×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
10

Im looking for a study that showed black kids raised by white parents had a lower IQ regardless

submitted by Barack_Obama to whatever 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 17:58:25 ago (+10/-0)     (whatever)

I don't like asking you fags for shit but this would be really help ful.


13 comments block


[ - ] Tallest_Skil 11 points 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 18:19:02 ago (+11/-0)

The Minnesota Trans-Racial Adoption Study is what you want. It’s basically the final word in both the “correcting for environmental bias” and “miscegenation improves offspring” claims of the kike-addled. And if you want the final word in “the education system is racist,” you want The Kansas City Desegregation Experiment. Both irrefutable.

NEVER be afraid to ask others for citations, especially if it’s for something you “read somewhere but aren’t sure if it’s legit.” We can only stop the spread of disinformation if we don’t spread it ourselves.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 18:27:58 ago (+1/-0)

But Scarr and Weinburg make conclusions that essentially contradict the data .

Summarized by Amren https://www.amren.com/news/2019/10/twin-studies-arthur-jensen-iq-race-differences/

There are some commentaries out there that come to some more objective conclusions than the authors if you google the study.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 8 points 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 19:17:15 ago (+8/-0)

I'm sure Weinburg was totally reasonable and unbiased in his interpretation of the data.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 20:03:09 ago (+3/-0)

undoubtedly.

[ - ] RecycledElectrons 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 20:10:47 ago (+1/-0)

Thank You, Tallest_Skill.

I recall insulted me one last time on Christmas day on the old Voat.

Thank You for many things.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 4 points 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 23:34:46 ago (+4/-0)

I probably did, and you probably didn’t deserve it.

Live as long as possible, white man. That’s all we have left.

[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 7, 2021 10:07:39 ago (+0/-0)*

Tallest_Skil gave a definitive answer, but I want to chime in with two useful references. In 1966, the second edition of Elizabeth Shuey's book "The Testing of Negro intelligence" contains this statement in the foreward:

"Dr. Shuey finds that at each age level and under a variety of conditions, Negroes regularly score below whites. There is, to be sure, an overlapping of 10-15 per cent which means that some Negroes achieve high scores. But the mean differences persist and are statistically significant. We are forced to conclude that the regularity and consistency of these results strongly suggest a genetic basis for the differences. I believe that the weight of evidence (biological, historical and social) supports this judgment."

You can find that book here: https://book4you.org/book/2743734/707d11

There's also "The Bell Curve", which has been written about so extensively, there's no need for me to describe it. Note that while I cause a great deal of indignation and condemnation, no one has been able to refute its conclusions.

https://book4you.org/g/Richard%20Herrnstein

I STRONGLY recommend getting David Duke's book, "My Awakening". It's a very interesting read, and he has an extensive list of sources for everything he says regarding race. Just those references is worth having a copy.

https://book4you.org/book/5850959/6ea9e5?dsource=recommend

There's also a twin experiment I can't find, where twin Negro children were adopted by different families, one in the US and one in Canada. As they grew, the researchers found that despite the dissimilar environments, their test scores where statistically equivalent. This was notable because it took into consideration that in the communities in Canada where the adopted Negro children lived, antipathy toward Negroes was non-existent (i.e, they experience little or no "racism"). (That might have come out in the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. If someone can set me right on that, I'd appreciate it.)

[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 18:49:45 ago (+0/-0)

Why do you need evidence of a study when their behavioral rhythms are proof enough?

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 20:02:28 ago (+0/-0)

Because science fags like to quantify.

[ - ] Fascinus 2 points 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 20:23:11 ago (+2/-0)

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 6, 2021 20:35:18 ago (+0/-0)

I recognize the importance of measuring the real world because I'm not a nigger.

[ - ] Barack_Obama [op] 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 7, 2021 18:49:19 ago (+0/-0)

Some things are observable though. I don't need a research study to identify that the sky is blue.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsNov 7, 2021 19:27:17 ago (+0/-0)

But its much better if you understand and can explain why the sky is blue. If a pack of jews are running around saying the sky is blue because white people are evil, and you can give a comprehesive explanation on how it is due to light refraction in the atmosphere.

I understand why whites act like whites and why blacks act like blacks and I can cite their crime rates and their IQs and I can explain the disparity in a scientific context. The more indesputable information you have, the more convincing you will be, especially if you can explain it as the result of a natural phenomenon in scientific terms. Especially for mid-wit edumacated normies.

Its just better to measure. What is the resistance to measuring?