×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
73
24 comments block


[ - ] fightknightHERO 14 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 10:38:44 ago (+14/-0)

trust the soyience goy

[ - ] 1Icemonkey 4 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 11:16:46 ago (+4/-0)

Soyience, now that made me laugh!

[ - ] boekanier 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 24, 2021 01:08:19 ago (+1/-0)

'Science' with a sauce of soy. Normies are fond of it.

[ - ] UndercoverGoyim 9 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 11:19:56 ago (+9/-0)

In the news: retarded goyim get bamboozled

[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 18:16:49 ago (+2/-0)

It's unbelievable how eager they are to believe the government and corporations love them.

It's impossibly difficult not to say they deserved it for ever being so grotesquely childish in thinking like that.

No country, place of employment or anywhere but your own family can work on that assumption.

[ - ] UndercoverGoyim 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 24, 2021 00:28:52 ago (+1/-0)

They're nothing more than peasants really — if you're the one supplying them with bread (metaphorically or literally) then they'll shill for you the same way they do for these kikes and their famous vaccines

[ - ] whitemail 4 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 14:39:19 ago (+4/-0)

Vaccines so powerful, so effective they kill babies. Wow. That's some good stuff. I'm going to get mine today.

[ - ] SparklingWiggle 4 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 11:40:16 ago (+4/-0)

How else would you know it's working?

[ - ] Fascinus 3 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 12:00:15 ago (+3/-0)

[ - ] taoV 2 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 16:57:12 ago (+2/-0)*

This is possibly statistically normal ASSUMING historical data is accurate.

Waterloo had a population of 113k as of 2017 according to census data (617k in the region according to the municipay authority). https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/regional-government/population.aspx


Canada doesn't seem to get that granular with their data. THe questionable part is that the WHO lists the national average stillbirth rate as 2.77 per 1,000. Canada adopted the WHO definition of stillbirth decades ago so their own data is probably similar.

Being generous and taking the more strict definition of the Waterloo region,
2.77 x 113 = 313.01

Divide by 2 since it's measuring 6 months instead of a year,
156.505

Discussion:
IDK if it's an indigenous area, but I would expect that to increase the rate of stillbirths.
There might be some seasonal variation in stillbirths, but the idea that it's almost entirely concentrated on one half of the years is...less than unlikely.
The WJO are corrupt fuckups, but I doubt they consipred with the Canadian government to deflate stillbirth numbers for 6 decades.

EDIT Apparently this is much higher than Canada's data would predict:
Per yesiknow:
"IN 2020 total for Canada regardless of area 361,667 births. 358,604 live births. 3,063 still births. 3,063 still births."
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310042801

[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 18:21:41 ago (+2/-0)*

You have to go far north to find where Natives have higher infant mortality and stillbirths. Northwest Territories where they just drink because they can't think of anything else (and don't have the necessary enzymes to process it). Half the Whites too.
IN 2020 total for Canada regardless of area 361,667 births. 358,604 live births. 3,063 still births. 3,063 still births.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310042801

That's 255 per month across the entire country of almost 40 million people.

[ - ] taoV 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 18:42:53 ago (+1/-0)

Interesing. Then one of the sources is wrong. I'm inclined to beleive the government data (yours) is more correct.

[ - ] dassar 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 19:27:58 ago (+1/-0)

Not disagreeing, however another component that completely skews all the various parameters used for data study, analysis and projection ( Region/ Population/ Age /Race, Ethnicity/Socio-economic status) is the spread of the Vaccine Batches.
If we are to believe the recent Slovenian 'whistleblower' that there are three different batch types in the vaccine numbers - with the numbers ending in either 1-2 or 3. Number 1 is a placebo/saline, 2 is the RNA flask being propagated by MSM and talking heads, 3 is RNA that also contains an Onco gene that is linked to an adenovirus that promotes soft cell cancers).
So the truth lies somewhere in between but all analysis so far is obfuscated and corrupted unless taking into account the distribution of these 'apparent' batches and only then can actual study begin.

[ - ] taoV 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 20:52:03 ago (+1/-0)

That's a fair point. We know SOMETHING is up with the vax and not to take it, but none of the theories seems conclusive yet so I usually don't mention them. Haven't heard of this whistleblower, will look it up.

[ - ] Kozel 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 17:28:46 ago (+1/-0)

86 deaths is a low number. the few that were saved will contribute weak genes to the population.

[ - ] Kneeoncat 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 24, 2021 02:46:26 ago (+1/-0)

Nice work, but stillbirth numbers are not per Capita, they are per pregnancy. Think again.

[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 2 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 12:26:16 ago (+2/-0)

Things are always better if you don't squirm and wiggle around. We need MORE disciplined babies. I'm sure they were white. Right?

[ - ] AnonymousLex 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 21:54:27 ago (+1/-0)

They teach that "institutional racism" causes higher stillbirth rates for non whites.

[ - ] blit416 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 14:17:51 ago (+1/-0)

this will have to hit the news eventually. they can't sit on 13 in 24 hours at the Lions Gate hospital in Vancouver - and 86 in 6 months at Waterloo, Ontario

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 12:39:06 ago (+2/-1)

deleted

[ - ] germ22 3 points 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 13:34:37 ago (+3/-0)

He said it in the video, in Waterloo it was usually 6 still births per year.

[ - ] taoV 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 23, 2021 17:00:01 ago (+1/-0)