×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
23
25 comments block


[ - ] WholeMilk 6 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 17:07:16 ago (+6/-0)

These are used to calibrate the testing equipment. Note on page one, positive control swab, negative control swab. The have to calibrate( or think they're calibrating) the machines for accuracy.https://www.ihs.gov/sites/labmedicine/themes/responsive2017/display_objects/documents/lab-requirements/Abbott_ID_Now_COVID_19_Training_Form.pdf

[ - ] mememeyou [op] 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 17:18:18 ago (+1/-0)

hmm makes sense... but with the false positives & nature of PCR tests, couldn't they just turn the up threshold on the 'negative' ones & they'd become positive? Terry Mullis talks seem to say that. Maybe it's just to convince the nursing staff, or maybe nothing nefarious going on.

[ - ] WholeMilk 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 17:24:19 ago (+3/-0)

It's possible but most nurses are retards when it comes to technology. I do know that most of the equipment is network connected for reporting (state, local, etc) It's not beyond the realm of possibility for them to remotely "adjust" the equipment based on desired targets. I recall looking at configuration documentation last week. I will see if I can dig it up again.

[ - ] mememeyou [op] 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 18:04:47 ago (+1/-0)

right, wondering if it's to dupe nurses & medical staff. Thanks for trying to clear it up, want the truth even if it's not in my favor

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 3, 2021 05:09:16 ago (+0/-0)

The tests are shipped in batches, or "lots". Each lot must be tested with a known positive and known negative sample to ensue they perform correctly. That's what you're looking at. The positive sample is labeled biohazardous because it's made from attenuated pathogen, so they label it hazardous to CYA.
Ironically, the opposite of what you're thinking is the case with viral antigen testing. They are notoriously low in sensitivity. The covid antigen tests are only 20-30% sensitive when pitted against PCR or viral culture methods.

[ - ] Cynabuns 5 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 16:40:46 ago (+5/-0)

Whoa.

[ - ] Love240 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 16:48:30 ago (+3/-0)

I thought I wouldn't be surprised about this crap anymore, Yet here is icing to the 'don't even take the test' cake. SMH
At this rate we're going to run out of 'conspiracy theories' by December.

[ - ] ZorbaTheGreek 4 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 17:51:17 ago (+4/-0)

I've never taken a test - but in a few months, I will really, really have to cross a border and after weeks of searching, there seems to be absolutely no legal way of me crossing it without a test.

So I've searched around. There are now tests that they send at home, you spit in them, and send them back. They give you the result in less than 24 hours.

My plan is simple: I've got an English bulldog and he can't wait to drool all over it.

There are several 'providers' and they cost a lot but here's one for those wondering about them: https://www.haloverify.com/

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 19:26:14 ago (+1/-0)

Its possible that you have trace amounts of covid RNA in your nose/throat because they are just floating around in the air. They are everywhere. Presence of the viral RNA is not necessarily evidence of infection. It might be a good idea to rinse your nose out with a saline nose spray and to gargle as well before your take the test. This would help prevent a “false positive”. You might be able to pull off a false negative by using a sanitizing nose spray and gargle ( like iodine nose spray and listerine which kill sars cov 2 on contact). Maybe.

[ - ] mememeyou [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 20:53:26 ago (+0/-0)

your cat's asshole works too

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 22:19:31 ago (+0/-0)

#BOMBSHELL: SARs COV2 ended in March of 2020 but compliance worked so well they continued with tyranny

[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 19:17:41 ago (+2/-0)

Okay faggots positive and negative controls in the context of PCRs are two types of tests you run to determine if a) you fucked the test up or b) there is contamination. I imagine that one has a biohazard symbol because it uses a different preservative than the other.
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-is-the-difference-between-negative-and-positive-control-in-PCR

There is sort of a broader meaning for these terms in science, but they serve a quality control function here. Jesus christ faggots. If they were disseminating the virus they would not make tictoc dancers knowing participants in the conspiracy.

[ - ] mememeyou [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 19:44:56 ago (+0/-0)

'disseminating the virus'
I'm definitely not saying that. there is no 'virus', but maybe there is some shit like theragrippers or graphene oxide on the test swab? Could be a nothingburger though, no doubt.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 19:59:49 ago (+1/-0)

There is in fact a virus. Its a bad one. It was created as a bioweapon under the guise of gain of function research to cure coronaviruse diseases (which it didn’t) and it was funded by the NIH.

Lets say they are jamming graphene oxide up your nose. Graphene oxide is not the safest thing to put in your body, but I wonder how much of it could get in to your bloodstream through your nose. Not enough to kill your or sterilize you. So what is the purpose of delivering GO on a nasal swab? What’s the end game? Why not contaminate a swab with shit or some other drug?

[ - ] mememeyou [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 20:57:49 ago (+0/-0)

been concerned about this since old voat https://searchvoat.co/v/science/4143338
drug delivery, not sure what else they and the hydrogels are capable of
https://www.theengineer.co.uk/theragrippers-gradual-release-drugs-johns-hopkins/

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 23:34:17 ago (+0/-0)

Okay I remember these. But they are made with a different material. Not graphene. And def not hydrogels.
The hydrogels systems like this pegylated lipid particle are really interesting and scary, but I think people don’t think they are as dangerous as metal or graphene because they are lipids. They charge these lipids so they can be drawn to your cells electrical charge.

[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 16:54:09 ago (+2/-0)

What does this mean?

[ - ] mememeyou [op] 5 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 17:04:34 ago (+5/-0)

looks to me like there is a test may have a bioweapon in it... and maybe they know in advance whether you are 'positive or negative' before you even take the test.
Looks pretty official on multiple tests, leads me to believe it is doubtful they are faked, IMO. Just found this though

[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 20:21:29 ago (+1/-0)

the positive control has covid, duh

[ - ] voatisajewishheaven 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 18:30:06 ago (+1/-0)

So they give out samples of the virus? You should analyze it to see if its real

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 20:03:21 ago (+1/-0)

You could engage in serious fuckery if you could buy covid contaminated q-tips off the internet.

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 22:20:32 ago (+0/-0)

Just the vaccinated the unvaxt catch it from the vaxt

[ - ] RedBarchetta 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 16:55:13 ago (+1/-0)

For all the bums in the world. Why aren't they getting the rona? Remember when the shit first hit? We all thought the "homeless" community was going to be decimated? Never materialized.

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 22:21:22 ago (+0/-0)

The same reason why you don't hear of THE CASES THE CASES in Afghanistan

[ - ] toobaditworks 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 2, 2021 16:48:00 ago (+1/-0)

neither