×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
42

“Racist” Is Merely An Anti-White Racial Slur - Nothing More

submitted by KingOfWhiteAmerica to whatever 2.8 yearsJul 17, 2021 22:46:43 ago (+42/-0)     (whatever)

The anti-White slur “Racist” has no real meaning, beyond being a label to lower the status of anyone against whom it sticks. Its effectiveness in this regard has been manufactured by virtually all of our institutions, which have now clearly been subverted against their Founders. It did not develop naturally.

As a term, it conveys no useful information, having been abused and beaten to oblivion by The Left.

Like any word, it’s power is commensurate with its currency. Theoretically, White Americans possess the capacity to make society fear to use the word. We could agree to ensuring a high social cost against anyone who dares throw the word around. I think that would be a splendid arrangement.


17 comments block


[ - ] mattsixteen24 7 points 2.8 yearsJul 17, 2021 23:07:03 ago (+7/-0)

Someone calls you a racist, you can ask why they hate white people? It spins it back on them.

[ - ] account deleted by user 4 points 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 01:04:34 ago (+4/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] ScheduledSuicide 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 11:18:05 ago (+1/-0)

You're describing the fat, rude, socialist bastard that I know also! I wonder if we have a mutual fat, rude, socialist in our lives.

[ - ] RecycledElectrons 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 03:07:46 ago (+2/-0)

TRUE!

[ - ] oppressed 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 02:45:42 ago (+2/-0)

Theoretically, White Americans possess the capacity to make society fear to use the word. We could agree to ensuring a high social cost against anyone who dares throw the word around.

Whites agree with the word, however.

[ - ] KingOfWhiteAmerica [op] 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 04:29:43 ago (+2/-0)

Well, I do not, which means there’s some statistically significant percentage of Whites who reject the anti-White rhetoric. And that means we can begin to make life difficult for anyone who pushes it.

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 23:41:46 ago (+1/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 17, 2021 23:28:23 ago (+2/-0)

I had this happen on Hollywood Blvd where all the nogz converge to sell their weak ass CDs. I said no thanks just trying to check out Manns Chinese theater. And I get called a racist and proceeds to say I'm afraid of him. So I look straight at him and say do I look fucking scared? The nog walks off. If it had been around other apes it would have chimped.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 17, 2021 22:49:50 ago (+2/-0)

It used to mean pride in one's race, without comment on any other race.

[ - ] KingOfWhiteAmerica [op] 3 points 2.8 yearsJul 17, 2021 22:54:07 ago (+3/-0)

Anymore, it only means “low-status individual” with zero societal protections and safeguards. Police have no obligation to respond to calls made by “racists”. “Racists” cannot win lawsuits, or keep their jobs.

[ - ] Bottled_Tears 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 01:16:09 ago (+1/-0)

I have noticed this. It is the new nigger word. Except there is no context. You call someone racist and they expect that to be the end of it because there is no normal counter.

What we need to do is say yes. I am racist and this is why. What can they do after that? Keep calling you racist and proving no points?

[ - ] KingOfWhiteAmerica [op] 3 points 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 01:48:14 ago (+3/-0)*

The only problem with that strategy - which may not be a problem for you, but it would be for me - is if the label sticks, one can lose their job/contracts, or get into legal trouble.

What I am proposing is to go on the offensive, and attack the label itself, and those using it, as anti-White hatred. Because it clearly is. As you’ve seen, it’s the new “nigger”. And just as there is high social cost against a White man using the word “nigger”, there needs to be an even higher cost for using the word “racist”.

After all, real damage can be done to a person being labeled “racist”, while the same is not true of “nigger”. There’s no consequence to being called the latter.

Edit: “anti-White rhetoric” is a great attack word. If people in the vicinity start pushing White Guilt or whatnot, just announce that you won’t tolerate the “anti-White rhetoric”. Probably about nine times out of ten, they’ll be so shocked they’ll shut up.

[ - ] Bottled_Tears 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 01:12:37 ago (+2/-1)

I have noticed this. It is the new nigger word. Except there is no context. You call someone racist and they expect that to be the end of it because there is no normal counter.

What we need to do is say yes. I am racist and this is why. What can they do after that? Keep calling you racist and proving no points?

[ - ] whostolemyusername 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 17, 2021 22:47:41 ago (+1/-0)

Reject racism, Embrace tribalism.

[ - ] GrayDragon -2 points 2.8 yearsJul 18, 2021 06:00:18 ago (+0/-2)

I'm making a good man's breakfast. Bacon and Eggs ... hic.