×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
24

Sheboon gets white guy fired because she can't dress her stinky child

submitted by voater to Niggers 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 15:34:08 ago (+25/-1)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/r9i2wo.mp4

Cringe public statement: https://files.catbox.moe/z6v4vb.jpg

He should be given a raise for maintaining a civilised atmosphere


73 comments block


[ - ] Nosferatjew 11 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 15:45:30 ago (+11/-0)

I would have kicked her out immediately for attempting to record a video of me on private property. Also because I wouldn't allow niggers in my restaurant.

[ - ] Roy_Batty 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:10:44 ago (+6/-4)

Aside from that, she is also recording other patrons without permission, and their kids. Fuck. No.

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:56:38 ago (+6/-2)

No. Im sorry but you are in public, you can be filmed. Unless that establishment wants to prohibit that. When you go out in public you are just that.

[ - ] Nosferatjew 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 17:04:11 ago (+5/-3)

No. I'm not sorry, but she was standing on private property (the restaurant), recording other people who on that same private property. No one in this video, including the nigger, was on public property.

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 17:19:00 ago (+6/-2)

Unless that establishment has that as a policy I don't care how you feel about it. You Are In Public. The same as if you ended up on ThePeopleOfWalmart. Walmart has no policy, most restaurants wont have such a policy.

Wad up your panties and cry all you want. You Are In Public.

[ - ] Nosferatjew -3 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 17:30:30 ago (+1/-4)

You clearly don't understand what the word "public" means.

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 18:00:03 ago (+2/-0)

You have that exactly backwards. Let me try to help. Everyplace Not your home is public unless very specifically designated private. The restaurant is the Owners private property. This is not your privacy. You have chosen to go out where there are dozens of other people. Your friends home may still be considered private. When you enter a Public space like a restaurant filled w dozens of random strangers you have entirely forfeited that privacy.

Again, unless the Owner of that property declares it private you aren't.

It's not like photographers havent been through the court system over this.

You are wrong. Be angry if you want. It wont change the fact that you are Entirely wrong.


At this point you should shut up. Im not lending you my shovel to keep digging that hole.

[ - ] voatersarefucktards -1 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 19:18:45 ago (+0/-1)

{crickets}

[ - ] Nosferatjew -1 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 02:00:38 ago (+0/-1)

Jesus Christ... it's like you didn't even read anything I wrote.

I don't have it backwards, you do. A restaurant is not a public space, it is a private place that people are invited to enter as long as they do not violate the rules of the establishment. For example: the restaurant not allowing those niggers to eat there because they are unable to comply with the dress code. If they wanted to kick that woman out for recording video, they absolutely could, because it is PRIVATE property. If she was recording that guy while standing on the sidewalk, they would not be able to legally stop her from recording. Do you see the difference yet?

Now, let's examine some of the dumbass shit you've said:
Everyplace Not your home is public unless very specifically designated private.
Except of course for literally all private property. Does this tard logic of yours apply to my neighbor's house? It's not MY home, so unless my neighbor has specifically designated his property as private, I assume with some sort of declaration, perhaps a sign, then it must be public? Retarded.
Your friends home may still be considered private.
"MAY"?? My friend's home "MAY" be considered private? It's literally his private property to do with as he sees fit. Yes, if he wishes to open it up for people to enter all willy nilly, he could, but because it would still be his private property, he could also kick any of those people out for any reason he likes. It's stupid remarks like this that lead me to suspect that you have no functional understanding of property rights.
The restaurant is the Owners private property.
Obviously. Where did I give any indication whatsoever that I am not aware of this obvious fact? You don't seem to understand what this truly means though.
This is not your privacy.
I never said it was. I said that the people she was recording were on private property. Am I wrong? Did I say something else? Did I even talk about "privacy"? Do you really, honestly believe that the restaurant is somehow suddenly public property because it serves food to people who enter the restaurant from what is actually public property?
When you enter a Public space like a restaurant filled w dozens of random strangers you have entirely forfeited that privacy.
Again, a restaurant is NOT a public space. It is a private place that people are invited to enter as long as they do not violate the rules of the establishment. Because you are clearly an idiot, I will repeat this with emphasis... *A RESTAURANT IS NOT A PUBLIC SPACE. IT IS A PRIVATE PLACE THAT PEOPLE ARE INVITED TO ENTER AS LONG AS THEY DO NOT VIOLATE THE RULES OF THE ESTABLISHMENT.*

If I saw someone in my restaurant, whether they were a legitimate customer or someone failing to get in because their niglet is wearing niggerball shorts, recording video of other patrons, or of members of the restaurant's staff, I would kick that asshole out and ban them and their family for life. And, to be very clear, I would do this in an effort to respect the privacy of my customers and employees while they are on my private property.

Keep your shovel. You need it way more than I ever will.

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 05:11:29 ago (+0/-0)

Man that's a lot of words to still be wrong.

[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 05:24:14 ago (+0/-0)

Cope harder fag.

[ - ] Kozel 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 21:09:16 ago (+0/-0)

you don't.

if the doors/gates aren't locked and there's no sign barring entry it is public access. if it is publicly accessible there's no expectation of privacy. if told to leave and stop recording by property owner one must legally and morally comply.

[ - ] 9000timesempty 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 17:33:13 ago (+0/-0)

Where I am if you are being recorded you can also record.

[ - ] 9000timesempty 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 17:32:14 ago (+1/-0)

Who are you to tell them what to do with their phones in public? You are in public. If my eyes can see you a damn camera can see you. You do not have privacy in a public space ESPECIALLY when they themselves are already recording in security cameras.

[ - ] Nosferatjew 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 17:43:55 ago (+2/-1)

Once you step off the sidewalk and into a privately owned business on private property, you are no longer in public. The First Amendment protected right to the freedom of the press, which is what protects people's right to record others in public, does not apply on private property.

[ - ] Kozel 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 21:10:29 ago (+0/-0)

it is publicly accessible and there's no expectation of privacy. until property owner asks them to stop and leave they don't have to. get A clue

[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 22:07:48 ago (+1/-1)

Appears you are retarded and either didn't read what I wrote, or have completely missed the point. This woman, being on private property, has no RIGHT to film people on that property. I didn't say she was doing anything illegal, I said she has no Constitutionally protected RIGHT. Obviously it is up to the property owner, or restaurant manager, or perhaps even the individual employee to tell her to stop and/or leave.

Also, "public accessibility" has nothing to do with the relevelant distinction between public and private property in this context. The restaurant is a private business on private property. THEY have the right to kick that nigger out whenever they please, whether it's for a dress code violation, or her child smells like feces, or she is recording employees or patrons, or simply because she is a stupid bitch. That nigger has has no RIGHT to be there, or to record video there, regardless of whether or not the restaurant has made itself "publicly accessible".

[ - ] Kozel 1 point 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 23:28:57 ago (+1/-0)

she has a right to film there unless told she can't by the owner/manager of property

she has a right to be there until told to leave by the owner/manager of property

[ - ] Nosferatjew 1 point 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 23:34:17 ago (+1/-0)

What you have just described is a privilege, not a right.

[ - ] Kozel 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 17:18:39 ago (+0/-0)

She can do what I wrote and not face any legal repercussions. Call it whatever you want, faggot.

[ - ] dalai_llama 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 07:24:45 ago (+1/-1)

Fucking kikes think everything is a right. Niggers aren't even real US citizens. You fucking kikes pilpulled your way around the Scott v Sandford decision and now we have to listen to you defend niggers every day. Fucking hell go back to Israel you faggot.

[ - ] Kozel -1 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 17:16:27 ago (+0/-1)

Did my facts hurt your feelings, precious snowflake?

[ - ] dalai_llama 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 20:46:35 ago (+0/-0)

lol, your opinions aren't facts.

But only a precious little snowflake would think that and then project onto the person that set then right.

You fucking faggot, nigger loving kikes are all the same. It's fucking hilarious.

[ - ] Kozel 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 23:54:11 ago (+0/-0)

Case law is not my opinion. Do you get inspiration for your insults from your mother?

[ - ] McNasty -2 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 18:24:35 ago (+0/-2)

Lol.good luck with that. It's 2021. If you haven't seen youtube videos on recording in public and what's considered public, you're just retarded I guess. How is a restaurant different from Walmart?

[ - ] dalai_llama 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 07:20:08 ago (+1/-0)

Just because you're a lazy faggot kike doesn't mean everyone is.

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 2, 2021 09:53:45 ago (+0/-0)

As lazy kike because I know it's legal to record in public? Lol. OK faggot.

[ - ] ilikeskittles 5 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:52:37 ago (+5/-0)

Why not just say you can't eat here because you're both niggers!

[ - ] boxslowly 2 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 20:12:04 ago (+2/-0)

Because then he'd have gotten fired oh wait

[ - ] ilikeskittles 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 12:08:17 ago (+1/-0)

Exactly.

[ - ] Sneedermeyer 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:12:26 ago (+4/-0)

Here's the thing "maam" I'm telling YOU to get the fuck out. We're not here to talk about someone else, now kindly get out of my store.

[ - ] SteppingRazor 3 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:48:26 ago (+3/-0)

He was doing the wait staff a favor by not seating them.

[ - ] WanderingToast 3 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 15:58:15 ago (+3/-0)

He missed two tricks.

1. Feel, felt, found

2. He should have pointed out that the other kid was wearing tailored shorts and a t-shirt that did not feature a giant logo of a sports brand

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 23:21:12 ago (+0/-0)

What is number one?

[ - ] WanderingToast 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 15:14:49 ago (+0/-0)

Classic manipulation / objection handling.

A: "I don't like how YouTube got rid of the dislike count, it's manipulate"

B: "I understand how you feel, and I actually spoke to another goat who felt the same way as you, but they found that by not being influenced by other people's knee jerk negative opinions or political biases that he had more agency and YouTube became less manipulate"


Super toxic example just to demonstrate how invidious some of this shit can get

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 15:58:58 ago (+0/-0)

Gotcha. Thanks for the information.

[ - ] fightknightHERO 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 15:36:29 ago (+2/-0)

these niggers don't even want to eat fancy food
they just want to boss these soygoys around so they can sue for "racism" and winning the nigger lottery

shit like this is a reminder that Nogs and Dogs are not welcome in any self-respecting restaurant and she should've been pepper sprayed for excessive nigging

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 15:57:54 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] JoggerLogger 1 point 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 20:23:53 ago (+1/-0)

ugh ma’am, ma’am.. i’m asking you to leave because in the 30 seconds you’ve been here your son has stuffed enough silverware in his pants for a table of 8.

[ - ] JoggerLogger 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 20:17:10 ago (+0/-0)

don’t offer any form of cooked chicken or fried fish at your restaraunts and you won’t have to deal with them.

[ - ] ButtToucha9000 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 19:09:00 ago (+0/-0)

If there wasn't a kid in the exact same type of clothing then sure, private company blah blah blah but there was a kid in the exact same type of fucking clothing. Nigger or not thats bullshit.

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 1 point 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 23:22:47 ago (+1/-0)

It wasnt the same. He didn't have a giant niggerball player on the front. He didn't have a drawstring. Are you a nigger and not understand nuances?

[ - ] voater [op] 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 02:20:23 ago (+1/-0)

So many kikes on voat recently, they join threads and start arguments over bullshit

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 10:20:32 ago (+1/-0)

It's really gotten bad. We just need to double down and drive them out (or convince them to neck themselves.)

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 6, 2021 23:56:43 ago (+0/-0)

Who was outside the restaurant at that point. Maybe someone else fucked up and let the kid in. Maybe if that happens they let it go. Maybe they're just arbitrary. It doesn't fucking matter. If you're not obeying the rules, you do not deserve to get in.

People don't enforce dress codes because they like it. I'm sure some manager told him he had to and then as soon as he was called racist fired him. Some restaurants treat their employees like shit and vice versa too.

[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 18:49:28 ago (+0/-0)

So wuz the white kid wearing athletic wear? Or just short pants and tee shirt?

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 23:23:32 ago (+0/-0)

Short pants and t-shirt.

[ - ] NuckFiggers 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 18:24:17 ago (+0/-0)

Honestly, I'm tired of niggers dragging down the quality of everything. First we allow this little niglet in and next they're wearing a g string of shit stained underwear.

And where's the proof that he got fired?

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 7, 2021 00:01:35 ago (+0/-0)

Niggers are told by the media and you know who that asking them to obey dress codes is racist. TO BE FAIR, most dress codes have evolved in response to nigger behavior, and, thus, the shit that's banned by them tends to be nigger shit.

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 17:10:30 ago (+3/-3)

This is the reason why the Jews created Christianity.

Before Christianity, this guy wouldn't have spent all that time apologizing to a nigger. He would have ended the conversation with a hatchet in her face.
And the best part is, nobody would be crying "Oh, morals morals morals!"
Everyone would be patting this guy on the back for removing a shit-hawk from the community.

Stop worshiping Jews.

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 23:25:30 ago (+0/-0)

So, what branch of norse worship are you a member?

[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 23:39:48 ago (+1/-0)

The quickest way to tell if someone is LARPing is if they have a "branch" of Heathenry.
He's probably a Jew in a Viking roleplay costume.

Look, either you are White, or you aren't. That's the branch.

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 10:23:44 ago (+0/-0)

Oh, come now. You should know which side you fall on unless you are larping. I'm starting to think you're a larper or a jew.

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 16:22:18 ago (+0/-0)

I know which side I fall under. I'm White.
It's the Jew Worshipping Christians you need to be interrogating. They are LARPing as jews.

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 17:13:29 ago (+0/-0)

Now I know you're a jew. You should have been able to answer my question without delay. You've been found out, jewboy.

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 17:22:31 ago (+0/-0)

Your question doesn't even make sense? What are you expecting?
"Oh, I'm a member of the Southern Baldrist Church".
"Oh, I'm a 7th day Odinist".
Fuck off Jew. It doesn't work like that.

Here's how it works. You are either White, or you are not White.

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 18:18:35 ago (+1/-0)

You're either an Odinist or Asatru. But you're just a fucking retard. Any semblance of credibility you had just went out the window. You know the name Odin and that is it. What a fucking faggot. LOSER.

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 18:27:03 ago (+0/-0)

See, you're thinking about this like a Jew. A Jew ASSUMES that because he requires a religious structure, that EVERYONE requires a religious structure.

We aren't Jews. We don't do structures. Fuck off with your jew-shit.

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2021 18:31:53 ago (+0/-0)

You larping-ass faggot. Hahahahahahaha.

[ - ] Thought_Criminal 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 15:38:18 ago (+2/-2)

She's right.

[ - ] voater [op] 3 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 15:42:11 ago (+3/-0)

No, the shorts are different

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:03:31 ago (+2/-1)*

She is still right. If the code is going to be that particular, then it should prohibit all shorts. She had a good argument, and she discussed it without losing her mind. I see nothing wrong here except policy written and enforced ignorantly. Manager should have bitten the bullet and then discussed a policy change later. If the policy had actually contained these details, he would have been able to say so. He stumbled, and it was over at that point.

[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 5 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:48:14 ago (+5/-0)

Even if the manager conceded, served the nigger and her future super predator complimentary meals, the nigger would have still posted the video and demanded restitution. The manager was fucked the moment he said "no".

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 18:39:05 ago (+0/-0)

People have lost the sense of how to communicate. This could have been handled with tact, even if he'd first said no. Even a white mother who was refused service for the same reason might have chosen to post this to social media; that isn't a phenomenon unique to blacks. It's the culture we live in. Women everywhere have been trained for years that if they do not get their way, it is best to throw a fit. Make a fuss. If it doesn't solve the problem you have with an individual immediately, somebody else will come along later and 'restore you', or at least show you sympathy. In the end, attention is worthwhile enough, and the repercussions of throwing these fits for women in society are so low, that there's rarely a reason not to do it.

The 'Karen' meme might have been a teehee moment, but it speaks to something cancerous in this society that we've all been watching for decades, which is women barking loud up any tree until someone caves and gives them what they want. Should this manager have been fired? Absolutely not. What, to please a market they don't want to serve anyway? No, bending the knee is just encouraging exactly the behavior I've just described. Women can be told no, and that can be that. But I swear, I've heard it from women's mouths. They talk about it, for instance, when they're on the phone with customer service or something. They know they just have to get emotional and the process of getting their compromise has begun.

[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 18:50:13 ago (+1/-0)

I agree with you in general that women, regardless of ethnicity, are trained to publicly complain to the largest audience possible, but this instance would never have gained as much traction, a company appollogy, or firing had the woman been white.

[ - ] Thought_Criminal 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2021 21:17:13 ago (+0/-0)

If the woman had been white, she would have lost her job by now.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 19:06:05 ago (+1/-0)

The rule is: no niggers allowed!

[ - ] NeoNazirite 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 19:05:17 ago (+1/-0)

Yep: niggers shouldn't be allowed where they aren't wanted.

[ - ] poopdawg15 -1 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:54:41 ago (+0/-1)

No indication of a firing.

[ - ] KCobain27 -1 points 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 16:00:33 ago (+0/-1)

Wearing a mask and gloves. Was this recent?

The woman has a slight point but that other kid didn't have a huge logo on his shirt. I'd side with management.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 30, 2021 19:03:28 ago (+1/-0)

slight point
If by point you mean racism, you are correct. The rule is to not allow niggerism.

I usd to frequent a bar with a dress code: no flat bill hats and no plain white t-shirts. I wore both once when the hostess told a nigger to get lost while wearing the same thing.