Just like AOU, bans users that criticize him. By the way, I gave AOU plenty of shit (deserved) on Poal in the comments, but even he didn't ban my account until after I had left for over a month.
And before you go defending The_Venerable because ALS is a "bad" person or is "harassing" people, could YOU get any person banned for replying to your comments? That's the abuse of a thin-skinned asshole admin, the kind of behavior people fled Poal to nuVoat for. But it's the same shit all over again.
The_Venerable (why does he hide behind "system", anyways?) claims he built a "better site" than the original Voat. No, you fuck, you rode on Voat's popularity and made a non-free speech clone of a free speech site. Even though Putt lost interest at the end, he never was an asshole admin, and that's what made Voat the place it was. In terms of usability, your site is worse than Poal. And as an admin, you're no better than Poal's AOU. So you offer nothing other than copycat branding. Good luck with "talk.lol". (What a fucking domain. No taste whatsoever.)
And in response to the inevitable "love it or leave it" reply, I'll stick around until I'm banned or find something better -- preferably a decentralized solution where users decide what they see, not asshole admins. In the meantime, I monitor the forum over at SearchVoat, which is where I found out about ALS's banning.
ALS is intentionally making drama and spams the chat with out takes from conversations he is recording just to make people paranoid about posting, He is a bad faith actor and I will not miss him.
Putt let old voat be ran by SBBH who vote brigaded people they did not like to the point where they could not fully participate in the site, SBBH and ALS forced systems hand really, They forced censorship and they cry out as they attack the site, Sound familiar?
SBBH and ALS forced systems hand really, They forced censorship and they cry out as they attack the site, Sound familiar?
Yes, sounds like AOU-level excuses. No hand was "forced". We didn't flee original and best Voat because of "cyber bullying". Original and best Voat was shut down because the owner lost interest. nuVoat arose and The_Venerable literally copied the name and look of the site to attract users.
But did we need a nuVoat when Poal was already around and had already established itself with goat refugees? No, only if you thought Poal's AOU was a thin-skinned, censorious admin. In terms of software usability, Poal is superior. No crappy page reloads on comments. So now that AOU's little sister has made herself known, this site serves no purpose other than as a holding place until a true free speech arises and gains traction.
ALS chased off countless great contributors from this web site.
ALS was a zealot, and all zealots can be bad. Even me.... I am a free speech zealot. And I am calmer now about my perniciously enforcing the US SCOTUS upon other "almost free speech" web sites this last week.
There is provably only ONE pure free speech web site on the internet, it has many enemies, and you are using that site now.
system supports all legal US Free Speech and ALS could NOT handle it. https://files.catbox.moe/odt15k.png There is provably only ONE pure free speech web site on the internet, it has many enemies, and you are using that site now.
Then what exception to the 1st Amendment did ALS violate?
Defamation. ALS dug up threads and took them out of context, screencapped reponses to his bullshit arguments to make it look like xyz has a pedo community.
That's a matter of interpretation, certainly not one to be judged by the site owner who has a conflict of interest. You could censor half the site with such reasoning.
We are talking about a DOWNVOTE STALKER banned for ruining this free speech web site and chasing away good contributors.
Free speech site does not mean "free for zealots to ruin site"
you and your alts seem to like to downvote more than you ought to. votes given: 584 (+440/-144) = 40% downvotes given, probably to builders
how many shekels are you getting paid today? Are you the leftist shill named CognitiveDissident5 ?
you seem allied with CognitiveDissident5 and I've had my eye on CognitiveDissident5 for months. The first time I studied CognitiveDissident5 i noticed out of 200 consecutive posts not one named the Jew, so now that account occasionally names the jew in a minor manor.
That would be you. You claimed this was a free speech site. The topic is the banning of ALS. I wanted to know what free speech rule ALS violated that got him banned by replying to comments to system/The_Venerable. You don't have an answer.
Free speech site does not mean "free for zealots to ruin site"
So fucking funny. You sit there on your high horse defending drawn child porn, because 100% Scotus approved, dude! Then you just pull "rules" out of your ass about how you're not allowed to "ruin" the site.
you and your alts
I don't have any alts. That's just an excuse for "free speech warriors" like yourself to shut down any criticism of Fearless Leader.
ALS was a vocal proven enemy of this web site and an enemy of pure free speech :
Okay, supply said proof and then explain why your behavioral patterns fit the profile of a pedophile as defined by counselors working with convicted sex offenders.
Go back to reddit if you need your safe space upheld. Why the fuck would you be paranoid about chat logs, least you're up to no good? Why not bitch about SearchVoat spying on your every move?
Thanks for outing yourself. You were part of the crowd that shit on Poal because of AOU (as was The_Venerable). But now that The_Venerable has shown himself to be no better, you go along with it. I had in my mind to make the suggestion that if The_Venerable wanted to extricate himself from this morass that he should just focus on the software side and leave decisions like bans up to you, as you seemed more even-keeled and less prone to banning on a whim. But if you wanna be little brother to little sister, so be it.
It's been troubling to see how AOU handles things but in the instance of ALS I believe he crossed a line after multiple requests to stop. I think that some libel was entering the picture but that's just my take on things.
that he should just focus on the software side and leave decisions like bans up to you, as you seemed more even-keeled and less prone to banning on a whim.
That is high praise, chrimony, thank you, but moot since I have no power. Cheers.
It's been troubling to see how AOU handles things but in the instance of ALS I believe he crossed a line after multiple requests to stop.
Really. You believe A COMMENT critical of The_Venerable is "crossing a line"? Does he not have a block function? Why does he use his powers in abusive fashion in a manner that no ordinary user can? Why wasn't ALS banned for going after TexasVet? He was explicitly given a pass. AOU"s little sister has a thin skin just like AOU.
[ - ] chrimony [op] 0 points 31 minutes ago (+0/-0) | Really. You believe A COMMENT critical of The_Venerable is "crossing a line"? Does he not have a block function? Why does he use his powers in abusive fashion in a manner that no ordinary user can? Why wasn't ALS banned for going after TexasVet? He was explicitly given a pass.
It wasn't just one comment from what I saw. Wait, now you want ALS banned for the TexasVet deal?? Something is weird here.
You have a screenshot of the comment thread that resulted in his ban. And this seems to be just more of the same, ALS criticizing The_Venerable over the way he admins the site. That's not grounds for banning, and doesn't "cross" any lines.
Wait, now you want ALS banned for the TexasVet deal?? Something is weird here.
No, I want you to explain how it's "crossing the line" when it happens to the thin-skinned admin, but not when it happens to TexasVet. Other than one user is an admin, and the other is not.
There were more comments than what ALS screenshot that took place prior to those.
It doesn't matter. If he doesn't want to hear what he has to say, AOU's little sister can block him just like any other user can. You can't legitimately BAN somebody for criticizing you in replies. Period.
TexasVet was asking us to stop harassment that was occurring off site primarily and secondarily the doxxing, which we found did not occur as I recall.
True enough, but he was also getting harangued by ALS in the comments. You don't ban people because they criticize other users on a "free speech" site. You especially don't do that if you are the admin and the person being criticized is you.
Chrimony, ALS and TV were going at each other equally if I remember right, and neither asked us to intervene I know for certain.
ALS on the other hand got to have his say, kept going on and on, was asked to stop and didn't. At some point, it's not unreasonable to ask your guest to stop smearing shit on the walls, free speech or no, we all have to see the walls.
I doubt system banned ALS for anything he said in a comment to system.
Why would you, when as justification for his SoapBoxBanHammer bans one of the reasons he gave was for "disrespecting" him? It's obvious by The_Venerable's comments that ALS has gotten under his skin. And you can find other screenshots documented by ALS where The_Venerable threatens him with banning for replying to him in chat. He's an asshole admin. He kept it under control for awhile, but he's obviously comfy now that he's determined there's no consequences. Just like on Poal, users will make excuses or look the other way until it happens to them:
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:56:54 ago (+2/-1)*
The fact that you have a screenshot of ALS in action tells me you're feigning ignorance about this whole situation.
Comments chains like that were repeated dozens of times with system, cynabuns and other users, he would come back the next day and do it again to the same users.
Comments chains like that were repeated dozens of times with system, cynabuns and other users, he would come back the next day and do it again to the same users.
So what? There's no rule against harping on an issue. You gonna ban all of nuVoat for obsessively talking about Jews and niggers, "mikenigger"? Weird how I manage to get by with ignoring topics or users that I have no interest in.
You can't change the fact that The_Venerable banned somebody for replying to him in a comment, using the same kind of reasoning that AOU would.
Clearly he didn't give a shit about whatever he was complaining about but was using the "issue" as an excuse to make chat useless for long periods, many would call that for what it is: spam.
When someone implies in every comment the site is a home for pedos it's more than trolling.
Clearly he didn't give a shit about whatever he was complaining about but was using the "issue" as an excuse to make chat useless for long periods, many would call that for what it is: spam.
Or most people would realize that he's just obsessed with a certain topic, like "Jews and niggers" are on nuVoat, "mikenigger".
When someone implies in every comment the site is a home for pedos it's more than trolling.
Yes, it's obvious that any hint of pedo shit drives him mad. Am I supposed to be upset about this? That's not trolling, that's obsession. Just like people are obsessed with Jews and niggers on nuVoat, "mikenigger".
[ - ] chrimony [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:52:43 ago (+1/-0)
is that all you can come up with? defamation and spam is just obsession?
Is that all you got? "spam" and "defamation"? Is he not clearly obsessed about the topic? He didn't break the rules. He broke The_Venerable's (and yours) brain. You shit on AOU, but The_Venerable is no better.
You're tossing around the word troll because you lost the argument. You defended AOU's little sister after having left Poal because of AOU. That makes you a sad sack of shit, "mikenigger". Fuck off.
I doesnt look that way to me. It looks like system lost his temper after ALS criticized him. I dont give a fuck about those pedo accusations. I dont give a fuck about mental issues. Thats the bar? Some sometimes acts like an asshole? Someone has mental problems? Then we are in trouble because that description fits most of the people here. I dont agree with that pedo shit. But this is free speech. I am against banning people over interpersonal dramas like this. And thats what this is.
I fell for this argument 6 months ago on Poal when they started banning. It goes the same way every time. Dont support this because it benefits you personally.
Finally a rational mind in this dump. My good content will be posted on SearchVoat from here on out. There's a fair and honest admin that's never had to back pedal. I hope you join us.
ALS is running an active harassment and defamation campaign on me and this website. I won't allow his libel and bullshit to be posted here any longer. He was given a warning prior to the ban to knock it off, and I was very patient with him. He literally asked to be banned and I gave him what he wanted. More ammo to trash this place with. That is fine, because at the end of the day I am the one providing a place for open discussion, and he's the one providing garbage. That is evident to any one paying attention.
What's increasingly evident to more and more people is that you rule according to your emotions (like a woman)
Whenever someone really pissed off PuttItOut he would just go quiet. PuttItOut was a man.
The whole point of being a goat was learning to shrug things off and not let anything get under your skin. If you can go six years without learning that lesson, you were never a goat to begin with. Go cry in your closet.
ALS is running an active harassment and defamation campaign on me and this website.
Lulz. AOU thinks the same with anybody that criticizes him. That's why you are AOU's little sister. The censors on the mainstream site spout the same reasoning. Can't have dangerous "misinformation" floating around. But I guess that's fine for all the nuVoat fags that are okay with this. Though if you came here because of AOU and are okay with this, and are now defending it, then you are one sad sack of shit.
He was given a warning prior to the ban to knock it off, and I was very patient with him.
Ooh, you were "very patient". AOU gave warnings too.
He literally asked to be banned and I gave him what he wanted. More ammo to trash this place with.
Uh huh. So if somebody said, "Just shoot me!", and I obliged him, that would make it okay? YOU gave him the ammo because YOU are asshole admin. It came out early on, when you said you needed no rules to ban people, then you backtracked it and kept it under control. Then you lost your shit with SBBH and it came roaring back out, and now it's the status quo.
That is fine, because at the end of the day I am the one providing a place for open discussion,
LULZ. "Open discussion", based on what YOU decide is open for discussion,and when you've had enough. It's like Jews running a "free speech" and then deciding, "Oy vey, we've had enough of this 'Holohoax' talk!"
and he's the one providing garbage. That is evident to any one paying attention.
Anybody who's paying attention knows that you are AOU's little sister.
You're a lying piece of shit. AOU doesn't give any warnings nor a reason after the fact.
Yes, he did. I've seen him do both. I personally received a warning to drop a particular discussion as being "off topic" after I handed his ass to him. And early on, I created a topic asking why a particular user was banned, and he eventually replied (somebody asked about this user in a comment thread because Poal actually has a ban log for site bans and noticed it, something nuVoat does not).
By finally banning that hyper-zealot enemy of 100% free speech, my respect for you and your work went up another 10% for you system.
He used to be at the front of my warning list to you of assumed destructive elements here. He toned down halfway after being named by me online for his harassment of builders here that merely SUPPORT other free speech proponents like b4a. He toned down, but somehow snapped.
you warned him many times, and patiently tried to explain free speech to him in this exchange of yours with fundamentalist ALS:
replying to an agitant-provocateur trying to curtail legal US free speech :
We all liked ALS content and his high IQ but he is a proven enemy of 100% free speech web sites, and his mind snapped days ago as seen here on a alt of his on Poal :
That's real, and looks like the mind of a madman! ALS cant understand why 50% of free speech lovers support the idea of USA protected 100% free speech including even loli hentai, erotica paintings, and things only dirty in his mind. All speech legal, except for 22 exceptions supported by SCOTUS listed on wikipedia.
Free speech defense is simple to state : "Whatever speech or imagery the US Constitution and Case Law permits". Jews and Puritans here cant take that and seek to ruin this site.
A line drawing of non-existent humans, even if "loli" leaning hentai, is NOT FORBIDDEN in USA Case law, nor this voat.xyz site and voat.co, if in proper subverse, as of 2021.08.20.
SCOTUS : JOHN D ASHCROFT, et al v THE FREE SPEECH COALITION et al, 535 U.S. 234 (2002) : 6-3 vote, Loli hentai is legal in usa
You got rid of the more down-voting-pernicious alts of SBBH, though 3 weeks late. Now you move faster than in the past, as you should
You have FOUR elements here that are not benevolent:
• 1 -- paid leftist contractors working for ADL/SPLC/MOSSAD/ShareBlue
• 2 -- the 2021 version of SBBH that was 50% infested by paid leftist contractors
• 3 -- RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALIST ZEALOTS that like most free speech but HATE all erotica links , cartoon line art erotica links, and links they imagine in their mind depict kids (those zealots were ALS, Granite_Pill, mikenigger alts, and the others that downvote-stalk B4A
• 4 -- Actual real glowniggers do no harm here yet, other than possibly to lower IQ by 'kookifying' using flat earther accounts, just like jews do to break up high IQ social groups. Glowniggers LIKE this 'de facto' honeypot and want it preserved, like voat.co. But they do not aid it too much. CIA/ NSA/ NRO/ FBI/ DIA/ USDOJ/ State Dept INR/ USAFISR/ DOE/ DHS/ TFI/ ONSI/ NSF/ USPS/ etc
Those four elements are your non-builders.
Sadly, I estimate that over 40% of your unique daily IP logins and non-logins are those 4 groups. Even Rush Limbaugh bragged that 20% of his daily listeners were enemies of th Rush Limbaugh show.
I LOVE THE FACT that you provably run the world's only pure US legal FREE SPEECH social site. All others have censorship of Jew naming, inciting hate thought against jews, inciting violent thought against jews , banning legal line art erotica, etc.
ALL OTHER SITES lack USA SCOTUS PROTECTED FREE SPEECH. All. All have censored even mere Jew Namers, like Gab used to before Jews enraged Gab.ai in 2021.
This site is now a TARGET of leftists.
Even if you rebrand in a few months using Eranet registrar and a 'cash' payment, you need to make a hot redirect from voat.xyz to NEWSITE.xyz forever , for years, though browsers only support 3 hops, and that will consume one hop.
anyway... YOU ARE A GODDAMN HERO to free speech lovers everywhere!
YOU ARE A PATRIOT system!
Hurray for you!
NOTE: people in this thread with extreme dissenting voices are possibly clever alts of ALS, or anti erotica zealots.
ALS is a faggot troll, all he did was push people's buttons. He's solely responsible for SavageHenry quitting this site and was on B4A's ass for weeks, concern trolling in chat and threads about a 2 month old post nobody gave a fuck about.
He was warned multiple times, he even got a 24h timeout for shitting up chat with his trolling. AFAIK he was only here to do damage and contributed the bare minimum to blend in.
You must be one of those "fuck drama" people that ignored everything he did and now you're all surprised he's banned.
ALS is a faggot troll, all he did was push people's buttons.
I didn't realize there was a rule against "pushing people's buttons". Blacks and Jews should petition system/The_Venerable to ban those topics, because we hear about them an awful lot around here.
[ - ] chrimony [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 19:17:17 ago (+2/-1)
Easy for you to be a smart ass, obviously you never were in chat throughout the days he called the admins and everyone who disagreed with him a pedo.
I closed the chat window months ago, and it had nothing to do with ALS. I ignore things that don't interest me. I've been in plenty of chat rooms, and there's always been that one guy that harps on an issue, day after day. Most people learn to ignore them.
You can read through his comments to get an idea what he was doing or come up with another shitty comeback, nobody gives a fuck.
You can keep defending AOU's little sister nr not. Up to you. He banned him because he replied in the comments. Could have just blocked him, but nope. He had to use his admin powers to do what no other user could do.
[ - ] chrimony [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 22:25:46 ago (+2/-1)
IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HE WAS DOING WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU EVEN ARGUING?
I had a sense of what he was doing from the screenshots and that I know he likes to harp on issues, and from descriptions already given in the comments. Do you know who else knew what he was doing? blumen4alles, the target of his ire. And what was his initial response? "I doubt system banned ALS for anything he said in a comment to system."
Well he fucking did. And like a "mikenigger", you support him, even though you went after AOU for the same kind of behavior.
What you are experiencing is cognitive dissidence for being a sad sack of shit for going after AOU for the same kind of shit that AOU's little sister is now pulling, so you lash out. You're a little bitch, sorry.
There are so many comments that this will get buried, but recall that ALS was very proud to have sown discord and drama into another site, the one with guilds. I can't say I trust him not to have intentionally caused this same thing here.
Why do you dislike what Antilib did on Ruqqus? He proved the ruqqus admins were the lying jews they denied themselves to be. What's wrong with holding up a mirror? The "talk.lol" admins and chat-fags shouldn't have a problem if they are as they advertise themselves to be?
i know he pestered system quite a bit these days but this is too much i hope system reconsiders, yes he's whines a lot but he contributed a lot of good content to this site not to mention his service while being on Ruqqus...
it's always a black day to see national socialists turning on each other...
[ + ] whostolemyusername
[ - ] whostolemyusername 14 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:40:34 ago (+15/-1)
Putt let old voat be ran by SBBH who vote brigaded people they did not like to the point where they could not fully participate in the site, SBBH and ALS forced systems hand really, They forced censorship and they cry out as they attack the site, Sound familiar?
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:43:24 ago (+6/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 15:18:35 ago (+6/-3)
Yes, sounds like AOU-level excuses. No hand was "forced". We didn't flee original and best Voat because of "cyber bullying". Original and best Voat was shut down because the owner lost interest. nuVoat arose and The_Venerable literally copied the name and look of the site to attract users.
But did we need a nuVoat when Poal was already around and had already established itself with goat refugees? No, only if you thought Poal's AOU was a thin-skinned, censorious admin. In terms of software usability, Poal is superior. No crappy page reloads on comments. So now that AOU's little sister has made herself known, this site serves no purpose other than as a holding place until a true free speech arises and gains traction.
[ + ] try
[ - ] try -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 16:10:03 ago (+3/-6)
SCOTUS : JOHN D ASHCROFT, et al v THE FREE SPEECH COALITION et al, 535 U.S. 234 (2002) : 6-3 vote, Loli hentai is legal in usa
https://www.thefire.org/first-amendment-library/decision/john-d-ashcroft-attorney-general-et-al-v-the-free-speech-coalition-et-al/
system supports all legal US Free Speech and ALS could NOT handle it.
ALS was a vocal proven enemy of this web site and an enemy of pure free speech :
From system replying to agitant-provocateur ALS trying to curtail legal US free speech :
https://files.catbox.moe/odt15k.png
ALS chased off countless great contributors from this web site.
ALS was a zealot, and all zealots can be bad. Even me.... I am a free speech zealot. And I am calmer now about my perniciously enforcing the US SCOTUS upon other "almost free speech" web sites this last week.
There is provably only ONE pure free speech web site on the internet, it has many enemies, and you are using that site now.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 16:31:24 ago (+5/-0)
https://files.catbox.moe/odt15k.png
There is provably only ONE pure free speech web site on the internet, it has many enemies, and you are using that site now.
Then what exception to the 1st Amendment did ALS violate?
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:37:29 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:45:17 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Antiliberalsociety
[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 3, 2021 11:14:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] try
[ - ] try -7 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 16:50:06 ago (+1/-8)
We are talking about a DOWNVOTE STALKER banned for ruining this free speech web site and chasing away good contributors.
Free speech site does not mean "free for zealots to ruin site"
you and your alts seem to like to downvote more than you ought to.
votes given: 584 (+440/-144) = 40% downvotes given, probably to builders
how many shekels are you getting paid today? Are you the leftist shill named CognitiveDissident5 ?
you seem allied with CognitiveDissident5 and I've had my eye on CognitiveDissident5 for months. The first time I studied CognitiveDissident5 i noticed out of 200 consecutive posts not one named the Jew, so now that account occasionally names the jew in a minor manor.
But CognitiveDissident5 does not fool me
https://files.catbox.moe/dv66rp.jpg
free speech does not mean free to fuck up a web site
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:20:05 ago (+5/-0)
That would be you. You claimed this was a free speech site. The topic is the banning of ALS. I wanted to know what free speech rule ALS violated that got him banned by replying to comments to system/The_Venerable. You don't have an answer.
So fucking funny. You sit there on your high horse defending drawn child porn, because 100% Scotus approved, dude! Then you just pull "rules" out of your ass about how you're not allowed to "ruin" the site.
I don't have any alts. That's just an excuse for "free speech warriors" like yourself to shut down any criticism of Fearless Leader.
Okay, little sister.
[ + ] Antiliberalsociety
[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 3, 2021 09:40:12 ago (+0/-0)
Okay, supply said proof and then explain why your behavioral patterns fit the profile of a pedophile as defined by counselors working with convicted sex offenders.
https://files.catbox.moe/3f9ztr.PNG
[ + ] CunnilingusAndPsychiatry
[ - ] CunnilingusAndPsychiatry 3 points 2.7 yearsSep 2, 2021 05:12:40 ago (+3/-0)
That's a favorite jew-phrase.
[ + ] Antiliberalsociety
[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 3, 2021 09:37:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Cynabuns
[ - ] Cynabuns -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:47:11 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:50:38 ago (+5/-0)
Thanks for outing yourself. You were part of the crowd that shit on Poal because of AOU (as was The_Venerable). But now that The_Venerable has shown himself to be no better, you go along with it. I had in my mind to make the suggestion that if The_Venerable wanted to extricate himself from this morass that he should just focus on the software side and leave decisions like bans up to you, as you seemed more even-keeled and less prone to banning on a whim. But if you wanna be little brother to little sister, so be it.
[ + ] Cynabuns
[ - ] Cynabuns -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 19:05:31 ago (+0/-1)
That is high praise, chrimony, thank you, but moot since I have no power.
Cheers.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 22:34:24 ago (+4/-0)
Really. You believe A COMMENT critical of The_Venerable is "crossing a line"? Does he not have a block function? Why does he use his powers in abusive fashion in a manner that no ordinary user can? Why wasn't ALS banned for going after TexasVet? He was explicitly given a pass. AOU"s little sister has a thin skin just like AOU.
[ + ] Cynabuns
[ - ] Cynabuns -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 23:11:31 ago (+0/-2)
It wasn't just one comment from what I saw. Wait, now you want ALS banned for the TexasVet deal?? Something is weird here.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 23:21:23 ago (+2/-0)
You have a screenshot of the comment thread that resulted in his ban. And this seems to be just more of the same, ALS criticizing The_Venerable over the way he admins the site. That's not grounds for banning, and doesn't "cross" any lines.
No, I want you to explain how it's "crossing the line" when it happens to the thin-skinned admin, but not when it happens to TexasVet. Other than one user is an admin, and the other is not.
[ + ] Cynabuns
[ - ] Cynabuns -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 23:35:45 ago (+0/-1)
TexasVet was asking us to stop harassment that was occurring off site primarily and secondarily the doxxing, which we found did not occur as I recall.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 23:45:57 ago (+2/-0)
It doesn't matter. If he doesn't want to hear what he has to say, AOU's little sister can block him just like any other user can. You can't legitimately BAN somebody for criticizing you in replies. Period.
True enough, but he was also getting harangued by ALS in the comments. You don't ban people because they criticize other users on a "free speech" site. You especially don't do that if you are the admin and the person being criticized is you.
[ + ] Cynabuns
[ - ] Cynabuns -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 23:59:37 ago (+0/-1)
ALS on the other hand got to have his say, kept going on and on, was asked to stop and didn't. At some point, it's not unreasonable to ask your guest to stop smearing shit on the walls, free speech or no, we all have to see the walls.
[ + ] Antiliberalsociety
[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 3, 2021 09:35:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:07:31 ago (+9/-2)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:16:29 ago (+7/-2)
Why would you, when as justification for his SoapBoxBanHammer bans one of the reasons he gave was for "disrespecting" him? It's obvious by The_Venerable's comments that ALS has gotten under his skin. And you can find other screenshots documented by ALS where The_Venerable threatens him with banning for replying to him in chat. He's an asshole admin. He kept it under control for awhile, but he's obviously comfy now that he's determined there's no consequences. Just like on Poal, users will make excuses or look the other way until it happens to them:
https://files.catbox.moe/69vkz9.PNG
[ + ] PuttitoutIsGone
[ - ] PuttitoutIsGone 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 20:19:57 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 1, 2021 21:47:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PuttitoutIsGone
[ - ] PuttitoutIsGone 1 point 2.7 yearsSep 1, 2021 22:38:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:56:54 ago (+2/-1)*
Comments chains like that were repeated dozens of times with system, cynabuns and other users, he would come back the next day and do it again to the same users.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:06:37 ago (+3/-0)
So what? There's no rule against harping on an issue. You gonna ban all of nuVoat for obsessively talking about Jews and niggers, "mikenigger"? Weird how I manage to get by with ignoring topics or users that I have no interest in.
You can't change the fact that The_Venerable banned somebody for replying to him in a comment, using the same kind of reasoning that AOU would.
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:13:19 ago (+4/-1)*
When someone implies in every comment the site is a home for pedos it's more than trolling.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:28:23 ago (+3/-0)
Or most people would realize that he's just obsessed with a certain topic, like "Jews and niggers" are on nuVoat, "mikenigger".
Yes, it's obvious that any hint of pedo shit drives him mad. Am I supposed to be upset about this? That's not trolling, that's obsession. Just like people are obsessed with Jews and niggers on nuVoat, "mikenigger".
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:47:37 ago (+1/-1)
is that all you can come up with? defamation and spam is just obsession?
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:52:43 ago (+1/-0)
Is that all you got? "spam" and "defamation"? Is he not clearly obsessed about the topic? He didn't break the rules. He broke The_Venerable's (and yours) brain. You shit on AOU, but The_Venerable is no better.
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 19:06:10 ago (+2/-1)*
you're trolling at this point, fuck off.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 19:18:24 ago (+2/-0)
You're tossing around the word troll because you lost the argument. You defended AOU's little sister after having left Poal because of AOU. That makes you a sad sack of shit, "mikenigger". Fuck off.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:30:19 ago (+4/-4)
[ + ] Antiliberalsociety
[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 3, 2021 11:16:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:39:02 ago (+6/-2)
Proof that's EXACTLY what happened:
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=61298dc71a306&commentid=612cc049da013
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:53:32 ago (+2/-1)
you're completely unaware of what ALS was doing for the last few weeks and now you want to single out one instance as the sole reason for the ban.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:42:21 ago (+3/-5)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.7 yearsSep 2, 2021 06:57:12 ago (+2/-0)
I fell for this argument 6 months ago on Poal when they started banning. It goes the same way every time. Dont support this because it benefits you personally.
[ + ] Antiliberalsociety
[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 3, 2021 11:19:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] system
[ - ] system 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:39:46 ago (+10/-4)
[ + ] Partyot
[ - ] Partyot 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 22:59:08 ago (+5/-0)*
Whenever someone really pissed off PuttItOut he would just go quiet. PuttItOut was a man.
The whole point of being a goat was learning to shrug things off and not let anything get under your skin. If you can go six years without learning that lesson, you were never a goat to begin with. Go cry in your closet.
[ + ] try
[ - ] try -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 23:56:17 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] Partyot
[ - ] Partyot 4 points 2.7 yearsSep 1, 2021 00:29:59 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:55:18 ago (+7/-4)
Lulz. AOU thinks the same with anybody that criticizes him. That's why you are AOU's little sister. The censors on the mainstream site spout the same reasoning. Can't have dangerous "misinformation" floating around. But I guess that's fine for all the nuVoat fags that are okay with this. Though if you came here because of AOU and are okay with this, and are now defending it, then you are one sad sack of shit.
Ooh, you were "very patient". AOU gave warnings too.
Uh huh. So if somebody said, "Just shoot me!", and I obliged him, that would make it okay? YOU gave him the ammo because YOU are asshole admin. It came out early on, when you said you needed no rules to ban people, then you backtracked it and kept it under control. Then you lost your shit with SBBH and it came roaring back out, and now it's the status quo.
LULZ. "Open discussion", based on what YOU decide is open for discussion,and when you've had enough. It's like Jews running a "free speech" and then deciding, "Oy vey, we've had enough of this 'Holohoax' talk!"
Anybody who's paying attention knows that you are AOU's little sister.
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:47:50 ago (+4/-2)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:01:04 ago (+2/-0)
Yes, he did. I've seen him do both. I personally received a warning to drop a particular discussion as being "off topic" after I handed his ass to him. And early on, I created a topic asking why a particular user was banned, and he eventually replied (somebody asked about this user in a comment thread because Poal actually has a ban log for site bans and noticed it, something nuVoat does not).
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 18:08:40 ago (+3/-1)
Which is useless, users are nuked manually which isn't far from a ban anymore and is not logged publicly.
[ + ] try
[ - ] try -5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 15:50:00 ago (+3/-8)*
He used to be at the front of my warning list to you of assumed destructive elements here. He toned down halfway after being named by me online for his harassment of builders here that merely SUPPORT other free speech proponents like b4a. He toned down, but somehow snapped.
you warned him many times, and patiently tried to explain free speech to him in this exchange of yours with fundamentalist ALS:
replying to an agitant-provocateur trying to curtail legal US free speech :
https://files.catbox.moe/odt15k.png
We all liked ALS content and his high IQ but he is a proven enemy of 100% free speech web sites, and his mind snapped days ago as seen here on a alt of his on Poal :
https://files.catbox.moe/m795jy.jpg
MY GOD!!!!
from this real thread topic there by ALS under an alt :
https://poal.co/s/MeanwhileOnVoat/423556/
That's real, and looks like the mind of a madman! ALS cant understand why 50% of free speech lovers support the idea of USA protected 100% free speech including even loli hentai, erotica paintings, and things only dirty in his mind. All speech legal, except for 22 exceptions supported by SCOTUS listed on wikipedia.
Free speech defense is simple to state : "Whatever speech or imagery the US Constitution and Case Law permits". Jews and Puritans here cant take that and seek to ruin this site.
A line drawing of non-existent humans, even if "loli" leaning hentai, is NOT FORBIDDEN in USA Case law, nor this voat.xyz site and voat.co, if in proper subverse, as of 2021.08.20.
SCOTUS : JOHN D ASHCROFT, et al v THE FREE SPEECH COALITION et al, 535 U.S. 234 (2002) : 6-3 vote, Loli hentai is legal in usa
https://www.thefire.org/first-amendment-library/decision/john-d-ashcroft-attorney-general-et-al-v-the-free-speech-coalition-et-al/
You got rid of the more down-voting-pernicious alts of SBBH, though 3 weeks late. Now you move faster than in the past, as you should
You have FOUR elements here that are not benevolent:
• 1 -- paid leftist contractors working for ADL/SPLC/MOSSAD/ShareBlue
• 2 -- the 2021 version of SBBH that was 50% infested by paid leftist contractors
• 3 -- RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALIST ZEALOTS that like most free speech but HATE all erotica links , cartoon line art erotica links, and links they imagine in their mind depict kids (those zealots were ALS, Granite_Pill, mikenigger alts, and the others that downvote-stalk B4A
• 4 -- Actual real glowniggers do no harm here yet, other than possibly to lower IQ by 'kookifying' using flat earther accounts, just like jews do to break up high IQ social groups. Glowniggers LIKE this 'de facto' honeypot and want it preserved, like voat.co. But they do not aid it too much. CIA/ NSA/ NRO/ FBI/ DIA/ USDOJ/ State Dept INR/ USAFISR/ DOE/ DHS/ TFI/ ONSI/ NSF/ USPS/ etc
Those four elements are your non-builders.
Sadly, I estimate that over 40% of your unique daily IP logins and non-logins are those 4 groups. Even Rush Limbaugh bragged that 20% of his daily listeners were enemies of th Rush Limbaugh show.
I LOVE THE FACT that you provably run the world's only pure US legal FREE SPEECH social site. All others have censorship of Jew naming, inciting hate thought against jews, inciting violent thought against jews , banning legal line art erotica, etc.
ALL OTHER SITES lack USA SCOTUS PROTECTED FREE SPEECH. All. All have censored even mere Jew Namers, like Gab used to before Jews enraged Gab.ai in 2021.
This site is now a TARGET of leftists.
Even if you rebrand in a few months using Eranet registrar and a 'cash' payment, you need to make a hot redirect from voat.xyz to NEWSITE.xyz forever , for years, though browsers only support 3 hops, and that will consume one hop.
anyway... YOU ARE A GODDAMN HERO to free speech lovers everywhere!
YOU ARE A PATRIOT system!
Hurray for you!
NOTE: people in this thread with extreme dissenting voices are possibly clever alts of ALS, or anti erotica zealots.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:40:37 ago (+7/-2)
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=61298dc71a306&commentid=612cc049da013
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:24:06 ago (+5/-2)
I called this a week ago: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=611eefdc42b19&commentid=611ef9e353e19
ALS is a faggot troll, all he did was push people's buttons. He's solely responsible for SavageHenry quitting this site and was on B4A's ass for weeks, concern trolling in chat and threads about a 2 month old post nobody gave a fuck about.
He was warned multiple times, he even got a 24h timeout for shitting up chat with his trolling. AFAIK he was only here to do damage and contributed the bare minimum to blend in.
You must be one of those "fuck drama" people that ignored everything he did and now you're all surprised he's banned.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:27:51 ago (+3/-0)
I didn't realize there was a rule against "pushing people's buttons". Blacks and Jews should petition system/The_Venerable to ban those topics, because we hear about them an awful lot around here.
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 17:41:41 ago (+3/-2)
Easy for you to be a smart ass, obviously you never were in chat throughout the days he called the admins and everyone who disagreed with him a pedo.
You can read through his comments to get an idea what he was doing or come up with another shitty comeback, nobody gives a fuck.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 19:17:17 ago (+2/-1)
I closed the chat window months ago, and it had nothing to do with ALS. I ignore things that don't interest me. I've been in plenty of chat rooms, and there's always been that one guy that harps on an issue, day after day. Most people learn to ignore them.
You can keep defending AOU's little sister nr not. Up to you. He banned him because he replied in the comments. Could have just blocked him, but nope. He had to use his admin powers to do what no other user could do.
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 19:34:20 ago (+4/-1)
IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HE WAS DOING WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU EVEN ARGUING?
kill yourself already
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 22:25:46 ago (+2/-1)
I had a sense of what he was doing from the screenshots and that I know he likes to harp on issues, and from descriptions already given in the comments. Do you know who else knew what he was doing? blumen4alles, the target of his ire. And what was his initial response? "I doubt system banned ALS for anything he said in a comment to system."
Well he fucking did. And like a "mikenigger", you support him, even though you went after AOU for the same kind of behavior.
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 1, 2021 05:30:30 ago (+1/-1)
Got any more retarded comparisons?
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsSep 1, 2021 13:02:40 ago (+1/-0)
You're repeating shit I already responded to, "mikenigger":
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=612e6c95e26c3#comment_612ea6a0a6aca
What you are experiencing is cognitive dissidence for being a sad sack of shit for going after AOU for the same kind of shit that AOU's little sister is now pulling, so you lash out. You're a little bitch, sorry.
[ + ] Partyot
[ - ] Partyot 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 22:46:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 21:57:43 ago (+3/-1)
You reap what you sow.
[ + ] CunnilingusAndPsychiatry
[ - ] CunnilingusAndPsychiatry 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 2, 2021 05:34:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 2, 2021 08:13:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] CunnilingusAndPsychiatry
[ - ] CunnilingusAndPsychiatry 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 3, 2021 01:25:24 ago (+0/-0)
What's wrong with holding up a mirror? The "talk.lol" admins and chat-fags shouldn't have a problem if they are as they advertise themselves to be?
[ + ] GoatsAdvocate
[ - ] GoatsAdvocate 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 16:09:37 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 16:21:46 ago (+3/-5)
[ + ] GoatsAdvocate
[ - ] GoatsAdvocate 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 1, 2021 13:00:13 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 1, 2021 13:04:02 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:19:17 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:30:35 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] PuttitoutIsGone
[ - ] PuttitoutIsGone 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 15:03:42 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] fightknightHERO
[ - ] fightknightHERO 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:15:21 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 8 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:26:07 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] fightknightHERO
[ - ] fightknightHERO 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 16:13:54 ago (+9/-2)
https://files.catbox.moe/a3k95h.png
i know he pestered system quite a bit these days but this is too much
i hope system reconsiders, yes he's whines a lot but he contributed a lot of good content to this site
not to mention his service while being on Ruqqus...
it's always a black day to see national socialists turning on each other...
[ + ] Antiliberalsociety
[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 3, 2021 11:25:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony [op] 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 31, 2021 14:17:43 ago (+5/-0)
I don't think ALS would lie and make up a screenshot. But there's no ban log for the site now, is there? Even Poal has that.