×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
4

Should drama fagging be a bannable offense?

submitted by Rotteuxx to whatever 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 09:37:15 ago (+14/-10)     (whatever)

It's clear that many around here are too freaking stupid to see an active shill campaign if it poked them in the ass with a red hot poker.

All the pedo drama is being led by a small group of users intent on shitting up the community and lay the ground work for selective censorship, which they would spearhead with the same manipulation techniques being used right now.

Does that qualify as freedom of expression? Does hiding behind the 1A to destroy a community and rob them of tbe 1A equal free speech? Isn't that jewish behavior we should get rid of if we had morals & values?

This is exactly how "hate speech" laws were created to benefit kikes.

See? it's easy to make a retarded argument for censorship.

Now wake the fuck up and stop feeding this orchestrated drama campaign.

edit:

Quick downvotes but zero counter arguments, how quaint!


48 comments block


[ - ] fightknightHERO 8 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:11:09 ago (+9/-1)

"time wasted on drama could be time spent naming the jew"
some faggot, date unknown

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety -1 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 12:47:54 ago (+5/-6)

Meanwhile, keep supporting child exploiters.

https://files.catbox.moe/zwndb0.jpg

[ - ] PostWallHelena 7 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:02:19 ago (+9/-2)

Rotteux has been gaslighting that these pictures on B4P posts are not sexualizing children and not sadistic. Keeps trying to argue that a pic of a little girls splayed open is not vivesection. That a little girl decapitated with blood spurting out of her neck whimsically entitled “fountain” is not sadistic. That we’re reading too much in to these pictures. He is B4Ps co-conspiritor it seems.

Now he takes the ironic tactic of “ban the banners” — classic talmudic argument. Its just another layer of chaos for him.

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=614650d39837c&commentid=6146a1a9db5f1

[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 15:58:48 ago (+3/-1)

Anyone White knows those pictures are disgusting.

Its interesting that there are users who disagree with this premise. Instead of having permutations derived from a common agreement with differences in handling a recognized evil, there are those who deny that the Evil exists in the first place.

Regardless of their opinions on a solution, the accounts crying over muh free speech at the very least could acknowledge that the material is degenerate smut. Everyone who is denying this premise this is suspect.

Those who are calling out bmfa behavior have more of a leg to stand on than those who call out those who call out his behavior. Yes it would be nice if we all just shut up about it however the admins have made it clear they will not remove his material, which leaves only two options for those wanting to use the site. Ignore him (which does not stop him) or we can attempt to shame him into deleting the content himself.


That being said the majority of users here are paranoid schizophrenic niggers who are biologically limited in their ability to think. I'll continue to focus on compiling information as its the only way to get through to you guys on matters of greater importance.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 18:28:06 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 15:58:32 ago (+2/-1)

deleted

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -1 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 16:18:22 ago (+2/-3)

Like a broken record? KeK

I've seen it before & it's a textbook application of the same strategy. Obviously people are falling for it and it needs to be explained repeatedly, there are lots of dense idiots who don't get it, being stuck in an automatic loop of "pedo, pedo, pedo" when you present them an alternate perspective on the matter.

What do you remember of the loli campaign on old voat?

I'm curious to know where you stand on selective censorship, considering this is a vote clone?

[ - ] deleted 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 16:33:25 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -1 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 17:15:48 ago (+1/-2)

Would you define censorship based on subjective ideas like degeneracy as anything else than selective?

What are the boundaries of degeneracy, skirts 4 fingers above the knee? Below the kneecap? At the ankle? Anything but a burka? Catch my drift?

You can't use subjective ideas like that to dictate what people can post on a website based on the philosophy of free speech absolutism according to U.S. law. That is what this place is after all and membership is voluntary.

I've always had the position of allowing people I disagree with to have their opinion and defend their right to express their thoughts on it. That was the prevailing philosophy on old voat and, like it or not, that's also what allowed us to flourish there as individuals by being exposed to raw truths and harsh realities.

Free speech is a lie, always has been, and is a lie used specifically by subversives to do what they do best: subvert.

Should I understand this to mean that the founding fathers were all subversives with degenerate long term plans? I'm tretching it here... it's a double edge sword for sure and not many people can understand the duality at play in our times in regards to the subversion and censorship of social boundaries in regards to morality... freedom of speech is the only thing giving decent people a fighting chance of not being silenced & exposing the subversive ways. The enemy simply got ahead of us.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 18:18:09 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 20:39:30 ago (+0/-2)

It's stil using a scantly clad human body to sell a product, should the context matter all that much?

Don't forget that the whole beach fashion push to take more and more clothes off was a kike endeavor, a shift of the overtone window for what is acceptable. How about no skin on the beach at all, only around the pool in your backyard behind tall hedges?

Not really, case law has been stable for a long time although challenges occur regularly.

We're not talking about real life here, just a platform based on case law which offers a censorship free environment. Let's not get carried away with visions of grandeur.

The point is, you're pretty much fighting windmills in some regard and in doing so, weakening the only platform that allows you to say whatever you want while working to polarize & divide a fragile community by lobbying against its founding principles. I know this is a delicate issue but one must be able to take a step back, keep things within context and look at the bigger picture.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 18:47:14 ago (+0/-0)

We don't need rules. We know it when we see it. Now take your ball and leave, idiot.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 19:38:30 ago (+0/-2)

Both your comments to me indicate that you're the idiot. You're in way above your mental capacity here, you might hurt yourself trying to discuss the subject.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 19:57:18 ago (+0/-0)

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -1 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:06:14 ago (+4/-5)*

it's called exposing your techniques through sarcasm you dumb wench.

Edit:

Open a dictionary and tell us the definition of vivesection.

Hin, it refers to animals, not humans.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 6 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:19:44 ago (+8/-2)

shitty stuff I do doesn’t count because Im intellectual while I do it.

Uh-huh.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -3 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:23:16 ago (+3/-6)*

once more this vapid woman brings nothing of intelligence to the discussion. More childish blabbering as expected from a miserable wench.

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 6 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:39:25 ago (+7/-1)

Resorting to name calling now ? How adult of you.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 11:02:37 ago (+3/-5)

Just getting on her level so we speak the same language.

It's not like she's worthy of respect anyways.

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 11:05:57 ago (+3/-2)

Like i said before, The truth hurts doesn't it ? lol now begone shill.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -1 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 11:15:56 ago (+2/-3)

What truth are you blabbering about? More idiocies you won't detail and instead move the goal post to avoid losing face?

make me faggot.

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 20, 2021 08:45:27 ago (+0/-0)

Starting to think you are @try under an alt.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 18:45:26 ago (+0/-0)

Not an argument.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 19:36:51 ago (+0/-2)

No shit sherlock, it's an observation

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 5 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:00:14 ago (+6/-1)

Truth hurts doesn't it.

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 5 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 09:48:25 ago (+7/-2)

Considering one account is creating all the drama right now, I say yes ban him. The present drama would be over and the site would continue on as per normal. A little drama is ok but this shit going on now has to stop before this site is destroyed. And that will happen. Think about that for awhile.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 09:51:26 ago (+6/-4)

it's already happening, users are being emotionally manipulated into killing the place.

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 5 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 09:57:34 ago (+7/-2)

Then why are you protecting and backing him up ? Free speech only goes so far and for others to voice their opposition to what he is doing is also freedom of speech. Most sane people don't want anything to do with that degenerate "art" he posts in v/all. IF he posts it in his sub only and not rub it in peoples faces in v/all. then maybe this will die off, Maybe. He's not worth it.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:08:08 ago (+4/-3)

Link to me protecting him.

All I've done is call out the ridiculousness & gaslighting that's going on.

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 6 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:12:10 ago (+8/-2)

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -3 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:16:14 ago (+2/-5)

Explain how that is protecting him while staying within context of that reply?

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:23:11 ago (+5/-3)

Because you are trying to support his degenerate style of free speech. As i said other degenerates look at and post stuff like that. Anyone with a brain will recognize it as degenerate "art". He cries about freedom of speech yet denies it to others to speak out about the evil "art" he posts.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -3 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:30:42 ago (+2/-5)

Nice reply, now do it while bringing up the context of my comment you're referring to.

[ - ] Thisismyaccount 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:36:33 ago (+5/-3)

Read it for yourself. I'm starting to think you are a jew shill now with your steadfast backing of that other jew shill blumen.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] -3 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:39:46 ago (+2/-5)

no, you bring up something without explaining the context for others to be able to understand properly and then force your single minded spin on it.

That is jewish behavior.

[ - ] ToNigIsToNog 3 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 11:29:26 ago (+3/-0)

good lord this stupid bullshit.

free speech is protection from government retaliation. nothing more. and even that has conditions.

[ - ] mikenigger 2 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:48:01 ago (+3/-1)

I created a block list, it's only a handful of users after all: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=61474d000ef13

[ - ] mikenigger 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 11:14:09 ago (+4/-4)

This was a rehash of the "ban porn or i'll leave" some asshole tried a while back, who was that?

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 11:21:17 ago (+4/-3)

can't recall, if it wasn't tfs or als failing on their first attempt i have no clue.

[ - ] patchCodeUnsuccessful -1 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 14:42:14 ago (+0/-1)

Drama accounts have been a tradition of voat. Get over it, you poor drama llama.

[ - ] Her0n -3 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 09:52:14 ago (+0/-3)

We don’t want porn here.

Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequence of that speech. If the locals decide that speech isn’t for them they can act accordingly, but not the state. That’s all that means. Your neighbors can argue and fight against you, but your government won’t interfere with your ability to speak your mind.

This isn’t a country, this is an Internet forum. The locals here don’t want the loli porn on here because it’ll be the ‘last straw’ to get the site shut down. We can’t physically remove the perpetrators ourselves so we are exercising OUR freedom of speech to tell our whipping boy what needs to be done. If we had the ability to vote people out of here like “survivor” do you think the loli porn posters would be here long?

Your argument with a bullshit, did you even look at the shit bluemen is posting? Maybe you shouldn’t now that I think about it, you would probably enjoy it. Either way the CP has to go, and the posters along with it.


Fuck off and die kike, you aren’t as slick as you think.

Tell your mossad boss that average White man IQ > top kike IQ.

[ - ] Her0n -3 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 09:51:53 ago (+0/-3)

We don’t want porn here.

Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequence of that speech. If the locals decide that speech isn’t for them they can act accordingly, but not the state. That’s all that means. Your neighbors can argue and fight against you, but your government won’t interfere with your ability to speak your mind.

This isn’t a country, this is an Internet forum. The locals here don’t want the loli porn on here because it’ll be the ‘last straw’ to get the site shut down. We can’t physically remove the perpetrators ourselves so we are exercising OUR freedom of speech to tell our whipping boy what needs to be done. If we had the ability to vote people out of here like “survivor” do you think the loli porn posters would be here long?

Your argument with a bullshit, did you even look at the shit bluemen is posting? Maybe you shouldn’t now that I think about it, you would probably enjoy it. Either way the CP has to go, and the posters along with it.


Fuck off and die kike, you aren’t as slick as you think.

Tell your mossad boss that average White man IQ > top kike IQ.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 10:05:33 ago (+5/-4)

This isn’t a country, this is an Internet forum.

What is the founding principle you advocating to scrap?

We can’t physically remove the perpetrators ourselves so we are exercising OUR freedom of speech to tell our whipping boy what needs to be done.

No, you're being manipulated by experts and falling for it.

Your pathetic calls of "he's a pedo" simply illustrates a lack of intelligence & critical thinking skills. You behave like a child when you do that, elevate yourself above ridiculous & pathetic name calling.

Accusing me of being a kike for exposing forum manipulation techniques is just plain stupid. Go look at yourself in the mirror and ask yourself: "Am I seriously so mentally weak that I'd let shills manipulate me into ignoring the opposite side of the coin?"

[ - ] Her0n 1 point 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 12:22:39 ago (+1/-0)

We should both go ask ourselves the question you just posed. Be sure to think critically while you try to conflate as much as you can.

I don’t want the porn here, I don’t like pedos, I’ll keep downvoting it all and making up my own mind about as I have from the start.

I spent enough time on this earth now to question everything I see and hear. The porn needs to go, that opinion is one I reached on my own, I want to protect children and this site from shutdown.

Then again I have my family growing, land to protect, and friends joining my cause in real life the more time drags on. If this site goes down I can continue to resist the kike-topia while you can be happy that the Jews were free to post quasi-cp on voat.

[ - ] Rotteuxx [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsSep 19, 2021 12:28:34 ago (+3/-3)

it comes down to this being a voat clone & the userbase attacking system and holding him to different standards while having celebrated Putt for the exact same philosophy.