Sign into an existing account

[ - ] Love240 [op] 4 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 15:51:03 ago (+4/-0)

Thank you for your expert opinion on the subject. Let's see your credentials, oh wise one.

[ - ] account deleted by user -1 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 15:56:06 ago (+3/-4)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Love240 [op] 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 15:58:20 ago (+2/-0)

I have been reading and researching, I post the link for discussion and analysis. What is so 'COMPLETE TRASH' about this source? Are you an expert on electron microscopes now too? Discuss.

[ + ] FacelessOne

[ - ] FacelessOne 5 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 16:22:40 ago (+5/-0)

Nico is a verified Useful Idiot who supports Globalist Kike Goals.

His primary goal to to distract and stifle any legitimate discussion on this site. He avoids getting to the point at all times and prefers to drag all discussions into the mud.

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 16:38:05 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 16:33:09 ago (+2/-2)

account deleted by user

[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 16:39:36 ago (+2/-0)

Did you go to the web site? Did you bother to read the article? There's more than just one picture.

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 17:15:36 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 19:14:01 ago (+0/-0)

So, you provide no proof, no evidence, no argument that it's bullshit, and you make a declaration about graphene without evidence. You should understand that you're much less credible than that web site, and your argumentation skills are completely jew level, i.e., never give proof, just attack and call people names.

[ - ] Love240 [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 18:08:56 ago (+0/-0)

Here you go, more 'random pictures'. https://search.brave.com/images?q=trypansoma%20parasite

Well, would you look at that...

[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 19:16:45 ago (+0/-0)

Good post. I'd like to mention that in the article, the writer did not say that what's in the picture "is" trypansoma. This is the phrasing used:

It appears and is identified anatomically as a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite

"Appears" is a far cry from saying "it is".

[ - ] Love240 [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 1, 2021 02:35:19 ago (+0/-0)

The article says, "It appears and is identified anatomically as a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite..."
That's hardly a 'far cry'.

[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 1, 2021 08:29:20 ago (+0/-0)

I'm sorry, I was unclear. I like the post and despite what another users says about the source, I think the source uses very careful language to describe the phenomena identified in the microscopy, which is a good practice. This is restrained language and is intentionally used to prevent leading to a conclusion without further examination and evidence. It "appears" is the best conclusion one can come to regarding something 10 microns large without further isolating it and doing whatever tests are needed to better associate its behavior with that Trypanosoma cruzi.

[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 15:55:04 ago (+2/-0)

Please explain why the source is bad.

[ - ] account deleted by user -1 points 3.6 yearsSep 30, 2021 15:56:28 ago (+2/-3)

account deleted by user