Insects are wasteful and saying otherwise is a LEFTIST KIKE MYTH!
SCIENCE PROVED in 2017 and later that CHICKENS are 200% more protein per dollar to raise than any known insect or worm!
This includes: crickets, cockroaches, and earthworms.
Even before 2017, in 2015, early cricket research proved chickens were more efficient way to create animal protein for human consumption (measured in dollars of food used) : 2015 :
Chickens killed at a specific age, are 200% more protein yield from cracked corn, calcium mineral powder and water, THAN ANY KNOWN INSECT or WORM.
This is not debatable any longer but proven from research.
scrounging for INSECTS ARE FOR RETARDED CULTURES UNAWARE OF MODERN CHICKENS or lacking feed for chickens.
Chickens will not eat some forms of foul smelling garbage and feces that cockroaches will eat, but I am talking about sustainable agro business.
Worms, Crickets, and Cockroaches yield LESS protein per dollar of crushed corn , water, and calcium powder, vs a young chicken.
Nobody knows where the myth that insects yield more protein per dollar spent originated.
Some think this old wives tale may take a long time for science facts to extinguish, no matter how many papers prove superiority of chicken.
In theory... a plant substitute of legumes combined with corn would be cheaper than chicken protein, if access to 'free' sunlight. But vegetarian protein is for mexican beaners to live on. I like steak and sometimes chicken tendies on the floor next to my videogaming chair.
(((Bernie Sanders))) wants WHITE AMERICANS TO EAT INSECTS and to tax chicken and tax beef, if not eaten for cultural exemption reasons.
Beef eating while younger prevents IQ loss.
Beef eating REMOVES net carbon from air, though carbon dioxide is not a pollutant anyways.
A new study has just come out from Michigan State:
Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems was just published in Agricultural Systems. The researchers tracked carbon sequestration over four years.
Across-farm soil organic carbon (SOC) data showed a 4-year C sequestration rate of 3.59 Mg C ha−1 yr−1in AMP grazed pastures. After including SOC in the GHG footprint estimates, finishing emissions from the AMP system were reduced from 9.62 to −6.65 kg CO2-e kg carcass weight (CW)−1, whereas feed-lot (FL) emissions increased slightly from 6.09 to 6.12 kg CO2-e kg CW−1 due to soil erosion. This indicates that AMP grazing has the potential to offset GHG emissions through soil C sequestration, and therefore the finishing phase could be a net C sink.
Attention alt/media creators, this is powerful. Just showed this to a “normie millennial” “just to see what he thought about it”. Says he feels like an idiot. Short and digestible.
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 3825501 1 point 2.8 yearsAug 22, 2021 23:14:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 7106787 5 points 2.8 yearsAug 17, 2021 18:16:57 ago (+5/-0)
SCIENCE PROVED in 2017 and later that CHICKENS are 200% more protein per dollar to raise than any known insect or worm!
This includes: crickets, cockroaches, and earthworms.
Even before 2017, in 2015, early cricket research proved chickens were more efficient way to create animal protein for human consumption (measured in dollars of food used) : 2015 :
https://entomologytoday.org/2015/04/15/crickets-are-not-a-free-lunch-protein-conversion-rates-may-be-overestimated/
Chickens killed at a specific age, are 200% more protein yield from cracked corn, calcium mineral powder and water, THAN ANY KNOWN INSECT or WORM.
This is not debatable any longer but proven from research.
scrounging for INSECTS ARE FOR RETARDED CULTURES UNAWARE OF MODERN CHICKENS or lacking feed for chickens.
Chickens will not eat some forms of foul smelling garbage and feces that cockroaches will eat, but I am talking about sustainable agro business.
Worms, Crickets, and Cockroaches yield LESS protein per dollar of crushed corn , water, and calcium powder, vs a young chicken.
Nobody knows where the myth that insects yield more protein per dollar spent originated.
Some think this old wives tale may take a long time for science facts to extinguish, no matter how many papers prove superiority of chicken.
In theory... a plant substitute of legumes combined with corn would be cheaper than chicken protein, if access to 'free' sunlight. But vegetarian protein is for mexican beaners to live on. I like steak and sometimes chicken tendies on the floor next to my videogaming chair.
(((Bernie Sanders))) wants WHITE AMERICANS TO EAT INSECTS and to tax chicken and tax beef, if not eaten for cultural exemption reasons.
Beef eating while younger prevents IQ loss.
Beef eating REMOVES net carbon from air, though carbon dioxide is not a pollutant anyways.
A new study has just come out from Michigan State:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.02.003
Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems was just published in Agricultural Systems.
The researchers tracked carbon sequestration over four years.
From paper : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X17310338
Beef improves the Earth, and Chickens take less resources to create a gram of protein than any known raised insect.
Asshole (((socialists))) want to take away Whitey's cheeseburgers, to drop IQ and drop testosterone.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 1049551 3 points 2.8 yearsAug 17, 2021 20:43:59 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 1625959 3 points 2.8 yearsAug 17, 2021 17:55:40 ago (+3/-0)
Just showed this to a “normie millennial” “just to see what he thought about it”.
Says he feels like an idiot.
Short and digestible.
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 2364302 3 points 2.8 yearsAug 17, 2021 16:33:33 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7972613 2 points 2.8 yearsAug 17, 2021 16:50:51 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 1113110 1 point 2.8 yearsAug 17, 2021 18:37:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 2217538 1 point 2.8 yearsAug 17, 2021 18:09:48 ago (+1/-0)