Before eugenics, we had the natural order the world creating a harsh distillation of the human spirit. This gave rise to advances in every facet of spritual, scientific, and philosophic understanding of the human condition as never rivaled by other processes.
As we approached this understanding and followed its logical conclusion, we determined that this process could by synthetically accelerated beyond the natural pace, and with the accuracy of a scalpal, humans could surgically improve our species, compared to natures cudgel of random adaptations. We called this Eugenics. The careful and intentional selection of the best of all humans is how it is characterized today. This is a false argument in its premise. The intention of Eugenics (and possibly its shortcoming) is that it did not seek to have only the strongest humans pro-create. It only sought to limit the procreation of the lowest and most primal examples of humanity that were crude corruptions of human mind and spirit, the damaged and dangerous wolves that lay among the sheep.
Then World War II happened. The end of the German government at the hands of the Allied Powers would cast Eugenics as a corruption of its intent as described above. The misunderstanding of the Eugenics movement, as it existed, was an intentional creation of the "winning" side to villify their opponents. The subsequent reaction to this casting has created a society where the "best of us" is encouraged to allow "the least of us" the space to grow and exist regardless of its effect on humanity. This was a societal overcorrection, bred by the propoganda of the industrial war machine that placed the USA and most other world nations into the most disastorous wars in human history. In turn, this led to the most unintelligent and incapable of society being placed under an umbrella of protection that allowed their rapid multiplication. To suggest that such a practice would be detrimental to the advancements of humans was now slogged and enshrined in accusations of racism and evil with nothing more than what amounts to the winner casting his opponent in less than favorable light simply to justify his own aggressions.
. The intention of Eugenics (and possibly its shortcoming) is that it did not seek to have only the strongest humans pro-create. It only sought to limit the procreation of the lowest and most primal examples of humanity that were crude corruptions of human mind and spirit, the damaged and dangerous wolves that lay among the sheep.
Its not the end of eugenics. When we educate people on the the differences between the races, how those differences came about and how to eliminate the worst behavioral traits in order to promote the most stable, prosperous and intelligent societies, almost everyone will see the wisdom in eugenics. Even blacks. Blacks stand to benefit the most because they can achieve the greatest improvements in efficiency through eugenics. The only group that eugenics does not serve is the group which only lives by exploiting other groups but is superfluous to all other groups— the group which lives by creating inefficiency.
The truth once discovered cannot be supressed indefinitely
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 11, 2021 18:52:51 ago (+1/-0)
Meh. THe bantus have been slaughtring as a way of life since we found them. South Africa was almost completely cleansed of it's indigenous by roaming Bantus before the Whites arrived and incorrectly started feeding them.
Both the Hutus and Tutsis are Bantu, and they've almost eradicated the pigmy. They killed 800,000 of each other without guns. They are what they are. You can breed them down with White or anything else and their lawyer mama with 1/8 Bantu will say in grammatical English some version of , "But he was a good boy."
How's that internalized guilt trip going bruh? are you descended from Jewish slavers or the 4% of European aristocrat colonists who owned and bred slaves?
Then why the fuck do you keep saying "we" you niggerbrain?
[ + ] thebearfromstartrack4
[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 11, 2021 15:49:01 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 3.6 yearsNov 11, 2021 17:03:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Redhairin
[ - ] Redhairin 0 points 3.6 yearsNov 13, 2021 04:22:40 ago (+0/-0)
https://www.nature.com/articles/hdy201484
Not all do.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 11, 2021 15:51:52 ago (+1/-0)
Its not the end of eugenics. When we educate people on the the differences between the races, how those differences came about and how to eliminate the worst behavioral traits in order to promote the most stable, prosperous and intelligent societies, almost everyone will see the wisdom in eugenics. Even blacks. Blacks stand to benefit the most because they can achieve the greatest improvements in efficiency through eugenics. The only group that eugenics does not serve is the group which only lives by exploiting other groups but is superfluous to all other groups— the group which lives by creating inefficiency.
The truth once discovered cannot be supressed indefinitely
[ + ] ForgottenMemes
[ - ] ForgottenMemes 2 points 3.6 yearsNov 11, 2021 16:15:53 ago (+2/-0)
Opposition to eugenics is support for dysgenics, which is child abuse.
So long as you frame the discussion correctly, it's easy to get every reasonable person to support eugenics.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 11, 2021 18:32:00 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 3.6 yearsNov 11, 2021 18:52:51 ago (+1/-0)
Both the Hutus and Tutsis are Bantu, and they've almost eradicated the pigmy. They killed 800,000 of each other without guns. They are what they are. You can breed them down with White or anything else and their lawyer mama with 1/8 Bantu will say in grammatical English some version of , "But he was a good boy."
[ + ] wyrmblut
[ - ] wyrmblut 0 points 3.6 yearsNov 12, 2021 02:40:53 ago (+0/-0)
Then why the fuck do you keep saying "we" you niggerbrain?
[ + ] StopTheEvilAgenda
[ - ] StopTheEvilAgenda 0 points 3.4 yearsJan 15, 2022 13:25:57 ago (+0/-0)