Sign into an existing account

I agree. Someone go post that on tictok and see how long it stays. KEK!

Hard to know without a source, but I'm guessing they divided it up by organisations. So as a country china produces more CO2, but it doesn't count because it's divided up among hundreds of factories, whereas they count the US military as a single organisation so it's bigger than any one of them.

I only made it to 43 seconds....i dont know how you made it that far

No she is to retarded to watch for long.

I made it to the end. Seems like she'd be fun in bed. I'd throw her a beating.

I watched the whole thing and also looked her up on Tictoc and messaged her and got into a relationship for a couple for weeks and fucked her fourteen times.

Why is blaming parasites the new thing?

"All that crazy dancin' was making my penis soft" - Dave Chappelle

Everything she said was dangerously fucking stupid.

deleted

We did have an excessive number of bases and troops in Europe. If nukes are real, Russia was never going to invade Europe again.

learn yea about the glory of the petro-dollar. it's why the US goes to war for oil, and yes, blowing up the odd well helps that.

I have serious doubt about your comments about co2 in ww2. every nation involved cranked its industry to 100%

You watched the whole thing, didn't you. Congratulations and thank you for taking one for the team.

Mental illness is contagious. Do we have the resources to put half of the nation in a facility?

Bullets are still cheaper even in the current market.

I'd fuck her but she's not what I would call hot. Have higher standards, King. You can do better.

Give or take...

We don't need one, but we still have to have one.

Other countries don't want to cooperate because they are programmed by game theory and evolution to be smart about cooperation, a big risk like the one you suggest everyone takes is one of the worst that selects against retarded survival strategies.

Those who cooperated the most died put first, even when exclusively in the company with other cooperators, it's the least viable strategy under normal average commonplace circumstances, under extreme circumstancestheir survival rate drops, as in, they die out even faster, either a more selfish actor arises to replace them, or they all die out.

Don't jump to conclusions aboit what I'm saying here, thevsecond worst strategy is the ones who never cooperate, who die out as the cooperators did as soon as the last of them is gone, just as with the cooperators, they die our even when only in the company of their fellows, they rely on the cooperators to survive, but are parasitic, and the relationship is not stable.

Learn about the development of morality as the product of rational self interest out of game theory.

And learn about how this applies when genes get involved via hamiltons laws of kinship selection, which shows why even self sacrificing altruism is the product of rational self interest under certain circumstances, though this decision is made by alleles in their own interests, rather than that of the organism whose behavior they play a role in influencing along with other alleles.

The rules of living are simple, all you gotta do is do what you can to make sure copies of your genes exist in other organisms after you die, preferably in greater numbers than before your death, and even more preferably in organisms that have a high chance of increasing the numbers of organisms with copies of those genes even further.

This is the ultimate driver of all your traits, including your behavior and conduct towards others, and the instincts and impulses that drive those decisions, such ax your emotions or thoughts.

When you are conflicted, it is because you have the genes for two genetic traits that work with two different survival strategies.

For example a man who cheats on his wife, and then feels guilty, has the traits that favor an r selected strategy of having a lot of sex with a lot of partners and leaving a lot of children that you won't do much to care for, but so the traits that favor a k selected strategy of finding one mate establishing a pair bond with them and them investing heavily into all the offspring you have with them. What seems to be a moral quandary is in actuality a competition between quality vs quantity, resource investment vs resource conservation, and a fixed-location cooperative build vs a mobile-roaming selfish one.