×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
17
17 comments block


[ - ] try 13 points 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 21:33:51 ago (+13/-0)

a Jew did it. the jews always try to create swastikas to make fake "hate thought crimes of vandalism"

A non-jew would put red pill links to offsite jew facts

[ - ] Lordbananafist 5 points 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 21:35:43 ago (+5/-0)

Jews want you to build them nice civilized camps and then give them a boat ride to Israel.

Don’t fall for it again.

[ - ] v0atmage 3 points 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 23:10:03 ago (+3/-0)

Too blatant. Algorithmically editing thousands of articles to subtlety red pill normies would be amazing.

[ - ] Garrett 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 23:26:11 ago (+0/-0)

Agreed

[ - ] 9000timesempty 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 17, 2021 03:52:57 ago (+1/-0)

Pics or it didn't happen.
How much do you want to bet that it never happened?
Each article I found is using the one "screenshot".

This is blatant jew tactics.

[ - ] ItsBacon 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 21:33:13 ago (+1/-0)

Nothing was damaged so how was this an act of vandalism?

[ - ] try 5 points 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 21:37:06 ago (+5/-0)

s Jew (((district attorney))) will call the COST to look for damage, over $5,000 in consultant fees and try to make it not mere vandalism, but "unauthorized access" and a FELONY, then the jews would add "HATE CRIME ENHANCEMENT: to the (((district attorney))) investigation... but after spending thousands of government shekels looking for the vandal, it will lead to a jew college student and the kike will not be charged with ANYTHING, like always.

because "the poor young man was a confused sad jew"

[ - ] ItsBacon 2 points 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 23:24:05 ago (+2/-0)

You're probably absolutely correct. I'm guessing it was also an employee of Wikipedia.

[ - ] oldblo 2 points 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 22:49:20 ago (+2/-0)

You bring up a good point. Its got me thinking about the line between censorship and vandalism.
What was done equates to going to a city and repainting half the walls. The city is magic though so once the new paint is noticed it can be reverted on a whim.
Calling it attempted vandalism assumes the intent to do lasting damage. Calling it vandalism implies that it counts as vandalism when it can be undone in minutes.

[ - ] Shotinthedark 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 17, 2021 01:25:19 ago (+0/-0)

You can paint over graffiti in a few seconds also

[ - ] oldblo 1 point 3.7 yearsAug 17, 2021 02:06:47 ago (+1/-0)

Revert and paint over is different.

Painting over takes materials and tools that you may or may not have access to. Especially so if we are talking about doing a task in seconds. The paint can be considered a dwindling resource. There is also no promise that things will be as they were after the attempt at painting over. The color might be wrong forcing one to repaint far more than the affected area. A historical mural might be put in a state deemed irrecoverable. Ect...

With the site I suppose the greatest task was identifying what was affected. A reset of each page individually would indeed be quite the chore. While certainly a nuisance at best this sounds like a case of misusing the site. When I think of vandals I think of village and city destroyers. People who erased your culture and homes through permanent destruction. I find it unpalatable to equate vandalism with something that can be undone with the push of a button.

[ - ] Shotinthedark 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 17, 2021 03:32:53 ago (+0/-0)

So use a sharpie and put a little swastika or kkk on anything ant the city will paint over it and maybe try to find who did it

[ - ] FellowWhite 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 17, 2021 18:36:09 ago (+0/-0)

Sidewalk chalk that will wash away after the first rain in considered vandalism, already so it's not that much of a stretch.

[ - ] oldblo 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 17, 2021 18:59:21 ago (+0/-0)

Definitions being horribly stretched is nothing new. Especially when some goal is in mind. The "Mostly Peaceful" riots that had fire, blood, injury, and death is a great example in modern times.

Doesnt mean I nor others must accept such exaggerated and outlandish misuse of language. Not even if it becomes popularized. Sure someone can call putting a "Kick me." sign on a statue vandalism. They are still full of it.

[ - ] KCobain27 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 17, 2021 12:29:19 ago (+0/-0)

[ - ] Psychicrussiaspy 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 17, 2021 06:44:33 ago (+0/-0)

Jews did it of course
....we are on to you rabbi...now fuck off

[ - ] Reawakened 0 points 3.7 yearsAug 16, 2021 22:48:53 ago (+0/-0)

vandal behind this blitz

LOL... That's very Germanish talk there... Vandal... Blitz...