Sign into an existing account

Good info, just checking through for asterisks. I was about to point out that it needs to be compared against non-injected Scots, however the article already does specify that those deaths were due to injections, thus with other causes already subtracted.

One damning point I want to add, apparently missing in that article, is that these deaths by injection are 0.1% of Scotland's total population, not its injected subset of the population.

I don't know the actual proportion, but if we suppose that a third of Scots are injected, that would mean the actual death rate of the injection becomes 0.3%. The fewer Scots who have actually been injected to produce 0.1% dead of the total, the more damning it is.

Ok, we need to control for natural deaths. This figure takes place over the period of a month. Last year ~65,000 scots died total, which is ~5,000 per month. Deaths are usually a little lower in summer (so higher than average is odd) and should be expected to mostly be elderly persons.

Vaccination in Scotland is pretty high, over 70% of adults in general and over 94.2% of those over 80. So the majority of natural deaths in that month are likely to have occurred within a month of their covid shot.

This isn't to say the jab isn't dangerous, those figures are higher than usual, but to my inexpert eyes they do seem to be broadly within the expected range. We would have to see if this trend continues and if there are repeatable death spikes immediately following vaccination drives.

TL;DR Keep an eye on this, but don't hype it too much. Those figures are high but not wildly higher than should be expected.

This is pure preliminary basic allergic level. Just wait until the jab starts to get you sick in the following colder months and few years after

This seems a huge amount

account deleted by user

Imagine how many will have died by the end of the first year..... I wonder what they'll end up blaming all these deaths on.. "climate change" perhaps?