In vitro means in test tube or similar. One issue is how much dosage is required in the body to get the same effect as in the lab.
Does Ivermectin work as a preventive pill? As a curative pill? How much should you take? I dunno, the water is pretty murky. You can find sites with studies saying how effective it is, and then you can find other sites saying those studies are flawed, and that proper clinical trials to resolve these questions are under way.
I would consider taking a preventive dose at ordinary usage levels if you're scared about getting the coof. But I stick with Vitamin D and eating right.
This is one of the biggest Ivermectin stories at the moment, but the MSM is completely silent about its success.
Remember that in order to allow EUA emergency use authorization for vaccines, US law says there cannot exist any other available treatments before approval. Otherwise EUA cannot be applied. This is the main reason for both the HCQ and Ivermectin blackouts.
I listen in on front-line doctor conferences, where they discuss treatment options amongst themselves, and most of them use Ivermectin successfully along with Hydroxychloroquine. In fact both Ivermectin and HCQ are part of the Front-Line Covid Critical Care Alliance FLCCC recommendations for treatment. Here's their statement on Ivermectin:
People can criticize these studies all day long, but fact is front line physicians already know that it works in practice. All the other huffing and puffing is just stall tactics by the medical industrial complex, in order to keep the vaccine jab machine running uninterrupted.
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 19:02:37 ago (+1/-0)
All the other huffing and puffing is just stall tactics by the medical industrial complex, in order to keep the vaccine jab machine running uninterrupted.
Ivmmeta.com / c19ivermectin.com is another good site with links to studies on multiple treatments besides ivermectin and statistical summaries of those studies.
I don’t think FLCCC is recommending use of HCQ anymore. They think there is unclear benefit in early covid and trend to harm in late covid.
Im not totally sure but PERHAPS the immunomodulatory effects of HCQ are cancelling out the virucidal effects in some people. HCQ is used in RA and lupus because it inhibits antibody production. When viral loads are low you would expect a typical dose (400mg /day for 5 days) to kill of the virus pretty effectively, so that depressed antibody production is not an issue. But if viral load was high (as it is in some people with higher exposures) you would expect that dose to be only weakly effective and the antibody issue would be a significant liability. This is me just making an educated guess as to why there are mixed results with HCQ, It may be better as a prophylactic.
Its not clear if typical doses used are achieving effective concentrations in lung tissue or other tissues to inhibit viral replication. Of course effective dosing is highly dependent on the amount of virus in your body.
The thing about IVM is, its pretty unlikely to cause serious harm so the trade offs look pretty good for high risk faggots. My elder person is taking .2 mg/kg 1x a week. He’s been doing it for most of the last 10 mos. or so. We increased the dose a little. He tolerated it well. Other fam member was just potentially exposed. So I told them to take a prophylactic — .4 mg/kg for 2 days. We’ll see. But Im not worried about the dose of IVM because most people can take quite a bit more than that without having significant side effects.
BTW IVM prophylaxis would be a seriously bad idea for women who could become pregnant. I think that is a caution that you can’t repeat too often.
Consider melatonin. Apparently it really jacks up the early immune response. Natural melatonin levels get seriously low after the winter solstice.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 15:32:42 ago (+2/-0)
Does Ivermectin work as a preventive pill? As a curative pill? How much should you take? I dunno, the water is pretty murky. You can find sites with studies saying how effective it is, and then you can find other sites saying those studies are flawed, and that proper clinical trials to resolve these questions are under way.
I would consider taking a preventive dose at ordinary usage levels if you're scared about getting the coof. But I stick with Vitamin D and eating right.
[ + ] qwop
[ - ] qwop 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 18:46:11 ago (+2/-0)*
https://files.catbox.moe/lua1h5.png
This is one of the biggest Ivermectin stories at the moment, but the MSM is completely silent about its success.
Remember that in order to allow EUA emergency use authorization for vaccines, US law says there cannot exist any other available treatments before approval. Otherwise EUA cannot be applied. This is the main reason for both the HCQ and Ivermectin blackouts.
I listen in on front-line doctor conferences, where they discuss treatment options amongst themselves, and most of them use Ivermectin successfully along with Hydroxychloroquine. In fact both Ivermectin and HCQ are part of the Front-Line Covid Critical Care Alliance FLCCC recommendations for treatment. Here's their statement on Ivermectin:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/faq-on-ivermectin/
63 studies showing that it works.
https://files.catbox.moe/ndwszf.png
People can criticize these studies all day long, but fact is front line physicians already know that it works in practice. All the other huffing and puffing is just stall tactics by the medical industrial complex, in order to keep the vaccine jab machine running uninterrupted.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 19:02:37 ago (+1/-0)
After watching this video, I agree: https://www.bitchute.com/video/AHGqHsMe1r6g/
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 20:37:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 21:04:08 ago (+0/-0)
Im not totally sure but PERHAPS the immunomodulatory effects of HCQ are cancelling out the virucidal effects in some people.
HCQ is used in RA and lupus because it inhibits antibody production. When viral loads are low you would expect a typical dose (400mg /day for 5 days) to kill of the virus pretty effectively, so that depressed antibody production is not an issue. But if viral load was high (as it is in some people with higher exposures) you would expect that dose to be only weakly effective and the antibody issue would be a significant liability. This is me just making an educated guess as to why there are mixed results with HCQ, It may be better as a prophylactic.
[ + ] StealthNinjaTaliban
[ - ] StealthNinjaTaliban 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 18:06:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 20:52:22 ago (+0/-0)
The thing about IVM is, its pretty unlikely to cause serious harm so the trade offs look pretty good for high risk faggots. My elder person is taking .2 mg/kg 1x a week. He’s been doing it for most of the last 10 mos. or so. We increased the dose a little. He tolerated it well. Other fam member was just potentially exposed. So I told them to take a prophylactic — .4 mg/kg for 2 days. We’ll see. But Im not worried about the dose of IVM because most people can take quite a bit more than that without having significant side effects.
BTW IVM prophylaxis would be a seriously bad idea for women who could become pregnant. I think that is a caution that you can’t repeat too often.
Consider melatonin. Apparently it really jacks up the early immune response. Natural melatonin levels get seriously low after the winter solstice.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 20, 2021 11:10:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] mememeyou
[ - ] mememeyou 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 16:02:38 ago (+0/-0)