My bro has his 2 girls dumped at his door, after not being allowed to see them for 3 months and having to pay child support. One had a shirt and no pants, one had pants and no shirt. One also had lice. That was about 2 years ago now and that bitch hasn't even called. Thank God my buddy's got custody of them. This system is beyond fucked.
I don't know. I've gotten two letters from Biden now telling me why $300 (child under 6 years) shows up in my bank account every month. No need to apply or file and it's untaxed because it's a credit. But if I earn more than $150k (married) they'll want some of it back or all of it back at $185k. So now every working man in the USA is donating $300 PER CHILD so worthless single mamas can raise fucked up kids. And Biden's campaigning with this money, sending out you're welcome letters.
To a man, his children are always his children. No matter who the mother was. Because he has no other way of getting children, and so that is irrelevant to him.
To a woman, the children of a man who has left her are a burden and a liability. They constantly remind her of the man who left, and the bitterness of separation and rejection. And they take up time and resources, which she would rather use to attract the attentions of another man... who is also likely to be put off by the presence of another man's children.
Consider:
Give a woman, fighting for custody, this choice: Keep the children, but receive no alimony or child support or any other payments. Or give up the children and receive generous monthly payments. Which do you think most women would choose?
Give a man, fighting for custody, the same choice: Keep the children and pay, or give up the children and owe nothing. Which do you think most men would choose?
I think most of us here, men and women alike, if we're honest with ourselves, know perfectly well what the most common outcome of those choices would be.
And that should tell us all we need to know about who should really have custody, by default, exceptional circumstances notwithstanding.
Since before I even started dating I've been very careful not to get legally connected to any woman because of shit like this. As soon as it's over I'm like Keyzer Soze and I never see the bitch again.
Or pocket dial a character reference on purpose, get their voicemail and bait her into giving one of those smug monologues about how she could do anything she wants and get away with it. Boom, independent evidence of unfit motherhood.
My ex owes me around 30k,if you see her remind her about that. My kid could use it for college. I was arrested at work for owing 1500$ about a week after legal split.
Those payments are worked out as a percentage of your income (or in some case expected income - which is beyond retarded especially in countries where they add jail to the mix) and the percentage of your income, is divided across all of your children.
If you know a woman you trust with a kid, who is not screwing the dad via child support agency, get them to claim to agency that child is yours, and that you have come to a 'private arrangement for child support' (give her a single dollar pound)
Congrats, you've just cut your bill in half..
Or have more kids.
Child support is total payment, not per child. Lawyers won't tell you this, because it doesn't result in money for them
Those payments are worked out as a percentage of your income (or in some case expected income - which is beyond retarded especially in countries where they add jail to the mix) and the percentage of your income, is divided across all of your children.
If you know a woman you trust with a kid, who is not screwing the dad via child support agency, get them to claim to agency that child is yours, and that you have come to a 'private arrangement for child support' (give her a single dollar pound)
Congrats, you've just cut your bill in half..
Or have more kids.
Child support is total payment, not per child. Lawyers won't tell you this, because it doesn't result in money for them
What do you expect, that wouldn’t be identifying information? You’re not wrong about the picture, but the narrative is plausible enough, and shouldn’t be discounted just because the possibility that other plausible narratives could exist.
It's a picture of shoes and a story that happens every day in almost every white country. I have no way of proving this particular one right or wrong, but it doesn't matter. Our laws encourage this.
[ + ] derpfroot
[ - ] derpfroot 18 points 2.8 yearsJul 26, 2021 23:58:06 ago (+18/-0)
[ + ] Splooge
[ - ] Splooge 7 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 02:25:51 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] Teefinyomouf
[ - ] Teefinyomouf 16 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 00:24:26 ago (+16/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 07:15:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Teefinyomouf
[ - ] Teefinyomouf 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 14:19:42 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GloryBeckons
[ - ] GloryBeckons 7 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 03:11:33 ago (+8/-1)
To a woman, the children of a man who has left her are a burden and a liability. They constantly remind her of the man who left, and the bitterness of separation and rejection. And they take up time and resources, which she would rather use to attract the attentions of another man... who is also likely to be put off by the presence of another man's children.
Consider:
Give a woman, fighting for custody, this choice: Keep the children, but receive no alimony or child support or any other payments. Or give up the children and receive generous monthly payments. Which do you think most women would choose?
Give a man, fighting for custody, the same choice: Keep the children and pay, or give up the children and owe nothing. Which do you think most men would choose?
I think most of us here, men and women alike, if we're honest with ourselves, know perfectly well what the most common outcome of those choices would be.
And that should tell us all we need to know about who should really have custody, by default, exceptional circumstances notwithstanding.
[ + ] Psychicrussiaspy
[ - ] Psychicrussiaspy 4 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 05:50:41 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] SulemanSeinfeld
[ - ] SulemanSeinfeld 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 07:23:26 ago (+1/-0)
Im of the thought that after the first year (breast feeding) mothers aren't necessary.
[ + ] Thought_Criminal
[ - ] Thought_Criminal 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 08:37:47 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] GloryBeckons
[ - ] GloryBeckons 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 10:38:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 6 points 2.8 yearsJul 26, 2021 23:55:10 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 4 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 08:11:49 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 4 points 2.8 yearsJul 26, 2021 23:57:31 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] pshawman
[ - ] pshawman 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 02:19:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Splooge
[ - ] Splooge 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 02:28:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Goatboy
[ - ] Goatboy 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 08:39:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Shotinthedark
[ - ] Shotinthedark 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 04:08:29 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] theBreadSultan
[ - ] theBreadSultan 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 04:03:14 ago (+1/-0)
Those payments are worked out as a percentage of your income (or in some case expected income - which is beyond retarded especially in countries where they add jail to the mix) and the percentage of your income, is divided across all of your children.
If you know a woman you trust with a kid, who is not screwing the dad via child support agency, get them to claim to agency that child is yours, and that you have come to a 'private arrangement for child support' (give her a single dollar pound)
Congrats, you've just cut your bill in half..
Or have more kids.
Child support is total payment, not per child. Lawyers won't tell you this, because it doesn't result in money for them
[ + ] RecycledElectrons
[ - ] RecycledElectrons 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 26, 2021 23:08:54 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 11:26:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] underpants
[ - ] underpants 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 11:13:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Psychicrussiaspy
[ - ] Psychicrussiaspy 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 05:47:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] theBreadSultan
[ - ] theBreadSultan 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 03:22:30 ago (+0/-0)
Those payments are worked out as a percentage of your income (or in some case expected income - which is beyond retarded especially in countries where they add jail to the mix) and the percentage of your income, is divided across all of your children.
If you know a woman you trust with a kid, who is not screwing the dad via child support agency, get them to claim to agency that child is yours, and that you have come to a 'private arrangement for child support' (give her a single dollar pound)
Congrats, you've just cut your bill in half..
Or have more kids.
Child support is total payment, not per child. Lawyers won't tell you this, because it doesn't result in money for them
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] -1 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 04:37:19 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel -1 points 2.8 yearsJul 26, 2021 22:36:53 ago (+4/-5)
I could take a picture of shoes and tell you how they belong to a jewish orphan and how they are oppressed in israel.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 10 points 2.8 yearsJul 26, 2021 22:48:49 ago (+10/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 00:37:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] KingOfWhiteAmerica
[ - ] KingOfWhiteAmerica 5 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 00:52:12 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 5 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 01:01:46 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 07:18:44 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 05:23:18 ago (+1/-0)
look at this shoo
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 27, 2021 05:47:19 ago (+0/-0)