IQ differences lead to disparite out comes, Which lead to envy, Which lead to strife.
In a free society the largess and generosity of the more able class is turned against it, out bred and murdered by the greater numbers.
In a less free society, all rules that keep the lower IQ population in check are sold as oppression so the world steps in and frees up the society, which leads to death.
You need to study more - your post is teenage philosophy that isn't borne out by history.
Jews lead to envy, which leads to strife, but that doesn't cause conflict (which jews also lead to). Intelligence (not IQ) differences have always existed, but the earliest records of mass envy comes from the jewish creation of 'wanderlust' in the 1700 and 1800s, when they were trying to cover up their own migration by making others envious of lands that weren't their own.
Also reminder that the peasants and serfs of old weren't envious of the 'nobles' they occasionally had to kill.
Â
Separately, jews also lead to conflict, but not by envy; they create conflict by fanning timeless slights (similar to the Shakespearean feuds which nobody knows who truly caused it). For blacks, they used slavery, even though blacks were perfectly happy being literal pets (pets are legally treated as chattel slaves btw), why is why repatriation failed, and why blacks continued happily sharecropping even after emancipation. The history has been forgotten though, and so now it is cause for conflict.
For women, they used the cruelty+oppression card (now, the 'equality' card). Intergenerational gaps in kids are created through 'virtual oppression', via kids emulating what they see the kids with (((stereotypically shitty))) parents on TV doing, though the situations are all fictional. They would use the slavery card on dogs as well, if dogs understood English.
We can see it firsthand - look at jews promoting hate of boomers both here and on reddit, (which should be a clue it isn't organic). The perceived slight? To leftists, boomers are selfish. To those of the right, boomers let jews take over the country. None of this is historically accurate, but who knows better? Nobody actually studies anything anymore.
'Nobles' of old had their own game they played for their own power, and much of it came from making and breaking alliances, which involved a lot of fighting. This requires an army, which was made of said serfs, and armies run on money, which requires even more taxes on the non-working serfs.
The 'nobility' was never killed because the serfs/peasants were jealous or envious of the displays of decadence, etc. Actually, the 'envious' mindset is relatively new, roughly becoming mainstream with MTV's 'Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous', which created a mindset called the 'Displaced Millionaire', where many act and make financial decisions as if they are millionaires that simply haven't earned their million yet. There is a ton of philosphy and history here, all with jewish underpinnings.
In short, I was saying that disparate outcomes aren't what lead to conflict historically, and the conflict that was present wasn't present from envy.
What is the truth and what are we taught?
Regarding how the numerous wedges jews have driven? This is way to long to even summarize here - is there a specific subtopic you are interested in?
BTW, everything has something wrong - including physics, chemistry, and even math (here, negative numbers and rules surrounding operations with 0).
I'd love to know truly about our history, firstly.
We don't have reliable records going back further than 600 years or so - one of the biggest problems has been the repeated (((plundering or burning of libraries))), going back to the 3 burnings of the Library of Alexandria, which had the last records of the origins of Alchemy and Astrology (and history, and math, and...). Generally, any document over 400-600 years old and not etched in stone can be assumed to be fake (using our own Declaration of Independence as an example, which is kept in an inert atmosphere, protected from UV and IR, has been treated 3 times to preserve the ink, and is still falling apart at barely 250 years old).
That said, we have really good history for the last 400-600 years. I only have 2 original works (the origins of the Slave Repatriation→Abolition movement / how that launched feminism, and my work on the creation of the 'Black Culture' / how that originated drug culture). I have some smaller bits (e.g. the origin of the Fire Codes / Fire Marshall, which also became the inspiration for every other non-Sheriff 'police' force, and related) but these build on the works of others.
The 2 whose works I primarily build on is the late Dave McGowan, who died of (((undiagnosed late stage lung cancer))) in 2015 - read both the features and newsletters. He is quite thorough, and he was the first to discover the creation of the 'hippie counterculture' was entirely (((Naval Intelligence))), which has implications reaching forward and backward in time. Also, his feature on both the Moon Landing and 9/11 is the most complete of any I've seen.
Regarding the problems with Mathematics, that one is original to me, but I'd rather dig up a post where I've written on it in the past. The short version is that negative numbers aren't real, making them invalid (and everything derived from them, e.g. imaginary numbers). It was the subject of a huge debate in France, which went all of the way to the king, who settled the rules of negative numbers by decree. I have an old document on this that I will try to dig up for you. Also, the rules for operations on 0 are arbitrary, and were modified a few hundred years ago because someone didn't like Brahmagupta's original rules for math with 0 (he invented the concept, as well as made the original errors that introduced negative numbers). https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Brahmagupta/
No,in a free society,people will rise or sink to their mean. If someone is capable,they will rise. If they aren't,they will sink. And charity is a choice.
In an enslaved society,you will do as you are told,everyone who isn't an elite will be a slave,and your excess will be taken and given to others by force. You will have no say in who gets what is rightfully yours.
This society is not free. In a free and fair society,I would know where I stand. In an enslaved society,I will simply be beaten down regardless of my ability.
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 19, 2021 11:34:02 ago (+3/-0)*
Jews lead to envy, which leads to strife, but that doesn't cause conflict (which jews also lead to). Intelligence (not IQ) differences have always existed, but the earliest records of mass envy comes from the jewish creation of 'wanderlust' in the 1700 and 1800s, when they were trying to cover up their own migration by making others envious of lands that weren't their own.
Also reminder that the peasants and serfs of old weren't envious of the 'nobles' they occasionally had to kill.
Â
Separately, jews also lead to conflict, but not by envy; they create conflict by fanning timeless slights (similar to the Shakespearean feuds which nobody knows who truly caused it). For blacks, they used slavery, even though blacks were perfectly happy being literal pets (pets are legally treated as chattel slaves btw), why is why repatriation failed, and why blacks continued happily sharecropping even after emancipation. The history has been forgotten though, and so now it is cause for conflict.
For women, they used the cruelty+oppression card (now, the 'equality' card). Intergenerational gaps in kids are created through 'virtual oppression', via kids emulating what they see the kids with (((stereotypically shitty))) parents on TV doing, though the situations are all fictional. They would use the slavery card on dogs as well, if dogs understood English.
We can see it firsthand - look at jews promoting hate of boomers both here and on reddit, (which should be a clue it isn't organic). The perceived slight? To leftists, boomers are selfish. To those of the right, boomers let jews take over the country. None of this is historically accurate, but who knows better? Nobody actually studies anything anymore.
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 20, 2021 19:08:17 ago (+0/-0)
What is the truth and what are we taught?
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 21, 2021 14:29:26 ago (+1/-0)
'Nobles' of old had their own game they played for their own power, and much of it came from making and breaking alliances, which involved a lot of fighting. This requires an army, which was made of said serfs, and armies run on money, which requires even more taxes on the non-working serfs.
The 'nobility' was never killed because the serfs/peasants were jealous or envious of the displays of decadence, etc. Actually, the 'envious' mindset is relatively new, roughly becoming mainstream with MTV's 'Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous', which created a mindset called the 'Displaced Millionaire', where many act and make financial decisions as if they are millionaires that simply haven't earned their million yet. There is a ton of philosphy and history here, all with jewish underpinnings.
In short, I was saying that disparate outcomes aren't what lead to conflict historically, and the conflict that was present wasn't present from envy.
Regarding how the numerous wedges jews have driven? This is way to long to even summarize here - is there a specific subtopic you are interested in?
BTW, everything has something wrong - including physics, chemistry, and even math (here, negative numbers and rules surrounding operations with 0).
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 22, 2021 13:20:14 ago (+0/-0)
I'd love to know truly about our history, firstly.
And then some elaboration on your last paragraph about math, especially.
Thanks
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 29, 2021 13:01:32 ago (+0/-0)
We don't have reliable records going back further than 600 years or so - one of the biggest problems has been the repeated (((plundering or burning of libraries))), going back to the 3 burnings of the Library of Alexandria, which had the last records of the origins of Alchemy and Astrology (and history, and math, and...). Generally, any document over 400-600 years old and not etched in stone can be assumed to be fake (using our own Declaration of Independence as an example, which is kept in an inert atmosphere, protected from UV and IR, has been treated 3 times to preserve the ink, and is still falling apart at barely 250 years old).
That said, we have really good history for the last 400-600 years. I only have 2 original works (the origins of the Slave Repatriation→Abolition movement / how that launched feminism, and my work on the creation of the 'Black Culture' / how that originated drug culture). I have some smaller bits (e.g. the origin of the Fire Codes / Fire Marshall, which also became the inspiration for every other non-Sheriff 'police' force, and related) but these build on the works of others.
The 2 whose works I primarily build on is the late Dave McGowan, who died of (((undiagnosed late stage lung cancer))) in 2015 - read both the features and newsletters. He is quite thorough, and he was the first to discover the creation of the 'hippie counterculture' was entirely (((Naval Intelligence))), which has implications reaching forward and backward in time. Also, his feature on both the Moon Landing and 9/11 is the most complete of any I've seen.
The other is Miles Mathis, who frequently gets lost in the weeds, but focuses more on faked history, of which he has done his best works (e.g. the (((Medicis))) taking over the Papacy 600 years ago, leading to the first scandals involving a pope (e.g. this guy)
Regarding the problems with Mathematics, that one is original to me, but I'd rather dig up a post where I've written on it in the past. The short version is that negative numbers aren't real, making them invalid (and everything derived from them, e.g. imaginary numbers). It was the subject of a huge debate in France, which went all of the way to the king, who settled the rules of negative numbers by decree. I have an old document on this that I will try to dig up for you. Also, the rules for operations on 0 are arbitrary, and were modified a few hundred years ago because someone didn't like Brahmagupta's original rules for math with 0 (he invented the concept, as well as made the original errors that introduced negative numbers). https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Brahmagupta/
Out of time, but this should get you started.
[ + ] Merlynn
[ - ] Merlynn 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 19, 2021 08:06:16 ago (+3/-0)
In an enslaved society,you will do as you are told,everyone who isn't an elite will be a slave,and your excess will be taken and given to others by force. You will have no say in who gets what is rightfully yours.
This society is not free. In a free and fair society,I would know where I stand. In an enslaved society,I will simply be beaten down regardless of my ability.
We are not free.
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 19, 2021 09:55:22 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ForgottenMemes
[ - ] ForgottenMemes 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 19, 2021 10:40:26 ago (+2/-0)
I think you've just invented communism.