I can never take seriously anything NASA shows or claims. I'm not a flat earther but NASA are liars and scammers. The woman with the long hair is in an airplane going down. The other ugly non-white scum have gorilla glue. Watch when they go down and back up, how their hair holds its shape. In zero gravity it would do like under water. It would keep going down and whip the moment they go back up. Its completely fake. The jews scam trillions for making fake videos.
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 16:52:03 ago (+3/-2)*
I think for long term space missions there are probably special hair washing products that both clean the hair and make it stiffer so that it doesn't fly around everywhere.
Ask the question further - how does one wash long hair in space?
The answer is obviously not with a normal shower (as the girl in the plane example has).
Edit: LMAO downvoater was mad to be made to think.
I would bet a lot of research went into whatever product it is.
It can't be too fine of a powder, otherwise it could float away and get into the electronics.
Even application and brushing out would leave some sort of debris that could potentially contaminate things. Living in orbit for months poses some pretty unique challenges compared to earth luxuries.
I wouldnt be shocked if thats what they were doing. I do however believe that space is real, and its entirely possible to go to and operate in it. Flat earth makes no logical sense.
It would make a lot more logical sense to grift trillions of dollars from tax payers to shoot a fucking useless rocket up into the sky and fuck off with a huge check.
The first black hole picture has recently been proven to be bullshit.
Given i can see further than geometrically allotted on a sphere with a known radius of ~3,959 Miles. What is you counter to my observation that proves that there is curve? What makes more sense, believing in a curve when i can prove to you there is none or realizing that there is no curve when seen evidence?"
Are you going to say that the observation is incorrect?
If the earth is a sphere with a radius of ~3,959 Miles mathematically the distance to the physical horizon (earth curve) could be calculated as follows; ~1.225 (√ Height of the observer in feet) = Distance to the horizon in miles from the observer.
So if you'll concede that you are able to see further than you should what is your explanation? You'll evoke terrestrial refraction and claim that what your observing is not being observed in a straight line?
You'll claim all vision is a result from curved light without explaining the leveling effect of this misuse of refraction called "terrestrial Refraction" ?
How do you measure an angle off of the surface of a sphere? Can you measure a curved adjacent yes or no?
I'll tell you what the proof for flat earth is - but you won't ever do it.
Record the sun setting.
Keep zooming in for an hour or more - as you say should be possible in a flat earth, right?
Analyze the diameter of the sun, angle of the sun, movement of the sun over that entire period.
Flat earth sun should a) move laterally, not just vertically, b) change size, since the sun is a fixed diameter and close to the earth, it should have some change in size, c) show how night arrives.
Any point source of light is visible no matter how far away it is - especially something as bright as the sun.
Post your video to prove the earth is flat.
Edit: being called a "globe-earther" because I provide the method needed to prove the flat earth... sounds just like anti-semitism???
Disproving the curve, is proving that it is not curved which means that it is flat.
Therefore proof of flat earth. No one needs to do your begging the question logical fallacy of horseshit experiment that has nothing to due with the nature of the surface of the Earth but everything to due with the strange nature of the Sun.
Here is an experiment that disproves the globe, but you won't ever do it.
You are making the claim that the Earth is a Globe.
VIA
"I suggested a method for retards to show the earth is flat - which cannot be argued against. Just record a sunset and prove that it never sets."
-------------
This would not prove the Earth flat and is based on many assumptions/ begging the questions fallacies you've made about the nature of the Sun.
"Keep zooming in for an hour or more - as you say should be possible in a flat earth, right?"
No, this would not be possible on a flat Earth at altitudes lower than the height of the Sun from the Earth provided no atmospheric or weather distortion.
If you are saying a plane and ship can be "zoomed in on" for hours, why not the sun?
As for part a) you need help with reading comprehension. I never made any claims about the shape of the earth - I just gave you a method for disproving a globe, right? What exactly makes anything I said a claim? Are you saying anyone that makes a suggestion supports the opposite side? Reading comprehension for retards is a good book.
As for your last claim, look up how a point source works. Bright point sources are visible from every direction.
Maybe you need to start from the basics in this topic then - how does night work? where does the sun go?
If the flat earth is an enclosed system, then the sun has to be within the "walls". Go rent an empty warehouse floor. Put an led anywhere in the building and test whether you can find it by zooming in. I bet you can.
If you go into any apartment building with windows towards the setting sun, with a free line of sight towards the horizon, when the sun sets the rays from the sun will come in through the window and hit the ceiling in the back of the room.
This effect implies the sun is below the ceiling of the apartment you are observing this phenomenon in.
However if you do the same test at noon, the rays of the sun will hit the floor of the same apartment.
How can this be? Which is it? One test says the sun is very low, below your ceiling. The other test says it is very high. So high the rays hit the floor instead.
Now the flat earth model says the sun moves in a circle above a plane. But this simple experiment I just explained, proves it also has to move up and down.
Now if it moves up and down, how come the rays hit the floor in apartment buildings in the US at noon, but at the same time the rays hit the ceiling in apartment buildings in other countries where the time is in the evening.
You cannot have it both ways at the same time. In one place it shows the sun is below your average apartment building height, in another place it shows it's high in the sky. At the same moment.
Which is it? How does your big brain resolve this conflict. Use evidence and reason. We need a Copernicus moment from you now.
"Now the flat earth model says the sun moves in a circle above a plane. But this simple experiment I just explained, proves it also has to move up and down.
Now if it moves up and down, how come the rays hit the floor in apartment buildings in the US at noon, but at the same time the rays hit the ceiling in apartment buildings in other countries where the time is in the evening.
You cannot have it both ways at the same time. In one place it shows the sun is below your average apartment building height, in another place it shows it's high in the sky. At the same moment."
You've created a problem from nothing i honestly suggest you learn how a Sun dial works.
Yes this is called timezones, that being Noon in which the sun reaches Zenith at a point of equal Longitude. The reason why the sunlight hits your floor at your "noon" while at the same time hitting the ceiling in another land due to the fact that the sun is a localized body that is close to the surface of the Earth and when it is above a land it is giving light from above, while at the same time to distant lands the sun would appear near the horizon and the sun would be giving off lights that would hit the ceiling in their land.
When the sun sets, it is traveling further away from you and so converges into the perceived horizon line of the observer relevant to the observers resolution power and angle of observation.
Lol. You guys are akin to the models used to calculate planet orbits before heliocentricism was discovered. You know they had similar models where the mathematics finally become so complex, nobody could calculate the results any more.
Why? Because the original idea was wrong. They tried to use mathematical trickery to patch their earth-centric model, and every day the pile of patches grew bigger, until one day it was so unwieldy nobody could make heads nor tails of it any more.
Once the sun was put in the center, the mathematical patches could be done away with, and all the equations became simple and straightforward.
Flat earth is doing the same thing, except you are doing it backwards. You are taking a simple and working model, and applying mathematical and conceptual patchworks onto it, in order to try and cram it into a deluded model.
That's what you're doing, and you're participating in this lunacy. You are absolutely out of your mind.
" Yes this is called timezones, that being Noon in which the sun reaches Zenith at a point of equal Longitude. The reason why the sunlight hits your floor at your "noon" while at the same time hitting the ceiling in another land due to the fact that the sun is a localized body that is close to the surface of the Earth and when it is above a land it is giving light from above, while at the same time to distant lands the sun would appear near the horizon and the sun would be giving off lights that would hit the ceiling in their land.( BECAUSE ITS LOWER IN THE SKY YOU NIGGER THATS WHY I SAID NEAR THE HORIZON YOU LOW INBRED NIG)
When the sun sets, it is traveling further away from you and so converges into the perceived horizon line of the observer relevant to the observers resolution power and angle of observation. "
I might understand how angles work more than anybody on this website.
If the sun is above us, and if we are on a flat plane of infinite area, and if the sun traveled from directly above us to infinitely far away, the sun's rays would only ever come infinitely close to parallel to our level plane, but could never actually be parallel much less come from below like you are suggesting.
Edit: another part of this explanation is that the sun maintains it's elevation above our plane. Otherwise we are proving the sun's orbit, or curved path relative to us.
Localized and smaller sun closer to the surface of the Earth. The Sun travels at 15 degrees per hour around the face of the Earth in a clockwise, westward spiral that get tighter in during the northern summer and longer during the southern summer. Islamic mosques base their time zones with Noon being the Suns relative Zenith along lines of equal Longitude.
Perception of Sun "setting around a curvature obstruction" is due to vision mechanics and the Sun only moves further away from the observer.
The Suns rotation gets wider in the southern summer months and tighter in the northern summer months, with the point of rotation being in reference to the North Pole/ Polaris.
(Polaris is unseen from extreme southern hemispheres because it smaller and closer to the surface of the Earth)
Why does toilet water rotate the opposite direction in the northern hemisphere as it does in the Southern hemisphere. It wouldn't happen if the earth was flat and on an even plane, but makes sense if the earth is a giant sphere.
Magnetic North is the North Pole/ center, while Magnetic South is the circumference which is away from the center. Which is why traveling East or West is a circle. While North is In and South is Out.
"Howcome when you fly with the rotation of the earth vs the opposite it takes less time?"
You might want to re-think that as you are proving my point with this one. The flights don't take less time, although if the Earth was spinning i'd see why you'd have to think the flights would be different. Does a Hot Air balloon leaving the earth in the morning In Virginia Find itself in California by the evening?
If the earth is a sphere with a radius of ~3,959 Miles mathatmatically the distance to the physical horizon (earth curve) could be calculated as follows; ~1.2 (√ Height of the observer in feet) = Distance to the horizon in miles from the observer.
There appears to be no measureable curvature. No curve. No R. No Sphere. No Gravity. The theatrical effforts put forth into a self admitted false portrait should be enough for anyone.
The cognitive dissonance one experiences when realizing the lies of the heliocentric model is of the most powerful spells ever cast. Much greater than any other redpill, in order to accept the premise one would have to acknowledge a degree of the depth to their own slavery within this maze. Many are not strong enough or intelligent enough. Many are too lazy, too prideful, too ignorant.
The Earth is Measurably, Demonstrably, and Observably Flat.
Thank you very much. I hope you're offlining these things. I've been compiling a lot but your info is amazing. Once i have a little more money i'd gladly pay you to store all this info but we can discuss this at a later point.
What do you think this entails then, if it is in fact, flat? From a spiritual perspective, or from a "meaning of life" perspective.
I appreciate your thorough replies and the info you share, thank you.
I offline everything in a Faraday pouch on separate drives there is no need to pay me i do it for free.
This branches into what is not known. It took ~7 years of researching to realize that i was making justifications for the globe model in the form of begging the question fallacies. Questions that would already assume the condition on which the question was based, for example why can't i see Polaris from the extreme south? It assumes that Polaris is what they have decided to label "star" and it has an assumed height and relative size. The question begged the answer and was not deductive.
So what i did after this realization was to reduce it back to a simple question. Is there curvature or not? I've conducted laser, zoom tests myself and with others and was forced to conclude that i could not detect curvature of any kind. Furthermore as this information was becoming more popular online there as a noticed increase in shill flat earthers who would promote crazy concepts with no proof, or would propose a false proof positive experiment that they would then test and find out the earth was a globe to their mistake. Then the paid normie television shows started show casing these fake proof positive exterminations.
They were all running from the lack of curve.
Running from the fact that you can see geometrically further than you should be able to. Which means. There is no R. Without a radius value for Earth you no longer have the calculations for the size and distance to the sun. The argument is reduced as;
We have proof That you can see further than what is mathematically possible given the restraints of our sphere. The globe model will tell you that the lines are being refracted (despite not being an example of refraction) and in the same breath tell you that you can get a straight line to the horizon while using a sextant.
You can't have it both ways. Also a sextant is impossible to utilize on a sphere you cannot measure angles on a curved edge. In order to use a sextant you have to pretend you are a on a flat plane first, and then transpose that to a sphere.
So they'll bring up something about the sun while assuming what the sun is and while believing in its distance and relative size in relation to the observer. Some think the sun we see could be a projection, not an actual object. (Catbox is down ATM but will be back up soon and ill post the relevant video) They'll bring up a multitude of "other" questions instead of addressing Curvature.
IF it is flat which it appears to be, it does have some interesting implications. Many i would imagine would interrupt the information to be indicative of prime creation. Either by a divine being or by Natural Law. Semantics for what one would consider "God or Creator". Others say its proof of a Simulation which i do not agree that it is proof of.
To me there is up and down. The sky is also flat and its only perspective that makes it look curved above us. It is logical that we are in a contained system because gas requires containment in order to have pressure. A fact i notice a lot of jews don't want us remembering. There happens to be uniform gas expansion that we observe. They say gravity hold the gas at the outer edges of the atmosphere from moving into the vacuum of space, thus utilizing a downward force. Then when the gravity should be stronger as you move closer to the surface of the earth (inverse squared) for some reason the gas now expands uniform in all directions.
Which is the firmament. If this barrier extends and curves to the ground past the southern ice rim i do not know however i believe highly unlikely. It is reason to me that it is an infinite plane with an infinite sky plane above it. Evolutionary mechanics all still work. Seasons and time zones still work. "outer space" thats just the space beyond inner space, which by law is the area south of 60 degrees south latitude.
Extra terrestrials come from extra land. Thule society, annhennerbe and many other occult anthropology research times during the Third Reich had great interest in this subject, considering break away civilizations to be those that went underground. Here is where you'll find the mythos of the draconian. No foreign plane-ts needed. Perhaps overlaid dimensions for the archons sure.
Water finds level. Fills the shape of its container.
Gas expands in all direction uniformly with no downward trend.
Angles are measured with two straight lines.
The sphere by Einstein evokes gravity within the theory of relativity. This was introduced to counter Telsa and others from the growing knowledge and adaption of the Aether. The Aether could be interrupted to either power/draw power from an individual. This is known in esoterics as Vril, Chi, ESP, Rddhi etc etc.
What is clear is that the "sun" moves at 15 degrees per hour over the surface of the stationary Earth. The Aether could be the power to this. There is also a sect of German occultists who believe in a body called the Black Sun. Of which i am one.
Apologies for taking 1.3 years to respond. Life has thrown me into a great darkness from which I am unable to escape and will soon give into. This realm is scorched earth.
Jesus, you are retarded. You can use two sticks and a laser in water to show the curvature.
Not only that, but by placing the camera at 1 ft. above the ground you are omitting variables that would be neglible at a fair distance above the ground. Tides, for instance. And speaking of tides, if the Earth is flat, please explain them.
Why the astronauts starch their hair I don't know excep to keep it out of their faces. The necklace in the video shows actual reaction to low-G environment.
[ - ] CPU 9 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:09:40 ago (+9/-0)
All those people look so ugly, and they look so jewy looking. Weird soy faces on all of them too. The only person who looked normal was that lady on the plane.
I've posted quite a few videos in the sticky post for /v/FakeAndGay. You'll soon recognize its only kikes and their lap dog good goy masons. Smart nig tyson said hair mean space!
They go up. Not far and come back down. The only edited youtube live video that i know of is the Spacex dual landing sequence video. They edited the original video without making the channel have to post a new one like very other channel.
Look most of you in the comments have some decent arguments. But the narrator in the video has none outside of look…the real zero g Jaír and the space hair look different. It’s so obvious and we all see it right? See look the lighting isn’t the same because then we would all think space is fake.
Not saying I believe in space or any of that. However this video is fake and the narrators lack of an argument is gay.
I’m not saying anything on that. I’m simply saying the video offers little to no evidence outside of … “see see it’s not the same, anyone who disagrees is dumb”
You only proved you are controlled opposition put into play. You act like you are based until it it time to discredit the site by putting forth preposterous theories that only a moron would believe in an attenpt to make us all look dumb.
You are a jew and a fucking asshole. Please kill yourself.
This is gatekeeping. You are preventing others from discovering the truth because of your own personal cognitive dissonance about the subject matter.
You make yourself look dumb without my help nigger. The reason why you say "act like i'm based" is because i am far more based and red pilled than you'll ever be goy. You'll always be a slave and i'll always be your superior. You'll always be a beta bitch believing a multitude of jew lies and the only reason you'll know any of them is due to Men such as myself holding your little baby hands along the way.
I'm pretty sure if you were on a cramped space station with equipment on all sides, switches, knobs, drawers and sticky tape everywhere, you would not want the airplane movie star type free flowing hair going everywhere. In fact it would most likely be prohibited for safety reasons, and you would wish to tie it down.
None of the other people in his clips had the same type of hair as the airplane blonde either.
The narrator is therefore retarded, just as retarded as I have heard all the other space deniers and flat earthers be before him too.
All the arguments are weak. You can see the space station from the ground as a bright fast moving star even with naked eyes. With better equipment you can photograph it and resolve enough details to see both the solar panels and the habitat modules.
You can also track its radio transmissions, and verify they disappear once the ISS moves below the horizon. There's more real science in these few sentences than most space retard flat earthers have ever thought about in their whole life.
You need better arguments, you need more logic, and you need to explain what it is people are tracking in the sky both visually, and with radio equipment, before you can get anywhere with these theories.
And if you think the earth is flat, you are completely lost. If you think space doesn't exist, then please explain the void inside your head.
Is it possible that they put a lot of glue in their hair so it doesnt go all over the place. Id imagine that your hair being able to go every which way would get annonying and they would want to glue and tie it down the vast majority of the time.
Look at the older NASA videos made for schools/pr, even they couldn't choose one method to show hair and other items like clipboards or clothing. Heck, they couldn't even decide with the Russians what to say about going to the bathroom or even brushing teeth in space as one claimed you'd swallow the paste and all when done brushing and the other claiming to rinse and spit. (Ignoring completely the dangers of swallowing fluoride infested toothpaste... especially longterm damage). These days they are really just shooting the movie gravity, over and over, although seemingly with worst cgi. There's even flat out scenes where an "astronaut" is literally riding an "invisible line", with a harness and everything. They actually forgot to remove the lines and harness in a few frames!
So no, don't tell me we have any definite take on space and nasa and "going into space". We don't know anything, but I do know this.
The technology, the ability and the finances to do so have existed for many decades TO SIMPLY MOUNT A CAMERA IN AT LEAST ONE WINDOW INSIDE THE ROCKET/SPACE SHUTTL3, WHATEVER, AND MAKE A VIDEO OF THE ENTIRE PROCESS OF LEAVING EARTH AND GOING INTO SPACE WITH A ROCKET!
Just give us that, one take. No alternate angles. Don't cut away. You can add other cameras for other takes and angles but one camera must remain on, with video/drive space for recording the entire launch, travel and 'insertion' into space, for us to see. Is that too much to ask for?
I think you guys are missing the fact that an airplane falling down is absolutely not zero G or a simulation of zero G. It is a simulation of weightlessnes but really you are falling the entire time (except when the plane goes back up).
NOT ZERO G.
Her hair moves about in the plane because she is being moved about by the parabolic flight. She is not zero G. Just falling. The plane matching that fall.
You people are fucking retarded.
The hair in space spreads out due to the only force left to act on it naturally. Static electricity/static pressure from each hair follicle has air between them now. Ripe for static charges.
They wear hair stuff to keep the hair together and to hinder growth but I don't think they do that anymore.
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:01:34 ago (+1/-0)
What exactly do you think the space station does?
Everything in orbit "falls". The moon "falls" around the earth too. This is simple physics.
What exactly is your definition of "zero g"? And when pilots experience 9Gs, what is that using your definition?
Where exactly in your universe would you find "zero g"? It can't be in this solar system because the sun has a huge gravity and captures every object out to Pluto.
Because you are all retarded niggers who think you are intelligent because someone wiser than you held your hand about the holocaust. The Earth is flat. Its a big deal.
My comment wasnt restricted to the flat earth topic. This entire site is imploding daily. Arguing over every little topic. EVERYthing. Religion. Muh flat earf. "Ur a shill". It's getting tiresome. Nothing but stirred up arguments with no hope of resolving them.
Pure balkanization of the 20 of us or so that are here.
If the woman in the simulated zero G jet drop didnt wash her hair for several weeks of constant plane stalling, her hair would probably look similar. Instead, she showered like a normal person and paid to experience a 20sec free fall.
Curly jew hair is like a scotchbrite brillo pad that has never been washed.
This is far from damning evidence to condemn the existence of space.
The hair thing is the wrong angle. If you want to know if space is fake, just ask yourself if the video has a brown person in it. If it has a brown person, it's fake. If it has White people and ONLY White people, it's real. And I'm telling you now, STRICTLY White, not even someone with curly hair who can otherwise pass for White. If it's not 100% White people, it's a fake video.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 11 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:14:04 ago (+11/-0)*
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 16:52:03 ago (+3/-2)*
Ask the question further - how does one wash long hair in space?
The answer is obviously not with a normal shower (as the girl in the plane example has).
Edit: LMAO downvoater was mad to be made to think.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 22:32:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 01:46:22 ago (+0/-0)
It can't be too fine of a powder, otherwise it could float away and get into the electronics.
Even application and brushing out would leave some sort of debris that could potentially contaminate things. Living in orbit for months poses some pretty unique challenges compared to earth luxuries.
[ + ] GlowNiggerDick
[ - ] GlowNiggerDick 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 17:28:39 ago (+2/-1)
It would make a lot more logical sense to grift trillions of dollars from tax payers to shoot a fucking useless rocket up into the sky and fuck off with a huge check.
The first black hole picture has recently been proven to be bullshit.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] -2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:47:42 ago (+0/-2)
Given i can see further than geometrically allotted on a sphere with a known radius of ~3,959 Miles. What is you counter to my observation that proves that there is curve? What makes more sense, believing in a curve when i can prove to you there is none or realizing that there is no curve when seen evidence?"
Are you going to say that the observation is incorrect?
If the earth is a sphere with a radius of ~3,959 Miles mathematically the distance to the physical horizon (earth curve) could be calculated as follows; ~1.225 (√ Height of the observer in feet) = Distance to the horizon in miles from the observer.
https://files.catbox.moe/vrwj8t.mp4 Flat Earth Fact 3 The Horizon Proves the Earth is Flat
https://files.catbox.moe/qiwlka.mp4 Flat Earth Fact 4 What About Refraction
https://files.catbox.moe/qppsqa.mp4 Flat Earth Fact 7 The Aeronauts Witnesses to Our Flat Earth
---------------------------------------------------
So if you'll concede that you are able to see further than you should what is your explanation? You'll evoke terrestrial refraction and claim that what your observing is not being observed in a straight line?
You'll claim all vision is a result from curved light without explaining the leveling effect of this misuse of refraction called "terrestrial Refraction" ?
How do you measure an angle off of the surface of a sphere? Can you measure a curved adjacent yes or no?
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:57:05 ago (+3/-1)*
Record the sun setting.
Keep zooming in for an hour or more - as you say should be possible in a flat earth, right?
Analyze the diameter of the sun, angle of the sun, movement of the sun over that entire period.
Flat earth sun should a) move laterally, not just vertically, b) change size, since the sun is a fixed diameter and close to the earth, it should have some change in size, c) show how night arrives.
Any point source of light is visible no matter how far away it is - especially something as bright as the sun.
Post your video to prove the earth is flat.
Edit: being called a "globe-earther" because I provide the method needed to prove the flat earth... sounds just like anti-semitism???
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:03:44 ago (+0/-1)
Therefore proof of flat earth. No one needs to do your begging the question logical fallacy of horseshit experiment that has nothing to due with the nature of the surface of the Earth but everything to due with the strange nature of the Sun.
Here is an experiment that disproves the globe, but you won't ever do it.
https://files.catbox.moe/uzwl4j.mp4
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:10:04 ago (+2/-1)
I never made a claim.
I suggested a method for retards to show the earth is flat - which cannot be argued against. Just record a sunset and prove that it never sets.
retards will be retards tho and never do it.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:37:10 ago (+0/-1)
"What am I trying to prove?
I never made a claim."
----
You are making the claim that the Earth is a Globe.
VIA
"I suggested a method for retards to show the earth is flat - which cannot be argued against. Just record a sunset and prove that it never sets."
-------------
This would not prove the Earth flat and is based on many assumptions/ begging the questions fallacies you've made about the nature of the Sun.
"Keep zooming in for an hour or more - as you say should be possible in a flat earth, right?"
No, this would not be possible on a flat Earth at altitudes lower than the height of the Sun from the Earth provided no atmospheric or weather distortion.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 21:29:38 ago (+0/-1)
What is the flat earth model for how night works?
Where does the sun go?
If you are saying a plane and ship can be "zoomed in on" for hours, why not the sun?
As for part a) you need help with reading comprehension. I never made any claims about the shape of the earth - I just gave you a method for disproving a globe, right? What exactly makes anything I said a claim? Are you saying anyone that makes a suggestion supports the opposite side? Reading comprehension for retards is a good book.
As for your last claim, look up how a point source works. Bright point sources are visible from every direction.
Maybe you need to start from the basics in this topic then - how does night work? where does the sun go?
If the flat earth is an enclosed system, then the sun has to be within the "walls". Go rent an empty warehouse floor. Put an led anywhere in the building and test whether you can find it by zooming in. I bet you can.
retards being retards.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:27:22 ago (+0/-0)
You are making the claim that the Earth is a Globe.
VIA
"I suggested a method for retards to show the earth is flat - which cannot be argued against. Just record a sunset and prove that it never sets."
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:49:29 ago (+0/-1)
You can't counter any of my arguments so you start dropping names. LMAO
You are just like the kikes that lost arguments - they claim anything they don't like is anti-semitic. LMAO
I know very well how to read, and not one of my posts ever used the word "globe" or even affirmed that the earth was a globe.
This is you 100 years ago:
you: seriously man, horses are the best and will never be beat by a car
me: the best way to prove horses are better is to have a competition
you: why are you so anti-horse? you car-lover!
LMAO kike retards.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] -5 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:16:26 ago (+5/-10)
I'm okay with saying what i know to be true from evidence and reason.
SOL INVICTUS HEIL
[ + ] qwop
[ - ] qwop 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:34:30 ago (+3/-1)*
Ok let's test your big brain.
If you go into any apartment building with windows towards the setting sun, with a free line of sight towards the horizon, when the sun sets the rays from the sun will come in through the window and hit the ceiling in the back of the room.
This effect implies the sun is below the ceiling of the apartment you are observing this phenomenon in.
However if you do the same test at noon, the rays of the sun will hit the floor of the same apartment.
How can this be? Which is it? One test says the sun is very low, below your ceiling. The other test says it is very high. So high the rays hit the floor instead.
Now the flat earth model says the sun moves in a circle above a plane. But this simple experiment I just explained, proves it also has to move up and down.
Now if it moves up and down, how come the rays hit the floor in apartment buildings in the US at noon, but at the same time the rays hit the ceiling in apartment buildings in other countries where the time is in the evening.
You cannot have it both ways at the same time. In one place it shows the sun is below your average apartment building height, in another place it shows it's high in the sky. At the same moment.
Which is it? How does your big brain resolve this conflict. Use evidence and reason. We need a Copernicus moment from you now.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] -2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:45:03 ago (+0/-2)
Now if it moves up and down, how come the rays hit the floor in apartment buildings in the US at noon, but at the same time the rays hit the ceiling in apartment buildings in other countries where the time is in the evening.
You cannot have it both ways at the same time. In one place it shows the sun is below your average apartment building height, in another place it shows it's high in the sky. At the same moment."
You've created a problem from nothing i honestly suggest you learn how a Sun dial works.
Yes this is called timezones, that being Noon in which the sun reaches Zenith at a point of equal Longitude. The reason why the sunlight hits your floor at your "noon" while at the same time hitting the ceiling in another land due to the fact that the sun is a localized body that is close to the surface of the Earth and when it is above a land it is giving light from above, while at the same time to distant lands the sun would appear near the horizon and the sun would be giving off lights that would hit the ceiling in their land.
When the sun sets, it is traveling further away from you and so converges into the perceived horizon line of the observer relevant to the observers resolution power and angle of observation.
https://files.catbox.moe/uzwl4j.mp4 here you go
[ + ] qwop
[ - ] qwop 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 20:30:58 ago (+3/-1)
Why? Because the original idea was wrong. They tried to use mathematical trickery to patch their earth-centric model, and every day the pile of patches grew bigger, until one day it was so unwieldy nobody could make heads nor tails of it any more.
Once the sun was put in the center, the mathematical patches could be done away with, and all the equations became simple and straightforward.
Flat earth is doing the same thing, except you are doing it backwards. You are taking a simple and working model, and applying mathematical and conceptual patchworks onto it, in order to try and cram it into a deluded model.
That's what you're doing, and you're participating in this lunacy. You are absolutely out of your mind.
[ + ] NeoNazirite
[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 23:48:04 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:13:55 ago (+0/-0)
" Yes this is called timezones, that being Noon in which the sun reaches Zenith at a point of equal Longitude. The reason why the sunlight hits your floor at your "noon" while at the same time hitting the ceiling in another land due to the fact that the sun is a localized body that is close to the surface of the Earth and when it is above a land it is giving light from above, while at the same time to distant lands the sun would appear near the horizon and the sun would be giving off lights that would hit the ceiling in their land.( BECAUSE ITS LOWER IN THE SKY YOU NIGGER THATS WHY I SAID NEAR THE HORIZON YOU LOW INBRED NIG)
When the sun sets, it is traveling further away from you and so converges into the perceived horizon line of the observer relevant to the observers resolution power and angle of observation. "
[ + ] NeoNazirite
[ - ] NeoNazirite -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:39:35 ago (+0/-1)
The sun's rays can't hit the ceiling unless the elevation of the sun is less than the elevation of the window.
Even if the sun were infinitely far away, it's rays could only appear parallel to a level plane at the elevation of the window.
The only way for the sun to hit the ceiling is to actually be lower than the ceiling.
Geez, I'm repeating myself, but I don't know how else to explain this simple thought experiment.
Again, you seriously can't be a white man.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:41:18 ago (+0/-0)
No shit you nigger and i've answered this you just can't read. Nor does it appear that you understand how angles work.
[ + ] NeoNazirite
[ - ] NeoNazirite -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:46:14 ago (+0/-1)
If the sun is above us, and if we are on a flat plane of infinite area, and if the sun traveled from directly above us to infinitely far away, the sun's rays would only ever come infinitely close to parallel to our level plane, but could never actually be parallel much less come from below like you are suggesting.
Edit: another part of this explanation is that the sun maintains it's elevation above our plane. Otherwise we are proving the sun's orbit, or curved path relative to us.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 18:59:09 ago (+0/-0)
Your example is a perfectly valid way to disprove the flat earth model with the sun just circling above the plane.
Facts really get in the way of retarded thinking.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic -5 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:26:45 ago (+0/-5)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 16:42:54 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 17:58:44 ago (+1/-1)
Perception of Sun "setting around a curvature obstruction" is due to vision mechanics and the Sun only moves further away from the observer.
[ + ] GroundskeeperWillie
[ - ] GroundskeeperWillie 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:23:20 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:41:19 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:51:32 ago (+0/-0)*
(Polaris is unseen from extreme southern hemispheres because it smaller and closer to the surface of the Earth)
[ + ] TheGreatWhiteHope
[ - ] TheGreatWhiteHope 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 20:22:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 20:25:28 ago (+0/-0)*
https://files.catbox.moe/v8d93w.mp4 Flat Earth Fact 2 Documents Evincing a Flat Nonrotating Earth
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:35:07 ago (+0/-1)
Magnetic North is the North Pole/ center, while Magnetic South is the circumference which is away from the center. Which is why traveling East or West is a circle. While North is In and South is Out.
"Howcome when you fly with the rotation of the earth vs the opposite it takes less time?"
You might want to re-think that as you are proving my point with this one. The flights don't take less time, although if the Earth was spinning i'd see why you'd have to think the flights would be different. Does a Hot Air balloon leaving the earth in the morning In Virginia Find itself in California by the evening?
[ + ] maroni
[ - ] maroni 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 08:48:52 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 11:33:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] -3 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:30:07 ago (+4/-7)
If the earth is a sphere with a radius of ~3,959 Miles mathatmatically the distance to the physical horizon (earth curve) could be calculated as follows; ~1.2 (√ Height of the observer in feet) = Distance to the horizon in miles from the observer.
https://files.catbox.moe/vrwj8t.mp4 Flat Earth Fact 3 The Horizon Proves the Earth is Flat
https://files.catbox.moe/qiwlka.mp4 Flat Earth Fact 4 What About Refraction
https://files.catbox.moe/qppsqa.mp4 Flat Earth Fact 7 The Aeronauts Witnesses to Our Flat Earth
There appears to be no measureable curvature. No curve. No R. No Sphere. No Gravity. The theatrical effforts put forth into a self admitted false portrait should be enough for anyone.
https://files.catbox.moe/3km5oq.mp4 The head knows which way is up
https://files.catbox.moe/hese7w.mp4 Lets just fake it
* https://files.catbox.moe/4yy2e8.mp4 Astronauts are Liars
The Earth is Flat. As in non spherical. Flat. Level.
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 22:19:39 ago (+1/-0)
Can you post all the flat earth facts when you have time?
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:23:28 ago (+1/-0)
The Earth is Measurably, Demonstrably, and Observably Flat.
The sextant proves the Earth is flat.
https://files.catbox.moe/9rjdfk.mp4
Flat Earth Pill
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=61319c47a1d2f
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 29, 2021 20:18:23 ago (+0/-0)
What do you think this entails then, if it is in fact, flat? From a spiritual perspective, or from a "meaning of life" perspective.
I appreciate your thorough replies and the info you share, thank you.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2021 14:40:58 ago (+1/-0)
This branches into what is not known. It took ~7 years of researching to realize that i was making justifications for the globe model in the form of begging the question fallacies. Questions that would already assume the condition on which the question was based, for example why can't i see Polaris from the extreme south? It assumes that Polaris is what they have decided to label "star" and it has an assumed height and relative size. The question begged the answer and was not deductive.
So what i did after this realization was to reduce it back to a simple question. Is there curvature or not? I've conducted laser, zoom tests myself and with others and was forced to conclude that i could not detect curvature of any kind. Furthermore as this information was becoming more popular online there as a noticed increase in shill flat earthers who would promote crazy concepts with no proof, or would propose a false proof positive experiment that they would then test and find out the earth was a globe to their mistake. Then the paid normie television shows started show casing these fake proof positive exterminations.
They were all running from the lack of curve.
Running from the fact that you can see geometrically further than you should be able to. Which means. There is no R. Without a radius value for Earth you no longer have the calculations for the size and distance to the sun. The argument is reduced as;
We have proof That you can see further than what is mathematically possible given the restraints of our sphere. The globe model will tell you that the lines are being refracted (despite not being an example of refraction) and in the same breath tell you that you can get a straight line to the horizon while using a sextant.
You can't have it both ways. Also a sextant is impossible to utilize on a sphere you cannot measure angles on a curved edge. In order to use a sextant you have to pretend you are a on a flat plane first, and then transpose that to a sphere.
So they'll bring up something about the sun while assuming what the sun is and while believing in its distance and relative size in relation to the observer. Some think the sun we see could be a projection, not an actual object. (Catbox is down ATM but will be back up soon and ill post the relevant video) They'll bring up a multitude of "other" questions instead of addressing Curvature.
IF it is flat which it appears to be, it does have some interesting implications. Many i would imagine would interrupt the information to be indicative of prime creation. Either by a divine being or by Natural Law. Semantics for what one would consider "God or Creator". Others say its proof of a Simulation which i do not agree that it is proof of.
To me there is up and down. The sky is also flat and its only perspective that makes it look curved above us. It is logical that we are in a contained system because gas requires containment in order to have pressure. A fact i notice a lot of jews don't want us remembering. There happens to be uniform gas expansion that we observe. They say gravity hold the gas at the outer edges of the atmosphere from moving into the vacuum of space, thus utilizing a downward force. Then when the gravity should be stronger as you move closer to the surface of the earth (inverse squared) for some reason the gas now expands uniform in all directions.
Which is the firmament. If this barrier extends and curves to the ground past the southern ice rim i do not know however i believe highly unlikely. It is reason to me that it is an infinite plane with an infinite sky plane above it. Evolutionary mechanics all still work. Seasons and time zones still work. "outer space" thats just the space beyond inner space, which by law is the area south of 60 degrees south latitude.
Extra terrestrials come from extra land. Thule society, annhennerbe and many other occult anthropology research times during the Third Reich had great interest in this subject, considering break away civilizations to be those that went underground. Here is where you'll find the mythos of the draconian. No foreign plane-ts needed. Perhaps overlaid dimensions for the archons sure.
Water finds level. Fills the shape of its container.
Gas expands in all direction uniformly with no downward trend.
Angles are measured with two straight lines.
The sphere by Einstein evokes gravity within the theory of relativity. This was introduced to counter Telsa and others from the growing knowledge and adaption of the Aether. The Aether could be interrupted to either power/draw power from an individual. This is known in esoterics as Vril, Chi, ESP, Rddhi etc etc.
What is clear is that the "sun" moves at 15 degrees per hour over the surface of the stationary Earth. The Aether could be the power to this. There is also a sect of German occultists who believe in a body called the Black Sun. Of which i am one.
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2021 23:31:19 ago (+0/-0)
Do you believe Jesus existed and if not why?
What are your top 3 books you recommend I read if you're willing to enlighten me further.
Thanks again for sharing.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 1 yearApr 21, 2023 00:32:34 ago (+0/-0)
The top three books that I would recommend are;
might-is-right-ragnar-redbeard; https://files.catbox.moe/gwl4rx.pdf
adolf-hitler-the-ultimate-avatar-miguel-serrano-english-pdf
https://files.catbox.moe/rsg10f.pdf
Devi, Savitri - The Lightning and the Sun (1958)
https://files.catbox.moe/b0541b.pdf
Take time to tell your loved ones that they mean everything to you. Take time to reflect on the beauty of a family. Never take them for granted.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 23:44:14 ago (+1/-1)
Not only that, but by placing the camera at 1 ft. above the ground you are omitting variables that would be neglible at a fair distance above the ground. Tides, for instance. And speaking of tides, if the Earth is flat, please explain them.
Why the astronauts starch their hair I don't know excep to keep it out of their faces. The necklace in the video shows actual reaction to low-G environment.
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:15:07 ago (+0/-0)
Prove it faggot. Prove curvature.
[ + ] CPU
[ - ] CPU 9 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:09:40 ago (+9/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:13:43 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] SunofGod
[ - ] SunofGod 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:57:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 20:11:50 ago (+0/-0)
They go up. Not far and come back down. The only edited youtube live video that i know of is the Spacex dual landing sequence video. They edited the original video without making the channel have to post a new one like very other channel.
https://files.catbox.moe/6qu6ew.mp4 It looks bad to me!
https://files.catbox.moe/qppsqa.mp4 Flat Earth Fact 7 The Aeronauts Witnesses to Our Flat Earth
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 22:05:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] frankenham
[ - ] frankenham 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 21:45:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 5 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 15:20:44 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 20:46:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] frankenham
[ - ] frankenham 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 21:44:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 4 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 15:39:15 ago (+5/-1)
this fact was brought to you by faggot OP, subscribe to his sub for more retarded deboonks.
[ + ] Blackpowerwhitepowder
[ - ] Blackpowerwhitepowder 3 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 16:09:15 ago (+4/-1)
Not saying I believe in space or any of that. However this video is fake and the narrators lack of an argument is gay.
[ + ] frankenham
[ - ] frankenham 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 21:49:19 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Blackpowerwhitepowder
[ - ] Blackpowerwhitepowder 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 29, 2021 17:46:05 ago (+0/-0)
That’s not evidence
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 23:50:31 ago (+3/-1)
You are a jew and a fucking asshole. Please kill yourself.
[ + ] ReturnOfTheGoats
[ - ] ReturnOfTheGoats 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 01:07:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:18:59 ago (+0/-0)
You make yourself look dumb without my help nigger. The reason why you say "act like i'm based" is because i am far more based and red pilled than you'll ever be goy. You'll always be a slave and i'll always be your superior. You'll always be a beta bitch believing a multitude of jew lies and the only reason you'll know any of them is due to Men such as myself holding your little baby hands along the way.
pathetic.
[ + ] qwop
[ - ] qwop 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:09:34 ago (+2/-0)
None of the other people in his clips had the same type of hair as the airplane blonde either.
The narrator is therefore retarded, just as retarded as I have heard all the other space deniers and flat earthers be before him too.
All the arguments are weak. You can see the space station from the ground as a bright fast moving star even with naked eyes. With better equipment you can photograph it and resolve enough details to see both the solar panels and the habitat modules.
You can also track its radio transmissions, and verify they disappear once the ISS moves below the horizon. There's more real science in these few sentences than most space retard flat earthers have ever thought about in their whole life.
You need better arguments, you need more logic, and you need to explain what it is people are tracking in the sky both visually, and with radio equipment, before you can get anywhere with these theories.
And if you think the earth is flat, you are completely lost. If you think space doesn't exist, then please explain the void inside your head.
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 00:27:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GlowNiggerDick
[ - ] GlowNiggerDick 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 17:24:18 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] JudyStroyer
[ - ] JudyStroyer 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 23:47:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Qwertytoal
[ - ] Qwertytoal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 17:46:29 ago (+1/-0)
These days they are really just shooting the movie gravity, over and over, although seemingly with worst cgi. There's even flat out scenes where an "astronaut" is literally riding an "invisible line", with a harness and everything. They actually forgot to remove the lines and harness in a few frames!
So no, don't tell me we have any definite take on space and nasa and "going into space". We don't know anything, but I do know this.
The technology, the ability and the finances to do so have existed for many decades TO SIMPLY MOUNT A CAMERA IN AT LEAST ONE WINDOW INSIDE THE ROCKET/SPACE SHUTTL3, WHATEVER, AND MAKE A VIDEO OF THE ENTIRE PROCESS OF LEAVING EARTH AND GOING INTO SPACE WITH A ROCKET!
Just give us that, one take. No alternate angles. Don't cut away. You can add other cameras for other takes and angles but one camera must remain on, with video/drive space for recording the entire launch, travel and 'insertion' into space, for us to see. Is that too much to ask for?
[ + ] 9000timesempty
[ - ] 9000timesempty 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 17:24:29 ago (+1/-0)
NOT ZERO G.
Her hair moves about in the plane because she is being moved about by the parabolic flight. She is not zero G. Just falling. The plane matching that fall.
You people are fucking retarded.
The hair in space spreads out due to the only force left to act on it naturally. Static electricity/static pressure from each hair follicle has air between them now. Ripe for static charges.
They wear hair stuff to keep the hair together and to hinder growth but I don't think they do that anymore.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 19:01:34 ago (+1/-0)
Everything in orbit "falls". The moon "falls" around the earth too. This is simple physics.
What exactly is your definition of "zero g"? And when pilots experience 9Gs, what is that using your definition?
Where exactly in your universe would you find "zero g"? It can't be in this solar system because the sun has a huge gravity and captures every object out to Pluto.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:11:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sturmgeschutz
[ - ] Sturmgeschutz 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:07:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:15:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sturmgeschutz
[ - ] Sturmgeschutz 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 14:48:47 ago (+0/-0)
My comment wasnt restricted to the flat earth topic. This entire site is imploding daily. Arguing over every little topic. EVERYthing. Religion. Muh flat earf. "Ur a shill". It's getting tiresome. Nothing but stirred up arguments with no hope of resolving them.
Pure balkanization of the 20 of us or so that are here.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 04:35:23 ago (+0/-0)
If the woman in the simulated zero G jet drop didnt wash her hair for several weeks of constant plane stalling, her hair would probably look similar. Instead, she showered like a normal person and paid to experience a 20sec free fall.
Curly jew hair is like a scotchbrite brillo pad that has never been washed.
This is far from damning evidence to condemn the existence of space.
[ + ] thebearfromstartrack4
[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:53:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:54:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 01:38:33 ago (+0/-1)
If you want to know if space is fake, just ask yourself if the video has a brown person in it.
If it has a brown person, it's fake.
If it has White people and ONLY White people, it's real. And I'm telling you now, STRICTLY White, not even someone with curly hair who can otherwise pass for White. If it's not 100% White people, it's a fake video.
[ + ] BoraxTheFungarian
[ - ] BoraxTheFungarian -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 28, 2021 00:09:36 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] NeonGreen
[ - ] NeonGreen -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 18:43:45 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Ifuckdolphinseverday
[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday [op] -1 points 2.3 yearsDec 27, 2021 14:11:48 ago (+1/-2)
Helios Heil!