×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
96
32 comments block


[ - ] ToNigIsToNog 17 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 13:09:28 ago (+17/-0)

none of the major powers at the time make mention of it, because it didn't happen.

[ - ] lord_nougat 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 15:22:09 ago (+4/-0)

Well, it did after the communists did it!

[ - ] KikesOnSpikes 3 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 18:52:13 ago (+3/-0)

"But it's ok when we do it!" - jews.

[ - ] lord_nougat 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 21:13:20 ago (+2/-0)

OYVEY!! Anything less would be ANTISEMITISM!!!!1

[ - ] toobaditworks 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 23:21:24 ago (+2/-0)

"Be sure to mention it -6,000,000 times in the media and history books!" - jews

[ - ] Ragnar 8 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 15:19:14 ago (+8/-0)

Wasn’t Winnie himself a pawn of the juice? A bought and paid for shill?

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 3 points 2.5 yearsNov 28, 2021 09:51:11 ago (+3/-0)

It's Voat, nigger. You can say jews. Or better yet, kikes.

[ - ] Ragnar -1 points 2.5 yearsNov 28, 2021 10:08:36 ago (+0/-1)

You sound like an angry keyboard warrior! Not sure about White.

[ - ] Huscarl 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 28, 2021 16:17:20 ago (+1/-0)

We live in reality here. You call a nigger a nigger, and a kike a kike. It's normal behaviour. Nothing angry about it, just using the words that are appropriate.

[ - ] whiteflourguy 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 28, 2021 20:20:46 ago (+0/-0)

Warrior does say the things i like so I will gladly accept them to this site, Anybody who claims to hate Niggers and Jews is good in my book

[ - ] lord_nougat 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 15:22:33 ago (+2/-0)

Clearly, yes.

[ - ] TopTierCIAShill 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 18:21:53 ago (+4/-0)

if you search the globe and mail archives (for those of u who are enrolled in canadian uni), you can search holocaust and there is no mention of the jewish holocaust pre 1949 (or pre nuremberg trial). pre 1949 it just says holocaust was a huge fire, so lots of articles of homes burning down. There's even one that says Britain holocausted the Germans in WWII kek.

do it.

also google Rhea Clymans. She was a jew who was living in Nazi Germany and she never mentioned the holocaust ONCE. She did mention the holodomor while it was happening and the West did NOTHING.

[ - ] 3Whuurs 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 21:54:31 ago (+2/-0)

I’d have to dig it up again, but I herd a based af author talking in a podcast about how the Holocaust story itself was made up by the British. British jews I’m sure, but the claim was that British Intel ran tests by pushing some true story that made them look bad, through as much of the theatre of war as they could and see if they could track it, and they would judge the sentiment about them, by wether people modified the stories in their favour or not.
Literally a game of telephone.
And in this case they wanted to see how bad Dresden was going to cost them in the public eye after the war and started the rumour about Germans being massacred, and it came back as the Germans massacring the Jews. And Winnie shared this with Stalin and FDR who then made sure the head of psychological warfare was the 1st to be photographed in a “liberated camp” and somehow all the actual extermination camps were magically on the soviet side of the Iron Curtain.

[ - ] Revek 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 15:41:12 ago (+4/-0)

I’m curious now, what was the first published reference to the Holocaust?

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 20:04:50 ago (+4/-0)

The jews were bitching about muh 6gorrillion before the war even started.

[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 21:42:20 ago (+1/-0)

Wasn’t it when the joo’s wrote the Talmud in Babylon talking about “when 6 million are killed, they’ll get muh olive trees back”?

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 28, 2021 09:05:36 ago (+0/-0)

As others have said, it's been an important thing to them for a long time, but I assume you're talking about post WWII. You could definitively answer this by referencing old encyclopedias and finding the first one to mention it. I've heard references on places like this over the years to the idea that it wasn't until the 60s that "they" made it seem like something that actually happened.

[ - ] TheSimulacra 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 14:39:43 ago (+4/-0)

Ahmidenajad calling the Holocaust a myth on the local evening "news" and the kvetching that ensued was one of the greatest moments in television history.

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 12:03:24 ago (+4/-0)

Of course not, it wasn't invented until after he wrote the books.

[ - ] deleted 3 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 19:30:08 ago (+3/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 3 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 19:23:29 ago (+3/-0)

Already knew that, there is no mention of the holocaust hoax in Encyclopedia Brittanica or Funk and Wagnals prior to 1972 either. In fact, no where in any of the captured German military records is there a mention of the "FINAL SOLUTION" or as much as an order to harm ✡ kikes...another point of interest is that the word NAZI didn't even get it's origin with the 3rd Riech it was the kikes who invented the word. NAZI came from the name GRAZIA MENDES NASI, a ✡ empress from the 1500s. The kikes are filthy swine.

[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 22:01:26 ago (+1/-0)

How could they have hyped the extermination story hard enough within a year of the war to successfully pulled off the Nuremberg trials, but not mentioned it as a Holocaust the whole time, or for 20 years after?
Surely they must have been absolutely screaming it everywhere during the trials if they were able to focus the entire hoax on dead Jews by then already instead of just other war activity?

[ - ] derpfroot 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 16:16:37 ago (+2/-0)

It wasn't mentioned by a single soul until the 70's. Not in a dictionary, a memoir, or even in conversation. The closest thing was the absurdities proclaimed at the kangaroo Court in Nuremberg.

I'm guessing they thought people would have found out what was said and then completely disregarded them as ridiculous, but when people didn't, they went full speed ahead with the insanity.

[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 18:06:42 ago (+2/-0)

They got away with it because that generation wanted the war over and done with and buried. They knew it was a result of the last war. They'd been through the depression, the war and their parents hadn't had it so easy that they were the type that wanted to pick at scabs either.

Plus the decency factor was heavy with them. It was considered indecent to punish the losers. They skipped over news reports about it and it wasn't a polite topic to raise with strangers on the streetcar. The propagandists don't tell us that the population was pissed off that they had the Nuremburg trials at all.

Involving your children in conversations with old people is priceless.

[ - ] RedBarchetta 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 15:40:02 ago (+2/-0)

Point of fact: Churchill was a Zionist. He actually sympathized with the kikes and wanted to be one.

[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 12:17:32 ago (+2/-0)

Does he mention Germany putting people (jews, deviants, and other criminals) in camps? I'm certain he doesn't discuss any kind of extermination in progress or the safety of the deportees.

[ - ] 1Icemonkey 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 20:11:49 ago (+1/-0)

Because they made up the tale after the war. Long after Churchill was gone, like in the sixties.

[ - ] Dread_Pirate_Johnson 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 19:07:58 ago (+1/-0)

Yes.

[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 27, 2021 17:00:12 ago (+1/-0)

Or combat babies. Always needing their mommies to carry them. Nap times. Just as likely to shoot their parents as the enemy. Hardly worth the effort. It's a morale issue mainly I think.


Jews hadn't come up with the word yet. EVERYBODY was a prisoner that was a wienie. HARDLY worth any attention compared to the COMBAT SOLDIERS who DIED and/or not FIGHTING to WIN. While they just went to camp.

[ - ] Nigloo_Dismantler 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 28, 2021 11:41:53 ago (+0/-0)

Yes. Neither does De Gaulle's "War Memoirs" or any of Roosevelt's writings.

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 28, 2021 09:56:54 ago (+0/-0)

Do you mean specifically mentioning the word "holocaust" or any reference at all to camps, extermination etc?

"Holocaust" is just a marketing buzzword coined long after the war.

And even if Churchill wrote a whole book about genociding kikes, it wouldn't necessarily make even a word of it true.