×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
1

Feature request: NSFL tag

submitted by v0atmage to IdeasForTalk 3.8 yearsAug 27, 2021 22:48:31 ago (+2/-1)     (IdeasForTalk)

I am posting hideous material which has no business being seen by anyone ever. However it is not "Gore" or "Adult Content", as such, and "NSFW" just isn't enough to convey how awful the image is.

Can you introduce "NSFL" (Not Safe For Looking) as an additional checkbox in the "Create a new post" form?

Thanks
- 'mage


12 comments block


[ - ] 2Drunk 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 28, 2021 16:37:16 ago (+1/-0)

Do you have any videos of jews in ovens?

[ - ] v0atmage [op] 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 28, 2021 16:38:02 ago (+0/-0)

No one does, unless it was deep faked.

[ - ] Cynabuns 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 28, 2021 00:07:42 ago (+2/-0)

You almost need your own FPH thumbnail haha

[ - ] Motorweed 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 27, 2021 23:02:18 ago (+2/-0)

Like 56 genders?
Can you post couple images which are "safe for work" but (Not Safe For Looking)?

[ - ] v0atmage [op] 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 27, 2021 23:07:24 ago (+1/-0)

NSFW isn't necessary offensive to the eyes but it is to your normie colleagues.
NSFL is shocking to the eyes, and usually yes its NSFW too but most people prefer the distinction regardless. I'm not making up any new conventions here.

[ - ] Motorweed 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 27, 2021 23:34:55 ago (+0/-0)

Just post safe for work image or video which should be tagged as NSFL.
Why do you refuse to show some examples.
How fragile users here are? Not so much...
If you dare check my offensive posts https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=61218ee995be5 and https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=6105c1b75bdc1

Gore and porn, but not heavily downvoted.

[ - ] v0atmage [op] 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 28, 2021 00:13:46 ago (+1/-0)

Why do you refuse to show some examples.

I thought my descriptions were adequate. Anyhow, it just seemed like NSFL was missing in the existing checkboxes to me. Also really easy to add it.

[ - ] MasterAce 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 28, 2021 01:38:01 ago (+0/-0)

I always thought it meant not safe for life.
But I agree an NSFL tag would be a risky click.ie. Worse than NSFW.
Now then,what makes you think a wholesome community like ours would be into that kinda shit tho?

[ - ] 1Icemonkey 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 27, 2021 23:38:07 ago (+0/-0)

This is like desiring a fake and gay safety warning an a pair of scissors stating they are “sharp”.

[ - ] v0atmage [op] 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 28, 2021 00:09:43 ago (+0/-0)

It was standard practice on old voat to mark something NSFW and/or NSFL. Also, there already are several "fake and gay" warnings you check before posting already.


[ - ] 1Icemonkey 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 28, 2021 00:19:01 ago (+2/-0)

I know, but it’s the interwebs and it’s more fun being shocked when you click than being warned.

[ - ] v0atmage [op] 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 27, 2021 22:49:27 ago (+0/-0)

Alternatively, open to generalizing the "Gore" option to just
"NSFL" but I like "Gore" as a separate category, personally.