The numbers need to be matched with the baseline percent vaccinated.
Their conclusion at the end of the article: vaxxed are 57% of the cases, 70% of the hospitalizations and 85% of the deaths.
If the vax rate is 70% (a guess, but a number is needed for the example) then vaxxed are less likely to be diagnosed as a case, are exactly equally likely to be hospitalized, and then more likely to die.
If the vax rate is 85%, then the vaxxed are equally likely to die, but less likely to be hospitalized or diagnosed.
All that said, the jab definitely does not do what it promised, and I don't know why any politician would still continue the charade, except for (((you know))).
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 4, 2021 15:22:45 ago (+0/-0)
Their conclusion at the end of the article:
vaxxed are 57% of the cases, 70% of the hospitalizations and 85% of the deaths.
If the vax rate is 70% (a guess, but a number is needed for the example) then vaxxed are less likely to be diagnosed as a case, are exactly equally likely to be hospitalized, and then more likely to die.
If the vax rate is 85%, then the vaxxed are equally likely to die, but less likely to be hospitalized or diagnosed.
All that said, the jab definitely does not do what it promised, and I don't know why any politician would still continue the charade, except for (((you know))).
[ + ] obvious
[ - ] obvious [op] 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 4, 2021 18:46:49 ago (+0/-0)