy who loves his work and is unafraid to speak out against Fauci and Walensky and call them liars. I think we need to give normies credit when they do great things even if they aren’t lockstep j-pilled antiestablishment types. We don’t have to make him our leader or anything. But I think he is a good dude and his intentions are genuine.
You should check out some of his interview with Rogan.
Whatever about MMR... it's relatively well tried and tested. Granted after all of this I've started taking the complaints against it more seriously but at least we know huge numbers have taken it without falling dead a few years later.
This stuff? It's untested. If he was involved in developing it then I guess it's noble to offer himself as a guinea pig but that doesn't mean he should have been recommending it to others, let alone his own kids.
If he's waking up and realising "hey, maybe it's bad to push the entire species into a medical experiment" then great, but that's hardly an impressive leap to make.
I hadn't heard of him before this thread. I tend to look at anyone who does something as extreme as taking an experimental vax for a disease that barely outperforms the flu as a brainwashed idiot.
[ + ] TOVA
[ - ] TOVA 16 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 08:02:41 ago (+18/-2)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] -3 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 08:51:50 ago (+0/-3)*
EDIT: Left out a word.
[ + ] albatrosv15
[ - ] albatrosv15 1 point 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:15:13 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 3 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:26:14 ago (+3/-0)
But, you think a big name doctor who literally invented the thing we're dealing with calling for "active surveillance, tracing, testing" is just a little oppsie doopsie he made? It's fucking obvious who and what Mallone is...
[ + ] Slumbermachine
[ - ] Slumbermachine 1 point 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 12:20:55 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:25:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] albatrosv15
[ - ] albatrosv15 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 13:45:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 14:08:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] fritz_maurentod
[ - ] fritz_maurentod 6 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:56:20 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] -1 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 10:11:23 ago (+0/-1)
Where did in my post, or in these comments, ask for that? Please, tell me...
Is it too much to expect that he doesn't ask for "active surveillance, tracing, testing"?
Tell me why you think he did that? I'm not a big fan of the other two points in his tweet either, but obviously point number 2 sticks out to me.
[ + ] 0rion
[ - ] 0rion 6 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 08:55:26 ago (+7/-1)
Mass formation psychosis. That is what we should be focusing on fixing the most right now.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:27:29 ago (+2/-1)
No. The left does not win because they're better at PR or more popular. They win because jews operate in lockstep to take over our institutions and establish jewish supremacy.
It doesn't matter how open minded or free thinking we are, this war is not going to be won with debates.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 2 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 13:31:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 10:00:53 ago (+0/-0)
Agreed, but I fail to see what it will be won with, at this point. "Guns" some would say, but my issue with that is: I don't exactly see soldiers marching with bayonets attached forcing this shit to happen. People are literally just going along with it, and trying to "win" that only feels like beating my head against the wall.
"The courts!" others will say. Well, I've started a telegram group that's successfully helped one guy in a 2,000 employee hospital stop the vax mandate, so it's not like I'm a doomer about this, yet...I know our groups success story is a rarity and there's a reason you'll never hear about it on the "news" anyways.
"Start a homestead!" still others will say. Oh I am. I'm about to go live in a tent with a family to help them do that and learn those very skills. But is that literally all I can do in all of this? Is this just an inevitable cycle that humanity has gone through multiple times before? Are we living first hand through why the pyramids exist but we have no idea how they were built or who built them?
Hey, at least I have this place to write comments as a form of mental therapy. So I've got that going for me I guess.
[ + ] olinneserpona
[ - ] olinneserpona 1 point 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 13:27:44 ago (+1/-0)
The way I view the situation is like this: the anti-whites are confident because their actions and anti-whiteism has no consequences for them. Whites, on the other had are demoralized because being anti-white has no consequence for the anti whites. Step one is to hand out consequences for anti whites and this starts on a local level.
Step one is to discipline your local anti white, film it and make propaganda out of it and spread it in channels where young white people spend their time. This is step one. When more than one white person is disciplining antiwhites because he has seen other white people dishing out discipline we have reached step two. And so on..
This is what Feds fear the most and why they either preach "do nothing" or "go blow up a building".
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 14:12:34 ago (+0/-0)
I think that second part you mentioned ("and spread it in channels where young white people spend their time") is the key bit though. That's how anti-white sentiment became normal in the first place, jews control popular culture and use it to spread ideas of jewish supremacy and white villainy. If we're going to do anything it has to be to take back that control.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 10:41:55 ago (+0/-0)
I don't think it is winnable, but if it is it'll be won by retaking control of media and storytelling. It sounds silly but that's the lynchpin of our enemys' system of control. If the general public were successfully deprogrammed then every other form of institutional control they have would be worthless.
Which is why I objected to the idea that we need to be more fair debating partners. They didn't get to where they are by debating fairly, they did it by propagandising and charicaturing their debate opponents. If we can do that better than they do then we'll win, if not then we'll lose.
Probably, yes. Every indo-european society warns about the ragnarok, or kali yuga or whatever. Either way they describe how society periodically collapses, the gods all kill each other and everything starts from scratch. It has happened several times in known history, every time there was a massive metropolitan empire (or multiple empires) that reached peak size and collapsed. The classes most networked and dependent on the imperial system mostly died off. The ones who were independent and self sufficient tended to survive.
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] -1 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:31:42 ago (+1/-2)
Wrong. Absolutely wrong. Malone isn't just "everyone"...quite the opposite. He's in the narrative because he's supposed to be, otherwise he wouldn't be there. He aint you and me bud...
How is calling for "active surveillance, tracing, testing" "breaking the mold"...it's literally the opposite of that. How do you not see that?
Not what I'm doing at all...
I'm not a "conservative"...
Do you actually NOT have a problem with an establishment doctor who's obviously being presented to us as "our guy" openly calling for "active surveillance, tracing, testing"
It's weird to me that nowhere in your comment did you address the obvious point of my post.
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 3 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 07:35:25 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 1 point 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 07:45:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 3 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 08:16:16 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] mongre
[ - ] mongre 2 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:07:42 ago (+4/-2)
What kind of doctor does that?
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 6 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 10:13:31 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 10:45:56 ago (+1/-1)
It's crazy to throw caution to the wind and jump straight to mass distribution. Doubly so for a vaccinologist.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 22:10:53 ago (+0/-0)
We can play purity games all day like “I was an antivaxxer before you”. There’s plenty of that going around here. Ive personally been anti-vax since I did a deep dive on MMR about 10 years ago but I understand that vaccines can work in select circumstances. I can understand how people have blinders on because of their jobs or personal circumstance, even if they’re knowlegeable, because I was one of them.
Ive watched maybe 4 or 5 long interviews with this guy. My impression of him is that he’s a literal genius in medical technology who’s spent his life pursuing research that he believed would save lives from within the establishment, which means his a bit prone to normie thought patterns, but he clearly had a big wake up call and has been speaking out against this vaccine and its risks in a way that few others can authoritatively. He understands the disease, the medications proposed for treatments, the vaccine, and the industry. This guy could have said nothing when he got pushback. Instead he’s continued to sound the alarm because he knows his bona fides on this subject are difficult to impugn.
Everytime I hear this guy talk I learn something. Whether he’s discussing the corruption of the regulatory agencies or the science side, he is incredibly informative. There’s no way you can dismiss the importance of having someone this smart on the subject on “our side”. I wish he loved hitler too, but we can’t have everything we want.
He seems like a fairly conservative family guy who loves his work and is unafraid to speak out against Fauci and Walensky and call them liars. I think we need to give normies credit when they do great things even if they aren’t lockstep j-pilled antiestablishment types. We don’t have to make him our leader or anything. But I think he is a good dude and his intentions are genuine.
You should check out some of his interview with Rogan.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RbEtHaVCeNYs/
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 4, 2022 06:04:33 ago (+0/-0)
This stuff? It's untested. If he was involved in developing it then I guess it's noble to offer himself as a guinea pig but that doesn't mean he should have been recommending it to others, let alone his own kids.
If he's waking up and realising "hey, maybe it's bad to push the entire species into a medical experiment" then great, but that's hardly an impressive leap to make.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 2 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:28:49 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 21:01:52 ago (+0/-0)
The faggots at poal en mass defended Joe Rogan as some type of fucking good guy!
Fuck that short faggot gate keeper who pushed drugs and faggotry and pedophile shit
[ + ] VaccineWaters
[ - ] VaccineWaters 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 12:12:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] thebearfromstartrack4
[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 10:32:48 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] ClaytonBigsby313
[ - ] ClaytonBigsby313 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:32:44 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity [op] 0 points 3.5 yearsJan 3, 2022 09:48:24 ago (+0/-0)