This is not far from the truth. Ashkenazi jews have a high frequency of a gene that causes something called non-classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Maybe this is what you mean? It seems to be linked to lesbianism and bisexuality in women as well as virilization and also some behavioral issues (impulsiveness, paranoid ideation). It seems that people with the full blown disease are about 1 in 27 among jews. But recessive carriers (1 in 3 jews) may also display some of these behavioral traits. Phenotype is short and hairy and males have early balding.
Like other “weird” jewish genes, I assume that it confers some sort of behavioral advantage FOR JEWS for to be so freqent in their population. Its frequency in gentiles is like 1 in 200 or something. Maybe it makes them better liars.
Morals provide strength and cohesiveness to a society. If your strategy is to infiltrate a society and to parasitize it to strengthen your own society, you want it weak, full of chaos— its easier to exploit that way. Morals ensure members of a society are behaving in each others’ best interest. But that gets in the way of jews sucking you dry. Morals are an obstacle to their fundamental strategy.
Wow, after looking at their very limited association data as well as simulation data which showed it would have bred out and extremely shakey hypothesis, I think the science shows us that faggotry is learned behavior.
I think they claim they don't want a woman because they can't get a woman. It helps with their ego, and fags are one of the most egotistical groups out there.
Believe it or not, they can't. Most women who are bisexuals or lesbians have found that very few homosexual men are willing to have sex with them. When men become homosexuals, rarely are any known to go back to dating women. Instead, it just becomes an addiction of searching for a tighter hole. And you'd be surprised at how many homosexuals don't even know the names of some of their previous partners. To them, the act of sex is the goal, and feeding the addiction is the only means of survival.
Zietsch and his team decided to test whether these genetic patterns might provide an evolutionary edge by increasing a person’s number of sexual partners
Typical leftist assumption. Increased promiscuity is an evolutionary edge? Cold climate societies have much higher levels of monogamy because those are regions which require higher levels of paternal investment. Which precludes polygamy. Promiscuity makes no sense in cold weather climates. Its just a stupid statement.
As one expert states in the article, theyve detected some genes for sexual adventurism and thrill seeking, not homosexuality.
I suppose there could be multiple genes for lowe testosterone in men which when combine in a particular individual would result in a somewhat feminized male. But that would be an infrequent occurance.
Arguments that gay men are helpful providers for their siblings’ children doesn’t hold water as an evolutionary advantage. A gay man would have to confer a massive survival advantage to his neices and nephews to make up for forgoing actual reproduction. Basically we are talking about an uncle that would double his neices/nephews’ chance of survival/reproductive success, which is absurd. People with gay uncles don’t have 2x as many children or 2x as much money or double their chance of reaching adulthood or. any of that shit.
It piqued my interest. They discuss how toxoplasmosis can also disrupt normal sexual behavior. Many other infectious agents, notably fungi and parasites seem to hijack nervous systems to create “zombies” that spread the pathogen.
I did a little more research on the subject and I discovered massaspora, a fungus that turns cicadas gay and makes them hypersexual. Male cicadas infected with massaspora start acting like female cicadas, producing “female” mating songs with their wings and seeking out many male sex partners. The behavior helps them spread massospora faster. Their abdomen, full of fungus, starts to fall apart as they get humped by other males and this litters the environment with the fungus.
It sounds exactly like a gay SF bathhouse. A closely related fungus causes similar behavior in a fly species.
Another fungus called fusarium is known to produce estrogen. There are a couple of species in this genus — some that infect grain and some that infect animals. Male animals that eat large amounts of fusarium infected grain have been shown to go gay (become feminized and hump other males). Bad fusarium infections in animals are found in HIV positive patients and also domestic sheep. Sheep often get fusarium infections and they also have a high rate of homo compared to other animals which has been statistically linked to atypical brain physiology (feminized structures analagous to the amygdala in gay male sheep). Its my wild ass theory that it may be linked to fusarium.
There are probably multiple causes for homo or various LGBTQ-pedo-paraphilia-BDSM type disorders but I would bet my ass one or more fungi, virus, protozoan parasites, will eventually be linked to alot of this shit. These will be people who have had their brain rewired in ways difficult to observe with traditional diagnostic tools.
Gay seems to occur like an epidemic. It hits children in high population density areas more than rural kids. It seems to be present in some societies in high amounts and other in low. Kalihari tribesman don’t even know what being gay is. Acceptance/occurance of gay is highly variable among native american tribes. Promiscuity is probably driving its spread, which would fit perfectly with the conclusions drawn by this study. Sexual adventurism leads to catching homo.
Potentially many idiopathic diseases like certain cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, schizophrenia, OCD, autism and other mental illnesses could have infectious causes. But I feel like many homosexuals behave as if they are atypical in other ways besides sexual orientation — they are wackos in many areas. To me this says brain damage.
I know there are some causes of homo that are caused by some specific conditions like congenital adrenal hyperplasia — linked to jewish dykes—but I think infectious disease could account for many if not most cases.
Congratulations if you got this far.
TLDR gay is catching.
Edit - I don’t know whats wrong with those links. I typed them normal in the source
[ - ] taoV 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 18:21:08 ago (+1/-0)
If the woman is a whore then a gay uncle just has to do better than no advantage at all (the father not being present). I could see that if only in the form of food gathering and such.
That is the strategy with many matrilocal polygamy societies in Africa.
Women sleep with who they want, which disincentivizes paternal investment in children, since paternity can not be securely established. So men live with their mothers and their sisters and their sisters’ children. Uncles are the father figure although they will only be about half as invested in neices and nephews as a bio father.
However. That does not stop the uncle from going out and making his own babies with some other whore to be raised with another uncle. That is the problem with gay uncles. The penalty for having no biological offspring is extinction. Nieces and nephews only have 1/4 of their uncle’s genes. Biological dads/children have 1/2 , which is twice as many genes in common— twice as invested in the kids’ well being. The sister has to be 2x as reproductively successful than she would have otherwise been for the “gay uncle” math to work. Subsistence level societies ( most of human history) can not afford for significant numbers of their members to not reproduce. Parents cannot afford to raise children that don’t reproduce. Waste of resources from an evolutionary pov.
Hmm. There was some genetic research suggesting that 80% of men failed to pass on their genes, a much higher portion than women. That would leave a lot of men around who would evolutionarily benefit from prosocial behavior. That woudn't provide any particular benefit to gays though, so your point stands. For the "gays are useful" argument to make sense they would need to have some particular trait that makes them provide differently than other males.
This makes a lot of sense to me. I wouldn't doubt that homosexuals are full of disease, considering that they honestly think that anal masturbation is a form of love. One of the most ancient rules of Christianity is that love is not defined as a spread of disease from one partner to another, be it same sex partners or male and female. The reason that homosexuality was forbidden was because they observed that it was nearly a 100% disease vector. Think about this and apply it to the Middle East, where they still have problems with sanitation and disease. It tracts that they would have homosexuals due to the lack of disgust over disease or unclean areas.
I think it was so taboo because we evolved a revulsion to it. That instinctual revulsion (homophobia) is a positive adaptation to avoid what is probably an infection. This revulsion would be gene based and probaby older than the human race. Homophobia is pervasive in many (arguably all) societies. Youve got to ask yourself why. Groups that hated fags survived. Groups that didn’t aren’t here anymore.
Covid is fake and gay but also a John Hopkins study found that current vaccines are 96% effective against delta. That must have been flushed down the memory hole.
For two doses of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, there is a slight reduction in protective efficacy against any symptomatic disease. In the U.K., one study showed it was 88% effective against symptomatic disease with the Delta variant. Some other studies have shown lower effectiveness, including data from Israel that received a lot of attention. But if you look at severe disease or hospitalizations, it’s about 96% effective
Cant find that exact quote but what I need to see is a study that shows how they collect their data and how they define effective. Occassionally you see some public numbers from israel or britain etc. Unadjusted data and it always makes the vax look totally useless. Then some government spoxfag comes out and says “no its really 96%”
Oh yeah? Great show me your math. Still waiting. No papers published which perform a serious statistical analysis and describe their methods for calculating these risks.
That can only mean fuckery. How are they estimating % of the population that is vaccinated? They need that data to calculate risk. I think I know. They are going from the number of vaccine bottles used up, even though they have to throw away all the vaccine delivered within 12 hours or so. Thats going to result in massive overestimation of vaccinated and will tend to underestimate the risk of actually vaxxed people.
I found this assertion.
The protection from getting symptomatic COVID-19 appears to be a bit less with the Delta variant – studies show a range from 85% to 40% – and this may differ by time post-vaccination. But in all studies the severity of illness is markedly less – the immune system of vaccinated persons can rapidly clear Delta. As noted above, severe disease among the vaccinated in the U.S. with the mRNA or Janssen vaccines is rare. Transmission to others from vaccinated persons can occur but it is less than from the unvaccinated population, although we have not yet demonstrated how much less. So, yes, one can still get infected with Delta despite being vaccinated if one doesn’t use precautions. That’s a fact. But a bigger fact is that you won’t get very sick, and you can reduce the risk of acquiring COVID-19 and spreading it if you wear a mask.
Doesn’t say what time frame data was from. And the second assertion has now been proven false, Transmissibility is now the same for vaccinated and unvaccinated.
CDC has collected number of breakthrough cases that have died and how many were vaxxed and how many werent. All they have to do is show that number. Thats all. They haven’t done it because its absolutely devestating.
ADE is setting in and causing people with non-neutralizing antibodies from the vaccine spike protein to get sicker than they would have done if they had never been jabbed.
Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?
Look at this silly explanation from the link you pasted.
The way evolution works is that if there’s a mutation that allows a variant to be more transmissible it’s going to take over and the other strains with other mutations will fall away. The rate of mutation in SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t changed. It’s just that we’re giving the virus more opportunities to mutate and evolve more transmissible variants, especially with these big surges in cases where there are many unvaccinated people. It becomes an amplifying cycle: you get a more transmissible variant that then causes more infections and that gives that variant more opportunity to mutate and evolve again. The Delta Plus variant is an example of this. Someone has called it a variant on a variant on a variant. They build on each other. The Delta Plus has one additional mutation over the Delta variant. But that mutation is in the spike protein, the critical place where the mutations are occurring because that’s what allows the virus to bind to our cells. But it’s also where our neutralizing antibodies are attaching.
The more people that were vaxxed the more opportunities the virus was given to mutate to a vaccine resistant strain. That was the constraint the virus was confronted with— 5 billion people with the exact same antibody to the exact same copy of the spike protein. It had to make only one mutation to become wildly successful with every vaxxed person. Had they only vaxxed old people the resistance would have taken longer to evolve. These strains are surging when they gain new functionality. The functionality is resistance to the vaccine induced antibody. Their neutralizing antibodies aren’t neutralizing anymore and their non-neutralizing antibodies are accelerating the infection.
If they were doing autopsies on vaccinated people who died of covid they would find atypical covid presentation and eosinophilic infiltrates in the lungs— not present in unvaccinated dead covid patients— evidence of ADE: accelerated infection due to the vaccine. They are hiding it.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 7 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 13:01:42 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 20:10:17 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Shotinthedark
[ - ] Shotinthedark 4 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 14:01:24 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 15:12:23 ago (+3/-0)
Can’t wait for 2030
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 15:45:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 17:11:02 ago (+2/-0)
Like other “weird” jewish genes, I assume that it confers some sort of behavioral advantage FOR JEWS for to be so freqent in their population. Its frequency in gentiles is like 1 in 200 or something. Maybe it makes them better liars.
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 30, 2021 03:38:18 ago (+0/-0)
Why is that the case?
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 30, 2021 13:51:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 13:26:32 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] enormousatom
[ - ] enormousatom [op] 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 18:32:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] allahead
[ - ] allahead 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 18:54:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FluffyBunnySlippers
[ - ] FluffyBunnySlippers 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 30, 2021 20:42:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] UselessIdiot
[ - ] UselessIdiot 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 19:24:03 ago (+1/-0)
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahha
[ + ] Flabbygasted
[ - ] Flabbygasted 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 12:59:05 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 14:25:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Flabbygasted
[ - ] Flabbygasted 2 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 14:50:11 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 15:06:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FellowWhite
[ - ] FellowWhite 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 20:18:20 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 20:15:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 16:37:11 ago (+0/-0)*
Typical leftist assumption. Increased promiscuity is an evolutionary edge? Cold climate societies have much higher levels of monogamy because those are regions which require higher levels of paternal investment. Which precludes polygamy. Promiscuity makes no sense in cold weather climates. Its just a stupid statement.
As one expert states in the article, theyve detected some genes for sexual adventurism and thrill seeking, not homosexuality.
I suppose there could be multiple genes for lowe testosterone in men which when combine in a particular individual would result in a somewhat feminized male. But that would be an infrequent occurance.
Arguments that gay men are helpful providers for their siblings’ children doesn’t hold water as an evolutionary advantage. A gay man would have to confer a massive survival advantage to his neices and nephews to make up for forgoing actual reproduction. Basically we are talking about an uncle that would double his neices/nephews’ chance of survival/reproductive success, which is absurd. People with gay uncles don’t have 2x as many children or 2x as much money or double their chance of reaching adulthood or. any of that shit.
I read this guy’s paper which argued that most causes of LGBT etc are in fact due to an infectious agent or agents. Gregory Cochran. A bit long and dry https://www.gwern.net/docs/genetics/selection/2000-cochran.pdf
Heres’ a summary of the argument. https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2009/02/origins-of-male-homosexuality-germ.html
And an interesting interview. http://web.archive.org/web/20050305131514/http://thrasymachus.typepad.com/thras/2005/02/cochran_intervi.html
It piqued my interest. They discuss how toxoplasmosis can also disrupt normal sexual behavior. Many other infectious agents, notably fungi and parasites seem to hijack nervous systems to create “zombies” that spread the pathogen.
I did a little more research on the subject and I discovered massaspora, a fungus that turns cicadas gay and makes them hypersexual. Male cicadas infected with massaspora start acting like female cicadas, producing “female” mating songs with their wings and seeking out many male sex partners. The behavior helps them spread massospora faster. Their abdomen, full of fungus, starts to fall apart as they get humped by other males and this litters the environment with the fungus.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/06/190625173456.htm
It sounds exactly like a gay SF bathhouse. A closely related fungus causes similar behavior in a fly species.
Another fungus called fusarium is known to produce estrogen. There are a couple of species in this genus — some that infect grain and some that infect animals. Male animals that eat large amounts of fusarium infected grain have been shown to go gay (become feminized and hump other males). Bad fusarium infections in animals are found in HIV positive patients and also domestic sheep. Sheep often get fusarium infections and they also have a high rate of homo compared to other animals which has been statistically linked to atypical brain physiology (feminized structures analagous to the amygdala in gay male sheep). Its my wild ass theory that it may be linked to fusarium.
There are probably multiple causes for homo or various LGBTQ-pedo-paraphilia-BDSM type disorders but I would bet my ass one or more fungi, virus, protozoan parasites, will eventually be linked to alot of this shit. These will be people who have had their brain rewired in ways difficult to observe with traditional diagnostic tools.
Gay seems to occur like an epidemic. It hits children in high population density areas more than rural kids. It seems to be present in some societies in high amounts and other in low. Kalihari tribesman don’t even know what being gay is. Acceptance/occurance of gay is highly variable among native american tribes. Promiscuity is probably driving its spread, which would fit perfectly with the conclusions drawn by this study. Sexual adventurism leads to catching homo.
Potentially many idiopathic diseases like certain cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, schizophrenia, OCD, autism and other mental illnesses could have infectious causes. But I feel like many homosexuals behave as if they are atypical in other ways besides sexual orientation — they are wackos in many areas. To me this says brain damage.
I know there are some causes of homo that are caused by some specific conditions like congenital adrenal hyperplasia — linked to jewish dykes—but I think infectious disease could account for many if not most cases.
Congratulations if you got this far.
TLDR gay is catching.
Edit - I don’t know whats wrong with those links. I typed them normal in the source
[ + ] taoV
[ - ] taoV 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 18:21:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 20:17:07 ago (+1/-0)
Women sleep with who they want, which disincentivizes paternal investment in children, since paternity can not be securely established. So men live with their mothers and their sisters and their sisters’ children. Uncles are the father figure although they will only be about half as invested in neices and nephews as a bio father.
However. That does not stop the uncle from going out and making his own babies with some other whore to be raised with another uncle. That is the problem with gay uncles. The penalty for having no biological offspring is extinction. Nieces and nephews only have 1/4 of their uncle’s genes. Biological dads/children have 1/2 , which is twice as many genes in common— twice as invested in the kids’ well being. The sister has to be 2x as reproductively successful than she would have otherwise been for the “gay uncle” math to work. Subsistence level societies ( most of human history) can not afford for significant numbers of their members to not reproduce. Parents cannot afford to raise children that don’t reproduce. Waste of resources from an evolutionary pov.
[ + ] taoV
[ - ] taoV 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 30, 2021 09:59:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 20:24:37 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 22:04:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 30, 2021 03:37:47 ago (+0/-0)
What is the implication and why are those in (((control))) suppressing this?
[ + ] 1Icemonkey
[ - ] 1Icemonkey 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 14:40:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheLastStraightMan
[ - ] TheLastStraightMan 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 13:15:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 15:13:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheLastStraightMan
[ - ] TheLastStraightMan 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 16:32:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 16:53:28 ago (+1/-0)
My study says viral loads are the same as is contagiousness between vaxed and unvaxed. Wheres your study? Cuz I call bull shit on that.
[ + ] TheLastStraightMan
[ - ] TheLastStraightMan 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 18:20:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 29, 2021 22:43:45 ago (+0/-0)
Oh yeah? Great show me your math. Still waiting. No papers published which perform a serious statistical analysis and describe their methods for calculating these risks.
That can only mean fuckery. How are they estimating % of the population that is vaccinated? They need that data to calculate risk. I think I know. They are going from the number of vaccine bottles used up, even though they have to throw away all the vaccine delivered within 12 hours or so. Thats going to result in massive overestimation of vaccinated and will tend to underestimate the risk of actually vaxxed people.
I found this assertion.
Transmission to others from vaccinated persons can occur but it is less than from the unvaccinated population, although we have not yet demonstrated how much less. So, yes, one can still get infected with Delta despite being vaccinated if one doesn’t use precautions. That’s a fact. But a bigger fact is that you won’t get very sick, and you can reduce the risk of acquiring COVID-19 and spreading it if you wear a mask.
Doesn’t say what time frame data was from. And the second assertion has now been proven false, Transmissibility is now the same for vaccinated and unvaccinated.
CDC has collected number of breakthrough cases that have died and how many were vaxxed and how many werent. All they have to do is show that number. Thats all. They haven’t done it because its absolutely devestating.
ADE is setting in and causing people with non-neutralizing antibodies from the vaccine spike protein to get sicker than they would have done if they had never been jabbed.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34384810/
They knew about this rist all along.
Look at this silly explanation from the link you pasted.
The more people that were vaxxed the more opportunities the virus was given to mutate to a vaccine resistant strain. That was the constraint the virus was confronted with— 5 billion people with the exact same antibody to the exact same copy of the spike protein. It had to make only one mutation to become wildly successful with every vaxxed person. Had they only vaxxed old people the resistance would have taken longer to evolve. These strains are surging when they gain new functionality. The functionality is resistance to the vaccine induced antibody. Their neutralizing antibodies aren’t neutralizing anymore and their non-neutralizing antibodies are accelerating the infection.
If they were doing autopsies on vaccinated people who died of covid they would find atypical covid presentation and eosinophilic infiltrates in the lungs— not present in unvaccinated dead covid patients— evidence of ADE: accelerated infection due to the vaccine. They are hiding it.
[ + ] TheLastStraightMan
[ - ] TheLastStraightMan 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 30, 2021 02:44:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Timothymcoyvey
[ - ] Timothymcoyvey 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 30, 2021 03:40:35 ago (+0/-0)
Link?
[ + ] TheLastStraightMan
[ - ] TheLastStraightMan 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 30, 2021 10:51:58 ago (+0/-0)